“Today I spoke with President-elect Trump and congratulated him on his victory,” Harris said on the vp’s alma mater Howard Universityin Washington, DC

It was the primary time Harris spoke to the general public on camera since Trump declared his victory early Wednesday morning.

“We will continue to fight this fight in the voting booth, in the courts and in public squares,” she said.

Harris was accompanied by her husband, Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff, along together with her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, and other relations and campaign staff. Many people present had tears of their eyes because the Vice President gave her speech.

“I know people are feeling and experiencing a range of emotions right now,” Harris said. “I’m so proud of the race we ran and the way we ran it.”

Harris urged her supporters to stay looking forward to the incoming administration.

“While I admit this election, I do not admit the fight that fueled this campaign,” Harris said. “The fight for freedom, for opportunities, for justice and the dignity of all people.”

“This is not the time to throw up your hands,” she added. “This is the time to roll up your sleeves.”

Over the course of her 107-day campaign, Harris broke fundraising records and held regular rallies attended by tens of hundreds of individuals. She also racked up various high-profile endorsements — from music superstars like Taylor Swift and Beyoncé to staunch conservatives like former Republican Vice President Dick Cheney and his daughter, former Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney.

“Our intention was to build communities and coalitions to bring people from all walks of life and backgrounds together, united by a love of country,” Harris said.

Harris was originally scheduled to talk at her election watch party at Howard University on Tuesday night, but her campaign turned away the group because the vote count got here in and Trump gave the impression to be ahead.

Wednesday's speech capped a series of events unparalleled in American political history. It began when Trump survived an assassination attempt in early July. Every week later, Harris was spontaneously catapulted to the highest spot within the Democratic presidential nomination after President Joe Biden dropped out of the race.

In shocking news, Kamala Harris is leading Donald Trump in Iowa 47% to 44% amongst likely voters Opinion poll released on Saturday evening, just three days before Election Day.

Harris' lead is throughout the poll's margin of error of three.4 percentage points, but her lead reflects a seven-point swing in voters' favor since September.

The results of the Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa poll got here as a whole surprise to political observers, as no serious analyst predicted that the Democratic candidate would defeat Trump within the state.

Since the conclusion of the presidential primary, neither candidate had campaigned within the state, which Trump won easily within the last two presidential elections.

“No one can say they saw this coming,” pollster J. Ann Selzer, president of Selzer & Co, told the Des Moines Register.

“She has clearly made the leap into a leadership position.”

Selzer & Co. conducted the poll of 808 likely Iowa voters Monday through Thursday. Selzer's company is well-respected by pollsters, and its results are likely to carry a whole lot of weight with political strategists.

Harris' lead within the poll was based on strong support from female voters, particularly older and politically independent voters.

“Age and gender are the two most dynamic factors that explain these numbers,” Selzer told the Register.

The poll found that 3% of respondents supported independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who ended his campaign in favor of Trump. Kennedy stays on the Iowa ballot.

The same poll in September showed Trump leading Harris, the present vice chairman, by 4 percentage points. Trump was 18 percentage points ahead of President Joe Biden, then the presumptive Democratic nominee, in June.

Trump won the state by 8 percentage points in 2020 and by 9 percentage points in 2016.

The Republican campaign gave one memo On Saturday evening, the poll called the poll an “outlier.”

The memo noted that the brand new Emerson College A poll of likely Iowa voters released Saturday showed Trump leading Harris 53% to 43%.

The Trump campaign memo said: “Des Moines Register is a clear outlier poll. Emerson College’s release today “far better reflects the state of the real Iowa electorate and does so with far more transparency in its methodology.”

Vice President Kamala Harris criticized House Speaker Mike Johnson on Saturday for suggesting that Republicans might attempt to repeal the law CHIPS and Science Act in the event that they win Congress, a comment he has since tried to retract.

“I also want to address the comments that the speaker of the House made recently,” Harris told a gaggle of reporters in Milwaukee. “It's just further evidence of everything I've been talking about for months [former President Donald] Trump’s intention to implement the project in 2025.”

“We have spoken repeatedly about their intention to get rid of this Affordable Care Act. Now the CHIPS law must be repealed,” she added.

Speaker Johnson, R-La., made the comment at a campaign event Friday in New York for House Speaker Brandon Williams, R-N.Y., an endangered Republican Party candidate in one of the vital closely watched House races this election cycle .

“I expect we probably will, but we haven't developed that part of the agenda yet,” Johnson said in response to a reporter's query about whether Republicans would seek to repeal the law.

The CHIPS Act was passed by Congress in 2022 with bipartisan support. The law freed up nearly $53 billion in funding to construct domestic production of semiconductors, that are critical to the expansion of strategic industries similar to artificial intelligence. The federal government has greater than announced $30 billion in investments based on the law from August.

Harris has made investment in manufacturing a central pillar of her economic platform.

“It is my plan and intention to continue to invest in American manufacturing, in the work of American workers that preserves and promotes good union jobs,” Harris said in Milwaukee. “This is how we will win the competition with China in the 21st century.”

Johnson's remark followed Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's attack on the CHIPS Act during an Oct. 25 interview with Joe Rogan.

In the interview, Trump accused Taiwan of stealing “our chip business” and called for tariffs on imported semiconductors.

“This chip deal is so bad,” Trump said. “We have allocated billions of dollars for rich companies to come in, borrow the money and build chip companies here, and they won't give us the good companies anyway.”

Rep. Williams' congressional district has welcomed the potential economic boost micron Semiconductor manufacturing facility funded by the CHIPS Act.

“The CHIPS law has a huge impact here,” Williams said in a subtle cleanup after Johnson’s comments. New York lawmakers also issued an announcement Friday saying Johnson apologized “profusely” for the error and said “he misunderstood the question.”

Democrats only need to realize 4 additional seats within the House of Representatives to wrest the gavel from Republicans in the following Congress. Polls up to now show the House race is basically at coin toss status.

Johnson has made attempts at further damage control since his Friday comments, saying after the campaign event that repeal of the CHIPS law was not on the Republican agenda.

Yet Democrats are piling on the faux pas just days before the Nov. 5 election.

“The Republican Speaker of the House just told the tens of thousands of construction workers working on the future of New York and America that they want to send them red slips as quickly as possible,” wrote Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. , on Friday post on the X platform.

Vice President Kamala Harris plans to make manufacturing the main focus of her final message against former President Donald Trump within the battleground state Michigan on Monday.

With just over every week to go before the Nov. 5 election, Harris' manufacturing-focused visit is considered one of her last opportunities to narrow Trump's poll advantage on the economy in a state that has change into an epicenter of emerging U.S. industries has change into semiconductor and electric vehicles.

CNBC's October All-American Economic Survey found that nationally, 46% of respondents said Trump can be higher for the economy of their community, while 38% said the identical about Harris. This difference is outside the survey's margin of error of three.1 percentage points.

In battleground states particularly, the poll found Trump had a comparable lead of eight points, even outside the 4.0 percentage point margin of error.

The Michigan tour is a component of the Harris campaign's week-long barnstorming of battleground states. The vp was in Pennsylvania on Sunday and is scheduled to go to North Carolina, Wisconsin, Arizona and Nevada on Wednesday and Thursday.

During her stay in Michigan, Harris will first give a speech Hemlock semiconductor manufacturing center, where she’s going to tout a recent $325 million investment from the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act.

Later Monday, she’s going to tour a union training facility before heading to Ann Arbor for a rally together with her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz.

Harris and Trump each promised a producing boom under their hypothetical administrations, but had different ideas about the best way to achieve it.

Trump has promised to repeal the Biden administration's Inflation Reduction Act and has criticized the CHIPS Act. Instead, the Republican presidential candidate has launched a universal tariff policy on all imports as his primary strategy for onshore manufacturing.

“This chip deal is so bad,” Trump said in a Friday interview on the “Joe Rogan Experience” podcast. “You just had to charge them customs duties.”

Harris has criticized this harsh tariff approach, branding it a “Trump sales tax” based on economists’ opinions. Estimates that a flat-rate import tax would increase consumer prices.

On your part Harris wants to spice up manufacturing through a mix of tax credits and government subsidies for sectors comparable to artificial intelligence, clean energy manufacturing, cars and semiconductors.

The Washington Post said on Friday that it could not endorse any candidate on this 12 months's presidential election – or ever again – in a break with a long time of tradition and prompting immediate criticism of the choice.

But the newspaper also published one Article by two staff reporters who revealed that newsroom staff had written an endorsement of Democratic nominee Kamala Harris over GOP nominee Donald Trump within the election.

“The decision not to publish was made by the owner of the post – Amazon Founder Jeff Bezos,” the article said, citing two sources briefed on the events.

As president, Trump was critical of billionaire Bezos and the post office, which he bought in 2013.

The Newspaper in 2016 and again in 2020 supported Trump Choice Opponents, Hillary Clinton and President Joe Biden, in editorials that condemned the Republican in blunt terms.

In a 2019 lawsuit, Amazon claimed it suffered a $10 billion loss Cloud computing contract with the Pentagon to Microsoft because Trump had exerted “undue pressure… to harm his perceived political enemy” Bezos.

The Post has recurrently endorsed presidential candidates since 1976, excluding the 1988 election. All of those endorsements were for Democrats.

In a press release to CNBC, the Post's communications chief Kathy Baird, when asked about Bezos' alleged role in stopping support, said: “This was a decision by the Washington Post not to support and I refer you to the full statement Editor.”

The Post published a third article on Friday evening, signed by Opinion columnists for the newspaper, which said: “The Washington Post's decision to not support the presidential campaign is a terrible mistake.”

“It represents a departure from the fundamental editorial beliefs of the newspaper that we love and have worked for for a combined 218 years,” the column said. “This is a moment for the institution to demonstrate its commitment to democratic values, the rule of law and international alliances, and the threat Donald Trump presents to them – the exact points The Post made when supporting Trump’s opponents in 2016 and 2020.”

CNBC has requested comment from Amazon, where Bezos stays the biggest shareholder.

Will Lewis, publisher and executive director of the Post, wrote in an article published online explaining the decision: “The Washington Post will not endorse a presidential candidate in this election. Not even in future presidential elections.”

“We are returning to our roots of opposing presidential candidates,” Lewis wrote.

“We recognize that this will be interpreted in different ways, including as a tacit endorsement of one candidate, a condemnation of another, or an abdication of responsibility,” he wrote.

“This is inevitable. We don't see it that way. We see it as consistent with the values ​​the Post has always stood for and with what we hope for in a leader: character and courage in the service of American ethics, reverence for the rule of law and respect for human freedom everywhere their aspects.”

Seven of the 13 paragraphs of Lewis' article quoted extensively or referenced Post Editorial Board opinions from 1960 and 1972, which explained the newspaper's reasons for not supporting presidential candidates in those years, including its identity as an “independent newspaper belonged.

Lewis noted that the newspaper had supported Jimmy Carter in 1976 “for reasons that were understandable at the time” – which he didn’t specify.

“But we were close to it and this is what we’re coming back to,” Lewis wrote.

“Our job as a newspaper in the capital of the most important country in the world is to be independent,” he wrote. “And that is who we are and will be.”

Multiple news outlets reported that Post Editor-in-Chief Robert Kagan, a member of the paper's opinion section, resigned following the choice.

More than 10,000 reader comments were posted on Lewis' article, a lot of them criticizing the Post for its decision and saying they’d cancel their subscriptions.

“The most consequential election in our country, a choice between fascism and democracy, and you're sitting outside? Cowards. Unethical, fearful cowards,” wrote one commenter. “Oh, and by the way, I’m canceling my subscription because you put business over ethics and morals.”

The announcement got here just a few days after Mariel Garza, the pinnacle of The Los Angeles TimesThe editorial team resigned in protest after that newspaper's owner, Patrick Soon-Shiong, decided against supporting the president.

“I am resigning because I want to make it clear that I do not agree with us remaining silent,” Garza said Columbia Journalism Review. “In dangerous times, honest people must stand up. So I get up.”

Like Bezos, Soon-Shiong is a billionaire.

Marty Baron, the previous editor of the Washington Post, called that newspaper's decision “cowardice of which democracy is the victim.”

“@realdonaldtrump will see this as an invitation to further intimidate owner @jeffbezos (and others),” Baron wrote. “Disturbing spinelessness in an institution known for its courage.”

The Washington Post Guild, the union that represents the newspaper's employees, said in a press release on the social media site that it supports presidential candidates, especially just 11 days before a hugely consequential election.”

“The message from our chief executive, Will Lewis – not the editorial board itself – gives us cause for concern that management has interfered with the work of our editorial board members,” the Guild said in the statement responding to the newspaper's reporting on the Role of Bezos referred to in the decision.

“We are already seeing cancellations from once-loyal readers,” the guild said. “This decision undermines the work of our members at a time when we should be building, not losing, the trust of our readers.”

Former Post reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, whose stories about the Watergate break-in during the Nixon administration won the paper a Pulitzer Prize for public service, said in a statement: “We respect the traditional independence of the newsroom, but this Decision. “11 days before the 2024 presidential election ignores the Washington Post’s overwhelming reporting on the threat Donald Trump poses to democracy.”

“Under Jeff Bezos' leadership, The Washington Post's news department has used its abundant resources to thoroughly examine the dangers and damage that a second Trump presidency could cause to the future of American democracy, and that makes this decision even more surprising and more disappointing, especially at this late stage in the electoral process,” Woodward and Bernstein said.

Post columnist Karen Attiah wrote in a post on the social media site Threads: “Today was an absolute stab in the back.”

“What an insult to those of us who’ve literally put our careers and lives on the road to denounce threats to human rights and democracy,” Attiah wrote.

Rep. Ted Lieu, a Democrat from California, wrote in his own tweet in regards to the news: “The first step toward fascism is for the free press to cower in fear.”

Trump told Fox Business News in August that Bezos called him after the Republican narrowly escaped an assassination attempt at a campaign rally in western Pennsylvania in July.

“He was very nice, even though he owns the Washington Post,” Trump said of Bezos.

Bezos last posted on X on July 13, hours after the assassination.

“Our former president showed tremendous grace and courage under literal fire tonight,” Bezos wrote in that tweet. “So grateful for his safety and so sad for the victims and their families.”

Trump met with executives from Bezos-owned space exploration company Blue Origin, including CEO David Limp, in Austin, Texas, on Friday, the Associated Press reported

Vice President Kamala Harris criticized Donald Trump on Wednesday for his alleged praise Adolf Hitlerand said the Republican presidential candidate “wants unchecked power.”

Harris, the Democratic nominee, spoke at her residence in Washington, DC, a day after reports of recent interviews with Trump's former White House chief of staff John Kellywhich echoed Trump's comments in regards to the Nazi leader during his time as president.

“It is deeply disturbing and incredibly dangerous that Donald Trump would invoke Adolf Hitler, the man responsible for the deaths of six million Jews and hundreds of thousands of Americans,” Harris said.

“Yesterday we learned that Donald Trump's former chief of staff John Kelly, a retired four-star general, confirmed that while he was president, Donald Trump said he wanted generals like Adolf Hitler,” she said.

“Donald Trump said that because he didn’t want a military loyal to the Constitution of the United States, he wanted a military loyal to him.”

Harris' statement got here lower than two weeks before the Nov. 5 presidential election, which she acknowledged by issuing a warning about Trump. Millions of Americans have already forged their votes in states that allow early voting.

“Donald Trump has become increasingly unhinged and unstable,” Harris said.

“And in a second term, people like John Kelly would no longer be there to fend off his tendencies and actions. Those who once tried to stop him from acting on his worst impulses would no longer be there and would no longer be there to contain him.

“So the bottom line is: We know what Donald Trump wants. He wants uncontrolled power. In 13 days the question will be: What do the American people want,” she said.

Kelly, who served as Trump's homeland security secretary before becoming White House chief of staff, recounted The New York Times that Trump met the definition of a fascist and that if elected to a second term he would rule like a dictator if not restrained.

“He certainly prefers the dictatorial approach to government,” Kelly told The Times.

Kelly also said in an interview for the Jim Sciutto book “Return of the Great Powers” that Trump told him, “Well, but Hitler did some good things.”