Ione Skye, who was often known as a cool girl star from “Say Anything” and other teenage movies from the Eighties, was also famous for her turbulent trysten and relationships with famous men, from Red Hot Chili Peppers Frontmann Anthony Kiedis to John Cusack and due to the darkness of Hollywood.

Fortunately, it doesn't sound as if Skeanu Reeves had something too dark on Skeanu Reeves, as they’ve revealed “say everything” of their latest, telled memoirs. However, she admitted that the friendship began along with her “persecuted”, the famous relaxed A-List actor, while working in her first film “Rivers Edge”, against the law drama from 1986. During the film recordings, she also described how her friendship achieved a crucial understanding after trying unsuccessfully to seduce him.

“Even the way he rejected me was charming,” wrote Skye, According to Entertainment Weekly.

Now 54, said Skye, she “difficult not to stare at Reeves”, while along with the indie film about dissatisfied teenagers, who, in keeping with Entertainment Weekly, take care of the murder of a lady through considered one of her friends. At that point, Skye was 16 and due to this fact accommodated, but it surely can have grew up quickly as a product of a Bohemian childhood of the show business. Her father was “Mellow Yellow” singer Donovan.

Reeves was now 22 years old. Skye said she had developed a “huge swarm” for the longer term star of “speed” and the “Matrix” and “John Wick” movies. She said she believed that Reeves felt a lot that she expected that she would have sex when she visited him in his studio apartment, as she wrote in her book.

At that point, Skye apparently didn’t think twice about pursuing an older man, probably since it was not so concerned that the corporate of the Eighties was as concerned as now about men who’re involved in teenage girls. It can be possible that your memory of your encounter can be dramatized, while Reeves didn’t answer a weekly entertainment request for comments.

In any case, Skye wrote that she had moved in to kiss Reeves, but he told her that he would take a shower. Skye apparently took this as an invite because she followed him in the toilet.

“Keanu switched on the water and stood with my back to me, hand in the stream and stared at the shower head,” wrote Skye, in keeping with Entertainment Weekly. “I maneuvered between him and the open shower curtain, water sprayed my back.”

“His beautiful neck was so close that I could lick him, so I did it,” revealed Skye. “I turned myself on his beautiful neck, suck and made it around. He made a low, growing noise and I felt my stomach turned well. “

“Oh, I even have to say myself,” continues Skye. “The room was thick with steam, my wet t-shirt stayed and desired to be peeled off.”

But when Skye reached for reeves pants, she wrote that he grabbed her wrist to stop her. He stated that he didn't want to take over things any further.

“I broke out with a quick, shocked laugh. “Sorry!”, She said. But she wrote that Reeves told her, “Don't be” when he released her wrist. “We were still together and breathed hard,” she continued. “I pressed my face red from my kiss and now embarrassed into his chest.”

Skye said the older Reeves treated them friendly. “Leave me, ah, get a dry shirt,” he said. “Damn,” thought Skye. “Even the way in which he rejected me was charming.”

Skye wrote that things were only a little uncomfortable the next day. Without saying anything, Keanu let me know that he did not accuse me of trying to have tried. “

Apparently Reeves' relaxed attitude was useful after they filmed more scenes, including a sex scene, Skye said. In “Rivers Edge” they play friends of the murdered girl who combines their joint confusion and grief. Incidentally, “Rivers Edge” is predicated on the true murder of a 16-year-old girl in Milpitas from 1981.

The filming of the sex scene still had an unpleasant start because Skye admitted that she was still interested in Reeves and felt that he was also interested in her.

“Be careful that I didn't let my hair fall over my face. I spanned Keanu and kissed it really, moved around, parts, sometimes missing and grinding on the leg or stomach,” wrote Skye. Anyone who reads this from a perspective of 2025 could be surprised by the plain lack of intimacy coordinator.

After that, Skye and Reeves “pulled a little shy, a little breathless,” she wrote. When Reeves asked: “You good? '” Said Skye: “I felt from the Husky edge of his voice that it wasn't just me who wanted more.”

“I whispered my lips to the side of his face, I whispered: 'Can I come to you after wraps?'” Said Skye, she asked.

It seems like Reeves Skye let back to his studio. But she wrote that this visit ended abruptly when Reeves suddenly stopped kissing her and offering her house.

Years later, Skye wrote, she got here to the belief that she was not in love with Reeves, but had a crush on him. But they stayed friends According to People Magazine

Reeves just isn’t the one famous man whose interactions with Skye are within the highlight of their memoirs. She also opens up on her holy relationship along with her British father, reveals that she actually slept along with her co-star John Cusack after having passed for years, and he or she writes that she is “a series fraud” who’s “a serial fraud” who confesses to her canoe with one other woman during her marriage to Beastie Boys-Rapper Adam Horovitz.

Curious Kids is a show for teenagers of all ages. If you’ve a matter you'd like an authority to reply, send it to curiouskidsus@theconversation.com.

---

Is it possible that at some point we will create Mars like Earth? – Tyla, 16, Mississippi

---

When I used to be in middle school, my biology teacher showed our class the science fiction film “Star Trek III: The Search for Spock.”

The plot captivated me with its portrayal of the “Genesis Project“” – a brand new technology that transformed a dead alien world right into a world vigorous.

After watching the movie, my teacher asked us to write down an essay about this technology. Was it realistic? Was it ethical? And to channel our inner Spock, was it logical? This task had a huge effect on me.

Fast forward to today, and I’m an engineer and professor Development of technologies to expand human presence beyond Earth.

For example: I’m working on advanced propulsion systems to take spacecraft beyond Earth orbit. I’m helping to develop lunar constructing technologies to support NASA's goal of long-term human presence on the moonAnd I used to be in a team that showed How to 3D print habitats on Mars.

Providing supplies to people beyond Earth would require an ideal deal of time, energy and imagination, but engineers and scientists have begun to deal with the various challenges.

An incomplete checklist: food, water, shelter, air

After the Moon, Mars is the subsequent logical place for humans outside of Earth.

But is it possible to terraform Mars – that’s, to remodel it into something more like Earth and support life – or is that this only a fantasy from science fiction?

To continue to exist Mars, humans need liquid water, food, shelter, and an environment that gives enough oxygen to breathe and is thick enough to retain heat and protect against the sun's radiation.

But the Martian atmosphere is just about all carbon dioxidepractically without oxygen. And it is vitally thin – only about 1% as dense because the Earth.

The thinner an environment, the less heat it could actually store. Earth's atmosphere is thick enough to store enough heat to sustain life. just like the greenhouse effect.

On Mars, nevertheless, the atmosphere is so thin that the temperature recurrently drops to -101 degrees Celsius (150 degrees Fahrenheit below zero) at night.

So what’s the most effective method to give Mars an environment?

Although there are not any lively volcanoes on Mars – so far as we all know – scientists could trigger volcanic eruptions through nuclear explosions. The deeply trapped gases in a volcano can be released after which drift into the atmosphereBut this plan is a bit crazy since the explosions would also release deadly radioactive material into the air.

A greater idea: redirecting water-rich comets and asteroids in order that they crash into Mars. This would also release gases from the planet's subsurface into the atmosphere and at the identical time release the water contained within the comets. NASA has already shown that It is feasible to redirect asteroids – but to attain something, relatively large ones and plenty of of them are needed.

Making Mars comfortable

There are quite a few ways to heat up the planet. For example, giant mirrors in-built space and placed in orbit around Mars could reflect sunlight onto the surface and warm it up.

A recent study suggested that Mars colonists could spread Aerogelan ultralight solid material, on the bottom. The aerogel would act as insulation and retain heat. This could occur anywhere on Mars, including the polar ice caps, where the aerogel could melt the prevailing ice and create liquid water.

To grow food, you would like soil. On Earth, soil consists of five ingredients: minerals, organic substances, living organisms, gases and water.

However, Mars is roofed by a layer of loose, dust-like material, RegolithThink of it as Martian sand. The regolith accommodates few nutrients, not enough for healthy plant growth, and it accommodates some harmful chemicals. so-called perchloratesused on earth in fireworks and explosives.

Clean the regolith and transform it into something usable wouldn’t be easyWhat foreign soil needs is a Mars fertilizerpossibly by adding Extremophiles robust microbes imported from Earth and survive even the harshest conditionsGenetically modified organisms are also a possibility.

Through photosynthesis, these organisms would begin converting carbon dioxide into oxygen. As Mars eventually became more hospitable to Earth-like organisms, colonists were in a position to introduce more complex plants and even animals.

Providing oxygen, water and food in the precise quantities is incredibly complex. On Earth, scientists have tried to simulate this in Biosphere 2a closed ecosystem with ocean, tropical and desert habitats. Although all habitats in Biosphere 2 are controlled, even there scientists struggle to seek out the precise balance. Mother Nature really knows what she's doing.

A house on Mars

Buildings may very well be manufactured using 3D printing. First, they’d need to be pressurized and guarded until temperatures and air conditions on Mars are much like those on Earth. Technologies for the autonomous construction of planets from the Moon to Mars The program explores how exactly this could be achieved.

There are many other challenges. For example different from the earthMars has no Magnetospherethat protects a planet from solar wind and cosmic radiation. Without a magnetic field, an excessive amount of radiation penetrates for living beings to stay healthy. There are Possibilities for generating a magnetic fieldbut to date the scientific status could be very speculative.

In fact, all the technologies I even have described are far beyond the present capabilities required to terraform Mars. Their development would require enormous amounts of research and money, probably far more than is feasible within the near future. Although the Genesis device from Star Trek III could terraform a planet in a matter of minutes, terraforming Mars would take centuries and even millennia.

And before we start turning Mars right into a second Earth, many ethical questions have to be addressed. Is it right to alter one other planet so drastically and permanently?

If all this disappoints you, don't be. As scientists develop innovations to terraform Mars, we'll also use them to make life higher on Earth. Remember the technology we're developing to 3D print habitats on Mars? Right now, I'm a part of a gaggle of scientists and engineers using that very technology to print homes here on Earth – which is able to help solve the issue. Housing shortage on the earth.

---

Hey, curious kids! Do you’ve a matter you'd like an authority to reply? Ask an adult to send your query to CuriousKidsUS@theconversation.com. Please tell us your name, age and the town you reside in.

And since curiosity knows no age limit, adults can take part too. Let us know what interests you. We can't answer every query, but we'll do our greatest.

GILROYOn a cloudless spring day on the outskirts of Gilroy, Christian Martorella accelerated past burgeoning orchards in an 18-wheeler. But as an alternative of the roar of a diesel engine, the cabin was full of the gentle hum of an electrical motor.

After driving diesel trucks for ten years, Martorella was initially skeptical about electric trucks. Now he praises the state-of-the-art machines, which he says ride smoother, speed up faster and are overall easier to keep up.

“It’s crazy how consistent they’ve been,” he said. “(They) definitely blew it away.”

The truck is one among seven heavy-duty electric trucks getting used to move food at Performance Food Group in Gilroy, supported by a series of brand name recent charging stations, an upcoming installation of solar panels and a fleet of all-electric refrigerated trailers.

While the Gilroy site is one among the few locations nationwide experimenting with zero-emission technology for semi-trucks, government regulations will push an increasing number of trucks on this direction in the approaching years. By 2036, manufacturers in California will only have the ability to sell zero-emission heavy-duty trucks, and plenty of fleets might want to progressively add more zero-emission vehicles over the following decade.

“It’s important for everyone in their organization to think about these things. But they are ahead of the curve,” says Bill Robertson, vehicle program specialist on the California Air Review Board. “We’re pretty excited about what they’re doing there.”

The Gilroy site will function a test bed for the brand new technologies – each for the corporate and the industry – and permit them to know the strengths and limitations of the technology in the true world. “We will continue to learn from this and add more technologies,” said Jeff Williamson, senior vp of operations for Performance Food Group. “This is in some ways our flagship, our model based on which we want to build future facilities.”

In the past, trucking and shipping were anything but environmentally friendly. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, about 29% of greenhouse gas emissions within the U.S. come from transportation, and a few quarter of that comes from medium- and heavy-duty trucks that power industry and move freight across the country. Almost all of those trucks run on diesel, a fuel whose emissions are linked to health risks equivalent to asthma and heart and lung disease.

“Diesel has been a great fuel for us. We just didn’t know 75 years ago that it would kill the planet,” said Mike Roeth, executive director of the North American Council for Freight Efficiency. “Now we have to do something different.”

But doing “something different” is difficult, especially for big systems. According to CALSTART, a company that researches clean transportation, only 0.02% of the greater than 5 million heavy-duty trucks within the U.S. are zero-emission. And converting more of those trucks to electric comes with some serious hurdles.

First of all, electric trucks have a limited range. The trucks utilized in Gilroy can travel about 200 miles on a charge. Their batteries are also heavy, meaning electric trucks can hit weight limits on roads, resulting in potential trade-offs between energy and beneficial cargo.

High-performance chargers for the batteries are also scarce and sometimes relatively slow. Even with fast chargers, charging can take 45 minutes, in comparison with the ten minutes it could possibly take to fill a tank with fuel. The batteries also require quite a lot of power to charge – each truck is such as around 4 to 6 Teslas when it comes to power, so larger truck stops and depots may have significant upgrades to their networks to offer what Roeth calls “a football stadium's worth of electricity.” “ is transferred to the truck batteries.

“In today’s world, there is no battery-electric vehicle that can truly replace the capabilities of a diesel engine vehicle, mile for mile,” said Len Lamkin, vp of transportation logistics at Performance Food Group

At its pilot location in Gilroy, Performance Food Group is working to alter that. The company ships food to 1000’s of locations across the country, and the Gilroy warehouse serves much of Northern California and beyond. Two of its current electric trucks have been on the path to Santa Cruz since last 12 months. The company also just expanded its electric fleet to seven by adding recent Volvo electric trucks that might be used for deliveries throughout the region.

This progress was made possible by a brand new set of chargers from FreeWire Technologies, that are able to supplying power to the electrical fleet. Each charger is supplied with an internal battery that enables the charger to store power for an extended time frame when demand is low. They can then deliver the electricity to the trucks once they come to charge without having to suddenly draw energy from the grid.

According to David Hochschild, chairman of the California Energy Commission, the charging facility is one among the biggest for heavy-duty transportation within the country. And by utilizing the chargers with built-in batteries, the location didn't need to make network upgrades, which could be expensive and will take years. The upcoming solar array may also help offset the expected increase in energy demand that may accompany a growing electric fleet.

“This really is a postcard from the future,” Hochschild said.

Since the corporate makes a speciality of food delivery, it’s also testing a fleet of over 30 electric refrigerated trailers. While most refrigerated trailers use a diesel-powered engine to offer cooling, the electrical unit uses a battery. The trailer can be equipped with regenerative braking and solar roofs – meaning it advantages from additional solar energy on hot, sunny days when cooling requires more energy. According to Advanced Energy Machines, the corporate that designs and manufactures the units, replacing each trailer will save about 20 tons of carbon dioxide emissions per 12 months – the equivalent of taking 4 passenger cars off the road.

However, all this recent technology comes at a price. An electric 18-wheel truck can sell for $365,000 to $435,000, greater than double the $170,000 price of a typical diesel truck, in line with TEC Equipment, which sold the trucks to the location. About $120,000 per truck might be offset by a government grant, and the location expects to recoup much of the upfront cost through maintenance and diesel fuel savings.

Ultimately, electric trucks will likely be a part of a multi-pronged approach that uses different technologies for various applications. The battery-powered cabs may very well be used on shorter routes where range is less essential, while other technologies, equivalent to hydrogen-powered vehicles, may very well be more suitable for long-haul trucks.

“There’s not one application that fits all… there’s no magic bullet,” Williamson said. “We think it will be a mix of different technologies. We’re just trying to find the right mix.”

The fashion industry is in crisis. It's hard to go a month without hearing one other fashion company issue profit warnings – even Sweden's H&M, long considered the industry's successor, is doing poorly. It lost in January 12% of market value and abruptly modified the CEO. The company has struggled with weak sales and inventory levels for years, largely resulting from inefficient supply chains.

Crisis talks and bankruptcy are also rocking other popular favorites, including Victoria's Secret, which closed greater than 10 years ago 100 stores in the previous few yearsTo Super dryGap, TopShop, Kookai And Scotch & Soda.

Anything but green

Worse still, the sector shouldn’t be sustainable. Accounting for an estimate 10% of world greenhouse gas emissionsglobal trade and textile production contribute more to climate change than all international flights (2%) and maritime shipping (also 2%) combined. The industry is notoriously wasteful, forsaking 92 million tons of waste annually a study from 2022. It is estimated that greater than half of fast fashion items are thrown away inside a yr of purchase.

Then the query arises concerning the working conditions. Eleven years after the Rana Plaza collapse, staff are still struggling to survive on extremely low wages while working excessively long hours in factories that usually violate their human rights.

The predominant reason behind the industry's misery? Many large fashion brands have developed practically in keeping with the so-called made-to-stock principle: the corporate produces large quantities of products to ship them through the distribution network, which incorporates warehouses, logistics centers and physical stores. In most cases, corporations depend on outsourced and distant production facilities. When demand falls, inventories rise – and with them waste. In 2017, H&M was accused of burning 12 tons of clothing annually since 2013. Burberry's 2018 annual report said the corporate destroyed a complete of €31 million price of products in a single yr.

The guarantees of on-demand fashion

So is the style world doomed to waste and overproduction? In probably the most recent one Plug and play conferenceI argued that this was not a stroke of fate and highlighted on-demand manufacturing as a promising latest path for the sector. Unlike the normal mass production model, where goods are produced based on predicted demand, on-demand manufacturing produces goods only when there may be an actual demand for them.

This signifies that the t-shirt you discovered online is not going to be made until you order it. Proponents consider supply chains ought to be redesigned to be tighter and more flexible, with an eye fixed toward factories being physically closer together and production runs that produce smaller batches.

Fashion experiments

Quite a few brands have dabbled in the concept. Nike and Adidas have followed the lead of the electronics and automotive industries and moved into on-demand production. In 2000, Adidas launched its online customizable platform. Adidas, which allowed customers to customize the colour, outsoles and laces of their best-selling sneakers. But in 2021, the service was mysteriously discontinued. Adidas described the move as one “strategic decision”on the grounds that the “future of individualization lies in co-creation”.

In August 2019, Nike also chosen 28 creatives and activists in New York City to design the “NYC by You” project.. This made-to-order shoe collection was available until September, when the brand announced its intention to supply sneakers “only available for a limited time, not in limited quantities”. Other brands like Shoes of Prey, NA or Tekyn based their entire business model on on-demand production.

But overall, these early experiments showed that there have been customers unwilling to pay more and wait longer to have your individual unique design.

Something apart from textbook success

Still, some brands have defied the chances and proven that on-demand models could be profitable. These include the Barcelona-based sustainable manufacturer Alohas and the French fashion brand Asphalte. Their success relies on small batches produced closer to the top consumer (e.g. in Portugal for European customers). right price. Alohas adjusts price to cut back inventory and provides its early buyers a bonus, turning the concept of traditional end-of-season discounts on its head. Collects asphalt early feedback from its customers to assist shape future designs.

So why are these innovators thriving while Adidas and others have shuttered their customizable outlets? The fact is that Alohas and Asphalte don't implement the customization or only really start production when consumers finally place an order. Like the pc manufacturer Dell a a number of a long time ago or within the automotive industry, they’ve approached the on-demand concept from the angle of small series moderately than one-off production.

This is smart because, in spite of everything, supply chains and manufacturing processes are batch-based and can’t profitably handle large-scale production of individual units. Existing infrastructure relies largely on emerging economies, limiting the potential of comprehensive transformation. Additionally, consumers are unprepared for the long wait times and better prices that include a radical shift toward customization.

Enable on-demand work

To further expand on-demand production, we’d like to support initiatives that impact each the provision side and the demand side. On the provision side, several start-ups are reorganizing the basics of fashion production with disruptive models. Some of them presented interesting innovations within the Plug and Play webinar:

• Unspun, allowing micro-series production using a 3D weaving machine;

• Austrian startup Silana has developed robotics to automate the garment sewing process, which currently relies on human labor.

• British start-up Pattern Project has developed artificial intelligence-based micro-batch manufacturing software that makes production significantly more agile and responsive.

These corporations depend on technology, which in turn relies on data and increasingly intelligent integration of the assorted links in the worth chain. Additive manufacturing or 3D printing on an industrial scale offers us the chance to provide garments with the minimum fabric required. Take a mean T-shirt: To produce it, traditional manufacturing first requires the cotton fabric after which cuts its components in keeping with predetermined patterns. This process leads to higher waste and long lead times resulting from its complexity. In contrast, additive manufacturing can produce a t-shirt in a single piece, significantly reducing waste.

This technology paves the way in which for the event of more complex types of on-demand manufacturing without compromising economic viability or customer satisfaction. Thanks to their flexibility, these tools can be positioned closer to the client, reducing transport and storage costs in addition to the associated environmental and social footprint.

Changing fashion culture

On the demand side, there may be an urgent need to coach the top consumer concerning the true cost of fashion. We have to reconnect with the unique meaning of fashion (from the French “façon” and the Latin “facere”), where value relies more on the way in which the product is made and its quality than on the rapid renewal of trends , which result in pre-conceived obsolescence.

Current regulations like those of France Anti-waste circular economy lawGermany Supply Chain Act or Sweden Extended producer responsibilitytrigger these developments, but there remains to be a protracted method to go before we are able to achieve the deep cultural change and infrastructure we’d like.

Overall, it shouldn’t be realistic to implement large-scale on-demand production within the short term. But as our examples show, purposeful fashion is well nearby.