It is increasingly likely that Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will announce his resignation, although he has not yet made a final decision, a source accustomed to Trudeau's considering said Sunday.

The source spoke to Reuters after the Globe and Mail reported that Trudeau was expected to announce as early as Monday that he was stepping down as leader of Canada's ruling Liberal Party after nine years in office.

The source requested anonymity because she was not authorized to talk publicly.

Trudeau's departure would go away the party with no everlasting leader at a time when polls show the Liberals will lose significantly to the official opposition Conservatives in an election that have to be held by the tip of October.

Sources told the Globe and Mail they didn't know exactly when Trudeau would announce his plans to quit, but said they expected it might occur before an emergency meeting of Liberal lawmakers on Wednesday.

A growing variety of Liberal lawmakers, alarmed by a series of dismal polls, have publicly called on Trudeau to resign.

The Prime Minister's Office didn’t immediately reply to a request for comment outside regular business hours. The prime minister's usually published schedule for Monday called for him to virtually attend a Cabinet committee meeting on Canada-U.S. relations.

It stays unclear whether Trudeau will step down immediately or remain prime minister until a brand new Liberal leader is elected, the Globe and Mail report added.

Trudeau took over as Liberal leader in 2013, when the party was in serious trouble and had fallen to 3rd place within the House of Commons for the primary time.

If he does resign, it might likely spark latest calls for a fast election to create a stable government able to handling President-elect Donald Trump's administration over the following 4 years.

The prime minister has spoken to Finance Minister Dominic LeBlanc about whether he can be willing to step in as interim leader and prime minister, a source told the newspaper, adding that this is able to not be practical if LeBlanc desired to run for the leadership.

Trudeau, 53, had managed to fend off Liberal lawmakers nervous in regards to the polls and the lack of secure seats in two special elections.

But calls for him to resign have been mounting since December, when Trudeau tried to demote Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland, one in every of his closest allies within the Cabinet, after she pushed back against his proposals for higher spending.

Instead, Freeland resigned and wrote a letter accusing Trudeau of “political gamesmanship” as a substitute of specializing in what was best for the country.

Trudeau brought the Liberals to power in 2015 by promising “sunny paths” and a progressive agenda that promoted women's rights and a promise to combat climate change.

But the day-to-day realities of governing step by step wore him down, and like many Western leaders, the necessity to cope with the results of the pandemic consumed much of his time.

Although Ottawa spent heavily on protecting consumers and businesses and ran record deficits, this provided little protection from public anger as prices rose.

A botched immigration policy led to a whole lot of hundreds of recent arrivals and put a strain on an already overheated housing market.

The soft-spoken Manmohan Singh, described as a “reluctant king” in his first term as prime minister, was arguably one among India's most successful leaders.

The first Sikh in office, Singh, 92, was being treated for age-related illnesses and died after being rushed to hospital on Thursday following a sudden lack of consciousness.

He is credited with helping India achieve unprecedented economic growth and lifting lots of of hundreds of thousands of individuals out of abject poverty. He then served a rare second term.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi said: “India mourns the loss of one of its most respected leaders, Dr. Manmohan Singh Ji.”

He praised the work of the economist-turned-politician.

Singh was born right into a poor family in an element of British-ruled India that’s now in Pakistan. He studied by candlelight to secure a spot at Cambridge University before going to Oxford and completing his doctorate with a thesis on the role of exports and free trade within the Indian economy.

He became a respected economist, then governor of India's central bank and government adviser, but had no apparent plans for a political profession when he was suddenly appointed finance minister in 1991.

During this term until 1996, Singh was the architect of reforms that rescued India's economy from a severe balance of payments crisis, promoting deregulation and other measures that opened an island country to the world.

He famously quoted Victor Hugo in his first budget speech, saying, “No power in the world can stop an idea whose time has come,” before adding, “The emergence of India as a major economic power of the world happens to be one such idea.” “

Singh's rise to prime ministership in 2004 was even more unexpected.

He was asked to take over the post by Sonia Gandhi, who led the center-left Congress party to a surprise victory. As a native of Italy, she feared that if she were to lead the country, her heritage would be exploited by Hindu nationalist opponents to attack the government.

During an unprecedented period of economic growth, Singh's government shared the spoils of the country's newfound wealth and introduced welfare programs such as an employment program for the rural poor.

In 2008, his administration also reached a landmark agreement that allowed peaceful trade in nuclear energy with the United States for the first time in three decades, paving the way for close ties between New Delhi and Washington.

But his efforts to further open the Indian economy often failed due to political disputes within his own party and demands from coalition partners.

And although he was widely respected by other world leaders, Singh at all times had to withstand the concept at home that Sonia Gandhi was the actual power in government.

The widow of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, whose family has dominated Indian politics since independence from Britain in 1947, she remained leader of the Congress Party and sometimes made vital decisions.

Singh was known for his easy lifestyle and had a repute for honesty. He was not personally considered corrupt. But he got here under fire for failing to take tough motion against members of his government when a series of scandals erupted in his second term, sparking mass protests.

In the ultimate years of his premiership, India's growth story, which he helped shape, faltered as global economic turmoil and slow government decision-making dented investment sentiment.

In 2012, his government fell right into a minority after the Congress party's foremost ally walked out of his coalition in protest on the entry of foreign supermarkets.

Two years later, the Congress was decisively swept aside by the Bharatiya Janata Party under Narendra Modi, a strongman who promised to finish economic gridlock, eliminate corruption and produce inclusive growth to the hinterland.

But at a press conference just months before he left office, Singh insisted he had done his best.

“I honestly believe that history will be kinder to me than the contemporary media or, for that matter, the opposition parties in Parliament,” he said.

Singh is survived by his wife and three daughters.

The attorney general of Washington, DC sued Amazon on Wednesday, accusing the corporate of secretly denying residents of certain ZIP codes within the nation's capital access to Prime's high-speed delivery.

AG Brian Schwalb's lawsuit alleges that since 2022, Amazon has “secretly” excluded two “historically underserved” D.C. zip codes from its express delivery service while charging Prime members living there the complete subscription price. Amazon's Prime membership program costs $139 per yr and includes perks like two-day shipping and access to streaming content.

“Amazon charges tens of thousands of hard-working residents of Wards 7 and 8 for an expedited delivery service it promises but does not provide,” Schwalb said in a press release. “While Amazon has every right to make operational changes, it cannot quietly decide that a dollar in one zip code is worth less than a dollar in another.”

In June 2022, Amazon reportedly stopped using its own delivery trucks to move packages within the 20019 and 20020 ZIP codes on account of driver safety concerns, the lawsuit says. Instead of its internal delivery network, the corporate relied on external carriers similar to: UPS and the U.S. Postal Service to make deliveries, based on the lawsuit filed in D.C. Superior Court.

The decision resulted in residents of those ZIP codes experiencing “significantly longer delivery times than their neighbors in other ZIP codes in the District, despite paying the exact same Prime membership price,” the lawsuit says.

AG data shows that before Amazon implemented the change, greater than 72% of Prime packages within the two ZIP codes were delivered inside two days of checkout. That number dropped to simply 24% after the move, while two-day delivery rates across the county rose to 74%.

Amazon has previously faced complaints about inequities in its Prime program. In 2016 the corporate said it could expand Access same-day delivery in cities like Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas and Washington a Bloomberg investigation found that black residents are “about half as likely” to receive a same-day delivery as white residents.

The ZIP codes in Schwalb's grievance are in areas with large Black populations, based on 2022 Census data based on the American Community Survey.

The Federal Trade Commission also sued Amazon in June 2023, accusing the corporate of tricking consumers into signing up for Prime and “sabotaging” their attempts to cancel through the use of so-called dark patterns, or deceptive design tactics designed to steer users toward a selected selection ” to have . Amazon said the complaint was “wrong as to the facts and the law.” The case is scheduled to go to trial in June 2025.

According to Scwalb's complaint, Amazon never communicated the delivery exclusion to Prime members in the region. When consumers in the affected ZIP codes complained to Amazon about slower delivery speeds, the company said it was due to circumstances beyond its control, the lawsuit says.

The lawsuit accuses Amazon of violating the county's consumer protection laws. It also calls on the court to “put an end to Amazon’s fraudulent behavior” and to seek damages and penalties.

To deliver packages to customers' doorsteps, Amazon uses a combination of its own contract delivery companies, typically characterized by Amazon-branded vans, as well as carriers such as USPS, UPS, and FedExand a network of gig workers who make deliveries using their own vehicles as part of the Flex program.

Amazon has rapidly expanded its in-house logistics army in recent years, cutting deliveries from two days to a day or even a few hours. In July the company said In the first half of the year, the company recorded the “fastest Prime delivery speeds ever,” delivering more than 5 billion items in one day.

By using its own workforce, Amazon has gained greater control over its delivery operations.

In his complaint, Schwalb cites an internal company policy that says Amazon may decide to exclude certain areas from delivery through its in-house delivery network if a driver is subjected to “violence, intimidation or harassment.” The Company relies on UPS or USPS to deliver packages to excluded areas.

REGARD: Amazon is betting on consumers shopping as they tune in to the Black Friday game

British Transport Secretary Louise Haigh has resigned after pleading guilty to an offense regarding deceiving police over a piece cell phone years ago, in an extra blow to Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

Her resignation, the primary from Starmer's top ministerial team since her landslide election victory in July, got here after media reports that she had been convicted in 2014 for what she described as a “mistake” and given a conditional discharge.

Haigh said in a letter to Starmer dated Thursday, November 28, that she told police she had lost a cell phone in a “horrific” night-time robbery in 2013, only to later discover the phone was at all times there was still at home together with her.

In her resignation letter, shared by Starmer's office early Friday, Haigh said she was stepping down because the difficulty “will inevitably distract from the work of this government and the policies to which we are committed.”

“I remain fully committed to our political project, but I now believe it will be best if I support you from outside government,” she said.

Starmer thanked Haigh for her work and for all the things she has done “to deliver this government’s ambitious transport agenda”.

The opposition Conservative Party said Haigh “did the right thing” but questioned why Starmer appointed her when he appeared to know of her fraud conviction.

“The responsibility now lies with Keir Starmer to explain this obvious error of judgment to the British public,” a Conservative Party spokesman said in a press release.

Haigh's resignation is an extra blow to the Labor leader, whose approval rankings have been falling since July.

Almost immediately after coming to power, the Labor government got here under fire for limiting fuel payments to the elderly and accepting donations for clothing and hospitality.

Since then, his government has angered farmers over changes to inheritance tax rules, and lots of businesses have complained about Labour's first budget, during which the Chancellor of the Exchequer raised taxes mainly on corporations and the rich.

Haigh, who was first elected in 2015 and held senior posts under each Starmer and left-wing former Labor leader Jeremy Corbyn, said the phone incident was a “real mistake” from which she “gained no profit.” ” have.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer's chief of staff, Sue Gray, resigned on Sunday after rumors emerged of tensions inside his advisory team, casting a shadow over his government barely greater than three months after a landslide election victory.

Gray, a former senior civil servant, was the topic of leaks about her salary to the media last month and was blamed for Starmer's difficult start in Downing Street by some officials who spoke to the media anonymously.

“Over the last few weeks, it has become clear to me that intense commentary on my position risks distracting from the government’s important change work,” Gray said in an announcement.

Starmer led the Labor Party to a shocking victory in July, promising discipline and alter after 14 years of Conservative Party rule. But his term in office had already been marked by criticism of free gifts from wealthy donors that he and other Labor politicians had received.

Starmer has returned hundreds of kilos value of gifts to his office said last weekhowever the figures were politically damaging at a time when his government is cutting financial support for hundreds of thousands of pensioners' energy bills.

Gray will take up a brand new post as Starmer's envoy to the regions and nations, the Prime Minister's Office said.

She might be replaced by Morgan McSweeney, who was previously the prime minister's chief adviser, it said.

Gray was hired by Starmer in 2023 when his Labor Party was in opposition. The appointment was considered controversial because she had led a government inquiry into parties in Downing Street in 2022, when the Conservative Party's Boris Johnson was prime minister. Johnson left Downing Street in 2023.

Starmer announced further changes to his advisory team and the creation of a brand new strategic communications team led by James Lyons, a former senior journalist at British newspapers.

A vital month lies ahead for Starmer and his finance minister Rachel Reeves as they announce their first tax and spending plans a budget statement on October thirtieth.

The Conservatives said Starmer's government had been “plunged into chaos” first by criticism of the freebies after which by Gray's resignation.

“Sue Gray was brought in to deliver a program for government and all we have seen in that time is self-service government,” a celebration spokesman said.

Amazon and 6 other organisations have been chosen to participate in a trial investigating the expansion of drone use within the UK.

The country’s Civil Aviation Authority, or CAA, announced It was announced on Thursday that the experiment will involve integrating drones into UK airspace beyond the road of sight of their operators, meaning operators is not going to have to regulate the drones.

These flights would use sophisticated technologies for navigation, control and detection of other aircraft, the CCA said.

Projects included within the trial include those providing services to distant infrastructure akin to offshore wind farms, inspections over the North Sea or the delivery of emergency medical supplies.

“Our aim is to make beyond-line-of-sight drone operations a safe and everyday reality, helping to modernise UK airspace and integrate new technologies into our skies,” said Sophie O'Sullivan, Director of the Future of Aviation on the UK CCA.

The trial will collect data on how the drones detect and avoid other aircraft, in addition to what electronic signals may be sent to make them visible to other airspace users and air traffic control.

The flights “have the potential to transform the way we deliver goods and provide services, particularly in less well-connected regions,” said Simon Masters, deputy director of the Future Flight Challenge at UK Research and Innovation. He added that the programme was a key a part of the CCA's wider airspace modernisation strategy, which goals to make UK airspace fit for the long run.

Amazon's drone delivery service Prime Air was a pet project of founder Jeff Bezos, who outlined his plans for the service greater than a decade ago.

The e-commerce giant said in October last 12 months that its customers within the UK and Italy would give you the option to have their packages delivered by drone from the tip of 2024. The company doesn’t currently have permission to operate drones within the UK.

“It is critical for operators like us to have clear regulatory requirements to bring and scale new technologies like drone deliveries to customers in the UK,” said David Carbon, Vice President and General Manager of Amazon Prime Air. “We appreciate the CAA’s efforts to work with us to bring clarity to the regulations that support commercial drone deliveries.”

Prime Air has already launched within the U.S. in College Station, Texas, and Lockeford, California, for packages weighing as much as 5 kilos (2.3 kilograms), however the expansion of this system has faced regulatory hurdles, delays and the departure of some executives.

Last 12 months, a big variety of Prime Air employees were laid off within the US, the biggest layoff in the corporate's history. The service also competes with Wing, a subsidiary of Google's parent company. alphabetAnd Walmart which partners with Zipline for drone deliveries.