By doing two jobs – each like all other player within the country – Travis Hunter lived up to teach Deion Sanders' hype and brought the Heisman Trophy to Colorado for the primary time in 30 years.

The Buffaloes' two-way superstar won college football's most prestigious individual player of the yr award Saturday night, edging Boise State running back Ashton Jeanty into CU's second Heisman winner.

Hunter received 552 first-place votes and a couple of,231 points to Jeanty's 309 and a couple of,017. In terms of total points, it was the closest Heisman vote since 2009, as Hunter and Jeanty took all two top votes, leaving the opposite candidates within the lurch.

Oregon quarterback Dillon Gabriel (24 first-place votes, 516 points) was third and Miami quarterback Cam Ward (6,229) was fourth.

When Hunter, wearing a baby blue suit with a white turtleneck underneath, was announced because the winner, he ducked his head for a number of seconds to take it in. He gave his fiancée and mother, Ferrante Edmonds, an enormous hug. Then an extra-long song for Coach Prime before he hypes up his quarterback, Shedeur Sanders from Colorado, and rapper and friend Lil' Wayne.

Hunter belted out, “Let's go!” As he reached the stage, he clapped his hands before gathering himself to present his acceptance speech.

“First I want to say thank God,” Hunter began. “Thank God, man. I never thought I can be on this position. It's crazy. Your faith will take you far. It's really crazy now. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Thank you very much.”

Hunter joins the late Rashaan Salaam, who won the Heisman in 1994 with a 2,000-yard rushing season, as CU's only Heisman winners.

With Hunter and Jeanty at the helm, the 90th Heisman was the first since 2015 that did not feature a quarterback in the top two of voting. Three straight times and seven of the last eight Heisman winners had played quarterback. In 2000, 20 Heisman winners were QBs.

It took two remarkable performances to break the trend.

Hunter was both an unguarded receiver and a lock-down cornerback, validating Sanders' decision to unleash the five-star recruit on both sides of the ball in a way that hasn't matched the junior with a Heisman winner in over a half Century makes comparisons.

One would have to go back to the waning days of one-platoon football in the 1950s and early '60s to find Heisman winners who made major contributions on offense and defense, such as Navy's Joe Bellino (1960) and Ernie Davis of Syracuse (1961). .

Charles Woodson of Michigan is closest to Hunter among recent winners. Woodson was a star cornerback for the national champion Wolverines and also played wide receiver and return man.

Even Woodson, who won the Heisman in 1997, doesn't see himself as a two-way player.

“They threw me out (on offense) when they needed a play. I didn’t attack much,” Woodson said. “Travis actually plays both sides of the ball. You can say he’s a two-way player who played defense, but I’m still the only defensive player who won it.”

Hunter played 688 defensive snaps and 672 on offense as Colorado jumped from four wins to nine in Sanders' second season as coach. And Hunter's performance was top-notch at both positions.

Entering the postseason — and Hunter plans to play in Colorado's bowl game — he is fifth in the country with 92 catches, sixth with 1,152 yards and second with 14 touchdown catches. He also leads the team with four interceptions. Earlier this week, Hunter won the Bednarik Award as the country's top defensive player and the Biletnikoff, which goes to the top receiver.

Sanders, the Football Hall of Famer and two-sport pro during his playing days, never held back when it came to pushing Hunter for the Heisman, even over his talented son Shedeur.

“Travis gets my vote. “Travis is the best player in college football,” Sanders said in November. “Really, Shedeur is that guy. He’s the catalyst, he gets everything going and allows Travis to be Travis, but Travis Hunter does something we’ve never seen before.”

Jeanty only played one position, but few in college football history have ever played it better. His decision to return to Boise State for a third year rather than transfer to a Power 5 school changed the course of the season. Jeanty enters the College Football Playoff needing 132 rushing yards to break Barry Sanders' sacred record of 2,628 set in 1988. Sanders finished his Heisman-winning season with an impressive 2,850, including his bowl performance, doing it all in just 12 games.

Nevertheless, Jeanty has left his modern teammates – and the opposing defense – behind him this season. Jeanty leads the country with 2,497 yards rushing and 30 touchdowns. He has five rushes of at least 70 yards this season. Only five other players have two.

Jeanty is the first player from outside the traditional power conferences to finish second in the Heisman voting since San Diego State University running back Marshall Faulk in 1992.

Jeanty would have been the first running back to win the Heisman since Derrick Henry in 2015, but Hunter's unique season was too good to overcome.

Hunter's route to the stage Saturday night in midtown Manhattan was also unique.

One of the nation's top 2022 high school recruits hailing from Georgia, the Florida native made a verbal commitment to Florida State on signing day to attend Jackson State, the historically Black university in Mississippi, where Sanders began his college coaching career.

No player rated as highly as Hunter had ever signed with an FCS program out of high school.

“Coach Prime, Shedeur, you all changed my life forever,” said Hunter, who grew up in the same area of ​​South Florida as 2016 Heisman winner Lamar Jackson of Louisville and watched Jackson in high school games.

Hunter was limited to nine games as a freshman due to injuries and showed star potential on both ends.

When Sanders left for Colorado, Hunter, who says his coach was like a father, followed him to Boulder to help rebuild a program after an 1-11 season.

Hunter was also limited to nine games in 2023, this time after suffering a late hit against Colorado State that left him with a ruptured liver. The injuries have never stopped Sanders from playing Hunter as often as possible, and this season the results have been undeniable.

Led by Hunter and Shedeur, Colorado fought for the Big 12 title until the final weekend of the regular season.

With the expanded playoffs casting a wider net of games with postseason implications this season, Hunter had a strong final statement: 10 catches for 116 yards and three touchdowns and an interception in a 52-0 win over Oklahoma State.

Hunter said his Heisman moment came in the Baylor game when he forced a game-winning fumble at the goal line in the Buffs' overtime win.

The fifth through 10th Heisman voters were Arizona State running back Cam Skattebo, Army quarterback Bryson Daily, Penn State tight end Tyler Warren, Shedeur Sanders, Indiana quarterback Kurtis Rourke and Syracuse quarterback Kyle McCord.

Hunter has one more game left, in the Alamo Bowl against BYU, before heading to the NFL, where he is expected to be one of the first players taken in April's draft. Many are already wondering what position he will play in the professionals.

Hunter's historic season suggests why not both?

Required reading

Brittany Mahomes has apparently finally woken as much as the fact that Donald Trump is a polarizing figure who likes to make use of harsh, hateful rhetoric against people she desires to demonize for political reasons or for her personal gain.

A report from the Daily Mail said the wife of Kansas City Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes is rethinking her reported support of the Republican presidential candidate following his scathing public attack on her friend Taylor Swift.

Trump attacked the pop star on Sunday morning after she endorsed his Democratic opponent Kamala Harris immediately following his poor performance within the presidential debate on September 10. Trump wrote on his Truth Social Platform: “I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT.”

“She is questioning her support for Donald Trump after he attacked Taylor and said he hated her,” a source told the Daily Mail. “This has deeply upset Brittany because Taylor is like a sister to her and she has done absolutely nothing wrong.”

However, the source cautioned that the mother of two's change of heart toward Trump didn’t mean she was “suddenly voting for Kamala. It just made her more conscious of supporting him so publicly.”

Mahomes was embroiled in controversy late last month when fans noticed she allegedly liked one in every of Trump's Instagram posts outlining the GOP platform. Since then, she has been embraced by Trump supporters on their social media accounts, while the previous president personally thanked her for defending him and his MAGA agenda.

But Mahomes' apparent support for Trump is seen as a strain on her friendship with Swift, whom she met since the pop star is dating Travis Kelce, a great friend of her husband and teammate on the Chiefs.

Then got here Swift's endorsement of Harris. On Instagram, Swift wrote: “I'm voting for @kamalaharris because she fights for the rights and causes that I believe need a champion to represent them.” Swift's statement of support was accompanied by a photograph of her holding one in every of her cats. She signed her endorsement “Childless Cat Lady,” a pointy reference to the demeaning statements made by Trump's running mate JD Vance about women, cat owners, and other people without children.

Trump seems to enjoy risking the 2 women's friendship to tear them apart over their perceived political differences. A day after Swift announced her endorsement, he sang Mahomes' praises on Fox News, saying, “If you want to know the truth, I actually like Ms. Mahomes a lot better.” He also warned that the “liberal” Swift would “pay a price for that in the marketplace.”

But irrespective of how hard Trump could have tried, he has didn’t drive a wedge between the 2 women. Swift and Kelce were seen in a box with Brittany and Patrick Mahomes at the boys's final of the U.S. Open on Sept. 8. Swift was also one in every of the guests on the twenty ninth party Mahomes threw for her husband on Sunday night after the Chiefs' victory over the Cincinnati Bengals. Us Weekly reported this.

Swift's support for Harris also expressed her concern over Trump's use of AI photos of her on Truth Social. Back in August, the previous reality TV star shared fake photos of Swift and her fans, in addition to messages that falsely portrayed her as a Trump supporter.

Trump's post “really revived my fears around AI and the dangers of spreading misinformation,” Swift wrote. “It made me realize that as a voter, I need to be very transparent about my actual plans for this election. The easiest way to combat misinformation is with the truth.”

To that end, Swift said she would support Harris within the 2024 presidential election.

Swift's support didn't come as an excessive amount of of a surprise. She “proudly” endorsed Joe Biden and Harris in 2020, saying the 2 within the White House would help heal the country after Trump stoked “the fires of white supremacy and racism” during his “entire” presidency from 2017 to 2021. She said she would love to assist vote him out “in November.”

Originally published: September 17, 2024 at 10:34 am

What parent hasn't felt this manner? It's been an extended day, you continue to need to make dinner, possibly even lunch for tomorrow, and you simply don't have the energy to steer your kids to do a brand new art project or ask them to choose up a book.

Instead, you give in when your child begs for more time on the iPad. Or possibly they promise to get their homework done after watching a couple of more YouTube videos, and it's easier to agree than argue again. Now you're not only exhausted, but you furthermore may feel like a nasty parent.

If this sounds familiar, you will not be alone. Worrying about how and the way much their children use media is a standard source of parental guilt, which is comprehensible given the popularity of screen time as a frivolous waste of time with no intrinsic value. So even when individuals are sitting in front of their screens, for a very good reason – to calm downFor example, or otherwise to administer their moods – they have an inclination to feel guilty about itAnd this guilt undermines any stress-reducing profit They may need enjoyed it otherwise.

But as uncomfortable as these feelings of guilt are, the excellent news is that for those who take heed to them, these feelings can assist you to and your kids make healthier selections.

Parents feel guilty about their child’s screen use

Studies, including my very own Media Research Group, have found that the usage of screen media is one of the vital steadily used tools with which individuals of all ages use to decompresscalm down and have a good time.

However, parents worry about their children’s screen time, and for good reason. Without proper management, screen time can too easily get uncontrolled, resulting in fears of negative consequences, resembling impaired sleepincreased Obesity risk, reduced academic performance And mental health problems.

So here is the dilemma. Well-intentioned Parents set different rules to guard their children from the hazards related to an excessive amount of screen time. But research shows that the majority Parents break these rules. If a toddler is sick, why not allow them to play video games for several hours? Maybe sit your child in front of the TV to maintain them occupied when you sort laundry or make a work-related phone call.

So what happens if you break your individual rules – especially when those rules are designed to guard your kids? You are prepared to feel guilty, and since Guilt is a type of stressThis dynamic creates tension that could be unhealthy for each parents and kids.

The dark side of oldsters’ guilty conscience in front of the screen

The COVID-19 pandemic, through which Media usage of all types increased amongst all populations within the United States and internationally, gave my research team the unique opportunity Investigating parental guilt about their children’s screen use.

Our research examined how the sudden and significant increase in screen use initially of the pandemic affected parents' feelings about their relationship with their children. We surveyed parents in March 2020 and one other group of oldsters in April and May 2020. We asked about their child's screen time, their feelings of guilt about their child's screen use, the stress they felt about it, and the way satisfied they were with their relationship with their child.

We found that 73% of oldsters felt not less than some guilt and 48% felt moderate to strong guilt about their child's screen time, so screen guilt amongst parents was quite common.

We also found that oldsters who felt more guilty about their child's screen use also experienced more stress about that screen use, and that more stress was related to being less satisfied with their relationship with their child. Importantly, parents' initial screen guilt in April predicted higher stress about screen use in May, but initial screen stress in April didn’t predict screen guilt in May. What does this mean? Screen guilt actually increased stress, not the opposite way around.

And what concerning the period of time children spend on screens? Is this the explanation parents feel guilty and stressed? Turns out, probably not. In our research, we found little to no association between the period of time children spend on screens and fogeys' screen guilt, screen stress, or relationship satisfaction. In other words, it was the guilt about children's screen use, whatever the period of time spent on screens, that was problematic for fogeys and, by extension, for his or her children.

Making lemonade out of guilt

So what can parents do? Instead of berating themselves for perceived mistakes or misjudgments in media selection, it will be way more productive to acknowledge the worth and deeper lessons of 1's own screen guilt.

People feel guilt once they see their actions contradicting their internalized belief systems or standards of behavior. And as uncomfortable as guilt could be, that guilt can assist you to repair any harm you are feeling you've caused. especially in relationships.

In other words, screen guilt could be useful information to assist you to reflect on and adjust your individual rules or selections. Was there a very good reason to calm down your usual limits on screen use, resembling if you tried to comfort your child once they were sick? On the opposite hand, is your child suffering negative consequences consequently of your indulgence with screens, resembling not doing their homework or not getting exercise? Or do you just feel like a nasty parent since you've internalized the assumption that good parents don't let their children play in front of screens?

Such reflections could be a possibility to think not only about how your loved ones uses screens, but importantly, what safeguards chances are you’ll must put in place or adjust to support family wellbeing.

Although chances are you’ll not hear this opinion often, not all screen media use is bad. In fact, there may be evidence that using screens and content can result in quite a lot of wonderful outcomes, including Learn, social connection, inspiration and yes, leisure and Stress relief.

Although feelings of guilt might not be nice, taking a moment to know why you are feeling them can assist you to not only create more balanced media consumption and real-world experiences for yourself and your loved ones, but additionally construct more satisfying relationships together with your children.

Local news

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — The $38 million verdict in a landmark trial over abuse at a New Hampshire youth correctional facility stays in dispute nearly 4 months later. Both sides filed their final motions with the judge this week.

“It is almost time to fully present and decide the facts,” Judge Andrew Schulman wrote in an order earlier this month, giving the parties until Wednesday to submit their motions and supporting documents.

At issue is the $18 million in compensatory damages and $20 million in aggravated damages that a jury awarded David Meehan in May after a month-long trial. His allegations of horrific sexual and physical abuse on the Youth Development Center within the Nineties sparked a significant criminal investigation that resulted in several arrests, and his lawsuit looking for to carry the state accountable was the primary of greater than 1,100 to go to trial.

The dispute centers on a portion of the decision by which the jury found the state chargeable for just one “incident” of abuse on the Manchester facility, now called the Sununu Youth Services Center. Jurors weren’t told that under the law, damages against the state are capped at $475,000 per “incident.” Some jurors later said they wrote “one” on the decision to point a single case of post-traumatic stress disorder resulting from greater than 100 episodes of physical, sexual and emotional abuse.

In an earlier order, Schulman said the cap requested by the state could be an “unreasonable miscarriage of justice.” But in his Aug. 1 order, he indicated that the one other option could be to order a brand new trial since the state had not allowed him to regulate the variety of incidents.

Meehan's lawyers, nonetheless, asked Schulman to throw out only the a part of the decision by which the jury mentioned one incident, leaving the $38 million award in place, or to order a brand new trial to find out only the variety of incidents.

“The court should not be so quick to throw the baby out with the bathwater because the jury made a single error,” they wrote.

“To force a man – who the jury found was seriously injured by the wanton, malicious or oppressive conduct of the state – to choose between reliving his nightmare in a new and very public trial or accepting one-eightieth of the compensation the jury intended is a grave injustice that cannot be tolerated in court,” wrote attorneys Rus Rilee and David Vicinanzo.

But the state's lawyers provided an in depth explanation of why imposing a cap is the one right plan of action. They said jurors could have found that the state's negligence created “a single, harmful environment” by which Meehan suffered harm, or they might have believed his testimony about only a single, episodic incident.

In support of their latter argument, they cited the testimony of an authority “according to which the mere fact that the plaintiff sincerely believes that he was raped multiple times does not mean that this was actually the case.”

Meehan, 42, went to police to report the abuse in 2017 and sued the state three years later. Since then, 11 former state employees have been arrested, although one has since died and charges against one other were dropped after the person, now in his early 80s, was declared incompetent to face trial.

The trial in the primary criminal case begins on Monday. Victor Malavet, who has pleaded not guilty to 12 counts of aggravated sexual assault, is accused of attacking a young girl in a jail in Concord in 2001.