SAN JOSE – A burst of holiday air travel helped San Jose's passenger trips zoom higher in December, offering hope for momentum in 2025 – although travel fell for all of 2024.

December's numbers were a 6.8% improvement over November activity, when the airport took on about 954,800 passengers.

However, the South Bay travel complex had a difficult 12 months overall in 2024 in comparison with 2023.

In 2024, San Jose International Airport served 11.85 million passengers, up 2% from the 12.1 million passengers the aviation center handled in 2023, recent statistics show.

San Jose Airport, the first aviation hub serving Silicon Valley, also received a significant award from an influential air travel industry analyst.

Cirium, which analyzes and tracks aviation statistics and trends, cited San Jose 2024 for on-time performance. Cirium also noted that San Jose Had the six best on-time performance worldwide amongst medium-sized airports.

“San Jose International Airport continues to exemplify excellence as an important gateway to our region and city,” said San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan.

The Cirium report found that 84.7% of San Jose airport departures in 2024 were on time.

In the identical study, Oakland Airport, officially referred to as San Francisco Bay Oakland International Airport, reported 81.1% of its departures occurred on time.

This helped Oakland Airport rank eleventh amongst mid-sized airports.

San Francisco International Airport didn’t make the highest 20 amongst major airports and was not mentioned within the report.

San Jose International Airport trends could provide a foundation for growth in 2025.

“Our team is committed to providing the best travel experience,” said Mookie Patel, San Jose aviation director.

The San Jose Airport recently reported that two airlines have decided to supply recent nonstop service that may connect San Jose to Las Vegas, Detroit and Baltimore starting within the spring and summer.

“We look forward to a new year of additional routes, new dining and shopping options, and continued investment in making San Jose Airport the easiest airport for Silicon Valley travelers,” Patel said.

Originally published: January 27, 2025 at 11:40 am PST

By Lilit Marcus | CNN

It takes loads to shock the TSA, but one traveler succeeded when officers found dozens of fireworks and weapons in her carry-on luggage.

The woman's bag was being searched in Terminal 4 at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) on December 15 when a screening officer spotted suspicious items on the X-ray machine.

Inside were 82 fireworks, three knives, two replica firearms and a canister of pepper spray.

“The sheer number of prohibited items discovered in a single piece of carry-on baggage is extremely concerning,” LAX TSA federal security director Jason Pantages said in a press release.

“This incident should serve as a reminder to all travelers to double-check the contents of their luggage before coming to the airport.”

According to the TSA, the lady was carrying consumer-grade fireworks, which generally have weaker explosiveness than fireworks utilized in skilled displays.

Regardless of this, explosives akin to fireworks are never allowed in luggage – no matter whether or not they are checked or carried.

The passenger, who was flying to Philadelphia, was questioned by police while the LAX bomb squad confiscated the fireworks.

And the explosives-carrying traveler isn't the one passenger who has tried to smuggle contraband through LAX in recent weeks.

Over Thanksgiving weekend, a California man allegedly attempted to examine two suitcases containing 70 kilos of meth-laced clothing – including a cow onesie.

The man who booked a United flight to Sydney was arrested at LAX after customs officers found “irregularities” in his luggage and searched the luggage.

The TSA reports that 2.6 million people passed through airport security checkpoints within the United States on December 15, up from 2.5 million on the identical day in 2023.

The CNN Wire
& © 2024 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery company. All rights reserved.

Originally published: December 23, 2024 at 7:52 am PST

When it involves consumer protection for airline passengers, Australia has long been hesitant.

The limited protective measures we’ve are based to a big extent on the final Australian consumer lawThe ‘consumer guarantees’ provided for on this law require only that services are provided inside the vague framework of a ‘reasonable time’.

This could also be positive if we’re only having a settee delivered from the furniture store. The cost of late delivery is minimal.

However, these safeguards weren’t tailored to the particular impact that delayed or cancelled flights can have on travellers. Australia’s lack of aviation-specific protections has long been a serious Pain point for air passengers, which has been exacerbated by the disruptions brought on by the pandemic.

The long-awaited Aviation white paperreleased in full on Monday, promised to handle this problem. At the center of the reforms are a brand new Australian Aviation Ombudsman System and a brand new Charter of Customer Rights for passengers.

Recognising that recent protections are needed is a step in the suitable direction, but this one-off White Paper missed the chance to attain way more by moving Australia towards the buyer protection model that has been in place for 20 years. Europe.

What makes air travel unique?

Passengers may expect to reach at their destination on the time (or roughly) indicated within the flight schedule by the airline on the time of payment for the reservation and issuance of the ticket.

If this isn’t possible, you need to at the very least arrive at a modified time that has been announced in good time in order that the relevant reservations and bookings can still be adjusted.

Air travel have to be on time as there isn’t a substitute for that. Even with a modest period of time, a automobile journey from Perth and even Sydney to Melbourne, for instance, isn’t a comparable option.

And the closer the departure date gets, the less opportunity passengers need to adjust their travel plans. In the previous few days before departure, hotel cancellation deadlines expire and alternative connecting flights are sold out or prices rise rapidly.

In some cases, traveling to a selected event may grow to be pointless for a passenger if the delay is long enough.

Australia must catch up

In contrast to Australia, many other industrialised countries have long had aviation-specific protection regulations in place.

In the European Union (EU), for instance, Regulations make clear that airlines have specific duties and responsibilities within the event of delays, cancellations and denied boarding. These include Right to compensation of as much as €600 (A$988).

This protection and the quantity of compensation for non-compliance with certain requirements for several types of flights are comprehensively regulated by law.

Canada has a barely different approach – Smaller regional transport corporations have different obligations than large line operators. But just like the European regulation, it requires the passenger to achieve the destination indicated on the ticket or to refund the ticket price if the journey has grow to be pointless.

The lack of such legally mandated protections in Australia implies that we often need to depend on the goodwill of the airline when something goes flawed.

Real measures were delayed

The central proposal of the White paper is the creation of a brand new ombudsman system with the ability to order airlines and airports to offer redress to consumers and to research customer complaints in regards to the conduct of airlines and airports. This will replace the prevailing one. Airline customer advisor.

A brand new charter of customer rights to be adopted as a part of this programme will give passengers “greater certainty about what they can expect in the event of flight cancellations and delays” and require airlines to be more transparent about their performance.

---

---

The White Paper highlighted the poor punctuality performance of Australian airlines. It also identified that the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission identified Problems with consumer protection for air travel in Australia as early as 2017. But his proposals don’t offer any truly measurable or enforceable improvements in consumer rights.

Despite proven models in comparable countries – lots of which have followed the EU's example – Australians may have to attend for further discussions before seeing what protective measures might ultimately be introduced.

The government's White Paper essentially just puts the issue on the back burner.

Passengers on Australian airlines are entitled to at the very least the identical assurances as travellers to and from Europe: within the event of a cancellation or major delay, they shall be taken to their destination as quickly as possible on an alternate flight.

In addition, they must be supplied with adequate food and accommodation until their onward journey, receive compensation within the event of long delays and have the chance to return home with a full refund of the associated fee of the journey whether it is pointless to forgo the journey.