Curious Kids is a series for youngsters of all ages. If you could have a matter you'd like an authority to reply, send it to curiouskidsus@theconversation.com.

---

When and why do girls start forming cliques? – Anushka, age 14, California

---

The plastics. Will, Mike, Dustin, Lucas, Max and Elevenalso often called The party. The pink ladies. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. These groups come from different a long time, universes, shows and movies, but all of them have one thing in common: they’re cliques.

Have you ever wondered why people form these tight-knit groups? Scientists have done it, they usually have conducted research to try to reply this query.

I’m a psychology professor who studies how children and young people interact with their peers. I explore each the nice and bad sides of teenage relationships, including friendships and bullying. Cliques could be a natural a part of these relationships.

What are cliques?

Simply put, Cliques are groups of people that spend quite a lot of time together. Even though you would possibly think that cliques are only for women, Anyone could be a part of a cliqueregardless of what gender they’re. You can also vary in sizewith some including just a number of children and others having as much as nine or ten members.

Typically people in a clique have this CommonalitiesB. what clothes they wear, where they wish to go, what sport they do or what music they take heed to. Some children are also included several cliques that reflect their different interests and activities. For example, on the weekend you would possibly spend time with a bunch of children from the varsity drama club and one other group of children out of your travel soccer team.

When and why do cliques form?

This is human nature desires to be a part of a bunch. For hundreds of years, belonging to a bunch has been a way for humans to guard themselves from predators and gain greater access to vital resources similar to food and shelter. Belonging to a bunch may define you feel secure and supported.

Believe it or not, cliques can form already in preschool age. Children of all ages wish to connect with peers who share their interests and make them feel included.

However, cliques have gotten more common and influential in late childhood and adolescence. Compared to younger children, teenagers spend more time with their peers in and out of doors of faculty. Plus, theirs Brains undergo changes This makes them wish to be with friends and belong higher.

How do cliques affect members and outsiders?

Cliques can have each good and bad effects. If you're in a clique with nice and funny kids, you might do that Feel less anxious and more confident. But if you happen to're in a clique with kids who’re mean or break the foundations, you would possibly as well start with that act in a negative way and have problems with friends or romantic relationships in the longer term.

Cliques can sometimes make others feel neglected. While everyone desires to feel secure and supported, some kids are really focused on being popular – and at it they might exclude others. Children who don’t belong to a clique or are at the underside of the clique hierarchy may feel this lonelier And sad.

The power of friendship

Although cliques could be difficult to navigate, you don't need to belong to a big group to feel joyful and supported. Even have a number of good friends could make a giant difference.

Friendships are special because they’re about mutual respect and care, not only fitting in. If you could have problems with cliques in school, remember to have one or two close friends who know you very well and can all the time be there for you because you may be just as meaningful and entertaining like belonging to a clique.

It could be difficult to make friends, but remember: everyone seems to be trying to search out their very own area of interest on this planet. Meet individuals who make you are feeling good and who’ve your back. It's not about having the most important or coolest group – it's about finding the correct people to support you.

---

Hello, curious children! Do you could have a matter that you want to an authority to reply? Ask an adult to send your query to CuriousKidsUS@theconversation.com. Please tell us your name, age and town where you reside.

And since curiosity has no age limit – adults, tell us what you're wondering too. We won't give you the chance to reply every query, but we are going to do our greatest.

WASHINGTON — The Affordable Care Act is under fire again. Not within the repeal-and-replace debates of old, but in a more recent form from Republican lawmakers who say key parts of the ACA cost taxpayers an excessive amount of and supply incentives for fraud.

Several Republican leaders within the House of Representatives have called on two Regulatory authorities while Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, fired greater than half a dozen questions in a brand new letter to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

It concerns the increased ACA subsidies that were introduced throughout the COVID-19 pandemic as a part of the economic recovery laws. Grassley said in a Current press release that the subsidies “left Obamacare, a program already riddled with problems, wide open to new waste, fraud and abuse.”

While potential fraud in government programs has at all times been a rallying cry of conservatives, the newest criticism is a renewed attack on the ACA because its repeal is unlikely, with greater than 21 million people enrolled in marketplace plans this 12 months.

“I see what's happening right now as the foundation for the big fight next year,” said Debbie Curtis, vice chairman of consulting firm McDermott+.

The increased subsidies expire at the top of 2025. Without them, thousands and thousands of Americans would probably Your premiums are increasing.

But the controversy is more likely to touch on other issues, including the Trump-era tax cuts, which can even have to be addressed next 12 months. Other points of the ACA may be at stake, including a special year-round enrollment period and zero-premium plans for low-income consumers.

What ultimately happens will depend in some ways on the composition of the Senate and the House of Representatives, in addition to the bulk within the White House after the November elections.

“The fate of the enhanced tax credits depends on whether Democrats have some majority in Congress and/or win the presidency, and is also inextricably tied to the expiration of the Trump tax cuts,” said Dean Rosen, a partner at Mehlman Consulting and a former senior Republican congressional staffer. That's because each side have an interest in extending all or a part of the tax cuts, but each can even seek compromise on other issues.

The growing Republican outcry over the subsidies goes hand in hand with a controversial current report from a conservative think tank that estimates that thousands and thousands of individuals – or their intermediaries – could misreport their income and still receive probably the most generous ACA subsidies.

The Paragon Health Institute report projects that the number of people that signed up for ACA insurance this 12 months and are expected to earn between 100 and 150 percent of the federal poverty level – amounts that qualify them for zero-premium plans and lower deductibles – likely exceeds the number of individuals at that income level, particularly in nine states.

It recommends several changes to the ACA, including phasing out the increased subsidies, increasing the repayment amounts for individuals who don’t appropriately project their incomes, and ending the Biden-backed initiative that permits very low-income people to Sign up for ACA insurance coverage year-round as a substitute of getting to attend for the overall open enrollment period that takes place annually.

Both Grassley and House Republicans cited the Paragon report of their letters to government oversight, which also highlight an issue they see as related: the continued problems of unscrupulous, commission-hungry insurance agents who enroll people in ACA coverage or change their plans without their permission, often to heavily subsidized plans. KFF Health News reveals the enrollment and transfer programs in the spring.

However, some critics query the conduct of the Paragon evaluation.

For example, Paragon's results are based on two independent data sets from different years. Combining these data sets makes many individuals who could be eligible for subsidies appear ineligible, says Gideon Lukens, senior fellow and research director on the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. “The analytical approach is not careful or sophisticated enough to produce accurate or even meaningful results.”

Paragon President Brian Blase, a former senior Trump administration official and co-author of the report, said it used publicly available data that others could use to verify the findings.

Paragon’s recommendations also elicited mixed reactions.

Sabrina Corlette, co-director of the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University, said they’d “make health insurance less affordable, which would disproportionately affect low-income people, and that is the opposite of the goals of the ACA.”

Another ACA expert, Joseph Antos of the conservative American Business Instituteagrees with one in every of the really useful solutions: a change within the subsidy structure to limit the variety of tariffs without premiums.

“The problem is giving away health insurance,” says Antos. He says this probably contributes to unauthorized insurance switching by rogue brokers who know that in the event that they sign someone up for a free plan without their permission, they won't get caught at first since the person won't receive monthly bills.

Another possible solution for individuals who misreport their income is for “the seven or eight states that have not yet expanded Medicaid to do so,” Antos said. Expansion would open Medicaid eligibility to more people earning lower than the poverty level and reduce the motivation to overstate their income to qualify for ACA subsidies.

Among other things, the subsidies are actually higher for those insured with low incomes. For example, families on the poverty line or simply above it (30,000 to 45,000 dollars for a family of 4). can currently qualify for insurance coverage with no monthly premium, whereas previously they’d have needed to pay 2 to 4% of their annual income for such a plan.

President Joe Biden pushed for the subsidies to be made everlasting and has often praised record enrollment in ACA plans under his leadership. Across all income groups, nearly 20 million of the 21 million ACA enrollees received no less than a subsidysays a KFF report.

Subsidies, also called premium tax credits, are generally paid on to health insurers, and to qualify, applicants must estimate their income for the approaching 12 months.

Anyone who misjudges their income – perhaps because they work irregular hours in retail, are self-employed and are only judging their business at random, or receive an unexpected pay rise or recent job – must pay back all or a part of the subsidy, on a sliding, income-related scale.

The cost of the increased subsidies has been sharply criticized by some GOP leaders after the Congressional Budget Office recently estimated that their everlasting introduction 335 billion US dollars on the federal budget deficit over 10 years.

The Democrats have identified to a different recent CBO report It is estimated that extending the Trump-era tax cuts would increase the deficit by $4.6 trillion over ten years.

The increased subsidies “cost a lot less and actually help people,” Curtis said.

Ultimately, “every health care debate comes down to money,” says Larry Levitt, executive vice chairman for health policy at KFF, a nonprofit health information organization that features KFF Health News. “There's a trade-off here. Millions of people have received coverage and lower premiums thanks to these increased subsidies, but expanding those subsidies would cost the government a lot of money.”

Although some Republican lawmakers are being attentive to the fraud allegations, many political observers consider they may not play a direct role in either party's election campaign.

“Republicans will stay out of health care reform. It's not a winning campaign issue for them,” Curtis said. “In Harris' campaign, we'll see that efforts to ensure affordable health insurance, particularly drug costs, remain a focus. You won't hear much from either party about the importance of extending the increased subsidies. It's too complicated.”

_____

___

©2024 Kaiser Health News. Visit khn.org. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Originally published: August 21, 2024 at 11:52 am