“The US government has not paid us for the reason that end of December. We have about $ 12 million we delivered. We wonder if that is so – is the US government still good? Is your word still good? “Just a few weeks after taking office, President Trump aimed at USAid:” The whole thing is a fraud. To be used little or no. “But his mission to reduce the expenditure for foreign help could cost thousands of jobs at home.” Here we come from Florida. Texas. For greater than a decade, the operation has been heavily based on the USAID financing. But on this Republican district, the employees could pay the value. “I used to be born here in Fitzgerald and grew up all my life. I just looked for extra money, pay higher. But after I arrived here and discovered what we do, the mission is to feed the youngsters. This place here is required. “In the early 2000s, Fitzgerald lost a big manufacturer of cars and railway jobs and was economically beaten up. “Really put within the mouth in some way. Unemployment probably rose from 4 percent to around 15, 16 percent. “In 2011 Mana opened his first factory here. Two years ago, they announced plans to quadruple production. “We hoped to become the capital of the hunger solution of the world.” “This is just not about eliminating foreign help. There are things that we do through USA, which we should always proceed to do. “At the top of February, Foreign Minister Marco Rubio announced a 3rd of Mana's contracts and said they weren’t in national interest. Every week later they were stopped again. The backwards and forwards broadcasts have stranded and got the business partners of Mana in a nutshell. “There continues to be numerous uncertainty. We received many calls. Peanut shells, suppliers say: “Are you continue to in business? Are you good for these contracts? 'When we check with our banks: “Is our credit line still good for us if our only customer does not pay?” “Well, even some of our employees, they voted with this administration. You can see who chose because you cannot hold it out now. You are concerned. “” I can't help but believe that the president has a strategy and we have the feeling that we will be implemented. I hope it certainly. “” I hope that the administration will have the moral imagination to preserve the interests and budget of the American people, but continue to feed the poorest in the world. ” “Are we concerned? Something. But we pray. “

Jon Tester has never had it easy.

The three-term Democratic senator from Montana has received greater than 50% of the votes just once in his three runs for the U.S. Senate, a draw 50.3% of the vote in 2018 against State Auditor and future U.S. Representative Matt Rosendale.

This 12 months, Tester's at all times perilous path to re-election appears narrower and more harrowing than ever before. And the The end result could determine whether the Senate stays under Democratic control or hands over to Republicans.

Current polls and political forecasters are even starting to show against it moderate from the farming community of Big Sandy with the flattop haircut. Thirty-five Tester's opponent, former Navy SEAL and businessman Tim Sheehy, gained 4 percentage points, and the venerable Cook Political Report even went to this point as to say the race: “leans toward Republicans.”

For Montana State University Political scientist Jessi BennionThis election could mark the top of an era in rural America.

“I used to call Tester the unicorn candidate because there was no one like him,” she told my students a number of weeks ago. “He was a farmer, he was a rural Democrat, the last rural Democrat.”

The end of the unicorn?

I teach political reporting on the University of Montana School of Journalism, and each two years I send students out to interview candidates, racially profile, and confer with voters. It's true that the situation has modified, even since Tester won in 2018.

Despite the influx of outsiders during the last decade, Montana remains to be one sparsely populated state with 1.1 million inhabitants within the last census. Although the state has historically depending on mining and timber In much of the economy, recent economic activity in tourism and technology has helped the population increase by 10% within the last census.

But with this influx, Housing costs have skyrocketed And The same applies to property taxes. It also threatens one among Montana's political traditions.

You see, Montana has done something prior to now that only a few people do today – Ticket splittingwhen an individual votes for candidates from opposing parties in an election. It's hard to assume in a time of deep polarization, but out here within the Rocky Mountains and Northern Plains, voters would consistently vote for a Republican for president and infrequently for the Legislature as well. but in addition for the Democrat Jon Tester.

Tester was capable of assemble a coalition of voters within the Liberals' few factions—college towns like Missoula, union strongholds like Butte, and indigenous voters on the reservation—and filter out enough moderate voters in additional rural areas to realize electoral victories. When I moved here in 2009, it wasn't just Tester who did it. That's what Montana did back then a Democratic governor, Attorney General And Heads of faculties. But Over time, these statewide offices have all disappearedoften in double digits, to the Republicans.

No Democrat won statewide since Tester did it in 2018.

Migration and the March from Purple to Red

Then COVID-19 hit Montana.

The state experienced a rise in population, increase by almost 5% between 2020 and 2023and experts comparable to political scientists Jeremy Johnson I told my students earlier this fall that it was vital to know who these recent residents were.

“I still think the race can be competitive,” Johnson said. “I think some of my broader themes here – the polarization, the calcification, the reluctance to split tickets – make it harder for testers. I also think there is evidence that more Republican-leaning voters have moved to the state in recent years than Democratic-leaning voters.”

An evaluation reported by the Montana Free Press found that for each two Democrats who’ve moved to Montana since 2008, there have been three Republicans.

There is not any party registration in Montana. So whenever you vote in a primary, you receive a ballot for each parties and you select which party you should vote on. In the highly publicized US Senate primary this 12 monthsOnly 36% of primary voters voted within the Democratic primary, while 64% selected to vote within the Republican primary.

The only query mark of 2024

Ask Sen. Tester and he’ll say his campaign is much from over. He is emphasizes his independence from his political party, as Republican President Donald Trump signed bills he sponsored and be longstanding support of veterans because the cornerstone of his election campaign.

But his path to reelection could run directly through Roe vs. Wade.

Montana's Constitution was written in 1972and it has some pretty progressive elements, including a right to a clean environment and a express right to privacyversus the more implicit one within the US Constitution. And in 1999, the state Supreme Court said this The right to privacy included access to abortion.

Nevertheless, voters made the choice, partially to be certain that a later court decision couldn’t take away this right CI-128 is on the ballot this fallwhich might explicitly include protections for access to abortion within the state structure.

Tester hit the subject hard in his final debate with Sheehy on September 30, 2024.

“The bottom line is: whose decision should be made?” Tester said in the course of the debate. “Is it the federal government’s decision, the state government’s decision, Tim Sheehy’s decision, Jon Tester’s decision? No, it's the woman's decision. Tim Sheehy called abortion “horrible” and “murder.” It doesn’t sound to me like he would support the lady on this decision.”

Tester's supporters hope the initiative could encourage younger voters and moderate women to end up in droves this fall and that it could make Tester's path to re-election a little bit more feasible.

But it could take a little bit of unicorn magic for Tester to win a fourth term.

Back at Montana State University, Bennion said the situation looks pretty dire for Democrats in rural states.

“I don’t think a Democrat is going to win in the long run unless our state changes in a lot of different ways,” he said. “Exactly the way our state grows, the type of person who moves here and votes.”

Curious Kids is a show for teenagers of all ages. If you’ve got a matter you'd like an authority to reply, send it to curiouskidsus@theconversation.com.

---

My parents said the planet was getting too hot for humans to live here. They called it climate change. What does that mean? – Joseph, 12, Boise, Idaho

---

Many countries have experienced extremely hot weather recently, but in most parts of the world it never becomes “too hot to live,” especially in relatively dry climates.

When it’s hot outside in dry places, our body can often cool down by water and warmth evaporating from our skin in the shape of sweat.

However, there are places where it occasionally gets dangerously hot and humid, especially where hot deserts are right next to the nice and cozy ocean. When the air is humid, sweat doesn’t evaporate as quickly, so sweating will not be cools us because it does in drier environments.

In parts of the Middle East, Pakistan and India Heat waves can mix with humid air blowing in from the ocean, and this mixture could be truly deadly. Hundreds of hundreds of thousands of individuals live in these regions, most without access to air-conditioned indoor spaces.

Scientists like me use a “Wet bulb thermometer” to get a greater sense of this risk. A wet bulb thermometer evaporates water by blowing ambient air over a moist cloth. When the wet bulb temperature is above 35 °C (95 °F), and even at lower values, the human body cannot allow enough heat outProlonged exposure to heat and moisture could be fatal.

During a severe heatwave in 2023, wet bulb temperatures were very high above the lower Mississippi Valleyalthough they didn’t reach lethal levels. In Delhi, India, where air temperatures were over 120 degrees Fahrenheit (49 degrees Celsius) on several days in May 2024, wet bulb temperatures approached, and a number of other People died of suspects heatstroke in hot and humid weather. In such conditions, everyone must take precautions.

Is it climate change?

When people Burn carbon – whether it’s coal in an influence plant or petrol in a vehicle – carbon dioxide (CO₂). This invisible gas collects within the atmosphere and traps the sun's heat near the earth's surface.

The result’s what we understand as “climate change”.

Every piece of coal, oil or gas that’s ever burned adds just a little more to the temperatureAs temperatures rise, dangerously hot and humid weather is spreading to an increasing number of places.

Areas on the US Gulf Coast in Louisiana and Texas are increasingly Danger of dangerous heat and humidity conditions in summer, in addition to heavily irrigated areas within the desert southwest, where water sprayed over fields adds moisture to the atmosphere.

Climate change causes way more problems than simply hot, humid weather.

Hot air evaporates rather more water, drying out crops, forests and landscapes in some areas, making them more vulnerable to forest firesEvery degree Celsius of warming can Sixfold increase in forest fires over parts of the western USA

Warming also allows the ocean water to expandwhich might flood coastal regions. The rising sea level threatens to 2 billion people by 2100.

All these impacts mean that climate change is threatening the worldwide economy. The continued burning of coal, oil and gas could reduce global incomes by about 25% According to 1 estimate, by the top of the century.

Good and bad news

There is each bad and excellent news about future climate change.

The bad news is: As long as we proceed to burn carbon, is getting hotter and warmer.

The excellent news is that we Replacement for clean energyresembling solar and wind energy, for the combustion of carbon to provide energy within the services of contemporary life.

Over the last 15 years, enormous progress has been made in the event clean energy reliable and inexpensiveand almost every country on the earth now has agreed to stop climate change before an excessive amount of damage occurs.

Just as our ancestors improved their lives by switching from shed toilets to indoor plumbing, we will prevent our world from becoming uninhabitable by switching from coal, oil and gas to scrub energy.

---

Hey, curious kids! Do you’ve got a matter you'd like an authority to reply? Ask an adult to send your query to CuriousKidsUS@theconversation.com. Please tell us your name, age and the town you reside in.

And since curiosity knows no age limit, adults can take part too. Let us know what interests you. We can't answer every query, but we'll do our greatest.