Canada

Mexico

China

'Global trade war

Local news

Local democrats have plenty of experience with wild claims and chaotic press conferences from President Donald Trump. His decision to instantly accuse the demands of the range for the worst catastrophe of the US airfare for years, though corpses have been identified and cleaned were cleaned, it appeared to increase a certain nerve with democratic legislators from New England.

Sixty people died on Wednesday evening when a helicopter of the military and a passenger jet American airline collided over the Potomac River near the Ronald Reagan National Airport. Among them were two teenagers, their moms and two trainers from the Skating Club in Boston.

“He is not doing well,” said Rep. Becca Balint from Vermont about Trump in a video that was released on social media on Thursday. “We have to stop normalizing this. This is not what President do, but that is not what managers do. “

“I first put security. Obama, bidges and the Democrats put politics in the first place, ”Trump told reporters on Thursday. He cited no specific evidence that the necessities of diversity played a job within the crash.

He referred to the long -standing practices of the Federal Aviation Administration to incorporate individuals with disabilities in recruitment. As early as 2013And in all of Trumps First termThe FAA website contained a language in regards to the attitude of “special focus” on the attitude of people with “targeted disabilities” such as “hearing, eyesight, lack of extremities, partly paralysis, complete paralysis, epilepsy, severe mental disability, psychiatric disability and dwarf scales “.

The multi-fold and inclusion sides of the FAA did not mention air traffic controls or other specific positions for which people are set with these disabilities. Air traffic controls have to meet High standards for physical and mental health.

In addition, actually the FAA launched “A pilot program to organize individuals with disabilities for careers in air traffic in the primary term of trump”.

The faa appeared to be Without a top official At the time of the crash. Michael Whitaker, who was unanimously confirmed by the Senate as a FAA administrator in 2023, resigned on the day of Trump's inauguration at first of this month. Elon Musk, the richest man on the earth and a detailed consultant of Trump, asked Whitakers to step down Last September. Trump card assigned A new acting administrator who heads the FAA on Thursday.

According to a preliminary FAA security report, which was handled by the two aircraft with the two aircraft, the staff in the traffic control tower was “not normal”, which handled the two planes. A controller advised both helicopters and airplanes in the Airport of Reagan, reported. This is usually something of two people.

The National Transportation Safety Board carries out an investigation and treats the situation as a “all-hand-on deck event”.

“Trump's ridiculous fault of the tragic crash of the FAA variety of last night is disgusting and a distraction. Let us do your work to the experts, ”Senator Ed Markay said.

Rep. Lori Trahan called Trump's comments “disgusting. “”

“What a betrayal“, Rep. Katherine Clark, said about Trump's comments.

Trump took the opportunity to show this incident “not to show leadership and empathy, but to Create a speculative story That fits comfortably with his political agenda, ”said Rep. Seth Moulton.

MP Ayanna Pressley said Trump was a “ruthless, lawless, dangerous man”, who ignored his responsibility, to comfort the tragedy grieving families.

I’m broken with a broken heart for the victims of the crash and their grieving families and relatives in Massachusetts & across the country.

Dr. King reminds us of power without love is ruthless and we see that from this white house. pic.twitter.com/kkst0SSGU

– Congressman Ayanna Pressley (@Reppressley) January 31, 2025

readers say

President Joe Biden announced Monday that he would commute the sentences of 37 of the 40 people on federal death row, just weeks before Donald Trump takes office. But Boston.com readers largely disagree together with his decision.

The move means inmates will remain in prison for all times with no possibility of parole. There are three remaining federal inmates who still face execution: Dylann Roof, who killed nine black members of Mother Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, South Carolina, in 2015; Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 2013 Boston Marathon bomber; And Robert Bowerswho fatally shot eleven congregants on the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh in 2018.

Biden attributed his decision to political motivations surrounding the upcoming Trump presidency in addition to his longstanding stance against federal executions “in cases other than terrorism and hate-motivated mass murder.”

“I am more convinced than ever that we must stop the use of the death penalty at the federal level. “I cannot in good conscience stand by and watch a new government resume the executions I stopped,” he said in an interview opinion.

In 2021, Biden's Justice Department ordered a moratorium to perform federal death sentences after a surge in executions under the Trump administration. He appeared during Trump's first term 13 federal executions – greater than under any president in modern history.

When we asked Boston.com readers to weigh in on Biden's decision, the bulk (77%) of the greater than 250 readers who responded to our poll disagreed with the move, while just below 1 / 4 (23%) agreed.

“Actions have consequences. Commit the crime and face the punishment. In fact, all cases of the death penalty involved the violent killing of another human being. “What makes the life of the convicted criminal more valuable to society than the life of the victim?” said reader Jay J. of Boston, who opposed the choice.

On the contrary, many readers who supported Biden's decision said that the death penalty is unethical and doesn’t deter crime.

“The death penalty does not deter crime and in many cases is unfairly imposed on minorities. “Furthermore, too many innocent people have been sentenced to the death penalty,” said reader Steven B..

Below, readers share their thoughts on Biden's decision to commute the death sentences of 37 inmates.

Do you agree with Biden's decision to commute the sentences of 37 people on death row?

No, I disagree

“A federal death penalty is very difficult to obtain. The law carefully protects the rights of defendants and sets a high bar for prosecution. They only apply to the most heinous first-degree murders. Once decided by a jury and upheld on appeal, they should not be swept away without compelling specific reasons. If the president disapproved of current federal law, he should have sought to change it democratically, not to cast it aside. He should also have explained why he did what he did. Undemocratic, lack of transparency, no explanation.” –

“I believe this mass commutation is another example of Joe Biden undermining the rights of victims and the decision of the judiciary. It seems to me that he did not respect the rule of law and did not evaluate all the details of the cases in question.” –

“In most cases the evidence was so convincing that there was no doubt that the defendants did it. Many of us were in Boston the day of the marathon bombing. This was an attack on our families, our culture, our community and people were killed, including a young boy. When a decision that took months is overturned by one person… What incentive is there for others not to commit such a crime? How can we defend ourselves and trust that a system will defend us against a person who has demonstrated the ability to commit acts of war or crimes without any sense of humanity?” –

“The judiciary found these people worthy of execution. Now we will support them until they finally die in prison. There will be no justice for their victims and their families with this senseless decision.” –

“The death penalty helps stop crime and reduce the cost of maintaining these inmates.” –

Yes, I agree

“I don’t want my government to play God and decide who should die and when. Courts and processes are not infallible.” –

“Death penalties should only be imposed for the most heinous acts of violence like this [Boston] Marathon bomber. Our entire legal and penal system needs to be reviewed and modernized. It’s not an easy solution, but it takes a start.” –

“The death penalty should be abolished in all states and the federal government.” –

“The death penalty has no deterrent effect and is a social revenge. Trump loved executing prisoners, and Biden prevented that by preempting his attempts.” –

DEAR HARRIETTE: Is it acceptable to deactivate my social media accounts without notifying anyone, especially if I live alone and my mental well-being needs to be a priority?

I actually have been desirous about taking a break from social media to deal with myself and my personal growth. However, I’m concerned about how my family and friends might react to my sudden absence from social platforms, especially since I live independently. I actually have no intention of causing concern in my social circle.

DEAR SOCIAL MEDIA BREAK: Yes! Turn it off. You don't owe anyone a proof as to why you're taking a break from social media.

Since you reside alone, you might wish to inform your emergency contact. Otherwise, the people closest to it’s best to contact you personally anyway.

DEAR HARRIETTE: How do I politely throw my son out of the home?

My 24-year-old son lives with me and my husband in Phoenix. He recently graduated from college and doesn't want to depart our house, despite the fact that he has a job and makes enough money to afford an apartment. He just must live a more modest life.

Right after he graduated from college, I allowed him to live with us because he hadn't found a job yet. But it's been two years since he found a job, and my husband and I feel it's time for him to grow to be more independent and move out.

We enjoy having him around, but we also consider that living alone will help him proceed to grow and mature.

I would like to approach this conversation gently to avoid unnecessary tension or hurt feelings. We don't want him to feel unwelcome or unloved; we would like him to know that this step is about his personal growth and development.

We are happy with his achievements and trust that he can do it on his own. How can we communicate this to him in a supportive and inspiring way?

DEAR TIME TO MOVE: Talk to your son about his plans for the long run. What does he want for his life? How does he imagine it? Does he wish to buy a house?

You will all the time love and support him, but you suspect it’s healthy for him to live under his own roof and make independent decisions. Make it clear to him that he’s all the time welcome within the family home, but that now’s the time for him to determine his own residence.

Morning sports update

Pacers players sound bad after bad loss: In the ultimate moments of Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Finals, it seemed several times as if upstart Indiana had won the sport.

But like before in Boston basketball history, the Celtics pulled off a miraculous game-saving play (several, actually). After a 133-128 extra time loss, the Pacers players were left to ponder what might have been.

“We gave it away,” Pacers forward and former Celtic forward Aaron Nesmith approved, based on ESPN's Jamal Collier“We should have won the game.”

Even after Jaylen Brown's unlikely game-winning 3-pointer, Indiana still had a probability to win in regular time. But with Jayson Tatum glued to him, Pacers guard Tyrese Haliburton couldn't get the shot he wanted. In the tip, his shot went wide and the sport went into extra time.

“I felt like there was a better chance that I didn’t get.” Haliburton told reporters.

“This is playing 100 times in my head and it will be on repeat when I get out of here,” he added. “But I can't go into detail about it. I felt like that was probably the look I was supposed to shoot. I wish I had, but I didn't.”

“We showed our age a little bit tonight,” Pacers center Myles Turner said. “Being a young team and in a game with so much at stake, these uncharacteristic mistakes just came out.”

Indiana finished the night with 21 turnovers.

Still, Haliburton was encouraged by the team's performance waiting for the remaining of the series.

“We know we can play with these guys,” he said. “We know we belong.”

useful information: The Pacers last won the Eastern Conference in 2000. That season, Indiana star Reggie Miller led the team in total points but was second in points per game. Which player, who finished second behind Miller in total points, had a rather higher total points per game?

(Answer below).

Note: He was a member of the famous “Fab Five” on the University of Michigan.

Results and fixtures:

The Celtics pulled off a dramatic 133-128 win in Game 1 against the Pacers within the Eastern Conference finals on Tuesday. Game 2 is scheduled for Thursday at 8 p.m. at TD Garden

Also from Tuesday: PWHL Boston lost Game 2 of the Walter Cup Finals against Minnesota 3-0. The best-of-five series is now tied 1-1, with motion happening Friday at 7 p.m. on the Xcel Energy Center in Minnesota

And the Red Sox beat the Rays 5-2. The two teams will finish the three-game series tonight at 6:50 p.m. as Boston looks for the win.

More from Boston.com:

The Celtics were down and out before Jaylen Brown saved them: Here is a take a look at the statistical fluctuations within the probability of winning.

Indiana's win probability was 97.4% after the Tatum foul with 10 seconds left. Truly a miracle save from Jaylen, who forced that turnover after which hit the OT-forcing 3. pic.twitter.com/iwmWTmlo2r

— Chris Forsberg (@ChrisForsberg_) May 22, 2024

Regret? Not everyone kept the religion in the course of the first game on Tuesday. WCVB's Mary Saladna snapped a humorous picture of a bunch of fans leaving TD Garden early and ending up watching the game-ending drama from a bar window outside.

On at the present time: In 1988, the Celtics did simply enough to match Dominique Wilkins' 47-point night in a single 118-116 Game 7 victory over the Hawks within the Eastern Conference semifinals.

On the opposite hand, the Bruins couldn't stop Wayne Gretzky (4 assists) and the Oilers 6-3 Lost in Game 3 of the Stanley Cup Finals.

Daily highlight: Perfect performance from the Red Sox (each Rafael Devers and naturally Jarren Duran), which led to a rare home steal.

MIAMI GARDENS, Fla. – A smile crept onto Lando Norris' face through the post-race media sessions.

His first Formula 1 victory was a protracted time coming. He got here close a number of times, but was then thwarted by small mistakes, like in Qatar 2023, and things beyond his control, just like the rain and strategic decisions in Sochi 2021. He joined the Formula 1 starting grid with McLaren in 2019 because the Nineteenth-year-old, now in his sixth season and before the Grand Prix weekend in Miami, the Brit had secured a pole position and was on the rostrum 15 times and drove over 6,000 laps.

As each rider stopped for interviews on the media station, almost everyone touched on the identical point: It's time.

“Well done, Lando,” said Fernando Alonso. “First victory after so many podiums. I'm really joyful for him. Hopefully he remembers today – the primary of many victories.” The Aston Martin driver was not the only one to suggest that this would not be the final victory for the 24-year-old. Max Verstappen said: “I’m very happy for Lando. It had been foreseeable for a long time. And it won't be his last. He deserves it today.”

The victory came at a pivotal moment in the sport. In the last 28 Grands Prix, Red Bull has won all but two races: Singapore 2023 and Australia 2024, both won by Ferrari driver Carlos Sainz. Verstappen remained largely unchallenged and built up a pretty good lead race after race. But this weekend in Miami, McLaren took the chance to beat Red Bull in a head-to-head battle. When Norris passed Verstappen after the safety cars, it was important that fresh tires and clean air beat an incredibly fast car.

“He probably deserved a race win many, many years ago,” Mercedes’ George Russell said. “And I think for all the drivers in Formula 1, in this era of dominance by one team and one driver, it's always great to see someone get the chance to get a win.”

Norris began sixteenth finally yr's Miami GP and finished seventeenth for a struggling McLaren that turned its season around within the second half of 2023. Now he’s celebrating his first win in three years. Oscar Piastri said he was “very happy for (Norris) and for the whole team, and I think we deserve it. “Our path over the past 12 months has been towards this moment.”

Lewis Hamilton remembered his first F1 victory in 2007, which he also celebrated with McLaren. The team still has “a big part of my heart,” he said, and was happy to see them win again. The Woking-based team's last F1 victory came at the 2021 Italian Grand Prix for Daniel Ricciardo.

Before post-race interviews, drivers traditionally have a quick chat with their team and crew members pat them on the helmet or back. However, Norris jumped over the barrier for joy, and the McLaren crew members were equally happy to hug their new race winner. The emotions were overflowing.

A memory that can last a lifetime! #MiamiGP pic.twitter.com/N1t0dc7orD

— McLaren (@McLarenF1) May 5, 2024

“I’m just really happy for Lando. “As much as we all want to beat each other and come out on top, it's always emotional to see so much emotion from one of our competitors,” said Ferrari's Charles Leclerc. “We all grew up together. I remember looking at Lando when he was still in KF3 and we all had the same dream of becoming Formula 1 drivers one day.”

Norris isn’t any stranger to hate, with memes and nicknames like “Lando No Wins” popping up on social media when people discuss his record. But the Brit says the words of those closest to him are more meaningful and thanked his competitors for his or her praise and support. In parc ferme and within the media area, various riders hugged Norris and congratulated him on a moment he’ll likely remember perpetually.

“When you put the helmet on and you hate them and you want to beat them and you don't care who's who, I've always had respect for the people I've raced against. So if someone shows up [to me]“Especially people who have achieved a lot, because it always means a little more,” said Norris. “So when Lewis, Fernando, Max, Charles, Carlos come up to you or people have good words for you, I really appreciate it. Because to these people it means something. Maybe from others, that's not the case.

“These people are the people who know what it takes to achieve things like this – the work, time and effort that goes into something like this.”