The trailer for Meghan Markle's Netflix Lifestyle show “With Love, Meghan” collected greater than 1.7 million prospects On YouTube After it had debuted on January 2. However, the show was hardly mentioned when the dominant streaming service on the planet held its programs for the programming of 2025 within the Egyptian theater on Wednesday within the Egyptian theater.

In fact, the comedian John Mulaney began in Meghan and Prince Harry's Content Creator effort when he got here to Ben Affleck, Tina Fey and other stars on the event to advertise their recent movies or streaming series. According to the Hollywood reporter.

Mulaney confirmed that his recent live talk show “Everybody's Live with John Mulaney” will start on March twelfth. This is per week before that when Meghan's “With Love, Meghan” is presupposed to start streaming – after the originally planned debut on January fifteenth of her show was delayed as a result of the outbreak of the devastating forest fires in Los Angeles.

When the star “Saturday Night Live” describes the unpredictable, unpredictable character of his show, he said that in response to The Hollywood Reporter, he would usually have a bunch of versatile guests.

“This will be the only place where Arnold Schwarzenegger, alongside Nikki Glaser, sits alongside a family therapist with music by Mannequin Pussy,” some free conversations with glazes and accompanied by music from the American punk and indie rock band from Philadelphia. “This is just a short scanning of guests.”

Mulaney praised Netflix when he hardly hid a discount comment, after which praised Netflix for believing in his show. “This is a really fun experiment,” he added. “Not because Harry and Meghan Netflix gave more money without a specific plan.”

Mulaney naturally refers to Netflix in 2020 to record a vigorous, five-year contract with Meghan and Harry and, in response to them, report $ 100 million for documentaries, documentaries, feature movies, scripting shows and youngsters's programs.

Netflix has accomplished the Duke and Duchess of Sussex after they’ve been resigned from the British royal life, although they’d no experience in the event or production of movies or television programs. Netflix appeared to hope that her global fame would result in the talent or skilled drive as a self -examined royals to provide appealing, entertaining and even award -winning content.

Industry experts akin to Matthew Belloni and Lesley Goldberg at Puck have since referred to Netflix 'take care of Harry and Meghan as one among the “worst” Hollywood Peak -Tv -ära -and referred to it as a blatant example of excess and hybris. Belloni and Goldberg predicted that Netflix can be closed with the couple after 2025.

In August, Belloni and Goldberg found that the couple's documentary series “Harry and Meghan” in 2022 was a blockbuster hit about their departure from their unlucky royal life. Critics say that that is as a result of the proven fact that the Sussexes Dirt had relatives in regards to the British monarchy and Harry's relatives.

Belloni and Goldberg said that not one of the couple's other projects “connected”, including Meghan's “Passion Project”, an animated children's series called “Pearl” before it even began. Meghan and Harry also produced Executive “Polo”, a reality TV series about Harry's Elite Polo, who played friends. But “Polo” was awarded by critics.

Then got here the trailer for “with Love, Meghan” and even critics of the couple asked in 2018 with Harry.

In the trailer, Meghan, based in Montecito, was in a position to have a good time the glory of her high-end lifestyle in Southern California. Critics believed that the audience would enjoy their strenuous attractiveness. Scenes showed that Meghan hovered through a kitchen and a garden – although they’re supposedly not their very own – visited a beehive, arranged flowers and hobbing with outstanding guests, including Mindy Kaling, boss Roy Choi and Bay Area, Alice Waters and Tatcha founder Vicky Tsai. Before the trailer, Meghan's Viel-Zweier return to Instagram was preceded by January 1st. Both media events showed Meghan's wish for what an industry expert in 2025 described as a “metaphorical clean slate” after some difficult years for his or her public image.

Unfortunately, the timing has not been on Meghan's side for the reason that trailer's premiere. Less than per week later, the devastating palisades and Eaton forest fires broke out in and around Los Angeles, killed 27 people and destroyed greater than 18,000 houses, buildings and other structures.

A number of days later, Meghan and Netflix announced that they’d postpone the publication of the show by March 4, when Meghan swore to focus on the needs of those affected by the forest fires in my home state of California. Critics said that Meghan and Netflix had no alternative but to delay the publication of a show in regards to the Duchess who enjoyed the fun of a well -equipped kitchen and other budgetary equipment when Angelenos lost their homes.

The premiere of “With Love, Meghan” continues to be on the Netflix calendar for March 4. Denien reported. But the shortage of fanfare on the Netflix event on Wednesday on Wednesday is probably not good for the prospects of the show. The Daily Mail reported. Someone who took part within the event thought it was “shocking” that Netflix would allow one among his stars to mock Meghan and Harry when everyone was “The Head Honchos”.

“And how strange that a show by the couple who signed a multimillion dollar handling with Netflix has hardly been presented-AB saw by a short clip in a assembly,” the person also told the Daily Mail. “Even filmmaker Tyler Perry, the guy who borrowed his La House on the Sussexes after (she had left it from Great Britain) mentioned. It really felt like Netflix didn't do anything about it. “

It also remains to be seen whether Netflix has been concerned about other controversy in the past few weeks that Meghan and Harry has.

The emerging global do-goders were publicly referred to “disaster tourists” From actor Justine Bateman for her response to the Eaton Fire. They were recorded on January tenth to get a private tour through burned -out districts in Altadena by city officials, for the reason that first aiders still fought against a fireplace that only contained about 3% and needed to take care of Pasadena and Los Angeles County with a swarm People evacuated from their houses.

The following weekend the couple stood one other PR crisis after it was the topic of an extended title story in Vanity, which was a brand new round of allegations about Meghan, bullying, difficult boss – accusations that first appeared during their time as work Royal and followed her to California. The story in Vanity Fair, normally a pro-sussex publication, also showed Harry as charming, but reasonably dark, each in relation to the alleged behavior of his wife and in relation to earning his livelihood outside of a prince.

Originally published: January 30, 2025 at 1:54 p.m. PST

A brand new documentary from German filmmakers offers an unglamorous look back at Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's efforts to determine them as ultra-wealthy global influencers and philanthropists since leaving royal life nearly five years ago.

“Harry and Meghan have set the bar very high,” says Ulrike Grunewald, the director of “The Lost Prince.” said The Daily Mail over the weekend. The documentary is scheduled to air in Germany on Tuesday. “They want to be global benefactors who create tangible change. So far they have not lived up to this image at all.”

For the 45-minute film, Grunewald desired to explore whether the Duke and Duchess of Sussex managed to “find freedom” by leaving the United Kingdom and moving to the United States. During their exit, the couple also vowed to turn out to be financially independent entrepreneurs and world-renowned thought leaders.

To answer questions on the couple's life after “Megxit,” Grunewald said she reported within the couple's latest hometown of Montecito, delved into the work of their Archewell Foundation and Harry's involvement within the Invictus Games, and examined recent reports, that they’re “separated” – not less than professionally.

“I was interested in whether Harry and Meghan’s strategies for independent living worked,” said Grunewald. “After four years, the results are very mixed.”

“Now they mostly appear separately because they have not managed to create a functioning image together,” said Grunewald. They got here to earth.”

On the one hand, Harry can have found a brand new sense of private freedom by leaving the confines of royal life.

“To be fair, from his perspective, Harry wanted the best for his own family,” Grunewald said. “And he has certainly now gained valuable experience in California and learned what it means to have to stand on his own two feet. He would never have been able to do that in the inner circle of the royal family.”

But Harry now has to determine for himself what he has to supply the world, said Grunewald. Sure, he still has “the glamour” in him, the son of King Charles III. and the late Princess Diana, said Grunewald. “But in the harsh atmosphere of the Hollywood industry,” that appeal can fade, she said.

Grunewald is probably going referring to the couple's difficulties becoming Hollywood media moguls. In late 2020, Harry and his wife, an American television actress, signed multimillion-dollar deals with Netflix and Spotify, saying they desired to create “impactful” content “that informs,” ​​”gives hope” and “triggers action.”

But in 2023, the couple famously parted ways with Spotify after Meghan only produced a 12-episode podcast and so they were branded “gribbers” by one among the platform's executives and star podcasters, Bill Simmons.

As for Netflix, they starred in “Harry and Meghan,” their 2022 blockbuster docuseries about their acrimonious departure from royal life. However, they increasingly lost public goodwill in each the United Kingdom and the United States because they felt that they had gone too far in publicly criticizing Harry's royal relatives within the documentary series and in interviews. While royal gossip lovers also made Harry's 2023 memoir “Spare” a worldwide bestseller, it also became clear that some people were uncomfortable with Harry's decision to disclose family secrets.

“People have long memories and few revelations can damage their image more than the private details that Harry and Meghan themselves have made public in recent years,” said Grunewald.

Things have now gone “a little downhill” with their Netflix partnership. The Times UK also reported. Harry's documentary about his work on the Invictus Games didn't make Netflix's top 10, and there's still no sign of Meghan's Netflix cooking show, which was reportedly accomplished in the summertime.

Next week, Netflix will release “Polo,” a documentary series produced by the co-director couple. But neither Harry nor Meghan appear within the series, which is about an elite sport that almost all people probably don't care about. The trailer also attempts to market the documentary as a Bravo-esque reality TV show about “dirty, sweaty boys…horseback riding” – hardly “influential” content that “gives hope” and “unlocks action.”

Former British friends of Harry were reportedly “horrified in hysterics” over the “tasteless” latest series, while a Hollywood executive warned that the couple are “running out of last chances” to prove they’ll make compelling TV shows by which it’s isn’t about herself. the Daily Beast reported.

The Daily Mail preview of the brand new German documentary doesn’t address whether it is going to consider Meghan's other business ventures, including the premiere of her Netflix cooking show, which could coincide with the launch of her latest lifestyle brand, American Riviera Orchard. But Meghan's company has been the topic of diverse reports of bureaucratic difficulties with the U.S. trademark office and questions on whether she has the business savvy to get her strawberry jam and other products ready on the market.

According to The Lost Prince, Harry and Meghan may be struggling in other areas of their lives post-Megxit.

For one thing, the couple doesn't appear to have “integrated” into Montecito's elite social circles, Grunewald told the Daily Mail.

“Cultural life is very lively, but everything often takes place in closed circles and Harry and Meghan rarely take part in these activities,” said Grunewald. “They seem to have become very isolated.”

Over the past 4 years, Harry and Meghan have appeared together and individually at some high-profile events in and around Montecito and Santa Barbara. In 2023, for instance, they attended Kevin Costner's annual star-studded fundraiser for local first responders at his estate near Santa Barbara.

They recently appeared on the September opening of a brand new bookstore near their Montecito home owned by famed literary agent Jennifer Rudolph Walsh and cosmetics mogul Victoria Jackson, who’s reportedly a great friend of Meghan's. Her Montecito neighbors, Oprah Winfrey and Ellen DeGeneres, also joined the party, although DeGeneres recently left California for a brand new home within the United Kingdom

Still, Grunewald's documentary suggests that Harry and Meghan don't spend much time in Montecito. A neighbor, Richard Mineards, told Grunewald that the couple didn’t plan to “put down particularly deep roots” in the realm. Every from time to time you see them on the local market or on walks – all the time with security guards in tow.

“Sometimes you see her at the farmers market or with a dog, but generally you don't see her and you just don't see much of him,” Mineards said.

As for the Archewell Foundation, Grunewald argues that the nonprofit, which launched to great fanfare in 2020, doesn’t seem like organized effectively, while the Invictus Games seem like a brilliant spot within the couple's portfolio – even when the filmmaker does said Harry is little greater than “a figurehead.”

Harry founded the International Sports Competition for Wounded Veterans and Military Personnel. Jack Royston, Newsweek's royal reporter, is reportedly interviewed for “The Lost Prince” and says: “I believe that Invictus is a genuine and authentic work. “Harry is fully committed to the topic.”

A number of weeks after famed editor and royal expert Tina Brown called out Meghan Markle for her “worst judgment in the world” and alluded to the failures of her post-royal experiment with Prince Harry, she is popping her critical eye to Prince William.

Brown, who was friends with the prince's late mother Diana and wrote an authoritative biography about her, wrote this week that William doesn't make good decisions either, particularly in the case of protecting the longer term of the British monarchy will rule at some point.

Brown, the highly influential editor of Vanity Fair, the New Yorker and the Daily Beast, also criticized Williams' recent “boastful” comments concerning the way forward for the monarchy at the top of his trip to South Africa for the Earthshot Prize.

When he becomes king after the death of his father, Charles III, William said he would do things in another way, “perhaps a smaller 'r' in royal.” The Guardian reported. He also discussed his plans for a more caring monarchy, adding “some empathy as well because I really care about what I do.”

“It helps make an impact on people’s lives,” said William, who leads initiatives to cut back homelessness within the UK and climate change globally. “And I think we could use more compassionate leadership around the world.”

To Brown, a few of Williams' comments looked as if it would devalue his father's accomplishments, she explained in an essay for her recent son Fresh hell substack. His comments also sounded tone-deaf given a current situation Sunday Times report about how his ancient duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster and his father's are value a “staggering” $2.2 billion and are making a living by charging British government agencies to be used of the land.

Brown said the Prince of Wales sounded “like a performative pinhead” and explained how she misses the presence of his younger, estranged brother Harry within the royal solid.

“In happier years, it was the irreverent Harry (or Harold, as William sadly used to call him) who could tease and put the Prince of Wales in his place,” Brown wrote. She also suggested that William is surrounded by yes men, individuals who “lick him up and down all day,” to make use of Kara Swisher's inimitable phrase about those that live in a gilded bubble.

But Brown said it was worrying King Charles III. to see that it looked “old and desolate”. The 75-year-old monarch also underwent cancer treatment last yr and attended the ceremony without his wife, Queen Camilla, who was reportedly affected by a chest infection.

Brown said it was inconceivable to look at the coverage and never consider the late Queen Elizabeth II, who viewed the annual ceremony as “the most sacred and essential of her royal duties.” Brown continued, “For Elizabeth, military service was anything but an ornamental necessity.”

Because of this, Brown said, there was “a gaping Harry-shaped hole in the depleted royal cast” on the ceremony. She noted that Harry is a veteran of two military tours in Afghanistan and the founding father of the Invictus Games, the nonprofit organization that “brings hope to injured vets through competitive sporting events.”

But the Duke of Sussex was stripped of his military honors after he and Meghan made a decisive exit from royal life and settled within the United States in 2020 with the concept of ​​becoming wealthy and powerful Hollywood media moguls and global thought leaders. Harry and Meghan became much more estranged from his relatives after he publicly criticized the royal family particularly, accusing it of racism, cruelty, indifference and dysfunction.

But despite all that, Brown said Harry “certainly deserves a place on the balcony” and he or she argued that the British nation “needs his human touch, and so does his ailing father.”

William recently admitted that the past yr had been “brutal” with each his wife and father battling a life-threatening illness. But the prince who “could credibly lighten the load is still in Montecito,” Brown said.

Then Brown poses the perennial query to royal fans and critics: Could things change? Could Harry be reconciling along with his father and even his brother, who’s reportedly particularly offended concerning the swipes Harry made against Catherine in his memoir Spare?

“Enough with the feuds,” Brown said. “Families, including this one, have to stick together.”

“William, whatever his lingering resentment may be against Harry for his self-indulgent broadsides in Spare, he should give it up now and allow his father to give Harry something to do,” Brown continued. Harry's involvement with the monarchy has change into increasingly vital “in an isolationist Trump world”, which Brown said means the UK must “move closer to Europe” and maintain its ties with the Commonwealth.

“William and Kate fear foreign travel, which will take the princess away from the children and interfere with what William calls (to the annoyance of his advisers) his 'me time,'” Brown said. “So offload the smaller but important red carpet trips to the Sussexes, who after five years in the wilderness would export some modern royal flair, particularly to former colonial trouble spots.”

In a podcast interview just a few weeks ago, Brown noted that Harry never really had any skilled training, apart from his years within the British Army. But in an interview with The Ankler's Janice Min, she praised Harry for being good at traveling the world, playing the role of the prince and supporting his favorite causes. On the recent “faux royal tours” he has taken with or without Meghan, he’s “charming, he's funny, he's sweet, he's authentic again,” Brown said.

On the opposite hand, in the identical interview, Brown expressed skepticism about whether the British public would welcome his American wife back right into a royal role. Brown explained the explanation why Meghan has change into unpopular with the vast majority of Brits. They feel that the previous American television actor has taken Harry away from them.

“He’s the lamb to the slaughter in this situation,” Brown said. “I mean, he was terribly impressed with Meghan. He thought she knew everything. She convinced him that she was the smart Hollywood wheel-dealer who would come in and make them stars and so on. And he just followed her blindly like a child.”

Harry's popularity in Britain actually fell after he left his home country, and in line with various polls, he used interviews and “spare” to criticize his family.

But Brown still predicted that Harry “could make a comeback.” Finally, she said: “He will always be Prince Harry.” He will all the time be the grandson of the Queen and the son of Diana. You can’t take that away from him, irrespective of what.”

Brown said the British people could be joyful to have Harry back, but only “if he came back alone.”

Originally published: November 13, 2024 at 11:45 am PST

Since the 14th century, the nations we now know because the United Kingdom and Portugal have been military and business allies under the oldest international treaty still in force. the Anglo-Portuguese Treaty of Windsor, Signed in 1386.

But could the treaty, which dates back to England's King Richard II, be in jeopardy because considered one of his distant descendants, Prince Harry, has decided to purchase a second home in Portugal?

Okay, in fact not. Despite it, a brand new report A British news outlet says that Harry and his American wife Meghan, renegade members of the British royal family who’ve been living in California, have decided to attempt to regain their footing in Europe by buying a house in Portugal. your possible destination, based on Daily Mail columnist Richard Edenis to determine something like a court in Portugal that might position them as “royal rivals” to the British royal family.

Eden broke the story this week that Harry and Meghan were buying a house somewhere in Portugal, speculating that they may use that residence to launch business or philanthropic ventures that may give them a profile and even the appearance of royalty in Europe would.

With a house in Portugal, King Charles III's son and daughter-in-law could developing their plans to change into “rival kings,” Eden wrote. In this role, they may also more easily undertake “quasi-royal tours,” comparable to their trips to Nigeria and Colombia this yr, Eden added.

Portugal's historic cities and stunning coastline have change into increasingly popular tourist destinations, including for Americans, says the Robb Report. The country is also a lovely second home for Meghan since it could give her access to a “golden visa,” Eden said. These are visa programs which were offered by around half a dozen countries within the European Union for the reason that European debt crisis in 2012. based on the New York Times. They have enabled wealthy foreigners – including Russians and Chinese – to settle in Portugal, Spain, Greece, Ireland and other countries by investing in those countries' economies, often by purchasing high-quality real estate. With a “golden visa” non-Europeans can travel more easily to different countries inside the European Union.

Harry and Meghan lost their footing in Europe after they acrimoniously quit royal duties in 2020 and moved to the United States, where they bought a $14 million nine-bedroom home in Montecito. In the months leading as much as Charles' coronation in 2023, Harry and Meghan were asked to provide up their British home, Frogmore Cottage near Windsor Castle, because the brand new king felt they were spending little time there. Royal watchers also noted that the “eviction” got here after the couple began criticizing the monarchy and members of the royal family, starting with their Oprah Winfrey interview in 2021 and continuing with their Netflix docuseries and Harry's 2023 memoir “Spare.”

Meanwhile, Harry is locked in a protracted legal battle with the British government over its decision to disclaim him automatic police protection when he or his family visit his home country. He continues to repeatedly return to the UK for events related to the Invictus Games or other charities he’s involved with, however the undeniable fact that the couple have decided not to purchase a second home within the UK suggests otherwise for Eden , that Meghan has no intention of ever returning.

By buying a house in Portugal, Meghan “found a way to gain a foothold in Europe without actually having to set foot in Britain, where she becomes increasingly unpopular with every bitter statement against the royal family,” Eden wrote.

It's also possible that Harry and Meghan selected Portugal amongst so many other European destinations with scenery, beaches and sunny weather because Harry's cousin, Princess Eugenie, and her husband, Jack Brooksbank, desire a house in a luxury development south of Lisbon own.

Despite Harry's estrangement from his father and brother, Prince William, he reportedly stays friends with Eugenie, Prince Andrew's daughter. Eugenie's husband works in marketing and sales for CostaTerra Golf and Ocean Club within the coastal community of Melides, and the couple split their time between Portugal and London, Eden said. However, it just isn’t known whether Harry and Meghan's latest property in Portugal is situated on the CostaTerra Golf and Ocean Club, but presumably a high-end home there would offer them loads of security and privacy.

Originally published: October 17, 2024 at 2:55 p.m

Prince Harry turned 40 on Sunday removed from the family from whom he’s estranged, however the royals sent him birthday wishes despite their ongoing rift.

“We wish the Duke of Sussex a happy 40th birthday today!” was posted on the royal family’s official social media accounts, complete with birthday cake emoji and a photo of a smiling Prince Harry.

It was the first public birthday message Harry received from the royal family's official account since 2021. The royal family accounts are managed by King Charles' office at Buckingham Palace.

His brother and sister-in-law, Prince William and Princess Kate Middleton, echoed the message by sharing the royal family’s post on X, saying: “We wish you all the best for your 40th birthday to the Duke of Sussex!” from the official account of the Prince and Princess of Wales.

Some observers of the royal family viewed the messages as Olive branchso People. Birthdays are often only publicly acknowledged by working royals. Harry and wife Meghan Markle resigned from his royal duties in 2020 And relocated to the USAwhere they raise their three children in California.

As People reported, Harry celebrated privately with friends and family in Montecito and plans to continue celebrating abroad with close friends.

The couple have since spoken very openly about the treatment they felt they were subjected to as senior, working royals, and expressed their concerns in a candid interview with Oprah WinfreyHarry also wrote extensively about his relationships and family in his memoirs “Spare”, reveal more internal Family business and saucy details.

Now he may be turning his attention from the past to the future.

“He is in a a form of cross“, royal watcher and writer Sally Bedell Smith told the Associated Press. “And he doesn't seem to have any idea how he wants to proceed.”

According to BBC News, he was optimistic just before his big birthday.

“No matter how old I’m, my Mission is to proceed to point out and do good on the planet,” he told BBC News.

With News Wire Services

Originally published: September 17, 2024 at 11:32 am

CELEBRITIES BORN ON THIS DAY: Taraji P. Henson, 54; Harry Connick Jr., 57; Virginia Madsen, 63; Scott Patterson, 66.

Happy birthday: Take your time. Make decisions with reason, facts and research. Express yourself intimately; don't leave anything to others' interpretation. Keep your evaluation easy, your life easier and your connections useful. Life is just too short to waste it on nonsense. Protect yourself from anyone who tries to reap the benefits of you. Put your energy where it counts and don't feel guilty about caring for yourself. Your numbers are 3, 15, 19, 28, 35, 46, 48.

ARIES (March 21 – April 19): Take charge and use your energetic attitude to impress and persuade others to hitch in your plans. Express yourself with charisma, but don't exaggerate what you’ve got to supply. Facts and truth are essential if you would like to maintain a superb fame. Personal growth and romance are on the rise. 5 stars

TAURUS (April 20 – May 20): Changes in the way you do business or do business can pay off. Make your money be just right for you. A change at work or home that increases your income or reduces your overhead will relieve stress and encourage you to pursue what makes you blissful. 3 stars

GEMINI (May 21 – June 20): Keep your paperwork up up to now. Don't lose sight of what's in your agenda and the way much it costs. Focus on health, well-being and doing the most effective work possible. Don't leave anything to probability or the responsibility of others. Take the initiative and protect your interests. 3 stars

CANCER (June 21 – July 22): Set the bar high and let your intellect, experience and intuition guide you. You will get back what you spend money on your goals, so don't be stingy together with your time or talents. High energy, flexibility and modern ideas will result in opportunities. 3 stars

LEO (July 23-August 22): Get on the market, become involved, network, and gather information that may aid you get ahead. Connect with individuals who can contribute as much as you’ll be able to, and also you'll be aware about unique ideas that may encourage you to reset your goals and improve your skills. Personal gain looks promising. 5 stars

VIRGO (August 23 – September 22): Offer your time, not your money. Someone will reap the benefits of you if you happen to allow them to. It's OK to alter your mind or say “no” to someone who pressures you. Don't wait until you're upset; if you happen to're not thinking about someone or something, say “no.” 2 stars

LIBRA (Sept. 23-Oct. 22): A change will lift your mood and energy levels. It's time to begin something latest and bask in activities that make you are feeling good and make you are feeling fit and cozy about your appearance and talents. Travel, education and conversations with forward-thinking people will transform you. 4 stars

SCORPIO (Oct. 23-Nov. 21): Avoid scams and offers that sound too easy. An affordable assessment of what is feasible will aid you change direction and improve your life as a substitute of falling for questionable hype. Stick with what you realize you’ll be able to achieve with the talents and experience you offer. 3 stars

SAGITTARIUS (November 22 to December 21): Focus on the way you feel and look and what you’ll be able to do, not the not possible. The odds are in your favor, so don't look at no cost gifts when input, intelligence and ingenuity are needed. Shut out and avoid emotional manipulation and pressure. Rely on yourself, not others. 3 stars

CAPRICORN (December 22 to January 19): Be careful where every dollar goes. Update documents before penalties are imposed. Stay informed and control the final result of situations that may go for or against you. Don't neglect your health, hygiene, or emotional well-being. Be honest in matters of the guts. 3 stars

AQUARIUS (January 20-February 18): Socializing, networking, and taking an interest in what others are doing will result in profits. Consider secure investments and avoid emotional spending or involvement in unsound joint ventures. Be mindful, resourceful, and concentrate on personal growth, profits, and peace of mind. 4 stars

PISCES (February 19 – March 20): Embark on the trail to enlightenment. Let your intuition guide you and let your conscience be your barometer. Consider methods to make your house user-friendly without going into debt. Sell stuff you don't need and make room for something you would like to pursue. 2 stars

Birthday child: You are smart, responsive and emotional. You are calculating and efficient.

1 star: Avoid conflicts, work behind the scenes. 2 stars: You can achieve something, but don't depend on others. 3 stars: Focus and you’ll achieve your goals. 4 stars: Set high goals, start latest projects. 5 stars: Nothing can stop you, aim for gold.

Visit Eugenialast.com or follow Eugenia on Twitter/Facebook/LinkedIn.

Prince Harry or “well-informed sources” near him are fighting back against a sensational report over the weekend that portrayed him as so lonely and aimless within the United States that he’s in search of a technique to reconcile along with his father, King Charles III, and return to work for the royal family.

Several sources near the Duke of Sussex in California stressed to reporters that the British Telegraph that he shouldn’t be have a midlife crisis he turns 40 on September 15. Instead, he’s “happy” in his marriage to Meghan Markle and “settled” in Montecito. Harry also has a “fantastic” recent circle of friends within the United States and a number of other promising philanthropic and skilled projects within the pipeline, the sources said.

Harry subsequently has “no interest” in resuming his royal duties within the United Kingdom and is concentrating exclusively on his future within the United States, it said.

Another group of sources told the Mail on Sunday that Harry is “turning away from all sorts of Hollywood PR people and seeking advice from his old friends and colleagues”.

These old friends and former royal advisers include people he reportedly lost touch with after he and Meghan quit their royal duties amid a falling out in 2020 and moved to the United States to hunt financial independence and lucrative careers as media moguls, entrepreneurs, philanthropists and global thought leaders.

Some of Harry's longtime British friends were reportedly repulsed by the best way he and Meghan tried to capitalize on their grievances against the royal family. Harry particularly disillusioned some through the use of his 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey or his 2023 best-selling memoir, “Spare,” to disclose family secrets and claim that certain relations were cold, dysfunctional or involved in various types of bullying, scheming and even racism – or “unconscious bias,” as Harry later backtracked.

The Mail on Sunday reported that Harry's overtures to his old friends and colleagues are the primary stage of a technique to “rehabilitate” him. The strategy would ultimately involve Harry spending more time within the UK to repair his relationship along with his father, who’s undergoing cancer treatment, and possibly initiate a partial return to royal circles. Some of those friends have even dubbed the trouble “Operation Bring Harry in from the Cold.”

Harry, alternatively, “is obviously trying to change something because he thinks, 'I need to do something different because what I'm doing is obviously not working,'” a source told the Mail on Sunday. “In short, he's rethinking his approach.”

What is “not working” is that Harry and Meghan lost their multimillion-dollar deal to provide a series of podcasts for Spotify and that a report emerged last month that Netflix is not going to renew its spectacular five-year, $100 million cope with the couple.

While industry newsletter Puck reported that the couple's 2022 docuseries “Harry and Meghan,” about their departure from their unhappy royal life, was a blockbuster hit, critics say it only attracted viewers since the couple spilled dirty words concerning the British monarchy. Puck also reported that Meghan's upcoming cooking show and Harry's announced polo series were two “offerings” not expected to “resonate” with audiences.

Last 12 months, the couple were also the topic of reports in The Wrap and other industry publications that said they’d “lost their reputation” in Hollywood and missed opportunities because they were demanding to work with and lacked experience.

Despite their fans denying it, Harry and Meghan have develop into polarizing figures in each the U.S. and the U.K. One example is the undeniable fact that the British Army veteran and Invictus Games founder courted controversy when he agreed to simply accept an ESPYS award named after Pat Tillman, the San Jose-raised NFL player and war hero who died in Afghanistan in 2004. Among those that questioned Harry's decision to simply accept the award were a retired British military leader and Tillman's own mother, Mary Tillman.

It's clear that Harry and Meghan have had a difficult time trying to seek out a path for themselves within the United States that doesn't involve working for the royal family. But their journey has been complicated by Harry's estrangement from his father and his older brother, Prince William, with whom Harry was once such close friends.

Friends of the family of his late mother, Princess Diana, have told the Daily Beast that they hope Harry and William can in the future reconcile and that they’re doing every part they will to encourage their rapprochement. These friends were encouraged by the undeniable fact that Harry visited Britain last week to attend the funeral of his uncle Robert Fellowes, who was married to Diana's older sister Jane.

William was also on the funeral. However, the brothers reportedly didn’t speak to one another on the funeral. It has also been reported that William doesn’t want his younger brother to be present at his coronation. Page Six said.

So it's probably unrealistic that anyone expects Harry to settle his bitter dispute with William anytime soon, the Mail on Sunday reported. But the Daily Mail reported last week that Charles remains to be willing to settle his dispute along with his son. On the opposite hand, sources also told People last month that the royal is reportedly now not taking calls from his son.

The Mail on Sunday reported that the renegade royal is open to ideas “from many sources” on methods to patch things up along with his father and do his part to be certain that “Operation Bring Harry in from the Cold” is a hit. A friend has reportedly devised a technique for a way Harry could move in British circles again and even tackle “very low-profile royal duties.”

According to a source, this friend believes that Harry could prove himself and win over the British public again if he returns to the UK quietly, with none publicity and only attends very mundane events.

Despite recent reports that Netflix is ​​working hard to supply a cooking show starring Meghan Markle and a series about skilled polo starring Prince Harry, the streamer is “not expected” to renew the spectacular five-year, $100 million deal it signed with the couple in 2020.

That's what Puck co-founder Matthew Belloni and entertainment reporter Lesley Goldberg say. In Belloni's Monday newsletter, he and Goldberg called Netflix's take care of the California-based royal couple and their production company Archewell certainly one of the “worst” in Hollywood's television heyday.

They noted that the couple's 2022 docuseries, “Harry and Meghan,” about their departure from their unhappy royal life, was a blockbuster hit. Critics say that's since the Duke and Duchess of Sussex spilled dirty words in regards to the British monarchy and Harry's relatives.

Belloni and Goldberg said not one of the couple's other projects were “connected” in the identical way, including Meghan's “passion project,” a children's animated series called “Pearl,” which was canceled before it even began. Belloni and Goldberg also said Meghan's upcoming cooking show and Harry's announced polo series were two other “offers” that weren’t expected to be “connected.”

If Harry and Meghan lose the Netflix deal, it could prove to be one other disappointment for the aspiring media moguls after Spotify cut ties with them in June 2023, reportedly on account of low production. Like Netflix, Spotify signed a serious take care of them shortly after the couple moved to California, reportedly paying them $20 million to supply a series of podcasts. But Meghan only managed to place out 12 episodes of a podcast series called “Archetypes.”

Last yr, the couple were the topic of reports in The Wrap and other industry publications that said that they had “lost their reputation” in Hollywood and missed opportunities because they were demanding to work with and lacked experience.

For the Puck newsletter, Harry and Meghan's high-profile Netflix deal joins a protracted list of failures in Hollywood's bloated Peak TV era. The list includes “the most expensive showrunner deals, the nine-figure contracts that resulted in zero new shows, and the biggest screw-ups” of the era.

Fans of the Montecito duo ought to be pleased to see their names mentioned in the identical breath as other Hollywood heavyweights who’ve nevertheless turn into “underperformers.” These veteran producers, creators and showrunners have loads of experience and a track record within the industry – unlike Harry and Meghan. But like Harry and Meghan, they did not deliver on the guarantees of the multimillion-dollar production deals they signed with producers and studios. The list of “underperformers” includes JJ Abrams, “Game of Thrones” creators David Benioff & DB Weiss, Seth MacFarlane, Phoebe Waller-Bridge and Ava DuVernay.

The list also includes Barack and Michelle Obama and their production company Higher Ground. Netflix signed a multimillion-dollar production take care of the previous First Couple in 2018. While Deadline reported in June that the deal had been “fruitful” and Higher Ground had “become one of Netflix's top suppliers of trending film and television projects,” Belloni and Goldberg said the corporate's “management changes and slow production” had frustrated the streamer.

As for Harry and Meghan's current relationship with Netflix, reports earlier this month said Meghan's cooking show wouldn’t be released until spring 2025. The streaming service has yet to announce when it’s able to release the show, although filming has reportedly wrapped in Los Angeles and her hometown of Montecito.

Both the Daily Beast and the Daily Mail reported that the cooking show aired to coincide with the launch of Meghan's latest luxury lifestyle brand, America Riviera Orchard.

The media hype surrounding the cooking show and the American Riviera Orchard (AOR) brand created anticipation amongst Meghan's fans and critics that each would launch in the autumn. Hype around the luxurious home and lifestyle products promised by AOR exploded within the spring as Meghan's celebrity friends tried to drum up excitement about her latest enterprise. Kris Jenner, Chrissy Teigen and others boasted on social media that they were among the many lucky few to receive their limited-edition AOR pots of raspberry and strawberry jam, in addition to some likely expensive dog biscuits.

But the Daily Beast reported that Meghan may not give you the option to follow the principle of “strike while the iron is hot” relating to distributing and marketing her brand. And that's not simply because it can reportedly happen similtaneously the Netflix series.

The US Patent and Trademark Office also told the previous Hollywood TV actress that she needed to correct “irregularities” within the applications she had filed with the office, the Daily Mail reported. The office has informed Meghan's lawyers of several issues, including the misclassification of other proposed AOR products equivalent to yoga blankets, picnic baskets and cookbooks. Unfortunately for AOR, trademark applications could take around eight months to review and as much as 14 months to register, the Daily Mail reported.

For reasons not entirely clear, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle will begin their four-day trip to Colombia on Thursday – described as a “quasi-royal” tour as they are going to now not represent the British government but only their interests and private concerns.

The California-based couple can expect glowing coverage from a reporter representing “a hand-picked publication” who has been chosen to be a part of their entourage. in line with The Telegraph. Meghan is bound to vary her designer outfits several times as the previous American television actress and her husband help their host, Vice President Francia Marquez, “illuminate Colombia's role as a beacon of culture and innovation.”

The trip is about to incorporate photo-friendly stops within the capital Bogota and the regions of Cartagena and Cali, The Telegraph reported. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will visit a city founded by runaway slaves that has grow to be a logo of anti-colonial resistance. In addition, they are going to proceed the work of their Archewell Foundation, which focuses on improving online environments for young people, by attending a summit of experts, activists and community members. People have reported. At some point they will even meet with Colombian participants within the Invictus Games at a lunch hosted by Marquez.

But there are questions on the true purpose of this high-profile trip and who really advantages from it. The Telegraph and the Daily Mail The tour has reportedly sparked controversy, with Colombians claiming Harry and Meghan risk getting used as “political pawns” in a government facing turmoil, corruption scandals and opposition from other branches of power.

“I'm sure Meghan and Harry mean well, but everyone here is talking about how obviously they are being manipulated,” a outstanding Bogota lawyer told the Daily Mail. “Of course their star status is being used to draw attention to poor people and certain areas of culture in Colombia… but the reality is that the Colombian government has been mired in scandal since it took office two years ago. They need something to appease people at home and make them look good abroad.”

President Gustavo Petro is a former left-wing guerrilla and mayor of Bogotá who promised to remodel Colombia right into a more just society. NPR saidHowever, he has faced criticism and protests for failing to implement promised reforms in healthcare, education and welfare for single moms and abused women, the Daily Mail reported.

Some of the criticism is self-inflicted, NPR added. He is understood for his inflammatory rhetoric and has been accused of cheating on his wife. His foreign minister has been suspended over alleged corruption and his 2022 campaign is under scrutiny over possible illegal donations, NPR and the Daily Mail reported. In addition, he recently claimed that the commander of rebel forces paid for his assassination by snipers. Meanwhile, Colombia continues to struggle to shed its status as a rustic inundated by drug trafficking and murderous cartels.

There isn’t any indication that Harry and Meghan will meet Petro, as their invitation comes from his vp. Still, the couple face other questions – which they’re unlikely to reply – namely who can pay for his or her flights to Colombia, their expected luxury accommodation and their security, in line with The Telegraph. The government – and due to this fact Colombian taxpayers – are expected to pay for his or her high level of security, especially in the event that they travel with Marquez, who has been the goal of assassination attempts, the Daily Mail reported.

“People are grumbling about why the Colombian taxpayer should foot the huge security bill for what is essentially a PR exercise for the Sussexes and a government that desperately needs to distract from its mistakes,” a source told the Daily Mail.

The Colombia trip has also reignited criticism over Harry's claims that he didn’t feel secure bringing Meghan and his children to the UK because he was cut off from armed police protection when he and Meghan gave up royal duties and moved to California in 2020. But now he and his wife are travelling to Colombia after the UK and US governments warned against travel to certain regions over concerns about terrorism, kidnapping and street crime.

Since Harry and Meghan will not be travelling to Colombia in an official diplomatic capability, they can not expect expert advice from the British Foreign Office on tips on how to take care of sensitive political or cultural issues.

“When you have this quasi-royal status, you are viewed internationally as a member of the royal family and treated as such when you travel, but you don't have the protection of the State Department,” royal writer Anna Pasternak told The Telegraph. “This is a high-risk tour for her.”

Pasternak has written a book about Wallis Simpson, the Duchess of Windsor, one other American who married into the British royal family but was banished from the monarchy's center of power. Pasternak sees some parallels between Harry and Meghan's quasi-royal trips to Nigeria last spring and now to Colombia and the controversial trips Edward and Wallis made as “private citizens” on the invitation of foreign governments.

One trip specifically showed the poor judgement of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor and did enormous damage to their status. In 1937, a yr after Edward abdicated the British throne, he and Wallis visited Germany, where they were hailed as kings with power and influence. They also drank tea with Hermann Göring, watched the training of the Hitler Youth, and were photographed meeting Hitler himself. Less than two years later, Hitler invaded Poland and Britain, and France declared war on Germany, sparking World War II.

While nobody believes the Sussexes would ever grow to be involved in anything akin to emerging Nazism, Pasternak and others explained that there have been potential risks in Harry and Meghan mingling with heads of presidency without following standard diplomatic protocol. The British government has tried to distance itself as much as possible from the Sussexes' world-traveling activities. A source within the Foreign Office told the Daily Mail that their trip to Colombia was “completely irrelevant” to British interests abroad.

However, Pasternak believes Harry shares a number of the reasons Edward had for these quasi-royal trips. Edward and Wallis accepted Germany's invitation to go to in 1937 “because Edward felt so hurt and angry that Wallis had been rejected by the royal family, and he desperately wanted her to experience the pomp and ceremony of a royal trip.”

“He wanted Wallis to be addressed as HRH and for people to curtsy to her,” Pasternak continued. “I'm not saying Harry wants the pomp and ceremony of a royal tour, but there may be a sense that he would love [to elevate] Meghan to the status she is entitled to.”

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are apparently preparing for a brand new media offensive: “CBS Sunday Morning” revealed that the couple filmed an interview with Jane Pauley that may air this weekend.

The chat would mark the primary time the California-based couple have taken part in a joint interview since their blockbuster sessions with Oprah Winfrey in 2021 and their 2022 Netflix documentary series. In those interviews, which got here after they stepped back from royal duties in 2020, they sparked a three-year media storm wherein they shared sensational revelations concerning the British royal family, alleging types of racism, cruelty and dysfunction, and specifically amplifying criticism of certain members.

But a brief clip from Harry and Meghan's interview with Pauley posted on social media suggests the California-based couple may avoid discussing Harry's relatives, from whom they’re notoriously estranged. In fact, a report in People magazine this week said King Charles III has stopped taking his son's calls. For the American and British public, Harry and Meghan's revelations have also develop into increasingly polarizing, as evidenced by the controversy that followed Harry receiving an award named in honor of American war hero Pat Tillman on the ESPYs.

The CBS Sunday interview could concentrate on one other latest initiative the Duke and Duchess try out with their Archewell Foundation, which involves children and social media. Page Six reported.

In the clip, the couple talks about continuing their work with parents who’ve lost their children to online bullying and abuse. Last October, the couple headlined a Project Healthy Minds festival in New York City, where they discussed the damaging effects of social media on young people's mental health.

This “CBS Sunday” interview comes amid what may very well be a serious latest media cycle for the couple, who’re still trying to search out their footing as media moguls, entrepreneurs and influential public figures.

Meghan was the subject of reports about ending filming a brand new cooking series for Netflix, which was a part of her five-year, $100 million take care of the platform. Harry can also be said to be working on his own show about skilled polo. Meghan has also announced plans to sell luxury home and lifestyle items through her latest American brand, Riviera Orchard. However, no launch dates for the cooking and polo shows or Meghan's lifestyle band have been announced.

Still, the couple has been making headlines currently. Following the ESPY controversy, Harry made more global headlines by giving an interview to British television about his high-profile legal battle with the British tabloids over their past phone-tapping and other illegal practices.

However, the once-popular British duke sparked fresh criticism when he said within the documentary “Tabloids on Trial” that his determination to fight against the tabloid press was “central” to his fractured relationship together with his father, brother Prince William and sister-in-law Kate Middleton. In various online forums, Harry was criticised for blaming his falling out together with his family on his court battles, relatively than taking responsibility for his decision to “talk incessantly about his family on a global scale”.

As a part of Harry and Meghan’s latest media cycle, the Duke can also be the quilt star for this week's People magazine, with a protracted story specializing in his other legal battle: getting the British government to provide him armed police protection when he visits the United Kingdom together with his wife and family. Harry was not interviewed for the story, but “sources” near him suggested he or his PR team approved the story.

The story allows Harry to argue that his estrangement from his family also stems from not getting the police protection he robotically enjoyed when he and Meghan were working members of the royal family. The Harry sources say he doesn't feel protected bringing his wife and youngsters, Archie and Lilibet, to the UK and that he’s frustrated that his father, as royal, is unwilling to assist him.

“Harry is scared and believes his father is the only one who can do something about it,” a royal insider told People. Another source acquainted with the situation said: “Harry is determined to protect his own family at all costs.”

Since losing the automated right to police protection, Harry has been waging an unsuccessful legal battle with the British government to have his protection restored, something he believes Charles could easily achieve.

But People reported, citing sources at Buckingham Palace, that under the British structure the monarch has no governing power and that the authority to supply police protection doesn’t lie with Charles but with the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (RAVEC), which acts on behalf of the British government.

While people near Harry said the problem had created “an impenetrable wall” between him and his father, sources near the king accused his son of resorting to “emotional blackmail” and threatened the king that he may never see his grandchildren Archie and Lilibet again if he didn’t address his son's safety concerns.

Originally published: August 1, 2024 at 10:54 am