SAN JOSE – A burst of holiday air travel helped San Jose's passenger trips zoom higher in December, offering hope for momentum in 2025 – although travel fell for all of 2024.

December's numbers were a 6.8% improvement over November activity, when the airport took on about 954,800 passengers.

However, the South Bay travel complex had a difficult 12 months overall in 2024 in comparison with 2023.

In 2024, San Jose International Airport served 11.85 million passengers, up 2% from the 12.1 million passengers the aviation center handled in 2023, recent statistics show.

San Jose Airport, the first aviation hub serving Silicon Valley, also received a significant award from an influential air travel industry analyst.

Cirium, which analyzes and tracks aviation statistics and trends, cited San Jose 2024 for on-time performance. Cirium also noted that San Jose Had the six best on-time performance worldwide amongst medium-sized airports.

“San Jose International Airport continues to exemplify excellence as an important gateway to our region and city,” said San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan.

The Cirium report found that 84.7% of San Jose airport departures in 2024 were on time.

In the identical study, Oakland Airport, officially referred to as San Francisco Bay Oakland International Airport, reported 81.1% of its departures occurred on time.

This helped Oakland Airport rank eleventh amongst mid-sized airports.

San Francisco International Airport didn’t make the highest 20 amongst major airports and was not mentioned within the report.

San Jose International Airport trends could provide a foundation for growth in 2025.

“Our team is committed to providing the best travel experience,” said Mookie Patel, San Jose aviation director.

The San Jose Airport recently reported that two airlines have decided to supply recent nonstop service that may connect San Jose to Las Vegas, Detroit and Baltimore starting within the spring and summer.

“We look forward to a new year of additional routes, new dining and shopping options, and continued investment in making San Jose Airport the easiest airport for Silicon Valley travelers,” Patel said.

Originally published: January 27, 2025 at 11:40 am PST

By Deidre McPhillips | CNN

Whooping cough has been on the rise within the United States for months, and the newest data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention suggests there aren’t any signs of slowing down.

According to preliminary information, greater than 32,000 cases have been reported up to now this yr Data from mid-December – about six times greater than this time last yr and greater than ever before since 2014.

RELATED: Flu surges in US as vaccinations lag, and here COVID and RSV infections are rising

Whooping cough, also generally known as whooping cough, is a really contagious respiratory disease. For many, the bacterial infection begins with symptoms much like a chilly—a runny nose, sneezing, mild fever, and dry cough—but after per week or two it may well grow to be a painful, full-body cough. These coughing suits might be so severe that they result in vomiting or broken ribs. They are sometimes accompanied by a wheezing sound because the person tries to catch their breath.

This cough can last for weeks or months, and the infectious bacteria might be spread for weeks after the cough develops. However, some infections might be so mild that they spread the disease without even knowing they’ve the disease.

Like many respiratory illnesses, whooping cough cases fell to low levels through the pandemic as people limited their social interactions and took other precautions to ward off Covid-19. According to the CDC, there are spikes in reported whooping cough cases every few years, and the newest trends suggest the U.S. is returning to pre-pandemic trends.

But reported cases have been rising sharply for months and have greater than doubled since mid-September, CDC data shows. About 1 / 4 of all cases have been reported within the Midwest, including Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin. More cases have been reported in Pennsylvania than another state.

While whooping cough might be serious at any age, children under one yr old are particularly sensitive because their immune systems are still developing. This is very true for infants and young children who haven’t received all really useful vaccinations.

But childhood vaccination rates have increased fallen; Only about 92% of kindergarten students had received their DTaP vaccine for the 2023-2024 school yr, below the federal goal of 95% and leaving 1000’s of college children in danger. Protection amongst those vaccinated can be possible fade over time.

Antibiotics can treat the infection, but only whether it is detected throughout the first few weeks, before the strenuous, painful cough occurs. Then the one treatment is comfort care with loads of rest and fluids while the infection progresses.

As the US enters the winter season, overall respiratory disease activity is comparatively moderate. surveillance Data suggests that Covid-19 levels are beginning to rise from low levels and flu levels are also continuing to rise.

The CNN Wire
& © 2024 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery company. All rights reserved.

Black adults living with long COVID pointed to issues with their physical health — moderately than their mental health — when asked to explain their long COVID symptoms. This is a central finding of our study latest studypublished within the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities.

However, once we examined the information further, we found that those living with long COVID within the US had significantly higher levels of hysteria, depression, hopelessness, psychosis and suicidal ideation than those without long COVID.

In other words, while participants were clear about how long COVID was affecting their physical health, they were less prone to attribute their recent mental health struggles to issues stemming from their experiences with long COVID.

For the study, we asked nearly 500 Black adults within the U.S. to finish a series of psychological questionnaires measuring various mental health outcomes within the spring of 2022. All participants, no matter their Long COVID status, provided responses to those survey questions.

Next, we asked study participants to explain their Long COVID symptoms by typing short phrases or sentences in their very own words. When we analyzed their written responses, we found that participants mostly referred to physical or cognitive health conditions similar to chest pain, difficulty respiratory, persistent cough, headache, memory loss, vision or smell problems, and severe physical pain.

This discrepancy between how individuals described their Long COVID symptoms and what they reported within the survey underscores the importance of collecting multiple forms of knowledge – especially when studying complex topics like Long -COVID in marginalized populations.

We used qualitative and quantitative evaluation techniques to discover points of overlap and divergence between the 2 data sources.

These approaches are consistent with our work as Suicide prevention And preventive medicine Researchers where we study issues on the intersection of race, mental health, and physical health promotion.

Why it matters

During the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, Black Americans were more prone to work within the United States within the service industry or in frontline positionsand again were at higher risk of COVID-19 Exposures and Infections.

Research confirms that members of this group were also disproportionately affected higher rates of hospitalizations and deaths related to COVID-19 through the first waves of the pandemic. Additionally, black communities across the U.S. faced this structural barriers to access to COVID-19 vaccines as soon as vaccinations became available.

One might assume that the cumulative impact of those different experiences would lead researchers, clinicians, and government officials to prioritize research into long-COVID in vulnerable populations.

Unfortunately, this was not the case. Black Americans' mental and physical health problems have largely declined hardly researched within the context of existing long-term COVID research.

What other research is being conducted?

Researchers are currently focused on understanding the underlying biological pathways This results in long COVID disease, together with potential biological markers that predispose some individuals to long COVID disease.

However, much of this work doesn’t consider the differences which will occur inside or between racial groups. Amid the rapidly evolving research on Long-COVID, several scientists are working to know each the event and progression of Long-COVID in various communities around the globe.

What is just not yet known

We only analyzed surveys at one cut-off date and would wish to gather multiple surveys over an extended time frame before we could determine whether long COVID has negative consequences for mental health or vice versa.

Therefore, the outcomes of our study ought to be understood as correlational, meaning that while there’s a statistically relevant relationship between these variables, we cannot rule out the possible influence of other external aspects that may additionally impact the mental health of Black adults through the pandemic . Further research is required to know how long COVID is related to psychological outcomes and mental health over time.

While the COVID-19 public health emergency prevails within the United States led to May 2023The mental and physical health needs of those living with long COVID proceed. We due to this fact plan to proceed studying how long COVID impacts people of various ages, genders, economic and other key demographic groups to answer the urgent need for evidence-based research and treatment options.

An easy difference within the genetic code — two X chromosomes versus one X chromosome and one Y chromosome — can result in big differences in heart disease. It seems that these genetic differences affect greater than just the sex organs and gender assigned at birth – they fundamentally change the best way heart problems develops and occurs.

While gender influences the mechanisms underlying the event of heart problems, gender plays a job in how healthcare providers recognize and treat it. Sex refers to biological characteristics corresponding to genetics, hormones, anatomy and physiology Gender refers to social, psychological and cultural constructs. women are more more likely to die after a primary heart attack or stroke than men. The probability can also be higher in women additional or different heart attack symptoms that transcend chest pain, corresponding to nausea, jaw pain, dizziness and fatigue. It is commonly difficult to completely distinguish the influence of sex on heart problems outcomes from the influences of gender.

While women who haven’t yet reached menopause have a lower risk of heart problems than men, their cardiovascular risk is lower accelerates dramatically after menopause. If a girl also has type 2 diabetes, her risk of heart attack increases equivalent to that of meneven when the girl with diabetes has not yet undergone menopause. More data are needed to higher understand differences in heart problems risk non-binary and transgender patients.

Despite these differences, one thing is similar: heart attacks, strokes and other types of heart problems are the identical thing commonest reason for death for all people, no matter sex or gender.

We are researchers that cope with women's health and the best way heart problems occurs develops and presents itself otherwise in men and women. Our work has identified an urgent must update medical guidelines with gender-specific approaches to diagnosis and treatment to attain this Improving health outcomes for all.

Sex differences in heart disease

The reasons for this Gender and gender differences in cardiovascular diseases should not fully known. The different biological effects of gender, corresponding to hormonal and genetic aspects, in comparison with gender, corresponding to social, cultural and psychological aspects, are also not clearly differentiated.

What researchers do know is that the collected evidence supports what good heart care should appear like for girls in comparison with men has as many holes as Swiss cheese. Medical evidence for the treatment of heart problems often comes from studies that excluded women, as until then women had largely not been included in scientific research NIH Revitalization Act of 1993. For example, current guidelines for treating cardiovascular risk aspects corresponding to hypertension apply based totally on data from men. This is despite evidence that differences in the best way heart problems occurs cause women to experience heart problems otherwise.

In addition to the gender differences implicit gender bias amongst providers and gender social norms amongst patients cause doctors to underestimate the danger of cardiac events in women in comparison with men. These biases play a job in why women die from cardiac events more often than men. For example, in patients with symptoms bordering on heart problems, doctors are inclined to order arterial imaging more aggressively in men than in women. One study partially linked this tendency to order less aggressive tests for girls to a Gender bias that men are more willing to take risks than women.

In a study of about 3,000 patients who had recently suffered a heart attack, women were less likely than men to consider this Symptoms of a heart attack were resulting from heart disease. In addition, most girls have no idea that it’s heart problems No. 1 reason for death in women. Overall, women's misperceptions about their very own risk can prevent them from searching for medical attention to judge possible symptoms of a heart attack or stroke.

For women of color, these problems are further exacerbated. Lack of access to healthcare and extra challenges promote health inequalities amongst underrepresented racial and ethnic minorities.

Sex difference in heart disease

Cardiovascular disease looks physically different in men and women, particularly resulting from the plaque buildup on artery partitions that contributes to the disease.

women have fewer cholesterol crystals and fewer calcium deposits in arterial plaque than men. Physiological differences within the smallest blood vessels Heart nutrition also plays a job in cardiovascular outcomes.

Women are more likely than men to suffer from heart problems, which manifests itself in the shape of several narrowed arteries that should not completely “clogged”. This results in chest pain because blood flow can’t be increased enough to fulfill the upper oxygen demands brought on by exercise, just like low blood pressure. Flow shower head. When chest pain occurs in this manner, doctors call this condition Ischemia and no obstructive coronary arteries. In comparison, men usually tend to have a “clogged” artery in a concentrated area that could be opened with a stent or heart bypass surgery. Options for multiple narrowed arteries lag behind treatment options for typical “clogged” arteries, putting women at a drawback.

In addition, within the early stages of a heart attack, levels of blood markers that indicate damage to the guts are increased are lower in women than in men. This may result in the next rate of missed diagnosis of coronary heart disease in women in comparison with men.

The reasons for these differences should not entirely clear. Some possible aspects These include differences in arterial plaque composition, which make plaque more more likely to rupture or rupture in men and plaque more more likely to erode in women. Women have it too lower heart mass and smaller arteries than men, even after accounting for body size.

Reducing gender differences

All too often, women with symptoms of heart problems are turned away from the doctor's office due to the gender bias that claims “women don't get heart disease.”

Considering different symptoms of heart problems depending on sex and gender could help doctors higher look after all patients.

One way the rubber is moving is thru higher approaches to diagnosing heart attacks in men and women. In particular, when diagnosing heart attacks, gender-specific limits are used for blood tests that measure heart damage – so-called highly sensitive troponin tests – may improve their accuracyThis reduces the variety of missed or false-negative diagnoses in women while reducing the variety of over-diagnoses or false-positive leads to men.

The heads of our research laboratory, Employees and other internationally recognized research colleagues – a few of whom collaborate with us Ludeman Family Center for Women's Health Research on the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus – will proceed this vital work to shut this gender gap in healthcare. Research on this area It is critical to make clear ways physicians can higher manage gender-specific symptoms and advance tailored treatments.

The The Biden administration's latest executive order Funding women's health research paves the best way for research that goes beyond simply understanding the causes of sex differences in heart problems. Developing and testing appropriate treatment approaches for every patient may also help improve the health of everyone.

That's why Disneyland has increased its ticket prices again. This 12 months's increase saw most multi-day passes and single-day passes increase by about 6.5%.

This increase last week triggered the expected flood of latest media and online complaints that Disneyland had change into too expensive — identical to every increase within the last decade or so. I asked the readers ThemeParkInsider.com over the weekend whether or not they thought Disney was too expensive, and 90% of respondents answered yes.

But each time I visit Disneyland and Disney California Adventure, the parks are full. Attendance increased 2.2% at Disneyland and 10% at Disney California Adventure last 12 months, in accordance with the industry's TEA/AECOM Theme Index report. If Disneyland is “too expensive,” it doesn’t seem to be those high prices are stopping Disney fans from visiting the theme parks.

RELATED: Disneyland with a Family of Four for About $300 – Here are the 15 Cheapest Days to Visit

Yes, these same fans are drained and frustrated because they’re pressured all over the place they spend money. Top concert and sports tickets typically cost as much, if no more, as a day at Disneyland, although they don't provide as many hours of entertainment. Restaurants have increased their prices a lot that eating out at Disneyland sometimes appears like a bargain. But simply because other things are too expensive doesn't excuse Disneyland from charging exorbitant amounts of cash for its tickets.

How do Disneyland fans make it work? From what I've seen on the parks, lots of them don't pay regular Disney admission prices. Casual fans will benefit from the numerous discounts Disneyland offers year-round, akin to the upcoming $50 children's ticket. Disney's most loyal fans pay far lower than $100 per visit with the resort's Magic Key annual passes.

Disneyland is just not currently selling Magic Key passes to latest customers. These passes are only available for renewal. However, Magic Key holders can move to other tiers upon renewal, and the regressive nature of Disney's recent price hikes seems designed to discourage people from downgrading.

There are two ways to get value out of something: pay less or get more. If Disneyland fans resolve to not pay less by downgrading their Magic Key passes, I think the upper prices could encourage lots of them to search for more value by utilizing the park visit more often and spend less on entertainment elsewhere. The higher list prices also serve to make seasonal discounts appear more attractive to casual fans.

In this fashion, a price increase at Disneyland can actually increase attendance on the park. We'll see what happens, but I think this 12 months's price increase won't reduce crowds within the park any greater than previous ones.

Originally published: October 15, 2024 at 8:38 am

All major supermarkets and retailers that sell food, comparable to Kroger, Walmart and Costco, are giving large quantities of food to food banks and pantries. In 2022, retailers donated close 2 billion kilos of food within the United States, which amounted to $3.5 billion this yr. The The estimated value of the donated food was just a little lower than $2 per pound in 2022.

Retailers donate products which are typically packaged, tasty and protected for consumption, but are unsuitable on the market as a result of quality concerns comparable to minor cosmetic defects. Since these things can go a good distance toward feeding hungry people, donations are certainly one of them absolute best uses of leftover or surplus food.

Donations are also technically charitable acts and the businesses chargeable for them are Receive tax breaks. This signifies that donations increase profits by reducing costs. There is a second impact of donations on the underside line: they improve the standard of the food on the shop's shelves and increase revenue from food sales.

As Supply chain scientist studying food banksI worked with a team of economists to estimate the impact of retail food donations. We used sales data for five perishable food categories sold by two competing retail chains whose stores were situated in a big metropolitan area within the Midwest. We've found that stores that remove items which are near expiration date donate them to food banks and replenish empty shelf space with brisker inventory generate more income from sales and achieve higher profits.

Retailers donate 30% of what food banks give to their customers

U.S. food banks operating for greater than 50 years Give away over 6 billion kilos of food annually.

They come around 30% of this food is accessible free of charge in supermarkets and huge retailers who sell food. Before the COVID-19 pandemic began, retailers delivered greater than twice as much food to food banks than the federal government did. The amount of food provided through U.S. Department of Agriculture federal programs comparable to the Emergency Food Assistance Program has increased steadily since 2020 and is now nearly equal to the quantity of food donated by retailers.

For example, in 2022, Feeding America's network of greater than 200 member boards sourced roughly 2 billion kilos from retailers and almost £1.5 billion from government programs.

The remaining 2.88 billion kilos of food were either purchased directly, provided by farmers, donated by food processors, or donated by people and organizations in local communities.

Despite several federal programs that help low-income people obtain food, and the nation's robust network of food banks and pantries, nearly 50 million Americans suffer from food insecurity. This signifies that they can not eat enough nutritious food, at the very least temporarily.

Retail donation routines are established but inconsistent

When food is nearing its expiration date on a store's shelves, store managers have three options. You can donate it, throw it away, or sell it at a reduction.

Stores that frequently donate food have established routines for after they put aside near-expired food to provide away. However, these routines are sometimes inconsistent.

Many stores only donate seasonally or only give away certain foods. For example, they might only donate meat, baked goods or fruit and vegetables. In many cases, donations take a backseat to more immediate priorities like customer support.

These realities can increase the possibilities of food ending up within the landfill fairly than on someone's table.

Although thousands and thousands of Americans struggle to search out their next meal nearby 40% of food is thrown away along the availability chain as food moves between agricultural producers, factories, retailers and consumers. This is principally as a result of logistical challenges: it’s difficult to move and distribute perishable food.

Discounts on food can reduce sales

Stores often prefer to sell food that’s nearing its expiration date at a reduction fairly than donating or throwing it away because that way they get a reimbursement. However, with this selection, the discounted foods also remain on the shelf, taking on useful space that might otherwise be used for brisker stocks.

Shelf space dedicated to selling and promoting full-price products competes with space dedicated to discounted foods. Stocking perishable foods which are beginning to look questionable – comparable to bananas with brown spots sold alongside pristine yellow bananas – could damage a retailer's image if shoppers begin to query the standard of the shop.

In other words, when consumers make Judgments based on all products displayedthen possibly it's higher for stores to stop selling sad looking bananas and just give them away.

My research team calls this practice “preemptive removal.” Increasing the typical quality level of the food on display not only results in an improvement in the looks of a store. We used panel data with over 20,000 observations and included 21 retail stores that compete in the same market region. The five fresh food categories were bakery, dairy, deli, meat, and fruit and veggies.

Stores that donated food as an alternative of discounting it may need made higher use of limited space to display brisker inventory. My research team has found that food donations can increase Average food prices by as much as 1%which corresponds to a Increase profit margins by 33%. The profit margins of supermarkets and other food retailers are quite low typically lower than 3%.

This signifies that even a small increase in food prices, even a 1% increase, may end up in significantly higher profits for retailers. At the identical time, increasing the quantity of retail food donations would end in more food attending to individuals who need it, curbing hunger and reducing food insecurity.

Children with difficult temperaments, including personality traits comparable to irritability and difficulty being comforted, are only barely more likely than other children to have insecure attachment relationships with one or each parents. in response to our researchThis result refutes the long-held opinion of many psychologists that early attachment behavior is principally is set by the temperament of the kid.

A bonding relationship reflects the kid's expectations of their caregiver in times of need. Secure attachment is probably going when a caregiver is consistently available and offers emotional support when the kid is anxious. However, if a baby learns that their caregiver isn’t there when needed or doesn’t provide effective reassurance, there’s a probability that they may develop an insecure attachment relationship with that caregiver.

As a researcher in Clinical Psychology And Child and family studiesWe are all in favour of how the standard of the connection between child and caregiver affects children’s development.

This includes understanding what influences the bond between child and fogeys. Even in young children there are great differences in temperament and Some psychologists have argued that these individual dispositions can also explain how adolescents interact with caregivers. Even essentially the most empathetic and loving parents can feel challenged when caring for a difficult child – does this dynamic affect the standard of their attachment relationship?

How we work

With 29 other researchers, we formed a research consortium to review the standard of kids’s attachment relationships with their moms and dads – or what we call their Binding networks.

For that Meta-analysiswe combined data from 872 children from North American families during the last 40 years.

The researchers observed how these children interacted individually with their moms and dads and conducted studies designed to evaluate the kids's attachment behavior: How do they seek comfort in times of distress? How easily do they find reassurance from their parents? How do they explore their environment within the presence of their parents?

In addition, parents reported the extent of inauspicious temperament of their children. How likely was the kid to experience intense negative emotions comparable to anger, sadness, or anxiety?

It seemed logical that children with a tougher temperament could be more prone to have insecure attachment relationships throughout the family – but that isn’t exactly what we found. Instead a difficult temperament had little or no to do with it with the variety of insecure attachment relationships a baby had along with his or her parents.

A stronger tendency toward difficult temperament had only a really small effect—lower than 1%, in response to our statistical evaluation—on the likelihood that children would have multiple insecure attachment relationships. And temperament was only barely tougher in infants who had an insecure attachment to each parents than in infants who had an insecure attachment to just one or neither parent.

Why it’s important

Recent research from our consortium has shown that children who develop a secure attachment to each their mother and father are likely to fewer anxiety and depression symptomsin addition to stronger language skillsin comparison with those that had just one or no secure attachment relationship of their two-parent families.

The results of our recent study suggest that even children with an innate difficult temperament can reap the advantages of multiple secure attachments. These findings may reassure concerned parents.

What isn’t yet known

Further research is required to clarify the slight increase in insecure attachment that we present in children with difficult temperaments.

For example, children’s difficult temperament increases the likelihood of negative parenting, including Anger and compulsion and overly controlling behaviorThese in turn can intensify children’s negative emotionsOver time, this mutual exposure to negative reactions may increase the likelihood of an insecure attachment relationship between child and parent.

Interventions that Promoting positive parenting and sensitive discipline increase the safety of kids's attachment to their parents. Parents can subsequently promote a secure attachment by paying particular attention to being more sensitive to the kid's emotional needs.

One thing has turn into clear: secure attachment relationships, which play a vital role in cognitive and emotional development, usually are not closed to children with difficult temperaments.