A judge of the district of San Mateo has the best way to come to a decision whether the supervisory authority must have the authority to remove the sheriff, released, released and a provisional judgment on Wednesday, February 26.

Sheriff Christina Corpus, which is accused of corruption and misconduct within the work palle, stipulated a petition on January 10 in front of the San Mateo Supreme Court to dam the Measure A from the ballot paper on March 4, and argued that the measure was illegal. However, the court decided that the alternative was as planned.

“The problem before the court is a narrower. The Court of Justice does not deal with the methodology, substance, merits or findings of the report, which judge Ladoris Cordell (RET) submitted to the board, and the court also does not make any statements or decisions about the allegations mentioned therein, ”wrote judge of San Mateo, Nicole Heale, in her preliminary decision. “Rather, this decision is only based on the question of whether the special elections for March 4, 2025 should be as planned.”

Unless it’s controversial, the judgment becomes the ultimate order of the court.

Corpus didn’t answer the request of this news organization whether she was planning to query the choice.

The judge also said that he couldn’t choose the prejudices of Corpus by the board.

“After the” separation of the powers doctrine “, the courts cannot ask for the impulse or the motif for legislative measures,” said Healy in her judgment. “Whether the exercise of legislative powers, a board of directors acts carefully or unclear, is not a concern of the courts”, “

The district of the district of San Mateo, John Nibbelin, said he expected the decision.

“From the start we expected that the court agreed that the district was properly placed for measurement A for the ballot paper for the special elections on March 4, 2025,” said Nibbelin. “We look forward to this result. We believe that the decision of the sheriff not to question the preliminary judgment, reflect the strength of the legal position of the district and the care with which judge Healy prepared its decision. “

Corpus was increasingly checked whether misconduct, corruption and an inappropriate relationship with its former chief of staff Victor Aenlle. Despite the demands for her resignation of Sheriff's Captains, union members, six cities in San Mateo County and congress leaders, she refused to step down.

In response to this, the supervisory authority of the San Mateo district passed a Charter change from the district districts, which might give them the authority to temporarily remove a sheriff from office.

The verdict comes since the election is already good and the ballot papers are distributed to greater than 440,000 voters. On Wednesday at 4:30 p.m., the electoral office of the San Mateo district received 72,476 ballots, while 192 voters had sold their ballot papers in coordination centers. The last election day is March 4th.

According to election officers within the district, the special elections cost taxpayers a minimum of 3.8 million dollars.

If the measurement of a passport and the office of the sheriff becomes free, the supervisory board has several options: If you immediately appoint a brand new sheriff, provide public interviews before choosing a substitute or call a special alternative.

If the board doesn’t act inside 30 days, the election officer must call an election. A spokesman for the district previously said that the superiors had not yet decided whether or not they would appoint a successor or hold a special election.

If the measure fails, Corpus could proceed to confront the efforts to remove, including an investigation by the civil jury or a recall alternative. The supervisory authorities previously discussed these options after they censored them and demanded their resignation in November 2024.

Corpus has biased Cordell's examination and rejected politically motivated. She didn’t answer what she desires to do when measuring a passport.

There is not any provision within the district chart or within the state election code that forestalls corpus from running again for sheriff.

A person was killed in a collision in San Mateo on Saturday in a collision in San Mateo, and the police asks the general public to discover the suspects involved.

The victim was Mark Kremer, a 56-year-old inhabitant of San Mateo. The police said that the incident occurred on Saturday shortly before 9 p.m. in a press release from the police authority that the crash west of the 1400 block of the Fashion Island Boulevard near the bridge took place towards South Norfolk Street. The police said Kremer had been approached by an unknown automobile and died of his injuries on the scene.

The San Mateo police ask the general public whether there are witnesses or video material that might have caught the crash. The crash occurred near a pc business near Iona Technology Inc. The police asked the individuals who live, work, work or visited, or visited all of the camera meters that they might record between South Norfolk Street and Chess Drive concentrated specifically on the world of ​​1400 fashion Island BLVD. and South Norfolk Street, on Saturday between 8:45 p.m. and 9 p.m.

The police said that also they are open to Dash -CAM film material for vehicles which might be east or west of the South Norfolk Street on the Fashion Island Boulevard, which can have recorded other vehicles in the world before or after the crash.

The police also encouraged the suspect to report as an alternative of getting the police find.

“It is not easy to carry to carry the scene of the accident and we understand that he will probably refer to it,” the police said of their press release. “The stress of the unknown can be a severe burden, but we ask you to do the right thing and report it forward.”

Anyone who has details about this case has been instructed to contact the Jolivette commissioned by jjolivette@cityofsanmateo.org by email to jjolivette@cityofsanmateo.

The case is just not related to an H5N1 incident, through which, in line with the County Executive office, a foci in San Mateo accommodates a poultry herd within the back yard.

The cat was recorded by half Moon Bay family. When it showed symptoms, they brought it to the human society within the peninsula, the veterinarians of which examined the cat and applied for tests.

The laboratory results confirmed that the cat had H5N1 and was put to sleep attributable to its condition, said officials.

According to the centers, the danger of spreading the virus to humans is incredibly low for the control and prevention of diseases, and the incident didn’t result in people in any cases.

Cats might be exposed to H5N1 by eating infected birds, contaminating with the virus in environments and using pasteurized milk from infected cows or raw costers.

The case shows how necessary it’s to forestall the spread of the virus proactively, said officials. Residents whose pets show signs of diseases should contact their vet.

H5N1 infected pets can experience a lack of appetite, lethargy and fever in addition to neurological signs reminiscent of circle, tremors, seizures or blindness, said civil servants.

The disease can quickly result in depression, discharges from the eyes or nose and other respiratory diseases reminiscent of sneezing or coughing, said officials. Death is feasible in severe cases.

Originally published: February 6, 2025 at 10:59 p.m. PST

San Mateo County defended itself against a $10 million government lawsuit filed last month by embattled Sheriff Christina Corpus. She claims the county's investigation into alleged misconduct and corruption by her administration stems from harassment and discrimination.

“The allegations in Corpus' claim – that she has been discriminated against, harassed and defamed, particularly because she is both a woman and a Latina person – are completely baseless and distract from the issues that give rise to the current circumstances,” the said county in a press release released this week.

Filing a state lawsuit is a required step before a lawsuit can begin.

The lawsuit follows the November 2024 release of an independent audit by retired Judge LaDoris Cordell detailing allegations of misconduct, corruption and workplace bullying involving Corpus and her former chief of staff Victor Aenlle on the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office were described.

“The government’s lawsuit, which contains false and misspelled names – including those of the sheriff himself and Supervisor Noelia Corzo – is largely devoid of alleged facts supporting its conclusions and egregiously accuses retired Judge LaDoris Cordell of complicity to be what the lawsuit calls an 'evil scheme,'” the county said.

Brad Gage, a lawyer for Corpus, claimed that the investigation led by Cordell was at risk and pointed to the former judge's financial compensation as a potential conflict of interest.

“Generally, investigators are paid by the municipal employer – in this case, the county,” Gage previously told this news organization. “If their results are not in the employer’s favor, they risk losing future business. It’s a lucrative system for those who conduct these investigations.”

The district rejected these allegations on the grounds that paying for the investigation was common practice when hiring external auditors.

“With respect to the cost of the investigation, Cordell was contracted at $750 per hour, and the investigation and associated report cost approximately $200,000 to complete,” the county said, publicly citing Cordell for the first time amount paid is known.

The county said the cost reflects the extensive work that was done, including interviews with 40 current and former employees, and the time it took to adjudicate numerous complaints.

“This is consistent with the expense of a complex and sensitive investigation of this nature, as well as the level of experience, expertise and unique qualifications that Cordell brought to the matter,” it said.

Another issue raised in the lawsuit concerns an alleged missing 29 pages from Cordell's interview with Aenlle, according to Gage.

The district denied that the omission of pages from Aenlle's interview was “disgraceful.” .

“Twenty-nine pages of the transcript were not included in the exhibit because they were not cited by Cordell nor were they relevant to the report,” the county statement said. “There was nothing wrong with these pages not being included, but given the level of interest, they are now available on the county website.”

Gage disagreed, saying the missing pages were essential to the investigation.

“It shouldn’t have been held back and hidden,” Gage said in a telephone interview Thursday. “Maybe it wasn't cited by Judge Cordell, but it surely must have been, because those are the pages that show lots of the conclusions are usually not supported.”

This March, San Mateo County voters will decide whether to give the Board of Supervisors the authority to remove Corpus from office, which would remain in effect until the end of Corpus' term in 2028. County election officials estimate the cost of the election to be more than $3.8 million.

The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, two sheriff's deputy unions, sheriff's department heads, several congressional and local politicians, and the city of San Carlos have all passed votes of no confidence in Corpus' leadership. She also faces a separate investigation into alleged campaign finance violations.

Despite mounting pressure, Corpus refused to resign or allow recall efforts.

“The defendants (San Mateo County) have now used the false investigation to seek an unprecedented recall – one that ends when Sheriff Corpus’ term expires – in an attempt to fire her based on false allegations,” says the lawsuit. “It’s time to fight back and bring the truth to light. This government claim is just part of that process.”

Originally published: January 9, 2025 at 3:42 pm PST

The response to a domestic violence incident in San Mateo County is comparable to that of law enforcement in lots of other places: officers show up, investigate, possibly take motion and connect survivors to a domestic violence hotline for help if needed.

But soon a trained domestic violence advocate will accompany officers on DV calls in three areas of the county as a part of a pilot program designed to assist domestic violence survivors get out of dangerous situations and find the support they need.

“We believe this program will save lives,” said San Mateo County Sheriff Christina Corpus. “We didn’t want to have any more statistics.”

The program is in response to a spike in homicides in domestic violence incidents in 2023, when five women were killed in domestic violence incidents within the county, said Karen Ferguson, CEO of Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse, the organization that may employ the attorneys.

Between 2010 and 2017, there have been between one and two homicides per 12 months related to domestic violence incidents, in line with a Report compiled by San Mateo County. The 12 months 2021 was the identical as last 12 months, with five such murders, in line with the district.

“There is a really small window of time in which we can reach a survivor and offer them support and help and give them reassurance that they will not be alone, that they are protected and have the resources they need.” Corpus said.

In response to the rise in domestic violence-related homicides in San Mateo County, Supervisor Noelia Corzo mobilized a task force to review domestic violence interventions within the county. Inspired by an analogous program in Queensland, Australia, Corpus developed a co-response model that gave rise to the Domestic Violence Emergency Response Team.

The model will initially be tested on the San Mateo and Daly City police departments, in addition to the North Fair Oaks Sheriff's Office branch, in line with a county news release. The 30-month contract includes about six months of ramp-up time, Ferguson said. CORA is within the technique of hiring attorneys and searching for candidates who speak multiple languages ​​and have experience working with survivors of domestic violence, it said Job commercial.

The attorneys can be hired and supervised by CORA but anchored inside police departments because this system also goals to “learn from each other,” Ferguson added.

“Have [the co-responder] Being a part of CORA and really understanding the cycles and the trauma and the resources that it takes to help someone – because they're an expert in working with victims of domestic violence – we thought that automatically the would be the best partnership there is.” Corpus said.

When they receive a call, police officers will arrive first to secure the scene, Ferguson said. Then the co-response advocate will arrive in their own vehicle to speak with the survivor and provide them with support resources and will follow up the next day.

“We want to get there as often as possible, and we want to get as close to the crisis as possible,” Ferguson said. “When we bring these two things together, we have a better opportunity to help someone mobilize and make meaningful change in a safe way.”

Ferguson pointed out that many factors come into play in a person's decision to leave an abusive relationship: how to pay for housing, what impact it may have on children, how long it has been since last work.

“There are many, many complicating factors,” Ferguson said. “There are many explanation why people find yourself reconciling and deciding to remain, and that's why we frequently need to knock on their door just a few times.”

Because the attorneys will be employed by CORA, they will provide domestic violence survivors direct access to CORA's other services, which include case management, free legal and mental health services, emergency housing and long-term rental assistance, Ferguson said. They can also help connect survivors with services offered by partner agencies.

Before implementing that program, police referred CORA to those involved in the incidents and had advocates and survivors “play phone tag,” Ferguson said, increasing the chances that families would reconcile. Advocates only have a 30% to 50% success rate when it comes to connecting with survivors through day-after outreach, she added.

“If we’re standing right there, at least 100% have chatted with us now,” she added. “Many assumptions and fears can be dispelled immediately. But you know, if we try to make contact the next day, they might be more cautious about taking that call.”

For calls outside of work hours, the program works in parallel with the emergency response program, where police connect survivors with a CORA hotline 24 hours a day.

To resolve whether to expand this system, law enforcement and CORA will monitor whether it has a positive impact, Ferguson said. A research and evaluation advisory group will help develop the metrics to be measured.

Initially, they are going to primarily take a look at three metrics, Ferguson added: the services customers use through ERP versus those through a co-responder, the prevalence of repeat offenders and whether law enforcement higher understands the mentality of victim advocates and vice versa.

“I’m really looking forward to the success of the program and I’m really an advocate for other law enforcement agencies and other sheriff’s offices to model this program,” Corpus said. “The most important thing here is to save lives and help the victims’ families.”

San Mateo County health officials have announced the primary known case of a severe type of Mpox, which has led to an outbreak of the disease throughout East and Central Africa.

The county health department said Saturday that it’s working with state and native health officials to reply to the case of Clade Impox, which an individual within the county contracted while traveling to Africa. The person appeared to have “mild” symptoms and is isolating and recovering at home, the health authority said.

The case was the primary known case of this particular version of MPOX within the United States, adding to the relatively small but growing number of nations all over the world which have discovered cases of it. A special version of the virus, called clade II, has been circulating within the United States since 2022 and has sickened at the least 108 people within the county and greater than 100,000 people worldwide lately.

The recently discovered version is thought to cause more severe illness and a better mortality rate than the version previously discovered within the United States. Still, local health officials said the danger to the general public from the virus, which might cause a painful rash in addition to fever, chills and muscle aches, was “very low.”

Local health officials are working to succeed in anyone who could have had contact with the infected person, and on this case they’re expected to achieve this, said Preston Merchant, a spokesman for the San Mateo County Health Department.

“There is no concern or evidence that MPox clade I is currently spreading among individuals in San Mateo County or elsewhere in the United States,” the health agency said in a news release Saturday.

The version of the virus discovered in San Mateo County is at the middle of an outbreak that has killed greater than 1,000 people in Central and East Africa this yr, with most of those cases occurring within the Democratic Republic of Congo. The spread of the virus prompted the World Health Organization to declare a public health emergency of international concern in August, particularly because the virus spread to several other neighboring countries in Africa.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, travelers who contracted the virus in Africa tested positive for the version in Germany, India, Kenya, Sweden, Thailand, the United Kingdom, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

The virus typically spreads through skin-to-skin, intimate and sexual contact, and folks can even grow to be infected with it by directly touching contaminated objects and surfaces utilized by people affected by Mpox, Landes say – and federal officials.

Originally published: November 16, 2024 at 3:32 pm PST

“As part of its commitment to a comprehensive, transparent and independent investigation, the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors will engage an independent firm to investigate the allegations made by Sheriff Christina Corpus,” Supervisors Noelia Corzo and Ray Mueller said in an announcement on behalf of the board.

The supervisors said the board also directed the county attorney's office to tell the California Attorney General's Office of “matters related to the sheriff's office.”

In a criticism Sunday, Corpus said any investigation into Callagy “should cover his attempts to conspire against an elected sheriff, discrimination, sexual harassment, abuse of power and ongoing interference in the operations of the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office.”

Corpus said it will refer the matter to the state level if the board didn’t act.

Corzo and Mueller said Monday that the panel is reviewing the criticism and can “take the time necessary to determine the appropriate course of action.” Callagy, they noted, “rejects the sheriff's allegations as false and defamatory” and “welcomes a full, transparent and independent investigation of all allegations made against him.”

“County Executive Callagy has been an ethical public servant in San Mateo County for over 41 years,” supervisors said Monday. “Unless proven otherwise, the board will continue to have complete faith and trust in his leadership.”

The criticism comes as a part of a separate investigation the committee commissioned to look into “multiple personnel allegations” related to the sheriff's office. Former Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge LaDoris Cordell is leading the independent investigation.

That investigation took a surprising turn last week when Mueller revealed that Corpus Assistant Sheriff Ryan Monaghan, her third deputy, had been fired after Cordell questioned him. The timing “suggests possible retaliation” against Monaghan for his participation within the investigation, Mueller said Friday in an announcement on behalf of the panel.

Cordell was asked to analyze whether Corpus took any retaliatory motion against Monaghan.

In its criticism, Corpus said Monaghan was fired due to his “performance underperformance and failure to expeditiously implement the goals of the Sheriff's Office,” not because he sat down for an interview with Cordell.

REDWOOD CITY – Tensions are escalating between San Mateo County Sheriff Christina Corpus and the Board of Supervisors: The San Mateo County Sheriff is asking for an investigation into County Executive Mike Callagy, while the sheriff is standing behind him.

In a grievance to the board on Sunday, Corpus accused Callagy of undermining her authority and undermining the effectiveness of her office.

“This investigation should cover his (Callagy's) attempts to conspire against an elected sheriff, discrimination, sexual harassment, abuse of power and ongoing interference in the operations of the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office,” Corpus said within the letter. “If the committee does not act, I will have no choice but to escalate this matter to the state level.”

The board is reviewing Corpus' grievance and “will take the time necessary to determine the appropriate course of action,” supervisors Noelia Corzo and Ray Mueller said Monday in an announcement on behalf of the board. Callagy “rejects the sheriff's allegations as false and defamatory” and “welcomes a full, transparent and independent investigation into all allegations made against him,” the supervisors said.

“County Executive Callagy has been an ethical public servant in San Mateo County for over 41 years,” they said. “Unless proven otherwise, the board will continue to have complete faith and trust in his leadership.”

In her grievance, Corpus paints a really different picture of Callagy. During their first meeting after her election, he told her that she had to reveal who she had met inside the district and when, Corpus said. She called the request “inappropriate and offensive.”

“As a woman of color who has endured sexual harassment in this county, I was shocked and appalled by his inappropriate behavior,” the sheriff said. “I cannot imagine he would have made such a demand of my predecessors, who were all men.”

Corpus also accused Callagy of exceeding his authority and interfering within the sheriff's office's operations. She said “a glaring example” was his decision to authorize double additional time “without involving me.” The move cost the county and taxpayers $17 million and had other consequences, in line with Corpus.

“This interference not only circumvented my authority, but also set a dangerous precedent,” Corpus said. “Mr. Callagy's actions destabilized labor relations, undermined my ability to lead effectively, and compromised safety in our correctional facilities. With Mr. Callagy's support, unions developed the false notion that their negotiations went beyond labor issues and included personnel matters.”

Corpus was apparently referring to a recent vote of no confidence in her chief of staff, Victor Aenlle. The unions representing the MPs and sergeants claim Aenlle has abused and demeaned their members and exceeded his civilian role by making decisions about their duties. Corpus dismissed the vote as a political ploy by special interests to undermine her leadership and pressure her into personnel changes.

The heated disagreement comes amid an independent investigation commissioned by the Board of Supervisors into “multiple personnel allegations” related to the sheriff's office. The investigation is being led by former Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge LaDoris.

That investigation took a surprising turn last week when Mueller revealed that Corpus Assistant Sheriff Ryan Monaghan, her third deputy, had been fired after Cordell questioned him. The timing “suggests possible retaliation” against Monaghan for his participation within the investigation, Mueller said Friday in an announcement on behalf of the panel.

Cordell was asked to analyze whether Corpus took any retaliatory motion against Monaghan.

In its grievance, Corpus said Monaghan was fired not for sitting down for an interview with Cordell, but due to his “duplicity in performance and failure to expeditiously implement the goals of the Sheriff's Office.”

“This decision had nothing to do with retaliation,” Corpus said, stating that it was her decision alone as an elected sheriff to fireplace an unterminated and unclassified worker.

The sheriff suggested that the county executive – through the board – was using its position to intervene in Monaghan's dismissal, stating that the 2 had a “long personal relationship.”

“Mr. Callagy's interference in internal personnel matters is not only inappropriate, it is legally unfounded and an attempt to undermine the democratic process. It sets a dangerous precedent that could lead to further destabilization of the district administration,” she said.

Corpus questioned whether Callagy would have treated her male predecessors the identical way.

“His actions are an example of the challenges women – especially women of color – continue to face in leadership positions, particularly in male-dominated fields like policing,” she said.

Corpus said she was disillusioned but not surprised by the panel's response to her grievance.

“This is what I have experienced for years in this county,” the sheriff wrote in a response Monday afternoon. “Your response does not address the serious concerns I raised regarding Mr. Callagy's inappropriate behavior. It sends a clear message: If you are a woman in San Mateo County and file a complaint, you will be fired.”

Check back later for updates.