Red Sox

Pitcher Rich Hill, 44, has seen quite a lot of talent in his 20-plus years in Major League Baseball.

Although Hill doesn't wish to make comparisons with regards to predicting the long run of talent, he generally has a feel for a selected player's development.

If his intuition in regards to the promising talents of Kyle Teel, Roman Anthony and Kristian Campbell is correct, the Red Sox are in for an actual treat.

Red Sox left-hander Hill Lecture on “310 to Left” with NESN's Tom Caron and Alex Speier, raved in regards to the potential of all three players. Hill, who played for Triple-A Worcester before returning to the Red Sox in late August, was extremely encouraged by the event of every young player after his transient interactions.

“All three have an incredible gift for the game,” Hill told Speier and Caron.

Hill said he spoke with catcher Teel before, during and after the sport to get on the identical page. He said Teel was enthusiastic, intuitive and willing to learn.

Hill is convinced that the Red Sox can turn him right into a catcher who has all the abilities the organization desires.

“His enthusiasm, his inexperience and, what I mean by that, his ability to see the game for what it is,” Hill said. “It's not really clouded yet, so there's still a lot of room to lay the right foundation.”

As for 20-year-old outfielder Anthony, Hill said he wouldn't be surprised to see him on the Red Sox roster after spring training next yr.

“If you said he's going to be an All-Star next year, I wouldn't be surprised,” Hill said. “In the race for Rookie of the Year, I wouldn't be surprised.”

He said Anthony was “mature beyond his years” and if he wasn't ready now, he could be very soon.

As for Campbell, Hill said he noticed his intensity immediately. Although Hill initially promised to not make comparisons, he ended up comparing one aspect of Campbell's playing style to a Hall of Famer.

“He may have a little more of that Frank Thomas forefoot finishing swing,” Hill said.

He also praised his ability on the bottom paths, his manner and his quiet charisma, and noted that he could also move as much as the key leagues very soon.

Hill praised Chief Baseball Officer Craig Breslow and the organization's ability to seek out and develop players like these three rising stars.

“They will be very successful players in the major leagues,” Hill said.

RICHMOND – A lawsuit filed this month accuses Richmond City Councilwoman Doria Robinson and her partner, Najari Smith, of wrongfully evicting Smith's former business partner from his home and ignoring conditions that made the apartment uninhabitable.

The lawsuit, filed August 19 in Contra Costa Superior Court, is just the most recent development in a months-long dispute over the closed Rich City Rides bike shop.

Roshni McGee is searching for greater than $1 million in damages, alleging he was illegally evicted from his home at 801 Marina Way South #2 before his lease expired, court records show.

The lawsuit is against McGee's landlords – Smith, who runs the nonprofit Rich City Rides, property owner Charles Patterson, Robinson and the nonprofit she runs, Urban Tilth. McGee co-founded the Rich City Rides Bike Cooperative with Smith and likewise served as co-owner, CEO and program director.

The group of defendants is accused of causing McGee “emotional distress, discomfort, annoyance, physical injury, pain and suffering” by failing to properly maintain the house where McGee lived from 2019 to May 2023, the lawsuit says. Starting in early 2023, McGee was harassed and intimidated with the intent to evict him from the house, the lawsuit says.

McGee claims they neglected insect and rodent infestations, mold and mildew, broken plumbing and locks, holes within the partitions and gaps within the flooring.

“These deficiencies were serious and had existed for a long time,” the lawsuit states.

According to the five-year lease attached to the grievance, McGee agreed to pay $1,700 a month plus utilities. The lease expired in August 2024, but McGee says he moved out in May 2023. According to 2 checks attached to the court documents, McGee received $16,000 from Urban Tilth to vacate the premises.

Robinson, who represents the Third District on the City Council and has served as executive director of Urban Tilth since 2007, declined to comment on the lawsuit “due to the legal nature of these matters.” But she said the lawsuit was “a continuation of political attacks” by former Richmond Mayor Tom Butt and his sons Andrew and Daniel. Daniel Butt is currently representing McGee within the case.

Earlier this month, the previous mayor filed a grievance with the state's election regulator accusing Robinson of a conflict of interest due to “commingling of funds and concerns about a connection” between Robinson and the nonprofit Rich City Rides during her tenure on the City Council. The Fair Political Practices Commission responded that Butt provided no evidence to support his claims and that Robinson had previously told her she followed legal advice and abstained from voting on Urban Tilth, Rich City Rides' financial sponsor.

“I am confident that these new allegations will be proven to be baseless when the truth comes to light,” Robinson said of McGee's lawsuit.

Robinson also accused McGee of stealing inventory and embezzling funds from Rich City Bike Shop, which closed earlier this yr. McGee didn’t immediately reply to a request for comment through his attorney. However, his attorney, Daniel Butt, posted on social media that Smith “defamed” McGee and retaliated against him.

Smith initially reported a burglary to police, but after an initial investigation, officers believed no burglary had occurred. However, other possible crimes are still being investigated, Lt. Donald Patchin, a spokesman for Richmond police, confirmed in an email Tuesday.

“It appears to be a business dispute between the owners/operators of the business,” Patchin said. “After the initial report, investigators determined that while there does not appear to have been a break-in, there were some possible crimes related to the handling of business funds and property.”

A brand new study has found that Americans have the bottom life expectancy in comparison with comparable English-speaking countries.

The researchers from Penn State University The people answerable for the study compared death rates from 1990 to 2019 in six English-speaking countries and located that individuals in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand live longer on average than their American counterparts.

In the United States, the typical life expectancy for men is 76.5 years, while for girls it’s about 81.5 years. In Australia, nonetheless, women lived almost 4 years longer and men five years longer than within the United States.

The study also found that men and girls in California and Hawaii lived longer than other Americans – although not so long as Australians – while life expectancy for people within the Southeast is well below the U.S. average (72.6 years for girls, 69.3 years for men).

Unlike the United States, other English-speaking countries have strict gun laws, fewer smokers, and universal healthcare, all of which might lead to raised outcomes.

“One lesson we Americans can learn about life expectancy when we look at comparable countries is where the limit of best performance lies,” Jessica Hoassociate professor of sociology and demography at Penn State and lead creator of the study, said: “Yes, we are doing poorly, but this study shows what goals we can pursue. We know that these increases in life expectancy are actually achievable because other large countries have already done this.”

Originally published: August 15, 2024 at 10:37 am

1932. 1984. 2028.

During these years, Los Angeles hosted – or can be host – the Summer Olympics.

Whether you like it, hate it, or are still undecided, there isn’t any denying that the Olympics are a component of LA's history and DNA.

As we look forward to the following 4 years and LA's plans to host the Olympics for a 3rd time, it's also price looking back at town's storied relationship with the Games – and a few of the lasting impacts that got here with hosting the world's biggest sporting event.

Take the 1932 Games, for instance. Back then, Los Angeles was still “a small town trying to grow up,” and excluding college football, few considered places west of St. Louis to be sports hotbeds, says Daniel Durbin, director of the Institute of Sports, Media and Society at USC's Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.

Then got here the 1932 Olympics. They helped LA gain a spot on the worldwide sports stage, Durbin says.

Christina Rice, senior librarian of the Los Angeles Public Library's photography collection, agrees.

“People knew LA, but I'm not sure we were considered a world-class city back then, and I think (the 1932 Olympics) played a big role in helping us establish ourselves as a world-class city,” Rice said.

The 1932 Games also gave LA its “Olympic Boulevard,” when town government decided to rename tenth Street. Those games also gave birth to the trendy Olympic Village for athletes, Rice said.

Fast forward 52 years. When the 1984 Olympics got here around, LA had already established itself as a significant city. However, hosting the Olympics for the second time gave the City of Angels one other likelihood to market itself.

“Los Angeles was definitely a world city in 1984 and didn't need the Olympics. But they helped put the city on the map,” Durbin said.

Unlike other Olympic Games where the host city loses money, many are talking concerning the The 1984 Olympic Games as a financial success story.

Zev Yaroslavsky served on the Los Angeles City Council during those games. In the years leading as much as the Olympics, he and others pushed for an amendment to town's structure that may prohibit town from spending tax money to host the 1984 games. Los Angeles voters approved this proposal in 1978.

This mandate from the voters of Los Angeles led to the primary privately funded Olympic Games.

Peter Ueberroth, Chairman of the 1984 Los Angeles Olympic Organising Committeedeveloped a brand new financial model that brought the committee a profit of over $232 million – some even estimated it at around $250 million.

“Financially, it was a huge success,” said Yaroslavsky, who now serves as director of the Los Angeles Initiative on the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs.

With a part of this surplus, civic leaders founded the LA84 Foundation, a company whose Mission is to advertise youth sports.

The aim is to interrupt down barriers and provides all children, no matter their background, income or ability, the chance to play sports. Over the last 4 a long time, the inspiration has awarded 3,065 scholarships, trained greater than 198,000 coaches and supported greater than 3.9 million children. in line with his website.

The LA84 Foundation is now celebrating 4 a long time of supporting youth sport and development and is taken into account by many to be one in every of the lasting legacies of the 1984 Games.

For Yaroslavsky, the LA84 Foundation was not the one lasting influence of those Summer Games. He attributes the Olympic Arts Festival in Los Angeles — a 10-week event that preceded the Games and attracted 1.25 million visitors to LA — for helping to spice up town's popularity as a cultural center.

“LA, which was already a cultural mecca, has really reached a new level,” he said.

For example, when world-famous Spanish opera singer Plácido Domingo got here to LA in 1984, he realized there was a possibility to start out an opera company, Yaroslavsky said. THE Opera opened two years later.

In the years that followed, LA continued to be a dominant force in the humanities and culture scene.

“I think the arts were a greater legacy of the Olympics than the Games themselves,” Yaroslavsky said.

While some look back on the 1984 Olympics with affection, not everyone was thrilled with the thought of ​​having LA as host.

The resistance of the valley was so strong that it was decided not to make use of any venues within the valley for the 1984 Games – although Skateboarding, BMX cycling and archery Competitions are expected to happen there in 2028.

Some residents proceed to precise Concerns about hosting Olympic competitions within the valley in 2028. And there are those that oppose hosting the Olympic Games in LA.

At least two grassroots groups — NOlympics LA and the LA chapter of the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE) — are concerned that the 2028 Games could lead on to forced roundups of homeless people as town tries to wash up its streets — knowing full well that LA can be under scrutiny in the method.

They also raised concerns about traffic and a possible explosion in short-term rentals in poorer neighborhoods in Central Los Angeles, South Los Angeles, Exposition Park and the Westlake District if landlords force families out of their apartments to rent their homes at high prices throughout the games.

“The city of Los Angeles is about to host a major global party and we want to make sure it is inclusive and uplifting to the community,” said Estuardo Mazariegos, co-director of ACCE LA. in a recent interview with the Los Angeles Daily News.

“We are threatened with displacement because of the Olympics,” Mazariegos said. “We do not want our community to be uprooted.”

LA Mayor Karen Bass, who traveled to Paris several times who this yr desired to learn more about how Paris Games officials and organizers were preparing for his or her Olympics, said one in every of her key takeaways was the importance of celebrating the Games across town of LA in a way that advantages all Los Angeles residents.

After the closing ceremony of the Paris Games on Sunday, where the official The Olympic flag was handed over to Bass As mayor of the following city to host the Summer Olympics, she said in a press release that it was time to “host the most impactful Olympic and Paralympic Games yet, with a focus on supporting local small businesses, creating local jobs, and creating lasting environmental and transportation improvements throughout Los Angeles that will provide tangible benefits to Los Angeles residents for generations to come.”

Originally published: August 13, 2024 at 04:37

DEAR MRS MANNERS: There is a non-public parochial school near where I live. The tuition is high and the college has a repute for being an elite club.

The parents of this school have initiated and vigorously promoted a fundraising campaign. They consider that the college is a necessary a part of our community and have to be kept open.

I even have been asked to donate but am not inclined to accomplish that.

I see this as wealthy people begging the general public on behalf of their private school, which they’ve run terribly badly. When asked, I said that if the college is begging for money, those in charge should show prospective donors their audited financial statements and explain what the long-term plan is. (I used to be going so as to add that folks should get a cardboard sign and stand on the corner, but I refrained.)

When asked in regards to the financial details, my response was “It's none of your business, just donate and don't ask any questions.” For this reason and due to the financial mismanagement, I is not going to donate, regardless that I’m a really generous person.

Is it fallacious to ask these questions after I'm asked to donate to something? I just don't appreciate blanket incursions into my wallet. Is it common today for wealthy people to ask for financial support from less wealthy people with none specific explanation?

I'm sick of being bombarded with all kinds of donations. I'm really affected by donor fatigue and I'm getting more moody and cynical each day.

DEAR READER: Phew. Is it possible that you just don't like this school? Or the parents whose children go there?
Then why are you asking them a couple of campaign you don't wish to contribute to?

Miss Manners agrees that somebody considering a donation should ask how it will solve the organization's problems. The “none of your business” response is just not valid when accompanied by a request for support.

But because you don't take into consideration donating, she concludes that you just only see this as a chance to vent your dislike.

How should I answer the registrar’s query: “Who gives this woman…?”?

DEAR READER: The usual answer is “Yes, I do,” with the emphasis on the “I.” Miss Manners guarantees that nobody will think you could have usurped the groom's answer, as he should put the emphasis on “I do.”

When you progress right into a latest home, sometimes you bring with you something you thought you left behind.

Rich Shertenlieb, whose latest Morning Drive program of the identical name premiered on Monday WZLXa little bit greater than six months after leaving 98.5 The Sports Hub still remembered his address on the iHeartMedia studios in Medford.

But the brand new phone number? Funnily enough, and completely understandably, that was a distinct story.

In the third hour of the show, Shertenlieb announced the phone number for his old job, which he had probably used a whole lot of times during his nearly 15 years at Sports Hub, fairly than the number where callers could reach his latest show.

Ted Johnson, who co-hosted with Michael Hurley on Monday, immediately alerted Shertenlieb to his faux pas.

“Oh yeah, don’t call it that,” Shertenlieb said, laughing. “It’s muscle memory, man. But I’m damn happy to be here.”

During the following business break, Shertenlieb giggled off camera concerning the release of the old numbers. “I’ll probably do it every morning for at least a month,” he said.

This is the case with every latest broadcast. Therefore, it’s advisable to permit changes in radio programming or personnel a while to take shape before assessing how they’re working.

Coincidentally, a working example: Sports Hub’s “Toucher and Hardy” program. Rob “Hardy” Poole replaced Shertenlieb as Fred Toucher’s co-host. Their pairing didn't go as easily as I expected, however the show has steadily improved since Hardy's official debut on January 4th – while maintaining excellent rankings.

It's hard to attract any major conclusions from the opening day of Shertenlieb's show, nevertheless it managed to sound each familiar and latest. Hurley, who will co-host each day, and Johnson often contributed to Toucher and Rich, and it showed in the benefit of their conversation, whether concerning the Celtics, Johnson's appreciation for bands that emerged within the grunge era, or various other topics.

Shertenlieb, as expected, brought a few of his better-known pieces from Sports Hub, including “Brookline 911,” wherein he and his co-hosts rant about frivolous calls by people to emergency services in various – and almost at all times wealthy – Massachusetts towns and cities.

At the start of the show, Shertenlieb was particularly strong, which pushed Hurley and Johnson into the background. When I spoke to him last week, Shertenlieb mentioned that it could occur, and he brought it up again on Monday. “I just need to know that I will always be absent-minded,” he said.

What's latest? Hurley, a relative radio newbie whose dry humorousness will grow with audiences, handles the sports updates, called “Front and Center.” These have had one or two glitches and again that is the primary day. It happens. Overall, the show felt just like the ones where Toucher was absent and Shertenlieb sat within the No. 1 chair on the Sports Hub.

Shertenlieb has chosen to not confront the attacks that Toucher and other Sports Hub hosts have occasionally suffered against him since his departure, and he remained resolute in that regard on Monday.

“This idea that you have to hate the place you used to work, it’s really not true,” he said.

But he admitted that towards the top of his time there he had a disappointment together with his old job: There was a dispute over the social media accounts that Shertenlieb ran there – accounts that he said he had created years before his His entry into the corporate itself, with an archive of meaningful personal messages – led to him spending “five figures” with a trademark lawyer before deciding to provide up the fight and hand over the accounts to the corporate.

“I have to be honest, it irritated me,” he said. “I felt that not only was it unnecessary, but that it compromised my relationship with you, the listener.”

He said he would donate $10,000 to the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute if the variety of followers on his latest blog increased X.com The @heyrichhey account matches the 150,000 he had within the Toucher and Rich account.

It can be interesting to search out out in the long run how Shertenlieb's show compares to WEEI's “Toucher and Hardy” and “The Greg Hill Show” by way of rankings.

I'm truthfully unsure what to anticipate. This is a story for the approaching weeks and months.

Monday was about day 1, a brand new starting and still a well-known atmosphere. After being on the air inconspicuously for six months, Shertenlieb returned on Monday and reconnected together with his listeners – even when the phone number wasn't at all times correct.

1. Feelings of isolation

Their relationships are defined by what they will offer others, not who they’re.

2. Paranoia and distrust

3. Distorted sense of purpose