Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, a possible democratic presidential candidate of 2028, used the primary episode of his recent podcast to interrupt from progressive by speaking out against transgender women and girls to participate in female sports.

Newsom made his explanation in an expanded conversation with the conservative activist Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old, who built the influential turn of Point USA organization, which President Donald Trump increased last autumn last autumn amongst the most recent generation of voters. Like Trump, Kirk was a loud opponent in allowing transgender women and girls to participate.

The governor's comments come just a couple of months after the volleyball team for ladies on the San Jose State University in the middle of a hearth storm.

“I think it's a problem of fairness, I completely agree with them. It's a problem of fairness – it's deeply unfair, “said Newsom to Kirk about” This is gavin newsoma “.

“I don't rings with the fairness problem,” drove Newsom, who played as a student Varsity Baseball. “I fully agree with you. … I worship sports. The problem of fairness is completely legitimate. “

The governor's comments are the most recent efforts by the Democrats to reconcile a alternative of 2024, which Trump brought back to the White House and gave the Republicans control over each congress chambers. The disagreements since November have been explaining the losses of the party – in contrast to economic policy and other affairs.

Overall, the surveys indicate that it isn’t popular that transgender athletes in women's teams can play in the ladies's team. Even many of the democrats – about 7 to 10 – reject it after a New York Times/Ipsos survey in January of the New York Times/Ipsos in January New York Times/Ipsos. A 2023 -Gallup survey also showed that the Democrats were divided, whether transgender people should give you the option to play in sports teams that correspond to their current gender identity.

Newsom, which has long positioned itself as a social progressive progressive, pulled sharp lectures from LGBTQ supporters.

“Sometimes Gavin Newsom applies to the profile in courage, sometimes not,” said the MP of California, Chris Ward and Senator Carolina Menjivar, who led the state's LGBTQ legislativ okay. “We are deeply ill and frustrated by these comments.”

Tony Hoang, Executive Director of Equality California, said that he was “disappointed and annoyed” by Newsoms and “to heart pain and fear”, the transgender community under the Trump administration, “to heart pain and fear” was added “.

“At the moment, transgender young people, their families, their doctors and their teachers are exposed to unprecedented politicians who wish to avoid their civil rights and wish to erase them from public life,” said Hoang. “You need guides who clearly fight for them.”

The California law, which became before Newsom, requires schools in the state to enable transgender athletes to play in school sports teams that are in line with their gender identity.

Apart from questions about athletics, there is less public support for broader restrictions on transgender rights and topics such as the medical care of transgender people, especially at Democrats.

According to AP Viewecast, 55% of voters in the 2024 elections stated that the support for transgender rights in the government and society went too far, while about 2 out of 10 said it was roughly correct and a similar proportion said that it was not far enough. It was also a bit more likely that voters prohibit laws, gender -specific medical treatment, such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy, for minors who identify themselves as transgender.

But the Republicans nevertheless tried to use the cultural test stone that represents sport in America.

Trump regularly hammered the democratic candidate Vice President Kamala Harris, the Californian of Newsom, for the support of LGBTQ+ Right. Trump promised to get “transgender madness to the devil from our schools” in his rallies and “to maintain men out of ladies's sports”. His campaign also spent tens of million dollars on television and digital ads with the scale: “Kamala is for her/her. President Trump is for her. “

“Boy, I saw how it was able to weaple it,” said Newsom to Kirk, before he gave up Kirk's protest and as a substitute said that the ads were an efficient “highlight” in the course of the campaign.

Since taking office, Trump has threatened to withhold federal money from schools that enable transgender athletes to participate in women or girls from women. He recently explained the victory on this topic when the NCAA, which the Collegiate Effective Athletics rules within the United States, modified its policy to limit the athletes' athletes to those athletes to whom the feminine gender was assigned at birth. Previously, the NCAA had a sports policy from sports to sport, which was determined by the national or international management bodies of the respective sport.

Ward and Menjivar, the California legislators, said it was not an issue to play in a team that corresponds to his own gender “until Donald Trump began to obsess.”

Kirk, not Newsom, raised the general problem during her hourly discussion, which partially focused on how Democrats can rebuild a wider coalition of voters. Kirk pressed news whether he would speak within the competition against Transgender athletes.

The governor tried to mitigate his comments and said that the discussion was greater than competitive advantage.

“There is also a humility and a grace that these poor people commit suicide, have fear and depression, and the way people speak with endangered communities is a problem with which I also find it difficult,” said Newsom. “So, both things I can hold in my hand. How can we tackle this problem with the type of decency that I think is inherent, but not always deals with this topic and at the same time with injustice. “

Nevertheless, Newsom's approach marks a special political slope greater than twenty years ago. As the mayor of San Francisco in 2004, Newsom attracted national attention for the primary time by leading town clerk with the creation of same -sex marriage licenses.

The step led to legal steps, which led to a choice by the Supreme Court of California in 2008, which legalized same -sex marriage within the country's largest state. This decision was made for seven years before the US Court of Justice arrange same -sex marriage as a national law. –

Barrow reported from Atlanta. Amelia Thomson-Deveaux and AP author Michael Blood, Tran Nguyen and Sophie Austin have contributed the reporting.

Today is Saturday, September twenty first, the 265th day of the 12 months 2024. There are 101 days left within the 12 months.

Today in history:

On September 21, 1981, the Senate unanimously confirmed the nomination of Sandra Day O'Connor to be the primary female Supreme Court justice.

Also on this date:

In 1792, the French National Convention issued a proclamation announcing the abolition of the French monarchy.

In 1915, Cecil Chubb purchased Stonehenge for £6,600; because the last private owner of the location, Chubb donated it to the British people three years later.

In 1922, President Warren Harding signed the Lodge-Fish Resolution, a congressional resolution supporting the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine.

“The Hobbit” by JRR Tolkien was first published in 1937 by George Allen & Unwin Ltd. in London.

In 1938, a hurricane devastated parts of New York and New England, causing extensive damage and claiming about 700 lives.

In 1939, Romanian Prime Minister Armand Călinescu was assassinated by members of the fascist Iron Guard.

In 1955, boxer Rocky Marciano ended his undefeated skilled profession at Yankee Stadium in New York by knocking out Archie Moore within the ninth round of their title fight.

In 1970, Monday Night Football debuted on ABC and the Cleveland Browns defeated the New York Jets 31-21.

In 1989, Hurricane Hugo hit South Carolina, killing 56 people within the Caribbean and 29 people within the United States.

In 2013, 67 people were killed and a whole lot injured in an attack by armed militants on the Westgate shopping center in Nairobi, Kenya.

In 2022, almost seven months after the invasion of Ukraine, Russia's Vladimir Putin ordered the mobilization of reservists for the primary time since World War II.

Today's birthdays:

• Producer Jerry Bruckheimer is 81.
• The musician Don Felder is 77.
• The writer Stephen King is 77.
• Artis Gilmore, member of the Basketball Hall of Fame, is 75.
• Actor and comedian Bill Murray is 74.
• Racing driver Arie Luyendyk is 71.
• Filmmaker Ethan Coen is 67.
• Sidney Moncrief, a member of the Basketball Hall of Fame, is 67.
• Actor and comedian Dave Coulier is 65.
• Actor David James Elliott is 64.
• Actress Nancy Travis is 63.
• Actor Rob Morrow is 62.
• Actor Angus Macfadyen is 61.
• Actress Cheryl Hines is 59.
• Country singer Faith Hill is 57.
• Actress and talk show host Ricki Lake is 56.
• Actor Billy Porter is 55.
• Actor Alfonso Ribeiro (rih-BEHR'-oh) is 53.
• Actor Luke Wilson is 53.
• The musician Liam Gallagher (Oasis) is 52.
• Television personality Nicole Richie is 43.
• Actress Maggie Grace is 41.
• Actor Joseph Mazzello is 41.
• Rapper Wale (WAH'-lay) is 40.
• Singer Jason Derulo is 35.
• Cyclist Tadej Pogačar is 26.

Women run for US President since 1872and for nearly as long, people have been wondering what women have to do to interrupt through what Hillary Clinton calls “highest, hardest glass ceiling“ in American culture.

Almost nobody has asked what men have to do to repair the issue that this job has been off-limits to greater than 50% of the talent pool for ages.

At the 2024 Democratic National Convention, that modified. Democratic men made decisions that were entirely latest or extremely rare to support a female presidential candidate and serve the nation. This was unprecedented.

As Communication scientist who studies gender and political leadershipI even have argued that the most important obstacle to electing a girl president will not be a scarcity of qualified candidates, but a collective inability to acknowledge them as suchThe fault lies not with the candidates, but with American culture.

As it turned out, men in politics were also accountable.

Faced with competition from female presidential candidates, many men previously have used their power and privilege in ways in which undermine women's candidacies. But the Democratic National Convention was different.

For the primary time in history, the lads of a significant political party unanimously supported a female candidate. They avoided strategically using the stereotype that strong women are unlikable, Barack Obama did this with Hillary Clinton within the 2008 Democratic primaries.

They accepted the party’s overwhelming support for a female candidate as an alternative of insisting Entitlement to superdelegateslike Bernie Sanders did in 2016.

And they put their careers on hold to support their spouse’s candidacy, moderately than undermining it by offering support to challengers in the first, as Bob Dole did when Elizabeth Dole ran for the Republican Party nomination in 2000.

“Relinquishing male power”

Rhetorical decisions reveal the underlying motivations of people and groups. The messages from Democratic men on the 2024 convention signaled that their party was finally able to do something no major party has done before. Not only did they nominate a female candidate, but in addition they renounced male power and privilege.

Biden surprised everyone by withdrawing from the race in response to pressure of declining poll numbers, skeptical donors and party leaders, and nervous candidates on the lower ballots. But any resentment he could have felt didn’t translate into irritation or pettiness on the convention.

As the gang chanted “Thank you, Joe,” he instructed: “Thank you too, Kamala” and promised to be “the best volunteer the Harris-Walz camp has ever seen.” He didn’t just hand over his candidacy. He gave up his authority – to the people and the party, but additionally specifically to Harris.

Although Transport Minister Pete Buttigieg to be Harris' running mate and possibly still harboring his own presidential ambitions, he didn’t use his place on the convention to advertise the 2028 campaign. Instead, he took on the role historically reserved for girls at party conventions: presenting the party's message from the angle of a parent whose primary concern is “Kitchen table” politics, Issues that the majority directly affect children and families.

The speech by the presidential candidate's spouse on the convention has historically been a possibility for future First Ladies to portray their husbands because the patriarchs of a perfect American family. In his speech, Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff emphasized painted an image a “complicated” and “patchwork family” and not using a patriarch, but with two energetic partners who may be equally successful of their careers and be intensively committed to the family.

When Harris selected Tim Walz as her running mate, She defied many experts and the Bookmaker who considered Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro to be the most effective strategic selection. The performance of the convention was described by a news channel as a message from a “Midwestern man” and an “antidote to toxic MAGA masculinity.” Even Ms. Magazine praised it as “Populist motivational speech on masculinity.”

But Walz did something that Americans are usually not used to seeing from “real men.” He made it clear that he couldn’t only work with a girl, but additionally for her. And that everybody should try this.

After inform the gang that the pick was within the metaphorical “fourth quarter,” the team was “a field goal behind,” and the offense was “driving down the field,” Coach Walz made it clear that, as in his time as a highschool coach, he was the assistant coachTheir leader was Kamala Harris, and “Kamala Harris is tough. Kamala Harris is experienced. And Kamala Harris is ready.”

Satisfied second fiddle

To be clear, Harris' early success as a presidential candidate is primarily as a result of her skillful and skilful response to a series of unprecedented events and to the competent support of black women who’ve long supported the Democratic Party.

But the lads of the Convention made a joint decision, “their supporting roles,” as one Axios reporter described it, and treat Harris like a commander in chief. This shouldn't be anything special. Women have been doing this for presidential candidates since… endlessly. But to see so many white men step down so enthusiastically for a lady of color was almost unbelievable.

Stepping back will not be the identical as walking away. This is vital since the overarching message of the Convention was the best way to create an inclusive, democratic community. If you want to expand a circle and let more people in, step back. That doesn't exclude you from the circle. It makes your circle greater.

The congress offered a big selection of topics, including Gay fathers raise strong-willed toddlers, Patchwork families attending synagogue and church, Football coaches who kill pheasants and function Faculty Advisor of the High School Gay-Straight Alliance ClubAnd Presidents who hand over their power for the great of the country.

This features a presidential candidate who’s unlike another president in US history. This is a big step forward for the country.

American women still have fewer orgasms than menThis is what a brand new study suggests, suggesting that the “orgasm gap” remains to be pronounced a long time after the sexual revolution.

One of the primary authors of the study on Kinsey Institute for Research on Sex, Gender and Reproduction told the New York Times that this gap persists because many Americans proceed to “privilege men’s pleasure and undervalue women’s sexual pleasure.”

As my research showsThese attitudes towards sexual pleasure have a protracted history.

But the identical applies to efforts to defend against them.

Almost a century ago, a pioneering American sex researcher named Katharine Bement Davis the prevailing opinion that decent women don’t have any sexual desire and mustn’t have sex – except to please men or to have children.

Davis' 1929 book, “Factors in the sexual life of 2200 women”, has turned this fashion of pondering completely on its head.

By surveying bizarre American women, she was capable of show that it is totally normal for them to have sex for pleasure.

An unusual advocate of sexual liberation

Davis spent the primary half of her profession policing women's sexuality fairly than promoting it.

In 1901, after earning her doctorate from the University of Chicago, Davis became superintendent of the New York State Reformatory for Women at Bedford Hills. While I’m there, she studied the ladies in her care. Most female prisoners, she concluded, were “immoral women.”

Davis' efforts to implement sexual morality caught the eye of philanthropist John D. Rockefeller Jr. In 1917, he invited her to go his private agency, the Office for Social Hygienefounded to research and combat prostitution and sexually transmitted diseases.

During the First World War, Davis promoted Sex education to scale back sexually transmitted infections amongst soldiers and civilians. Through this work, she became convinced that sexual ignorance – not sexual immorality – was the best threat to women's well-being.

Davis had long criticized the sexual double standardswhich tolerated men's sexual experimentation but condemned women's sexual experiences.

Now she also realized that this double standard promoted women's chastity on the expense of information. She complained that discussions about women’s sexuality are “taboo”, The result was “distorted views, confusing speculations and unfortunate experiences.”

Tackling a taboo subject

Consist Davis believed that Americans needed accurate information to develop “a reasonable view of all matters related to sex” and made it his mission to teach women about sex.

But first she needed to learn more about women’s actual sexual experiences. Davis decided to conduct a large-scale study to seek out out what She called “the sex life of normal women.”

Davis' approach was a dramatic departure from existing studies of “abnormal” sexuality, which focused on institutionalized populations. “Except on the pathological side,” she noticed“Sex is scientifically an unexplored territory.”

In contrast to Davis explainedshe desired to “understand the woman who was neither mentally nor physically ill.”

For this purpose, Davis distributed an in depth questionnaire to as she called it “Women of Good Standing in Society” from 1921 to 1923. The resulting study sample of 1,000 married and 1,200 single women was not representative – it was skewed toward white, well-educated, and wealthy women. But their responses allowed Davis to redefine female sexuality.

America's first sexual revolution

Davis began her study of girls’s sexuality in a time that historians today call America's first sexual revolution. The second – and higher known – would happen within the Sixties.

In the Nineteen Twenties, when One commentator notedA “morals and morals revolution” was underway. Sex permeated popular culture. Beauty contestants flaunted their charms in skimpy swimsuits and short skirts. Actresses flaunted their sex appeal on stage and screen.

New attitudes toward sex also affected the each day lives of average Americans. Young women across the country adopted the sexy look of “Succeed”, the term for ladies who wore short skirts, rolled up stockings and bobbed hair.

Before the Nineteen Twenties, courtship often took place at home so that oldsters could closely supervise the couples. But the ever present automobile – the a juvenile judge had “a brothel on wheels” – eliminated the necessity for adult supervision and granted young people unprecedented sexual freedom.

Meanwhile, contraception activists like Margaret Sanger and Mary Ware Dennett Distributed contraceptives and spread sexual information, in violation of the Comstock Act of 1873which defined contraception and sex education as “obscene” and made the distribution of such materials a federal crime.

Sex, secrecy and shame

Even throughout the country's first sexual revolution, the facts of life remained briefly supply.

According to surveys Davis distributed to married women, about half of the respondents believed they were “sufficiently prepared for the sexual side of marriage.”

After Davis expanded her study to incorporate single women, she found that lower than a 3rd of all participants received sex education from their parents.

Many women didn’t understand how pregnancy occurs. Some weren’t even prepared for menstruation. One remembered When she got her first period, “of course I thought I was going to bleed to death.”

Instead of knowledge, many ladies inhaled shame. “Even as a small child, I had the feeling that every sexual desire was shameful and a great sin,” as one respondent put itsome were never capable of overcome their discomfort with sex. Another woman looked all sexual thoughts as “something that must be avoided like the devil.”

An answer the issue briefly summarized: “Most of our sexual problems today arise from our secrecy, fear and repression.”

Questioning the conspiracy of silence

Many women wanted to just accept the challenge what was called a “conspiracy of silence” surrounding female sexuality.

The study participants ultimately provided Davis with over 10,000 pages of handwritten responses. She used this information to the primary major study on female sexuality within the countrya book of over 400 pages filled with statistical data and private stories.

“Factors within the sexual lifetime of 2200 women“” covered a big selection of topics, from sex education to sex games. But one central idea ran through the complete work: women liked sex.

Davis included data on contraception, same-sex relationships, and masturbation. At the time, these practices were widely stigmatized and sometimes criminalized. Yet significant proportions of study participants engaged in all of those activities.

Almost three quarters of married respondents said Use of contraceptives. Many probably took advantage of state laws that allow doctors to prescribe diaphragms to guard patients' health. Surprisingly, almost one in ten women admitted to having had an abortion, although The procedure was illegal in every state.

More than half of single women and almost a 3rd of married women said, “intense emotional relationships” with other women. In each group, about half described these relationships as sexual. This was a remarkably high number considering prevailing views on homosexuality as a sexual deviation And State laws criminalizing homosexual acts.

Almost 65% of single women and greater than 40% of married women reported on masturbation. Since Almost all doctors and priests condemned this practiceDavis assumed that the actual numbers were even higher.

Davis' data showed that “normal” women experienced what one shouted “natural sex feeling.” In short, their study showed that many ladies enjoyed sex for its own sake.

Davis believed that reliable data would result in “more satisfactory adjustments to the sexual relationship.” In other words, higher information would lead to raised sex.

Davis paved the best way for future studies confirming women’s sexual desire. While she was researching female sexuality, founded The Committee for Research on Sexual Problems of the National Research CouncilThe Rockefeller-funded committee later subsidized Alfred Kinsey's Studies in human sexuality.

Davis' legacy lives on. The results of the Kinsey Institute's recent study show that discussing sexual pleasure remains to be essential, especially for ladies. They also suggest that Americans' understanding of sex has improved over the past century.

When Davis conducted her study within the Nineteen Twenties, She found it “advisable” to define “orgasm” for participants who were confused by the concept. Now a generation of better-informed Americans is considering find out how to address a persistent “orgasm gap.”

Since President Joe Biden dropped out of the presidential race on July 21, 2024, and endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris because the Democratic presidential candidate. Harris' campaign has generated great enthusiasm and a focus. She quickly became the official Democratic presidential candidate and equaled Donald Trump's lead over Biden in National team And Swing state Opinion poll.

Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, have also Tens of 1000’s of supporters to her recent rallies in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona and Nevada.

While things could change dramatically in the following two months, there may be an actual possibility that the United States will finally elect its first female president.

But a poll we conducted in August 2024, after Harris was expected to be named the Democratic nominee, found that sexism remains to be a strong force in American politics.

Hope and alter?

Yes, the scars of the 2016 election campaign – through which sexism played a key role within the election of the Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's defeat by Trump – are still fresh for the Democrats. But many hope The America has modified and ladies in leadership positions are increasingly accepted.

This argument suggests that Harris' gender is not going to be a major obstacle for voters.

Superficially, Current nationwide representative survey of 1,000 American adults support this, with 51% of Americans agreeing with the statement, “America is ready for its first African-American president.” Only 23% of Americans disagreed.

Nevertheless, some Republicans appear to imagine they’ll win by Making gender a difficulty within the election campaign. This is obvious within the sexist rhetoric that Trump and other Republicans use when talking about Harris.

Trump, the has a story making sexist remarks, claimed foreign leaders would Harris as a “toy”, them as unintelligentand is now Comment on their appearance. Both The Associated Press And The New York Times have reported – based on unnamed sources – that Trump also called Harris a “bitch” in private conversations, although Trump’s spokesman denied that he used that term.

In a similarly sexist manner, Trump’s allies have tried to make Harris' past amorous affairs into campaign issues, with a conservative commentator on Fox Business News crudely describing Harris as “Original Hawk Tuah Girls,” an obscene sexual innuendo.

Will such attempts to take advantage of sexism as a campaign strategy backfire? Or is it still not possible, in any case these years, for a girl to beat sexist stereotypes and win the very best office within the United States?

Understanding the meaning of sexism

We are Political scientist who study the role of identity in American politics and who Conduct surveys that examine Americans' views on gender and the extent of sexism that also permeates the country.

We conducted two national polls this yr—one in January 2024, when Biden was still within the race, and the opposite in August 2024, after Harris became the Democratic nominee. For each poll, we surveyed 1,000 American adults ages 18 and older, asking them about their thoughts on the election, their political opinions, and their attitudes toward various social groups.

Given the change at the highest of the Democratic ticket, we are able to higher assess the impact of sexism on voting within the presidential election by comparing the ends in January, when there have been two male candidates, with those in August, when Harris entered the race.

In each surveys, we first asked respondents which candidate they’d vote for if presidential elections were held today.

To measure sexism, we asked respondents whether or not they agreed or disagreed with a series of three statements expressing prejudice, resentment, and hostility toward women, or what political scientists call “hostile sexism.” The statements in the “hostile sexism” battery are: “Women try to achieve power by asserting control over men”; “Women are too easily offended”; and “Women exaggerate after they have problems at work.” Stronger agreement with these statements indicates more sexist views.

We also measured respondents’ demographics (including age, gender, race, education, and income), their political attitudes and identities, and their racial views.

Sexism played a task even when Biden was within the race

Partly resulting from Trump's sexist rhetoric during his election campaigns and his presidency. sexist attitudes have turn into closely linked with who individuals support as presidentOn average, more sexist people tended to Republican candidates within the last elections.

For example, even in our January poll, when Biden was the Democratic nominee, sexism was strongly correlated with support for Trump. When we examined a head-to-head matchup between Biden and Trump, the more respondents agreed with statements about hostile sexism, the more likely they were to prefer Trump to Biden.

Of those that most strongly disagreed with statements measuring hostile sexism, 73 percent supported Biden, while about two-thirds of those that scored highest on the sexism scale supported Trump.

Taking under consideration other aspects that influence support for Biden—partisanship, ideology, racial attitudes, education, economic views, and so forth—we found that those with the least sexist views had an 83 percent probability of supporting Biden, while those with probably the most sexist views were 17 percent prone to accomplish that.

Sexism is more vital for Harris

If sexism has weakened individual support for Biden's candidacy, does that mean Harris won't face additional disadvantages in the shape of lost support for her candidacy? Hardly.

Hostile sexism, as we measured it, is costing Harris votes.

While sexism played a task in January, it was much more outstanding in August after Harris took over the Democratic ticket.

In a direct comparison between Harris and Trump, 89 percent of those in the underside third of the sexism scale—those that most disagree with statements measuring hostile sexism—support Harris, in comparison with 11 percent for Trump. On the opposite hand, only 18 percent of those that rating highest on sexism support Harris, in comparison with 82 percent for Trump.

When we have in mind other considerations that influence whether individuals prefer Harris or Trump, our results are much more striking. The least sexist respondents are 92% prone to say they plan to vote for Harris, but probably the most sexist respondents are only 4% prone to say they support her.

This implies that while sexist attitudes influenced individuals' preferences for the president when Biden was the Democratic presidential nominee, they’ve a good greater influence now that Harris is the Democratic nominee.

Without sexism

Harris appears to be barely ahead of Trump within the polls. Why should we care in regards to the influence of hostile sexism on the election?

To answer this query, we imagine a world through which hostile sexism doesn’t affect attitudes toward female presidential candidates. Our results suggest that Harris' lead over Trump could also be larger in such a world. Simply put, hostile sexism contributes to creating the election closer than it otherwise could be.

sexism has long played a strong role in influencing the Americans Voting behavior and attitudes towards political issuesThis is particularly true today given the high political importance of gender-related issues equivalent to abortion, contraception and LGBTQ+ rights.

Our evaluation shows that folks with negative attitudes toward women are much less prone to support Harris as a presidential candidate. Whether Harris' campaign can successfully take care of this reality stays to be seen.

According to an investigation by the Center for Countering Digital Hate, Instagram did not remove toxic comments directed at Vice President Kamala Harris and other female political leaders from its app shortly before the 2024 election.

The nonprofit advocacy group analyzes major web platforms to see in the event that they adequately monitor their pages for hate speech. Wednesday's report is predicated on an evaluation of 560,000 comments on Instagram posts by five high-engagement Republican and five Democratic politicians.

The politicians the group monitored included Harris, the present Democratic presidential candidate, Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas), and Republican Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Lauren Boebert of Colorado.

Of the comments posted between January 1 and June 7, researchers identified greater than 20,000 that were classified as “toxic.” Google's Perspective AI content moderation tool. Researchers then conducted a manual evaluation and discovered 1,000 comments that “clearly violated Instagram's terms,” ​​CCDH CEO Imran Ahmed said during a press conference on Tuesday.

“Our recommendations are simple: Instagram must enforce its policies designed to protect women in public life,” Ahmed said in the course of the briefing. “Organizations must be better equipped to support female candidates who experience abuse and frequently provide them with best practices on how to deal with it.”

Meta, Instagram's parent company, has been repeatedly criticized by lawmakers for failing to combat the spread of hate content on its family of apps and for being unable or unwilling to crack down on harmful behavior. New Mexico's attorney general has alleged in an ongoing lawsuit against Meta that the corporate fails to guard underage users from sexual assault and sexual exploitation.

In previous election cycles, Facebook has also been a hub for the spread of misinformation and harmful content targeting political candidates.

Some of the problematic comments captured by the CCDH included statements equivalent to “legalize rape” and “we don't want black people around us, no matter who they are,” the report said. One comment directed at Harris mocked her ethnicity, while one other comment called on President Joe Biden to sexually assault her.

The CCDH researchers then used Instagram's own content reporting tools to flag the 1,000 abusive comments that they had manually discovered. Every week later, “Instagram had not taken action on 926 of them, representing a failure to act on 93% of them,” the report said.

Meta said in a press release that it will review the examples the CCDH highlighted and take away comments that violate company policies, but added that while some content could also be offensive, it doesn’t violate the foundations. The company also said, citing a Google resource page, that the Google AI tool the CCDH relied on partially of its research was not at all times accurate.

“We provide tools that allow anyone to control who can comment on their posts, automatically filter out offensive comments, phrases or emojis, and automatically hide comments from people who don't follow them,” said Cindy Southworth, Meta's head of ladies's safety, in a press release. “We work with hundreds of safety partners around the world to continually improve our policies, tools, detection and enforcement, and we will review the CCDH report and take action against any content that violates our policies.”

The report on Instagram comes months after a California federal judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Elon Musk's ex against the CCDH. The suit was filed shortly after the group released a study showing an increase in hate speech following Musk's acquisition of the location formerly referred to as Twitter.

Because of all of the negative attention Musk has received, Meta and CEO Mark Zuckerberg have escaped scrutiny recently, giving the impression that Instagram has develop into “a platform that people feel safe to use,” Ahmed says.

“Mark Zuckerberg's strategy is to keep a low profile, while X acts as a lightning rod for much of the anger about the toxicity in public life and political discourse,” Ahmed said. “We wanted to look specifically at this platform to see if they are actually backing up their gloating over X's misfortune with their own actions.”

After months of turmoil, the Welsh Labour Party has elected a brand new leader, its second in only five months and third this yr. The election was triggered by the resignation by Vaughan Gething, who was forced to resign after 4 senior politicians in his government resigned.

Eluned Morgan is the primary woman to steer the Welsh Labour Party and is about to turn out to be the primary female First Minister of Wales. The current Cabinet Secretary for Health, Social Care and the Welsh Language, Baroness Morgan of Ely, will even be the primary peer to steer a UK government since Alec Douglas-Home in 1963.

While they’re working for his or her Management of the NHS in WalesMorgan has significant political experiencewas a Member of the European Parliament and Shadow Minister within the House of Lords from 1994 to 2009. She has promised “Strength, stability and unity,” and her supporters unanimously declared that she had the power to unite the fragmented party.

Labour’s electoral success should put the party in an optimistic and proactive mood in Wales. But while the brand new British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is busy formulating a Program for the federal governmentIn Wales, Labour is currently in a recovery phase, having announced a series of policies since its election on 4 July.

The Failure of the cooperation agreement between Welsh Labour and Plaid Cymru in May has left Welsh politics in a stalemate. It is now harder for the federal government to operate because Morgan's party doesn’t have an absolute majority within the Senedd.

With lower than two years until the following Senedd election in May 2026, Welsh Labour hopes Morgan might help it put recent events behind it, regain lost support and restore its status.

---

---

But the people of Wales could also be wondering what they get out of it. Public service are fighting, Educational standards are in decline, and Poverty in Wales is at an appalling level. The recent leader may bring stability and unity to the Welsh Labour Party, but there may be currently little or no evidence that this may improve the lives of the people of Wales.

Throughout the 2024 British election campaign, Welsh voters were told that two Labour governments work together would bring advantages to Wales. But the primary test of this has already failed.

In support of the Welsh Government Child poverty strategy (last updated earlier this month) would abolish the cap on the two-child allowance 65,000 children in Wales out of poverty. But the brand new Chancellor, Rachel Reeveshas insisted that the British government is not going to achieve this, and this week voted against an amendment to remove the two-child limit. While some argue that this shall be removed in some unspecified time in the future in the longer term, it can bring little relief to the hundreds now living in poverty.

There are also questions on how Labour governments in Cardiff and London will improve public services in Wales. While Morgan fought to “Modernise our NHS” During the recent general election, people in Wales could also be wondering why the Welsh Government, which is liable for the Welsh NHS, has not done so already. Unless recent money comes from the UK Government, it’s difficult to see what recent mechanisms the Welsh Government will adopt to handle the issues facing the NHS.

Dominance and renewal

What is evident is that renewal is crucial for a celebration that has been in power because the starting of decentralisation in 1999. The political scientist Maurice Duverger warned that dominance reduces “the need for innovation” and “takes the joy out of political life.” While defeat often leads a celebration to reflect and reorient itself, if it stays in power for therefore long, it has less incentive to achieve this.

There are several signs that the Welsh Labour Party is looking for such a Dominance crisisThe falling support for Labour in Wales, the rise of the Reform movement and the increased support for Plaid Cymru within the recent general election should give Welsh Labour politicians food for thought.

Because Morgan was elected unopposed, there was no leadership contest. This deprived Welsh Labour of the chance to reflect at a time when recent ideas are needed to resolve Wales' problems. However, a leadership contest alone wouldn’t necessarily have generated sufficient debate. We saw within the previous leadership election between Gething and Jeremy Miles that there was not many differences between the 2 candidates.

Instead, the Welsh Labour Party must create some form of Revaluation that is characteristic of the British Labour Party within the face of successive electoral defeats. Whether this is finished through a policy review or a more informal debate about ideas, it should involve all parts of the party and include different ideas. It is critical that since Carwyn Jones' (who became First Minister in 2009) pamphlet The way forward for Welsh work In 2004 there was little sign of the same form of reflection.

A serious debate about values ​​and concepts wouldn’t only be good for Welsh Labour – it will be good for the people of Wales. As Welsh politics stumbles into 2026, business as usual shall be enough for all those that desperately need a government that might help them.

At the recent annual meeting of the Southern Baptist Convention, quite a few motions were made as regards to women. The Conversation asked Susan Shawa gender and sexuality scholar who studies Southern Baptist women to elucidate the election and other developments within the country's largest Protestant denomination.

The Southern Baptist Convention has rejected a proposal that explicitly stated that only men might be pastors. Does this mean that the SBC is changing and becoming more accepting of ladies in leadership positions?

Absolutely not. The day before the vote on the proposed constitutional amendment of the denomination to exclude churches with women in pastoral roles, the Convention expelled the First Baptist Church of Alexandria, Virginia, for its position that girls can function pastors. The vote was not even close, 6,759 to 563.

How many female pastors are there currently within the SBC? Could you furthermore mght share a bit concerning the history of resistance to women in leadership positions?

There is somewhere between 1,000 To 1,800 Women who function pastors in Southern Baptist churches. Few, if any, of those women are senior pastors. Instead, they’re assistant pastors, youth or children's pastors, women's pastors, or other varieties of pastors, all of whom work under the supervision of a male senior pastor.

The SBC adopted a Resolution of 1984 Rejection of ladies as leading pastors.

While resolutions are usually not binding on local churches, the proposed constitutional amendment would have defined a church as cooperating with the SBC provided that it “[a]confirms, appoints, or employs only men as pastors or elders of any kind, as directed by the Holy Scriptures.”

To change its bylaws, the convention must first approve any proposed change at an annual meeting after which confirm it with a final vote at the next annual meeting. That vote requires a two-thirds majority for the change to turn out to be a part of the bylaws. The women pastors amendment was set to pass in 2023, but failed this 12 months since it received only 61% of the vote.

Some of those against the change argued that the assembly had already spoken on the problem, had mechanisms in place to deal with churches with women pastors, and subsequently didn’t need to alter its structure. Nothing on this argument suggests support for girls, and in reality, opponents of the change often reiterated their support for the denomination's stance against women pastors.

For many Southern Baptists, the exclusion of ladies from the position of senior pastors isn’t an obstacle to their participation in other pastoral roles who wouldn’t have the supervisory authority of the senior pastor or require ordination. That was definitely the language of the initiators of the 1984 resolution, and the try and exclude churches where women hold pastoral roles apart from senior pastor, as they recently did in Alexandria, Virginia, goes beyond the intent of the sooner resolution.

Southern Baptists also place great importance on what they call “the autonomy of the local church.” This deeply held Baptist belief implies that each local church is self-governing and isn’t controlled in any way by the SBC. By increasingly excluding women from pastoral roles, the SBC could have been perceived as encroaching on the autonomy of the local church.

In 2023, the Southern Baptist Convention refused to readmit Saddleback Church to its ranks after it was expelled from the church earlier that 12 months for appointing female ministers. What do you think that this vote will change?

I don't think the vote will change anything. Saddleback's pastors weren’t senior pastorsthey were ordained, and the church affirmed the flexibility of ladies to assume any pastoral role. We can see from this 12 months's expulsion of First Baptist Alexandria that the SBC will proceed to purge churches that endorse women in any pastoral roles.

The only thing this 12 months's vote has shown us is that a major minority of “Messengers” – as Southern Baptists call the delegates to the SBC's annual convention – don’t want to interfere within the structure of the convention.

At the identical time, the SBC has voted against in vitro fertilization. Could you explain this vote and the SBC's historical views on the personification of the fetus?

This resolution expands Southern Baptists' opposition to any procedure that kills fetuses or embryos. The resolution sympathizes with infertile couples but argues that the method is ultimately the “destruction of embryonic human life” because embryos are sometimes stored and destroyed after successful implantation.

In the Seventies, before the fundamentalist takeover of the SBC within the Eighties and early Nineties, generally against abortion on demandbut additionally they anxious about government interference in women's decision-making about their very own bodies.

In the Eighties, the Convention made a pointy turn to the fitting with the aim of Abortion banned again. The language of the SBC modified from “fetal life” to “preborn” or “unborn” individuals. Now we see the SBC speaking of embryos as fully-fledged people and calls for “the government to prevent actions that are incompatible with the dignity and worth of every human being, and this necessarily includes frozen human embryos.”

What else was necessary about this meeting?

Despite the pressure that has been placed on the SBC in recent times to do something about its Problem of sexual abusehas the Convention repeatedly failed to make significant progress, especially on the long-awaited database to trace perpetrators. This 12 months, too, the Messengers voted to pass several abuse reforms, but survivors were disillusioned how little change actually takes place. Significant changes all the time appear to fail as a consequence of concerns about insurance and liability.

Taken together, the vote against the constitutional amendment, the resolution against artificial insemination, and the inaction on sexual abuse reform underscore that the religion community's ultra-conservative views on women remain unchanged.

Biology is ultimately about food and sex. To survive as a person, you would like food. To survive as a species, you would like sex.

Not surprisingly, the age-old query of why giraffes have long necks revolves around food and sex. After 150 years of debating the query, biologists still cannot agree on which of those two aspects was most significant for the evolution of the giraffe neck. Over the past three years, my colleagues and I even have attempt to unravel this query.

Necks for sex

In the nineteenth century, biologists Charles Darwin and Jean Baptiste Lamarck speculated that the long necks of giraffes helped them reach acacia leaves high up within the treesalthough they probably didn’t observe the actual behavior of giraffes once they recommend this theory. Several a long time later, when scientists began observing giraffes in Africa, a bunch of biologists developed a alternative theory based on gender and reproduction.

These pioneering giraffe biologists noticed how male giraffes standing side by side used their long necks To swing their heads and hit one anotherThe researchers called this behavior “neck fighting” and suspected that it helped the giraffes prove their dominance over one another and court mates. The males with the longest necks won these contests and in return increase their reproductive successThese favorable circumstances, scientists predicted, led to the evolution of long necks.

Since its founding, the Hypothesis of sexual selection by necks for sex has overshadowed Darwin and Lamarck’s “throat as food” hypothesis.

The hypothesis that necks represent gender equality predicts that males must have longer necks than females, since only males use them for fighting, and so they do. But adult male giraffes are also about 30 to 50 percent larger than female giraffes. All of their Body parts are larger. Therefore, my team wanted to seek out out whether males have a proportionally longer neck relative to their overall size (head, neck and forelimbs).

Necks should not for sex?

However, it will not be easy to measure the body proportions of giraffes. Firstly, their necks grow in the primary six to eight years of their livesAnd within the wild, it’s inconceivable to say exactly how old a person animal is. To avoid these problems, measured body proportions on captive Masai giraffes in North American zoos. Here we knew the precise age of the giraffes and will then compare this data with the body proportions of untamed giraffes that we knew obviously were older than 8 years.

To our surprise, we found that adult female giraffes have proportionally longer necks than males, contradicting the hypothesis that necks determine sex. We also found that adult female giraffes have proportionally longer trunks, while adult males have proportionally longer forelimbs and thicker necks.

Baby giraffes don’t exhibit any of those gender differences in body proportions. They only appear when giraffes reach maturity.

The finding that female giraffes have each proportionally longer necks and longer bodies led us to propose that the evolution of the giraffe's long neck was driven by females slightly than males, and never for sexual reasons, but for foraging and reproduction. Our theory agrees with Darwin and Lamarck that food was the first driver of the evolution of the giraffe's neck, but with the emphasis on the reproductive success of females.

A type of dying

Giraffes are notoriously picky eaters and can eat fresh leaves, flowers and seed pods. Female giraffes specifically must eat enough as they spend most of their adult lives either pregnant or give milk to their calves.

Females are inclined to use their long necks to penetrate deep into bushes and trees to seek out probably the most nutritious foods. In contrast, males are inclined to feed high up in trees by extending their necks vertically. Females require proportionally longer trunks to lift calves, which might be well over six feet tall at birth.

For the males, I’d suspect that their proportionally longer front legs are an adaptation that permits them to more easily mount females during intercourse. While we’ve got found that their necks should not as long proportionally because the necks of the females, they’re thicker. This is probably going an adaptation that helps them win neck fights.

But giraffe necks should not their only long feature. They have relatively long legs, which contribute to their height almost as much as their neck. However, their long legs come at a price – especially for male giraffes. A disproportionately large a part of their body mass rests on their thin front legs, which might result in injuries and mobility problems in the long run.

Graham Mitchell, a widely known giraffe biologist, has described the giraffe body as “a form of dying.” In captivity, where staff can determine the reason behind death, well over half of male giraffes die from problems with their front legs, which shortens their life expectancy by 25% in comparison with females. Very few female giraffes die from health problems related to their legs.

Because of their size, giraffes are also not good at climbing steep slopes. Investigations have shown that this restriction probably prevented them from climbing the steep slopes of the Great Rift Valley in East AfricaBut the mating advantage they gain from their size must outweigh these costs to health and mobility.

This research doesn’t completely rule out the idea that necks are sex. The long neck probably plays a vital role in male neck fights and in attracting a mate. However, our research suggests that male neck fights were probably a side effect of giving females higher access to food.

In the long run, my team will study the genetic aspects that led to the giraffe's extraordinary stature and construct, and hope to trace and reconstruct the evolutionary path it took to succeed in the skies.

Mexico could have its first female president, after a groundbreaking vote on June 2, 2024.

After a Election period overshadowed by violenceThe ruling Morena party's candidate, Claudia Sheinbaum, a former mayor of Mexico City, emerged victorious with about 60% of the vote – a bigger share of the vote than her mentor and predecessor, President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, won in 2018. Sheinbaum defeated her rival Xóchitl Gálvez, a senator from the center-right National Action Party, who trailed by lower than 30%.

Given the importance of this occasion Sheinbaum said: “For the first time in the 200 years of the Republic, I will be the first female president of Mexico.”

But Scientists who study politics and Gender in Mexicowe all know that appearance is one thing, actual performance is one other. Seventy years after Women won the fitting to vote Is Mexico getting closer to changes that might give women true equality?

Unequal fight for gender equality

Women now represent half of Congressafter electoral reforms mandated gender parity in nominations for Mexican parliaments almost a decade ago. And two women, Ana Lilia Rivera and Marcela Guerra Castillo, occupy the highest posts in each houses of Congress. Meanwhile, Norma Lucía Piña is the first woman as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Mexico. The preliminary results of the election night also favor Sheinbaum's Morena party and provides them a Two-thirds majority in CongressTherefore, Sheinbaum will almost definitely have ample support for a feminist political agenda should she pursue one.

But the election of ladies to high office doesn’t necessarily result in a major shift in power. Experts on women in politics call this “descriptive representation“ – when political leaders resemble a gaggle of voters but don’t pursue policies designed to guard them. In contrast, “factual representation“ occurs when public officials pass laws that really profit the groups they supposedly represent.

Scientists studying the difference between the 2, including Sonia Alvarez, Mala Htun And Jennifer Piscopohave found that gains in the general public sphere, reminiscent of the fitting to vote or to carry office, have rarely led to progress for ladies within the private sphere, reminiscent of the fitting to reproductive freedom or protection from domestic violence.

In other words, while Mexico has overtaken many countries, including the United States, in promoting women in political leadership positions, it still has not reached its Stigma of machismo and be History of authoritarianism.

In the Nineties resurgent feminist movement Across Latin America, the reforms led to major breakthroughs in women's rights. By the tip of the last decade, many countries had passed laws against gender-based violence and introduced reforms requiring gender quotas in party nomination lists. In the last 17 years, seven women have been elected president in Central and South America.

But the fight for gender equality is uneven. Mexico is a rustic that remains to be shaken by high femicide rateGovernment data shows that on average Every day 10 women and girls are killed by partners or relations.

Government accused of harassment

An enormous query now is whether or not Sheinbaum will give you the chance to deal with the problem of gender-based violence, something her predecessors did not do.

Any skepticism in regards to the willingness of Sheinbaum’s government to implement a real feminist agenda could be justified: her campaign theme was continuity, and she or he has hesitated up to now deviate far, if in any respect, from Lopez Obrador’s agenda.

Under López Obrador, Morena was accused of downplaying the extent of the femicide crisis. At least one critic claimed that López Obrador was “the primary president to categorically deny” the violence.

Instead, López Obrador used his every day press conference “tomorrow” to report Verbal attacks against women in office, including Sheinbaum's defeated rival Gálvez. In July 2023, the independent National Electoral Institute found Lopez Obrador guilty of targeting Galvez with derogatory remarks about her gender.

López Obrador also condemned Piña, the chief justice of the Supreme Court, where Mexico's National Association of Judges has described as hate speech and the federal judiciary sentenced as “gender-based violence” and hatred against them. His statements at a rally in March incited his followers to burn Piña in effigywhich led critics to imagine that such attacks not only reflect López Obrador’s aversion to checks and balances, but The aim is to undermine women in positions of power.

Mexico's client politics

Observers see Sheinbaum as López Obrador’s hand-picked successor: He has publicly supported her, and she or he has vowed to proceed his “fourth transformation,” a campaign promise to finish government corruption and reduce poverty that Mixed results.

Sheinbaum's record as mayor of Mexico City is equally mixed. She has publicly described herself as feminist and has criticized Prosecutors for covering up the murder of 27-year-old Ariadna Lopez. At the identical time, Sheinbaum attempted to criminalize participants a mass protest against the hundreds of ladies who’ve disappeared lately, claiming that these demonstrations were violent.

Political scientists have shown that even when politicians change, the actors behind the scenes can remain the identical – especially in Mexico, where political parties entangled in client politics – when party leaders reward loyalty by deciding who runs for office and who keeps their post when the federal government is handed over to a brand new administration.

Sheinbaum will likely remain committed to the Morena coalition and rely heavily on López Obrador to implement its policies.

A feminist future?

During the election campaign, Sheinbaum and her rival Gálvez Advocates And shared their experiences as women.

But in the ultimate stages of the campaign, neither Sheinbaum nor Gálvez could offer potential voters greater than the “historic first” argument. Therefore, the expansion of ladies's rights under the brand new government stays uncertain.

Beyond front-line politics, there was progress on women's rights in Mexico when politicians committed to substantive change.

In particular, under Pinã, the Mexican Supreme Court declared all federal and state laws Abortion ban unconstitutionalWhen Piña took office, promised to fight for ladies's rights in her agenda. So far she has delivered.

If Sheinbaum hopes to realize similar success, she must follow Pinã's example and focus her programs on the problems that the majority affect women of their every day lives, starting with the rising rate of femicides. Women could also be gaining political power in Mexico, however the query now is whether or not they may use it to fight for the ladies they represent.

This is an updated version of an article originally published on November 13, 2023.