When the brand new roller coaster debuts at Valencia Amusement Park in 2026, a brand new, unique ride at Six Flags Magic Mountain will take adventure seekers on an off-road motorcycle ride over rugged hilly terrain.

Magic Mountain announced plans in November to expand its collection of 20 roller coasters with a brand new, first-of-its-kind coaster ride in North America in 2026. This is a component of Six Flags' plan to spend $1 billion on latest rides over the subsequent two years.

The latest permit allows grading to start so Magic Mountain can construct retaining partitions, a station and a mechanical constructing for a brand new roller coaster.

In the development plans for Project 90011, the brand new ride is variously described as a “Six Flags Vekoma Coaster” or a “Six Flags Thrill Glider Roller Coaster.”

“These labels indicate that the new coaster will be a Vekoma Thrill Glider, a new model from the Dutch manufacturer that was first rumored to be a type of floating motorcycle coaster a few years ago,” it says Theme Park Insider.

Six Flags will spend $1 billion on 11 roller coasters over the subsequent two years

The Vekoma Thrill Glider could be built on 3.4 acres of the previous Showcase Theater site between the Full Throttle and Superman: Escape from Krypton roller coasters.

Since 2004, Vekoma has built straddle-style motorcycle coasters within the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and China – but never in North America.

Vekoma has manufactured several suspended roller coaster models – but has not yet produced a floating motorcycle roller coaster.

Magic Mountain features the 1988 Ninja roller coaster, but an off-road motocoaster that travels over hilly terrain would definitely add a contemporary twist to the ride concept.

Six Flags will release more details concerning the latest Magic Mountain coaster in summer 2025.

Originally published: January 7, 2025 at 4:37 am PST

BUFFALO, N.Y. — Matt Murray checked out the scoreboard above him, counted down the seconds as they disappeared and at last pumped his fist.

It had been 638 days since Murray last felt that feeling come over him.

Bilateral hip surgery forced the Toronto Maple Leafs goaltender out of your entire 2023-24 season, the ultimate term of his four-year contract. There was no guarantee that the oft-injured Murray would play within the NHL again. A one-year contract gave him the lifeline to proceed operating far out of the limelight within the AHL with only one goal.

And over a yr and a half later, Murray was back where he struggled: within the NHL win column after stopping 24 shots in a 6-3 victory over the Buffalo Sabres.

“A long way. A big mountain to climb. But I kept that moment in my mind on the days when it was difficult,” Murray said.

With every word he said after the sport, the 30-year-old's eyes became redder. His voice was shaking.

“A big release,” he said, struggling to seek out the correct words to place his nearly two-year absence from the NHL into perspective. “A rush of emotions.”

The goalkeeper's typical hugs along with his teammates after the win were tighter and longer. In a physical game where a player's profession can turn right away, Murray's return resonated way over the 2 points the Leafs also added that day.

“It’s nice to see (Murray) smile,” Steven Lorentz said, “because you know he’s back doing what he loves.”

In the locker room, Max Domi immediately presented Murray with the team's WWE-style wrestling belt as Player of the Game. Murray's inconsistent performance was secondary.

“He got the thing 100 percent, he deserved it,” Domi said. “The ability to mentally persevere after all those days where I'm sure he had a lot of doubts is a long road to recovery. “We're all super happy with him.”

It's easy to quantify how long Murray's journey back to the NHL took in days: 628 of them between his last two appearances.

It is much more difficult to describe exactly how difficult this journey is.

Injuries have dogged Murray throughout his career, having won back-to-back Stanley Cup titles in his first two seasons in the NHL with the Pittsburgh Penguins. From 2018 to 2022, his play declined each season. After being traded to the Leafs in the summer of 2022, he struggled through his first season. It was fair to wonder if hip surgery would be the final blow of his NHL career.

But Murray still stayed with his teammates at the Leafs' training facility during his rehabilitation last season, feeling so close but so far away from the league he once conquered.

“The fact that he’s on his way here right now says a lot about his character and his commitment to the game,” Lorentz said.

Murray had a stand full of his equipment at this facility that was never used. An important and human gesture from the Leafs organization, but still a reminder that Murray didn't play any NHL games.

Even after signing a one-year, $875,000 contract with the Leafs, he felt like the organization's No. 4 goaltender. When the Leafs needed a goaltender to replace the injured Anthony Stolarz, they called up Dennis Hildeby. The lanky Hildeby is seven years younger than Murray.

How could Murray not wonder if his NHL return would ever come?

“There were definitely times when it felt really difficult,” Murray said. “But whenever I felt like that, I had a great group of people around me. That’s the only reason I’m here.”

All Murray could do was work his tail off far from the public eye and quietly hope for the return that finally came on Friday evening.

“Emotions were high today,” Murray said.

These emotions were perhaps at their highest before the game. The typically stoic Murray allowed himself to pause and appreciate how far he had come.

“I was able to take a moment during warmups and during the anthem to look around and appreciate the long journey it has been and think of all the people who helped me get here,” Murray said.

It was a game that reminded viewers of the fragility of an NHL career. Only a few years separated Murray from winning the Stanley Cup to largely retiring from the NHL, all essentially before the age of 30.

“You feel bad for a guy like that because he works so hard and wants it so badly,” Lorentz said. “We’re all rooting for him.”

Murray moved quite well on his return. He swallowed many of the 27 shots the Sabers threw at him and looked every bit the veteran he’s. Murray had conceded two goals and was recalled after a video review. His long-range save on Sabers forward Alex Tuch was a reminder of the athleticism he can provide now that he's also fully healthy.

These are all qualities that Leafs fans could have forgotten. But they’re qualities which are still on the forefront of Murray's Leafs teammates.

“I haven't forgotten what he accomplished in his career in this league,” said Leafs forward Max Pacioretty, who is not any stranger to debilitating injuries that threaten his profession. “It's hard to even begin to remember what you've done, what you've achieved, because it seems like all the noise is always in the moment, be it the injury or what's happened recently. “

Perhaps the Leafs victory could have been predicted in advance. Sure, they were playing against a shaky Sabers team that had now lost twelve in a row. And they were worn by an up-and-coming, red-hot line consisting of Max Domi, Bobby McMann and Nick Robertson. They're the third line in name only: The trio combined for three goals and six points against the Sabres.

But the opponent shouldn't denigrate what was at the forefront not only for Murray, but also for the Leafs in Buffalo. They wanted to do right by a player who did everything in his power to return to the NHL. You didn't have to squint to see a defender like Jake McCabe throwing the Sabers out of Murray's crease with a little more vigor.

“It gives you some incentive to go the extra mile knowing that (Murray) went the extra mile just to get back to the position he's at,” Lorentz said. “It's not that he was half-hearted about getting back to this point and that he expected to be here. Surgeries and injuries like the one he went through can put a damper on your career for a long time. You may never be able to return to your old form.”

But Murray is working to get back to his old Matt Murray. And the Leafs' need for Murray won't end as they head north on the QEW back to Toronto.

Stolarz's earliest return from a knee injury is anticipated to be mid to late January. Hildeby doesn't exactly have the total confidence of the Leafs organization for the time being after allowing just a few poor goals against the Sabers at home in a recent outing, combined with a less-than-stellar AHL season up to now. He will likely develop into an NHL player down the road, but there’s room for him to proceed to develop and develop into more confident in his game.

But Murray has what no other goalie within the Leafs organization has: experience. And that's vital for Brad Treliving and Craig Berube: Both value games played and would like to depend on veterans if possible.

They will depend on Murray due to the whole lot he has done and been through in his profession.

After Friday night, this profession looks completely different.

“The reality is you have to take each day as it comes and you never know when it will all be over,” Pacioretty said. “So you don’t want to take days for granted.”

After drying his eyes and slowly removing his sweat-soaked goalkeeping gear, Murray sat alone within the locker room. The Leafs equipment staff stopped unloading bags from the locker room to softly pat him on the shoulder.

Murray looked up and saw a note on a board within the locker room. The Leafs bus would go away in 20 minutes. There was one other NHL game on the horizon.

He was capable of smile again, knowing that it definitely won't be 628 days before he can do what he loves.

LAS VEGAS – Boise State has not yet made a call whether it can face San Jose State within the Mountain West women's volleyball semifinals on Friday after losing two games to the Spartans within the regular season.

Boise State defeated Utah State 3 sets to 1 within the quarterfinals on Tuesday, winning the primary, third and fourth sets. The game was played between two of the five teams that selected to face San Jose State this season, resulting in uncertainty as as to whether the winner would face the Spartans within the semifinals.

“I don’t know what’s going to happen,” Boise State media director Doug Link said. “I think we’ll play, but there’s nothing more to say at this point.”

When further asked if he personally believed Boise State would decide to participate, Link again responded that he didn’t know and that the university couldn’t comment further presently.

Asked whether external pressure contributed to the choice, Link said he couldn’t comment. He didn’t give a timetable for the upcoming decision. The game is scheduled for Friday at 4:00 p.m. PT in Las Vegas.

Due to opponents refusing to play, SJSU was awarded six conference wins and 7 wins overall. Neither school explained why she withdrew, but after a lawsuit filed in September by Spartans co-captain Brooke Slusser and others, they claimed an SJSU teammate was transgender and argued she had benefits over opponents and teammates. Neither San Jose State nor the player have commented on the allegation, nor have any of the forfeit schools commented.

A legal motion in a second lawsuit in search of to bar the player from the tournament was rejected by a federal judge on Monday, and that call was upheld on appeal on Tuesday.

Largely because of these losses, San Jose State secured second place and a tournament bye to the conference semifinals. The Spartans enter conference play with a record of 12-5, but have gone 6-5 in actual Mountain West games played. Boise State finished 10-8 in conference play to complete in sixth place.

Originally published: November 27, 2024 at 6:42 pm PST

SAN JOSE – The site of a women's volleyball game between Nevada and San Jose State on Saturday has been moved from Reno, Nevada to San Jose.

The schools announced the choice in a joint statement Tuesday, with the Mountain West Conference concurring with the choice.

In the statement, the colleges said: “The decision to move the venue was made in the best interests of both programs and in the interest of the well-being of the student-athletes, coaches, athletic staff and spectators.”

Before the venue change, a bunch of Nevada players recently made an announcement that they’d not be taking the ground at their home game against the Spartans. The players referred to their “right to safety and fair competition”. However, the college reiterated that on the time the sport was still scheduled, the sport was still scheduled and that state law prohibits forfeiture “for reasons related to gender identity or gender expression.”

There continues to be a likelihood that the sport will probably be lost if the Wolf Pack decides to not play. Nevada plays at Fresno State on Thursday.

San Jose State has already had 4 teams cancel games this season – Southern Utah, Boise State, Wyoming and Utah State. Neither school explicitly explained why it fell into disrepair. All of those schools, aside from Southern Utah, are within the Mountain West.

Political figures from Wyoming, Idaho and Utah have spoken out, suggesting the cancellations are focused on protecting women's sports.

Mountain West commissioner Gloria Nevarez said last week that she was heartbroken about what has transpired across the Spartans and their opponents this season.

Originally published: October 22, 2024 at 5:45 p.m

Hunting large carnivores is a controversial issue in wildlife management and conservation. In the autumn of 2024, Colorado will probably be on the ballot where voters will weigh up Initiative 91a proposed ban on the hunting and trapping of cougars, bobcats and lynx within the state.

Wildlife authorities often use regulated hunting as a way of controlling predator populations, reducing impacts on endangered wildlife, or minimizing the danger of conflict between predators and humans, domestic animals, and livestock. But Scientific studies have questioned how effectively recreational hunting achieves these goals. And public attitudes are changing as participation in hunting declines.

We run Colorado State University Center for Human-Carnivore Coexistence And Centre for Animal and Human Policy. Together with our colleague Benjamin Ghasemiwe recently Colorado residents surveyed about their perceptions of mountain lion and black bear hunting within the state.

We found that support for hunting relies on the aim. Most Colorado residents oppose looking for trophies or for pleasure. Gender, age and other demographic aspects also play a job.

Meet the neighbors

Mountain lionsalso often known as pumas or cougars, live mainly within the western USA and are legally hunted in all western states except California. Black bearswhich mainly in Mountain and forest regions Deer are hunted in most states within the continental United States where they occur.

The Colorado Parks and Wildlife Agency estimates that roughly 3,800 to 4,400 adult mountain lions And 17,000 to twenty,000 black bears live in Colorado. They are found mainly within the Rocky Mountains, with the eastern edges of their range near more populated areas within the Front area.

According to the state, hunters in Colorado killed 502 mountain lions through the 2022-2023 hunting season and 1,299 black bears through the 2023 season.

Both species have conflicts with humans within the state. Most commonly, bears wander into mountain towns seeking garbage or other food left by humans. Mountain lions are occasionally seen in urban areas, and in rare cases people have attacked.

Different views on hunting

Our study collected responses from Colorado residents through two public mail surveys. Samples were weighted to be representative of the state's population demographics, including age, gender, level of urbanization, geographic region, and hunting participation.

Respondents' opinions on legal and controlled hunting of mountain lions were evenly split, with 41% in favor and 41% opposed. The same was true for black bears, with 46% in favor and 46% opposed.

Large majorities disapproved of hunting each animals as trophies, for hide or pelt, or for recreation. For cougars, 78% of respondents disapproved of trophy hunting; for black bears, 86% disapproved of trophy hunting. People also generally disapproved of hunting each species for his or her meat.

Respondents were more supportive of looking for other reasons. 63% and 57%, respectively, supported hunting mountain lions and black bears to guard people. And 56% supported hunting mountain lions to cut back harm to livestock.

Large majorities disapproved of hunting mountain lions with dogs (88%) or recorded electronic calls (75%). Most mountain lions hunted in Colorado are legally killed with the assistance of dogs that chase the cats after which herd them right into a tree or corner them. The use of electronic calls to draw the cats was allowed in some parts of western Colorado until 2024, when the practice was banned. banned resulting from hunting of mountain lionsHunting other carnivores resembling bobcats and coyotes stays legal.

Women, younger people, urban residents, and folks who identified or leaned toward Democrats tended to be less supportive of hunting than men, older people, rural residents, and Republicans. A study we published in 2022 on wolf reintroduction in Colorado found an analogous political split, with individuals who identified as Democrats more supportive of wolf reintroduction than among the many Republicans.

How can one coexist with carnivores?

Although Colorado residents generally support using hunting to cut back conflict between humans, black bears and mountain lions, studies suggest it will not be probably the most effective tool.

For example current experimental study in Ontario, Canadaconcluded that increased hunting of black bears didn’t reduce conflicts – especially in years when the bear’s natural food sources, resembling nuts and berries, were limited within the wild. An extended-term Study on bears in DurangoColorado, also found that the supply of natural food within the wild and the lure of human food in town were the essential causes of bear encounters.

Conversely, one other Studying in New Jersey – which is more densely populated than Colorado, making bears more prone to encounter people – concluded that well-regulated hunting of closely monitored black bear populations could help reduce conflict.

Similar to bear policy, Colorado uses hunting as a Mountain lion management toolThere is restricted scientific evidence that hunting mountain lions can prevent conflicts with them. A recent study found that young cougars from a hunting area in Nevada tended to avoid built-up areas. In contrast, young cats from a non-hunting area in California showed no preference for or against built-up areas.

Other correlational studies in Washington, California And Canada have suggested that hunting could also be exacerbating the issue. According to those researchers, hunting may disrupt the social dynamics and age structure of cougar populations, which could lead on to young cats moving into populated areas seeking latest territory, thus increasing their probabilities of encountering humans.

Overall, we consider that more reliable scientific information is required to guide predator management and test assumptions about how effective hunting is in addressing these problems. Further give attention to proactive, non-lethal strategies for conflict prevention is important.

Ultimately, promoting coexistence between humans and carnivores is usually way more about controlling humans than controlling predators. The secret is changing human behavior.

For example, inadequate waste storage attracts bears. The same goes for filling birdhouses in spring, summer and autumn. when bears are energeticSteps to Reduce encounters with mountain lions These include walking in groups and making noise, keeping dogs on a leash in distant areas, keeping pets indoors, and avoiding plants that attract deer, the cats' essential prey.

Big cats on the ballot

Colorado's Initiative 91 would ban the hunting and trapping of cougars, bobcats and lynx within the state. It would allow the killing of problem animals to guard human life, property and livestock.

Hunting and trapping bobcats, primarily to sell their pelts within the fur trade, is currently legal in Colorado. On average, hunters and trappers have 880 bobcats annually within the last three years, most of which were caught. Hunting and trapping are currently prohibited for lynx, that are endangered in Colorado and threatened nationwidehowever the proposed ban would protect them as their populations get better.

Colorado residents have already voted previously to limit the hunting of predators. They passed a People’s initiative in 1992 to ban bait, dogs and a spring hunting season for bears, and one other in 1996 to ban using leghold traps, poison and snares.

Our research adds to the growing evidence that Public opinion about hunting and carnivores is changingA growing share of Americans consider that humans should coexist with carnivores and oppose lethal control for the good thing about humans. Studies also suggest that ballot measures resembling Initiative 91 could occur more steadily while public attitudes are changing and an increasing number of different groups are attempting to influence wildlife management.

Wildlife managers will find it difficult to adapt to those changing values. Authorities may have to think about: more participatory methods that involve different interest groups within the decision-making process, develop latest financing mechanisms which might be less depending on hunting and fishing license fees, and review how and for whom they take care of wild animals.

There aren't many options for pre-show dinner near Mountain View's Shoreline Amphitheater, the Bay Area's largest concert venue. That's because its closest neighbors are likely to be high-tech corporations (most notably Google).

But you can find some great food options in the world in the event you know where to look. Here are a few of one of the best restaurants near Shoreline. And if you desire to know what food options can be found locally, now we have those too.

Restaurants nearby:

Kitchen Twenty — Start your concert evening with a visit to this upscale Italian restaurant, which offers all the pieces from filet mignon and seafood paella to fettuccine with duck confit and kale ravioli. Details: 1390D Pear Ave., Mountain View, www.cucinaventi.com

In-N-Out — People go crazy for this legendary Southern California burger joint, which has long lines before and after shows. Super hungry? Try the Double-Double or Triple-Triple. Details: 1159 N. Rengstorff Ave., Mountain View

Los Altos Taqueria — Don't let the name idiot you. This place is in Mountain View, not Los Altos. And it's one in all our favourite places to eat a burrito off Shoreline. Details: 2105 Old Middlefield Way, Mountain View, www.losaltostaqueria.com

Originally published: September 3, 2024 at 2:50 p.m.

The founders of Internet search and digital promoting giant Google wrote in a 1998 document that the goals of internet advertising “do not always” align with useful Internet search results.

Now that Google has been found to have an illegal search monopoly, critics claim that the corporate that has change into synonymous with Internet search, as Sergey Brin and Larry Page fearedhas shifted “away from the needs of consumers.”

Google has “become greedy,” said well-known technology industry critic Ed Zitron in an interview.

Today, once you type a search term into Google, you frequently find relevant information, but you furthermore may get a page of promoting, followed by links to web sites with content designed to convert views and clicks into money. Recent research shows that e-commerce sites like Amazon and crowdsourcing sites like Reddit and Google's own YouTube are increasingly appearing in search results.

Google didn’t reply to questions on its search product and the federal court's monopoly ruling. In a blog post this 12 months, the corporate said it has used “advanced spam defense systems” for many years and in 2022 began adjusting its website rating systems to “reduce unhelpful, unoriginal content and keep it at a very low level” while “algorithmic improvements” would help “surface the most helpful information.”

Judge Amit P. Mehta's landmark monopoly ruling within the Justice Department's case against Google last month has put the Mountain View company's hugely popular search engine within the highlight. Mehta, of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, said Google's conclusion in a 2020 study that it will not lose search revenue if it drastically reduced search quality was evidence of an illegal monopoly.

On September 6, Mehta will begin the following phase of the U.S. Justice Department's case against Google, which he says controls not less than 90 percent of the U.S. web search market. The goal is to strip Google of its monopoly on the search engine. In his 277-page ruling, the judge focused on the corporate's payments to firms like Apple and Samsung to make Google the default search engine. He said, “Most devices in the U.S. come pre-installed with Google only.”

Critics argue that the corporate’s freedom from competition allows it to neglect quality, while money – 238 billion US dollars in promoting revenue last 12 months – rolls in.

Zitron, CEO of San Francisco public relations firm EZPR and host of the iHeart podcast “Better Offline,” said internal Google emails revealed within the lawsuit suggested that a change in top-level management led to less user-friendly changes to look results.

According to the emails, Google's top managers declared a “Code Yellow” emergency five years ago due to declining search growth and the high promoting revenues related to it. While Google's accountants searched for solutions, search engine managers anxious concerning the conflict identified by founders Brin and Page. Search engine boss Ben Gomes complained that his department was being pushed “too close to the money” and was “too busy with advertising for the good of the product and the company.”

Slightly over a 12 months later, Google combined search and promoting right into a single unit under promoting chief Prabhakar Raghavan. Gomes, who had spent twenty years constructing the search function, was relegated to education initiatives.

Google has began prioritizing the variety of searches over the standard of results “so they can show you as many ads as possible,” Zitron claimed.

The company's search results page has change into cluttered lately with ads marked as “sponsored” that don't help the user but are lucrative for Google. Spammers and marketers use keywords and content tricks to push certain sites higher in the outcomes, leaving Google to play catch-up while users pay in wasted time and frustration.

“I've never seen so many people complaining or raising issues about Google's results as I have in the last year,” said Lily Ray, vice chairman of promoting agency Amsive, which researches Google search trends. “I see a ton of spam in Google search results. It's never been more obvious to me.”

Mehta said “some evidence” showed Google's search spending had declined, and on the rare occasions when competition emerged, the corporate was quick to take a position in improvements. But the judge said innovations could increase its already dominant market share, calling Google the “highest quality search engine” within the technology industry.

But Christopher Hockett, an associate professor at UC Berkeley's law school, said: “The rationale behind all this is that the quality would be higher if there was more competition.”

Research from Illinois-based Amsive shows that Google's updates lately have made certain kinds of sites less visible. These include sites that use stock images or photos from social media, present AI-generated content that lacks expertise, or contain intrusive promoting or a lot of cash-per-click links. When it involves product search, nevertheless, many high-ranking product comparison sites make cash when a user clicks through to a brand's site to buy. Or, as Ray noted, they’re “pay-to-play” businesses that charge brands money to be listed on their site.

The changes Google made this 12 months appear to have pushed product review sites down while e-commerce stores, particularly Amazon, appear near the highest, often together with YouTube, Amsive said. The New York Times' popular website Wirecutter, whose product reviews are based on extensive testing, now often ranks behind web forums Reddit and Quora for top product results, Ray said.

Reddit's visibility has increased by greater than 1,000% this 12 months in comparison with 2023, Amsive found. In July 2023, a Google seek for “how to teach a boy to use the potty” only returned pregnancy and medical sites and YouTube in the highest 10 results, with the Mayo Clinic at No. 1. In July of this 12 months, a five-year-old Reddit post rose from No. 50 to No. 2, landing ahead of “authoritative sites like the Mayo Clinic,” Amsive reported.

Google could have developed technology to seek out probably the most helpful answers to questions, but apparently decided to “just put Reddit there,” Zitron said.

Thousands of layoffs at Google lately have eroded institutional knowledge in search, Zitron said, and “they may have fired so many people that the thing no longer works.”

Google's race to compete within the generative AI hype that began with the discharge of ChatGPT in 2022 “might explain why some things have fallen by the wayside in search,” Ray said. She added, “They have a monopoly. They are the default search engine. Their stock is going up and up. What incentive do they have to change that?”

Barry Schwartz, CEO of New York-based software company RustyBrick and editor of the blogs Search Engine Land and Search Engine Roundtable, said Google is always innovating and experimenting with search. “I probably see five to 10 new things a day in terms of testing,” Schwartz said. “Probably one of their main things they focus on is making sure the content in the search results is useful.”

Still, Schwartz said, “If Google was under competitive pressure and had to do more, I think it would.”

Originally published: September 1, 2024 at 6:00 a.m.

The recent season pass combo for Knott's Berry Farm and Six Flags Magic Mountain costs $1,459 lower than a comparable Disneyland pass, a whole bunch of dollars lower than a Universal Studios Hollywood pass, and about half the worth of SeaWorld and Legoland passes.

Knotts Season Passes for 2025 go on sale on Thursday, August eighth with a heavy discount and can last until September 2nd.

A Southern California season pass valid just for Knott's and Magic Mountain isn’t currently planned.

Knott's is now offering an All Park Passport with the Gold season pass for $190 and the Prestige pass for $474, which provide access to all Cedar Fair and Six Flags parks in 2025. The limited-time sale runs through September 2, after which prices are expected to extend.

Both the Gold and Prestige Passes haven’t any blackout dates. The Prestige Pass includes parking and other perks.

The 2025 passes will give passholders access to Knott's and other Cedar Fair parks for the rest of 2024 and all of next yr. Access to Magic Mountain and all other Six Flags parks begins January 6.

The recent all-park pass with no blackout dates for Knott's, Magic Mountain and all Six Flags and Cedar Fair parks costs $190, significantly cheaper than similar passes for other Southern California theme parks.

The Inspire Key Annual Pass, for $1,649, is valid at Disneyland and Disney California Adventure almost day-after-day of the yr—with blackout dates of about two weeks.

There are not any blackout dates for the $599 Universal Studios Hollywood Platinum Annual Pass.

Disney and Universal don’t offer annual passes which might be valid for all of their parks worldwide.

SeaWorld San Diego offers a Platinum Pass for $369, which also includes United theme parks in Florida, Texas, Virginia and Pennsylvania.

Legoland California sells an Elite Pass for $349, which will be used at Legoland parks in Florida and New York, in addition to other Merlin Entertainments locations.

Originally published: August 8, 2024 at 11:48 am