I’m currently busy and have never been experienced by being released.

I did numerous freelance work, so I know the way it feels that a project ends, but to be honest, I used to be at all times lucky enough to get recent work at the top of the projects that I worked on.

Lately, nevertheless, I actually have seen how much the industry is changing and what number of strikes and layoffs happen, and I actually have developed paralyzing fear.

Although I really like the role through which I’m currently and is a full-time (not at short notice), I’m at all times nervous in regards to the what-. It is emotionally chaotic and keeps me from with the ability to concentrate and it pushes me into negative thought patterns.

How can I stop myself to fret about what is going to come?

Love instability: Start gratitude daily. When you get up, be thankful for the work and the life you could have and deal with giving all the pieces.

Nearly approach daily. Take a take a look at the upcoming tasks. Think about how you possibly can make yourself invaluable in your day. Be a positive and thoughtful team member and problem solver, each time possible.

Be practical. In view of the undeniable fact that they work in a volatile industry that has suffered many strokes lately, it’s advisable to be prepared. Save as much money as possible. Give your best to create a neste with not less than six months. In this manner you possibly can have the option to care for yourself while you lose your job.

Take a go searching to see what options exist outside your organization so that you just are aware of what could possibly be there for you when you need it.

Dear Harriette: In response to “he snores”, the person whose recent partner snapped like crazy, I also caught.

My wife quite ignored it until I had a TIA (mini button). Her cardiologist got here to a visit and said after a number of questions, I probably have sleep apnea. Boy, he was right.

After studying sleep, it was found that I woke up a median of 53 times an hour. This is chronic sleep apnea.

I used to be included in a CPAP machine and in the primary night I went from 53 times an hour to 3. I couldn't remember the last time I slept so well.

Say “he snores” to take your friend to the sleep doctor. It could save his life. This TIA might have been an important stroke that was because of chronic sleep apnea.

Dear life saving: Thank you for shared your experiences. You are right: sleep apnea affects tens of millions of individuals and there are healthy solutions for individuals with this challenge.

The CPAP machine was a player for some. There can also be an implant that was successful for others.

policy

Bogota, Colombia (AP) — The United States and Colombia, long close partners in anti-narcotics efforts, clashed Sunday over the deportation of migrants and imposed sanctions on one another's goods in a show of what countries face after they enter the Trump could intervene within the administration's crackdown on illegal immigration.

Presidents Donald Trump and Gustavo Petro defended their views on migration in a series of social media posts, with the latter accusing Trump of failing to treat immigrants with dignity during deportations and of retaliating by imposing 25% of Colombia's tariffs on U.S. goods cause.

Previously, the US president had ordered visa restrictions, 25% tariffs on all Colombian incoming goods, increasing to 50% in per week, and other retaliatory measures triggered by Petro's decision to reject two US military planes carrying migrants certain in Colombia.

Trump said the measures were obligatory because Petro's decision “endangered” national security within the United States

“These measures are just the beginning,” Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social. “We will not allow the Colombian government to violate its legal obligations regarding the acceptance and return of the criminals they forced into the United States.”

Later on Sunday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that he was approving the visa restrictions on Colombian government officials and their families “who were accountable for interfering with U.S. repatriation operations. They were imposed along with the State Department's move to curb the Suspend visa processing on the US embassy within the Colombian capital Bogota.

The restrictions will proceed, Rubio said, “until Colombia fulfills its obligations to accept the return of its own citizens.”

Earlier within the day, Petro said his administration wouldn’t accept flights carrying migrants being deported from the United States until the Trump administration creates a protocol that treats them with “dignity.” Petro made the announcement in two X-posts, certainly one of which included a news video of migrants reportedly being deported to Brazil walking on asphalt with restrictions on their hands and feet.

“A migrant is not a criminal and must be treated with the dignity a human being deserves,” Petro said. “That's why I returned the US military planes that were carrying Colombian migrants… in civilian planes, without being treated like criminals, we will receive our fellow citizens.”

Following Trump's announcement, Petro said in a post on

Colombia has traditionally been the US's top ally in Latin America. But their relationship has strained since Petro, a former guerrilla, became Colombia's first leftist president in 2022 and sought distance from the United States

Colombia hosted 475 deportation flights from the U.S. from 2020 to 2024, fifth behind Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico and El Salvador, in keeping with Witnesses on the Border, an advocacy group that tracks flight data. It accepted 124 deportation flights in 2024.

Colombia can also be among the many countries that began accepting prescribed deportation flights from Panama last 12 months.

The U.S. government didn’t immediately reply to a request for comment from the Associated Press about aircraft and protocols utilized in deportations to Colombia.

“This is a clear message we are sending that countries are committed to accepting repatriation flights,” a senior administration official told the AP. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to debate the problems publicly.

Rubio said in an announcement that Petro “cancelled” his approval for the flights while the plane was within the air.

Colombians have emerged in recent times as a big presence on the U.S. border with Mexico, helped partially by a visa regime that enables them to simply fly into Mexico and avoid trekking through the treacherous Darien Gap. They made 127,604 arrests for illegal crossings during a 12-month period ending in September, including Mexicans, Guatemalans and Venezuelans.

Mexico has not imposed visa restrictions on Colombians because it has imposed on Venezuelans, Ecuadorians and Peruvians.

Petro's government said in an announcement later that the South American country's presidential plane had been made available to facilitate the return of migrants who arrived hours earlier on US military planes, guaranteeing them “dignified conditions.”

As a part of a flurry of moves by Trump's campaign to vow to crack down on illegal immigration, his administration is using active-duty military to secure the border and perform deportations.

Two U.S. Air Force C-17 cargo planes carrying migrants faraway from the U.S. touched down in Guatemala early Friday. On the identical day, Honduras received two deportation flights with a complete of 193 people.

As he announced what he called “urgent and decisive retaliatory measures,” Trump explained that he was ordering the tariffs and “a travel ban and immediate visa revocation” for Colombian government officials, allies and supporters.

“All party members, family members and supporters of the Colombian government,” Trump wrote, “visa sanctions.” He didn’t say which party he was referring to or provide additional details on visa and travel restrictions.

Trump added that each one Colombians will face enhanced customs inspections.

Trump's actions appear to undermine his goal of reducing his country's trade deficit. Unlike Mexico or China, Colombia is certainly one of the few countries with a trade deficit with the United States of around $1.4 billion, in keeping with U.S. trade data.

According to the U.S. Grains Council, Colombia is the U.S.'s second-largest buyer of corn and corn feed, boosting U.S. commodity exports from farm belt states like Iowa, Indiana and Nebraska to greater than $733 million last 12 months.

The U.S. export boom has been driven by a two-decade-old free trade agreement between the 2 countries, which have long been close partners within the war on drugs. It is unclear whether Trump's tariffs are allowed under the deal, which incorporates a dispute mechanism to resolve trade disputes.

Colombia is the U.S.'s fourth-largest overseas crude oil supplier, shipping about 209,000 barrels of oil per day last 12 months, although booming domestic production has reduced U.S. dependence on foreign oil. The South American country can also be the most important supplier of fresh-cut flowers within the United States.

___

Regina Garcia Cano reported from Caracas, Venezuela. Jill Colvin in New York, Joshua Goodman in Miami and Elliot Spagat in San Diego contributed to this report.

At the recent annual meeting of the Southern Baptist Convention, quite a few motions were made as regards to women. The Conversation asked Susan Shawa gender and sexuality scholar who studies Southern Baptist women to elucidate the election and other developments within the country's largest Protestant denomination.

The Southern Baptist Convention has rejected a proposal that explicitly stated that only men might be pastors. Does this mean that the SBC is changing and becoming more accepting of ladies in leadership positions?

Absolutely not. The day before the vote on the proposed constitutional amendment of the denomination to exclude churches with women in pastoral roles, the Convention expelled the First Baptist Church of Alexandria, Virginia, for its position that girls can function pastors. The vote was not even close, 6,759 to 563.

How many female pastors are there currently within the SBC? Could you furthermore mght share a bit concerning the history of resistance to women in leadership positions?

There is somewhere between 1,000 To 1,800 Women who function pastors in Southern Baptist churches. Few, if any, of those women are senior pastors. Instead, they’re assistant pastors, youth or children's pastors, women's pastors, or other varieties of pastors, all of whom work under the supervision of a male senior pastor.

The SBC adopted a Resolution of 1984 Rejection of ladies as leading pastors.

While resolutions are usually not binding on local churches, the proposed constitutional amendment would have defined a church as cooperating with the SBC provided that it “[a]confirms, appoints, or employs only men as pastors or elders of any kind, as directed by the Holy Scriptures.”

To change its bylaws, the convention must first approve any proposed change at an annual meeting after which confirm it with a final vote at the next annual meeting. That vote requires a two-thirds majority for the change to turn out to be a part of the bylaws. The women pastors amendment was set to pass in 2023, but failed this 12 months since it received only 61% of the vote.

Some of those against the change argued that the assembly had already spoken on the problem, had mechanisms in place to deal with churches with women pastors, and subsequently didn’t need to alter its structure. Nothing on this argument suggests support for girls, and in reality, opponents of the change often reiterated their support for the denomination's stance against women pastors.

For many Southern Baptists, the exclusion of ladies from the position of senior pastors isn’t an obstacle to their participation in other pastoral roles who wouldn’t have the supervisory authority of the senior pastor or require ordination. That was definitely the language of the initiators of the 1984 resolution, and the try and exclude churches where women hold pastoral roles apart from senior pastor, as they recently did in Alexandria, Virginia, goes beyond the intent of the sooner resolution.

Southern Baptists also place great importance on what they call “the autonomy of the local church.” This deeply held Baptist belief implies that each local church is self-governing and isn’t controlled in any way by the SBC. By increasingly excluding women from pastoral roles, the SBC could have been perceived as encroaching on the autonomy of the local church.

In 2023, the Southern Baptist Convention refused to readmit Saddleback Church to its ranks after it was expelled from the church earlier that 12 months for appointing female ministers. What do you think that this vote will change?

I don't think the vote will change anything. Saddleback's pastors weren’t senior pastorsthey were ordained, and the church affirmed the flexibility of ladies to assume any pastoral role. We can see from this 12 months's expulsion of First Baptist Alexandria that the SBC will proceed to purge churches that endorse women in any pastoral roles.

The only thing this 12 months's vote has shown us is that a major minority of “Messengers” – as Southern Baptists call the delegates to the SBC's annual convention – don’t want to interfere within the structure of the convention.

At the identical time, the SBC has voted against in vitro fertilization. Could you explain this vote and the SBC's historical views on the personification of the fetus?

This resolution expands Southern Baptists' opposition to any procedure that kills fetuses or embryos. The resolution sympathizes with infertile couples but argues that the method is ultimately the “destruction of embryonic human life” because embryos are sometimes stored and destroyed after successful implantation.

In the Seventies, before the fundamentalist takeover of the SBC within the Eighties and early Nineties, generally against abortion on demandbut additionally they anxious about government interference in women's decision-making about their very own bodies.

In the Eighties, the Convention made a pointy turn to the fitting with the aim of Abortion banned again. The language of the SBC modified from “fetal life” to “preborn” or “unborn” individuals. Now we see the SBC speaking of embryos as fully-fledged people and calls for “the government to prevent actions that are incompatible with the dignity and worth of every human being, and this necessarily includes frozen human embryos.”

What else was necessary about this meeting?

Despite the pressure that has been placed on the SBC in recent times to do something about its Problem of sexual abusehas the Convention repeatedly failed to make significant progress, especially on the long-awaited database to trace perpetrators. This 12 months, too, the Messengers voted to pass several abuse reforms, but survivors were disillusioned how little change actually takes place. Significant changes all the time appear to fail as a consequence of concerns about insurance and liability.

Taken together, the vote against the constitutional amendment, the resolution against artificial insemination, and the inaction on sexual abuse reform underscore that the religion community's ultra-conservative views on women remain unchanged.