The money problem in politics has nothing latest. We have been warned for a long time that America is or will likely be an oligarchy. But within the early days of President Donald Trump's second term in office felt a bit of different, and I feel it’s the next: Attention, not money, is the shape of power that interests him essentially the most.

Many of his billionaire holders didn’t make the cut in his inauguration. The Catbird seats were as a substitute filled by the titans of attention. It was the leaders of Facebook and Instagram and X and Tiktok and Amazon and Google, which Trump tried to see in front of him.

Washington is stuffed with lobby offices and donations because strong interests consider that something is obtained when dollars are spent. You are right. We have expected and accepted a grotesque measure of every day corruption in American politics – from quite a few decisions by the Supreme Court that give money to guard the speech, and from republicans of the congress who even fought modest reforms of campaign financing. But we’ve got no less than some rules to limit the facility of cash in politics and pursue their movements.

The same doesn’t apply to attention. If Trump saves Tikkok and in return before the 2026 TIIKTOK elections increases the Pro-Trump content, would that be illegal? Perhaps. But would we even know that it happened? If Elon Musk turns the dial to X to tend the conversation before the 2028 elections within the direction of the Republican Party, who will stop it?

New technique to power

Attention, not money, is now the fuel of American politics. It seemed clear in 2022 that Musk had overpaid when he bought Twitter for $ 44 billion. And whether it is assessed as a business transaction, he probably paid overpaid. The sales of X is way from justifying its purchase price. But we didn't know on the time and we don't know the way we appreciate the eye he bought. With regard to attention, Musk's purchase of Twitter made him essentially the most powerful person on the earth, except perhaps Trump. What is that value?

Oligarchy just isn’t a mere corruption. It describes what happens when prosperity is intertwined with the violation of rule. Musk just isn’t just searching for contracts or favors. He is searching for influence and centrality. He not only offers Trump money, but attention. And Trump was no less than so glad to make this trade. Former presidents had their wealthy supporters, and these supporters have gained access and even prey, but we had not viewed a transparent trade for power in the fashionable period. And to make this trade publicly, Musk and Trump opened a way that other attention oligar should want to go.

In Trump's world all the things is on the market. Most presidents and parties negotiate inside a circumscribed zone: they’re sure to existing interests and ideologies and guarantees. Some of the Silicon Valley executives split by the Democrats is that the Federal Trade Commission of Lina Khan was relentlessly pursued them and led many technological CEOs who had long supported liberal causes to feel cheated. Money in Washington is a hand on the steering wheel, nevertheless it isn’t the one hand on the steering wheel.

Trump's zone of deal-makeing is wider. It was Trump, who originally suggested to ban Tikkok primarily – a part of his wider campaign against the Chinese influence and the facility, certainly one of the few policy areas that he gave the impression to be very desirous about. Then he met Jeff Yass, a billionaire investor, whose company has a big proportion of Tiktok, and Trump's position turned. Now he’s attempting to be Tikok's Redeemer.

Trump explained his shift in how he was motivated by his hatred on Facebook. “You are a real enemy of the people!” He wrote in regards to the truth of social. He accused Mark Zuckerberg's expenses for the election integrity for his lack of 2020 and his response was partly to support the principal competitor of Meta. Elsewhere, he said about Zuckerberg: “We watch him exactly, and if he does something illegal this time, he will spend the rest of his life in prison.”

A greater investment

After he had closed peace with Trump in Mar-A-Lago, the President's resort in Florida, and moved the Meta guidelines in Trumpian, Zuckerberg was only a foothold from Trump in front of Trump, not to say . Trump is a greater investment than a median president: each the blessing of his favor and the implications of his hostility are more extreme.

I don't need to overdo my case. The motivations, interests and philosophies of the eye titans that differ from Trump. Grouping them means deleting obvious differences. Sundar Pichai just isn’t a musk. Jeff Bezos just isn’t chewing. The statement that Trump desired to make by putting her so prominently about his inauguration cannot reflect the role you should play. It is feasible that Musk and Trump fell out in a single or two years and have been business for the remaining as usual: a combination of cooperation and irritation, floating and discharge. Historically, Trump's alliances were only short -lived, especially when his allies exercise real power.

May or not it’s so. I will likely be glad if I look back on this column and browse with some embarrassment as an artifact of incorrectly placed alarm. But I’m not able to see how Trump America's strongest merchants pays attention, a few of the perfect seats in his inauguration and do as if he doesn't want anything from them or that there’s nothing that they need from him, for one Copy deal.

And the issue will exist beyond Trump. The right to consider that the social media platforms were biased against them for years, and the left will spend years of believing. As absurd as prosperity in America, attention is much more. As powerful as money is in politics, attention is much more. Most of us haven’t managed to control the role of cash in politics. The problem is worse for attention – and we’ve got not even began trying solutions.

There is a reason: on the very moment when Gareth Southgate and his players were being pelted with obscenities and plastic cups in Cologne on Tuesday, all of Britain's leading bookmakers were lowering the percentages for England to win the 2024 European Championship.

It had nothing to do with a sudden surge in optimism or a flurry of betting activity. Who would put money on an England win after that?

The reason for this was the best way the tournament was being arrange: the percentages for England were reduced, as were those for Italy, Austria and Switzerland. The odds for a French, Spanish, German or Portuguese title fell accordingly.

If there have been a free draw after the group stage, as is the case in European club competitions, it will be difficult to get past Spain, Germany, Portugal and – given their poor performance up to now – the tournament favourites France.

But the trail was predetermined. The knockout rounds seemed unbalanced even before kick-off. The imbalance was further exacerbated by France's failure to win its group and now find themselves in the highest half of the round alongside Spain, Germany, Portugal and Denmark. Belgium could also find yourself there in the event that they finish second or third in Group E.

On paper, the underside quarter of the table looks pretty strong: Switzerland face Italy in Berlin on Saturday; England face a third-placed team (probably the Netherlands) on Sunday. But Switzerland, Italy and England have each won one game within the group stage. Add within the Netherlands (or whoever finishes third in Group E – Romania, Belgium, Slovakia or Ukraine) and that's 4 wins out of a possible 12.

To be clear, in the underside quarter of the draw, a team that has won only once within the group stage will reach the semi-finals – where, within the worst case scenario, they’d face Austria, Belgium or the Netherlands. The almost definitely semi-final constellations in the opposite half of the draw can be Spain or Germany against Portugal or France.

Southgate said on Tuesday, after a disastrous 0-0 draw with Slovenia, that England could have been lucky with the best way the knockout stages have turned out. “We shouldn't be seduced by half the draw,” the manager told ITV Sport. “We have to take it step by step. Tonight was an improvement. We have to improve to win the next round.”

In his post-match press conference, it was made clear to him that England had finished on the opposite side of the table to Germany, France, Spain and Portugal. “We have a lot of respect for all the teams you mentioned, but there are some very good teams on our side of the draw as well,” he said.

But to not the identical extent. As on the 2018 World Cup, luck was on England's side and all the opposite teams that finished on that side of the table – not least Austria, who can rightly say they took their luck into their very own hands by ending ahead of France and the Netherlands.

In 2018, five of the highest six teams within the knockout rounds (Brazil, Belgium, Portugal, Argentina and France) ended up on one side of the draw, while the opposite half consisted of Spain (which had won only considered one of its three group matches), Russia, Croatia, Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland, Colombia and England.

This World Cup was widely seen as Belgium's best probability to win a serious tournament, with lots of the 'golden generation' players at the height of their powers. But they paid a heavy price for winning Group G, beating Japan and Brazil but losing to France within the semi-finals. England's prize for ending second to Belgium of their group was a spot in the better a part of the draw, which saw them beat Colombia and Sweden before losing to Croatia within the semi-finals.

An identical imbalance prevailed at Euro 2016. Antonio Conte's Italy shone within the group stage, but the value of winning Group E was a tougher opponent. They beat Spain 2-0 but lost to Germany on penalties within the quarter-finals. Germany lost to hosts France within the semi-finals. Portugal, meanwhile – who had secured third place in Group F by drawing with Iceland, Austria and Hungary – reached the ultimate by beating Croatia within the round of 16, Poland within the quarter-finals and Wales within the semi-finals.

Some competitions are based on a free draw, comparable to the FA Cup. Others, comparable to the NFL or NBA, rank teams in keeping with their leads to the regular season, which should, in theory, be sure that the 2 strongest teams in a conference find yourself on opposite sides of the draw.

Things are different in international football competitions – including the World Cup, the European Championship, the Copa America, the Africa Cup of Nations and the Asian Cup of Nations. The teams are already determined on the draw: the winner of Group A plays against the runner-up of Group B, the winner of Group C against the runner-up of Group D and so forth.

The group stage draw is predicated on seedings, but teams are randomly assigned to every group, increasing the potential of an uneven finish within the knockout rounds. With tournaments compressed right into a 4 or five week period and matches happening within the host country, it is useful to have a pre-established structure for planning, travel and ensuring each team gets enough rest between matches.

However, there are inconsistencies. Austria has a seven-day break between the tip of the group matches on Tuesday and the round of 16 next Tuesday, while Spain's round of 16 opponent (who has yet to be determined) only has a four-day break.

Everything in knockout football is variable. But you may predict with some certainty that a team that performed miserably at Euro 2024 will reach the semi-finals or, probably, the ultimate. After a difficult group stage, England, Switzerland, Italy and others have made a soft landing. For considered one of them, it could even be a springboard.

The popular 52nd annual Oakland Greek Festival drew nearly 20,000 people this weekend to enjoy live music, traditional dance performances, food and crafts at Ascension Cathedral.

The festival was an absolute joy,” said Rev. Fr. Nicholas Mueller, senior priest of the Greek Orthodox Cathedral of the Ascension. “We welcomed many new visitors and were thrilled to see friends who have been coming for years.”

Frosene Phillips, who performed Greek folk dances at the primary festival in 1972, is now a volunteer and uses her previous experience as a journalist to assist with the festival's promotion and marketing.

“The festival is truly Greek hospitality on a grand scale,” Phillips said. “I love sharing our faith, food and culture with the greater Bay Area. Every year is like an atmospheric reunion for all of us.”

The @OaklandGrkFest, now in its 52nd 12 months, is full again! What a fun event. #Oakland #Greek #Festival @oakland @OakTribNews @EastBayTimes pic.twitter.com/sQv1RnNAY8

– German German) May 20, 2024

Scientific discoveries don't at all times require a high-tech laboratory or an enormous budget. Many people have a first-class laboratory right at home – of their kitchen.

The kitchen offers quite a few opportunities to view and explore what physicists call soft matter and sophisticated fluids. Everyday phenomena like Cheerios buildup in milk or rings left behind when coffee drops evaporate have led to this Discoveries on the interface of physics and chemistry and other tasteful collaborations between Food scientist and physicist.

Two students, Sam Christianson and Carsen Grote, and I published a brand new study in Nature Communications in May 2024, which deals with one other kitchen statement. We've been studying how objects can float in carbonated liquids, a phenomenon whimsically called “dancing raisins.”

The study examined how objects like raisins can move rhythmically up and down in carbonated liquids for several minutes, even as much as an hour.

An accompanying one Twitter thread about our research went viral, garnering over half 1,000,000 views in only two days. Why has this particular experiment captured the imagination of so many individuals?

Bubbling physics

Mineral water and other carbonated drinks fizz with bubbles because they contain more gas than the liquid can hold – they’re “supersaturated” with gas. If you Open a bottle of champagne or a soft drink, the liquid pressure drops and CO₂ molecules begin to flee into the encompassing air.

Bubbles don’t normally form spontaneously in a liquid. A liquid is made up of molecules that wish to stick together, so the molecules on the liquid boundary are somewhat unhappy. That results in Surface tension, a force aimed toward reducing surface area. Because bubbles increase the surface area, surface tension and fluid pressure normally immediately displace any bubbles that form.

But rough spots on a container's surface, just like the engravings in some champagne glasses, can protect recent bubbles from the crushing effects of surface tension, giving them a likelihood to form and grow.

Bubbles also form within the microscopic, tubular fabric fibers which can be left behind once you wipe a glass with a towel. The bubbles grow continuously in these tubes Once large enough, they detach and float upwards, expelling gas from the container.

But as many Champagne enthusiasts who add fruit to their glasses know, surface etching and small fabric fibers aren't the one places where bubbles can form. Add a small item like a raisin or a peanut to a sparkling drink also enables bubble growth. These submerged objects function tantalizing recent surfaces on which opportunistic molecules like CO₂ can accumulate and form bubbles.

And once enough bubbles have grown on the item, an act of levitation may be performed. Together, the bubbles can lift the item to the surface of the liquid. Once the bubbles reach the surface, they burst and cause the item to fall back down. Then the method begins again, in a periodic vertical dance movement.

Dancing raisins

Raisins are particularly good dancers. It only takes a couple of seconds for enough bubbles to form on the wrinkled surface of a raisin before it begins to rise to the highest – bubble formation is tougher on smoother surfaces. If a raisin is dipped in just-opened mineral water, it may possibly dance a vigorous tango for 20 minutes after which a slower waltz for one more hour or so.

We found that rotation or rotation is crucial make large objects dance. Bubbles that cling to the underside of an object can keep it aloft even when the highest bubbles pop. But when the item begins to rotate even a little bit, the bubbles underneath rotate the body even faster, causing much more bubbles to burst on the surface. And the earlier these bubbles are removed, the earlier the item can return to its vertical dance.

Small objects like raisins don't spin as much as larger objects, but as an alternative spin and wiggle forwards and backwards quickly.

Modeling the bubbly flamenco

In the work, we developed a mathematical model to predict how often an object like a raisin would come to the surface. In one experiment, we placed a 3D printed ball that acted as a model of a raisin in a glass of just-opened mineral water. The ball traveled up from the underside of the container over 750 times in an hour.

The model installed the speed of bubble growth in addition to the form, size and surface roughness of the item. This also took into consideration how quickly the liquid loses carbon dioxide resulting from the container geometry and specifically the flow generated by the bubbling activity.

Using the mathematical model, we were in a position to determine which forces had the best influence on the item's dance. For example, the fluid resistance on the item turned out to be relatively unimportant, however the ratio of the item's surface area to its volume was crucial.

Looking forward, the model also provides a method to determine some difficult-to-measure quantities using simpler measurable quantities. For example, just by observing the dance frequency of an object, we will learn rather a lot about its surface at a microscopic level without having to directly see these details.

Different dances in numerous theaters

However, these results will not be only interesting for lovers of carbonated drinks. There are also supersaturated liquids in nature – for instance magma.

As magma in a volcano rises closer to the Earth's surface, the pressure drops rapidly and dissolved gases from contained in the volcano rush toward the exit, identical to the CO₂ in carbonated water. These escaping gases can form into large high-pressure bubbles and emerge with such force that a a volcanic eruption occurs.

The particles in magma may not dance in the identical way as raisins in soda water, but tiny objects within the magma can influence the progression of those explosive events.

In recent many years there has also been an outbreak of a special kind: hundreds of scientific studies have been dedicated to lively matter in liquids. These studies have a look at things like floating microorganisms and that The within our fluid-filled cells.

Most of those lively systems exist not in water, but in additional complicated biological fluids that contain the energy needed to supply activity. Microorganisms absorb nutrients from the fluid around them with a purpose to proceed swimming. Molecular motors move cargo along a highway inside our cells by drawing energy from the environment in the shape of ATP from the encompassing area.

Studying these systems can assist scientists learn more about how the cells and bacteria within the human body function and the way life on this planet evolved to its current state.

Meanwhile, a liquid itself can behave strangely resulting from the difference in molecular composition and the bodies moving inside it. Many recent studies for instance, have checked out the behavior of microorganisms in liquids equivalent to mucus, which behaves each like a viscous liquid and an elastic gel. Scientists still have rather a lot to study these highly complex systems.

While raisins in soda water seem quite easy in comparison with microorganisms floating through biological fluids, they supply an accessible method to study generic traits in these more difficult environments. In each cases, bodies extract energy from their complex fluid environments and concurrently influence them, resulting in fascinating behaviors.

New insights into the physical world, from geophysics to biology, will proceed to emerge from table-scale experiments—and maybe right within the kitchen.

Bruins

SUNRISE, Fla. (AP) — Aleksander Barkov scored two goals and two assists, Sam Reinhart added 4 assists and the Florida Panthers beat the Boston Bruins 6-1 on Wednesday night to even the second-round series at one game apiece.

Brandon Montour scored a goal and two assists, and Steven Lorentz, Gustav Forsling and Eetu Luostarinen also scored. The Panthers chased Bruins starter Jeremy Swayman for 4 straight goals early within the third period after which added two more against Linus Ullmark.

Sergei Bobrovsky finished the sport with 15 saves for the Panthers. The five-goal margin was Florida's largest margin in a playoff game, tying the mark set April 29 in one other 6-1 win over Tampa Bay.

Charlie Coyle scored the goal for the Bruins, who lost to Florida for the primary time in six meetings this season. The series moves to Boston for Game 3 on Friday night and Game 4 on Sunday night.

And now it's a streak – 136 penalty minutes handed out within the third period after multiple altercations created a narrative that may proceed into Friday, highlighted by Florida's Matthew Tkachuk, who starred in a star-versus-star showdown Several shots at David Pastrnak from Boston took the sport out of their hands.

After the primary 20 minutes, Florida was simply dominant. They didn't allow Boston even a single shot on goal for greater than 16 minutes of game time, or 53 minutes of actual game time. Parker Wotherspoon sent the puck the length of the ice with 5:08 left within the second period, which was ruled a shot since it was right at Bobrovsky. The Bruins didn't get one other try until Wotherspoon had one with 8:57 left within the third.

Swayman – who virtually split time with Linus Ullmark in the course of the regular season, making 43 starts while Ullmark had 39 starts – made his seventh straight start, the longest such run for a Boston goaltender since Tuukka Rask at the tip of the made eleven starts in a row within the 2021/22 season.

Swayman did not finish after Florida finally broke him up within the second period. Swayman stopped 19 of 23 shots and his playoff goals against average increased from 1.42 to 1.81.

Boston had not conceded a couple of goal in any period in these playoffs and had not conceded three in a period in almost two months – not because the New York Rangers scored three goals within the third period on March 21. two of them were short sellers. The Bruins hadn't had a three-goal period with a real goalie in net since March 16 against Philadelphia.

But the Panthers found a way and scored one goal early within the period, one in the midst of the quarter and one on the very end. Lorentz redirected a Montour shot into the highest corner of the online at 1:58, Barkov got here close and swept a rebound from Reinhart's shot into the online for a 2-1 lead at 9:49, after which Forsling made a small one Lead -the-clock to increase the result in 3-1.

With about seven seconds left, Montour had his glove on the puck to dam it because the Bruins attempted to clear it. His shot from the proper side went wide, Anton Lundell controlled the rebound off the tip boards and located Forsling's shot from the left side past Swayman – who seemed to be shielded by Boston defender Charlie McAvoy in the course of the play – with 1.3 seconds left.

The momentum continued within the third. Florida needed just 1:28 to make it 4-1, with Barkov easily organising Luostarinen from close range. That was the tip of Swayman's night.

The Indian government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi has implemented the controversial Citizenship Amendment Actor CAA, in March 2024.

Opponents of the law – which of them accelerates citizenship for undocumented, non-Muslim migrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan – condemn the best way wherein Muslims are discriminated against.

As with the passage of the law in 2019, many Indians did so too went onto the road.

This time the demonstrations were more subdued, although some demonstrators were arrested by police. The government had increased the number, perhaps fearing a repeat Police patrols and deployed paramilitary troops in places that had previously been hotbeds of protest.

Four years ago, University campuses and Muslim neighborhoods like that of Delhi Shaheen Bagh were stuffed with individuals who chanted slogans, sang songs and recited poems day after day.

Poetry appeared to unsettle the federal government probably the most. Dissenters who recited protest poems were accused of spreading hatred against India, beaten and arrested by police.

Poet Hussain Haidry rose to prominence in the course of the 2019-2020 protests. Haidry, who can also be a Bollywood lyricist and screenwriter, penned anti-CAA poems, which notably became a rallying cry against the federal government “You Dekhogey” or “You will see” in English.

I heard “Tum Dekhogey” for the primary time in 2020 as Haidry recited it during a lecture at Columbia University on the anti-CAA protests.

As a scholar and translator of Urdu poetryI used to be touched by the best way the poem described the state's violence against peaceful protesters. I then translated the poem and am currently writing about it for my forthcoming book, Urdu Poetry and Politics in Contemporary India.

For me, the poem crystallizes the troubling turn of events in a rustic that after valued secularism, democracy and free expression. Because poems like Haidry's directly challenge state power, the federal government and its supporters seek to portray them as seditious and anti-India.

A secularist ethos was suppressed

The CAA was passed in 1955, a number of years after India's liberation from colonial rule in 1947.

The aim was to formalize citizenship for everybody living in India since 1949, in addition to those born in India since or before that date.

But in 2019 the right-wing government is coming modified this law To give migrants from religious groups from neighboring Muslim-majority countries the chance to use for citizenship.

There was one exception: Muslim migrants.

In one fell swoop, this latest law worn out India's constitutional guarantee of granting citizenship for people of all religions. Most poor people in India do not need formal citizenship papers, even when their families have lived within the country for generations. If they’re Muslim, they’ll not apply.

This law – together with plans to create a National Register of Citizens, which might require all Indians to indicate proof of citizenship, tens of millions of Muslims, lower castes and the poor in India would effectively be ineligible for presidency advantages. They wouldn’t give you the option to vote and can be at constant risk of being expelled from their country of birth.

Lawyer based in Delhi Gautam Bhatia has argued that the division of suspected migrants into Muslims and non-Muslims “explicitly and obviously seeks to enshrine religious discrimination in law, which is at odds with our long-standing, secular constitutional ethos.”

In 2019, the passage of those laws by the Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Indian Parliament, sparked nationwide protests. The most distinguished was the 101-day sit-in at Shaheen Bagh led by Muslim women. Due to protests and widespread outrage, implementation of the law was placed on hold.

“We will throw your crowns”

Perhaps probably the most recited poem in Shaheen Bagh and other places in the course of the 2019 protests was the Urdu poem by Faiz Ahmed Faiz “We see” – or “We’ll see.”

Faiz, who was born in pre-divided India in a region of the country that’s now a part of Pakistan, the poem was written in 1979 to protest against the regime Muhammad Zia ul Haq, Pakistan's sixth president. After coming to power, Zia placed the country under martial law and ruled as a military dictator, while at the identical time promoting the Islamization of Pakistan's political and cultural life.

It could appear strange that a poem written several many years earlier to protest against a Pakistani ruler was used to protest against Indian laws. But in South Asia there may be a protracted tradition of reciting Poetry as a type of protestand poems from the past often develop latest relevance.

While lots of these poems appear in print, the tradition is is primarily an oral one – they’re recited as poems and sung as songs at marches, protests and on university campuses. This allows them to stay in the favored imagination for many years after their release.

In 2019, Faiz's 1979 poem became a rousing backlash against the Modi government's attempts to marginalize India's Muslims.

Just as Pakistani protesters chanted the road “Sab taj uchale jayenge, sab takht giraye jayenge” – “We will throw your crowns, we will overthrow your thrones” – to denounce Zia’s authoritarian regime, Indian protesters recited the identical lines to denounce Modi’s rule .

“I was there and so were you.”

Haidry was in Shaheen Bagh in the course of the 2019 protests. Inspired by women's activism, he wrote “Tum Dekhogey” as a variation of “Hum Dekhenge”.

While Faiz's poem speaks of the ability of the people to overthrow tyranny, Haidry's poem is written from the attitude of the ladies of Shaheen Bagh. It insults the silent spectators who do nothing as hardcore Hindu nationalists – who imagine in Hindu supremacy – terrorize religious minorities.

 You will see
 Yes, you too will see
 This night spent on the streets, 
 this ice in our breath,
 This brutal, unjust night, 
 this too will likely be your fate  
 When the tyrant attacks you, you stifle your screams
 When you beg for justice, you might be battered as a substitute
 When trapped in saffron cages, 
 eating roti dipped in water –  
 Our slaughtered faces will appear before you
 We will curse you, we'll spit on you
 And Hindustan will likely be but a hole word – 
 scared, cowardly 
 hell, slaughterhouse – and you'll lament:
 I used to be there and so were you
 Then the tyrant will laugh and say:
 I used to be there and so were you

The poem begins with the setting of the stage.

“That night on the streets, that ice on our breath” is a reference to the cold winter nights experienced by the ladies of Shaheen Bagh during their sit-in, once they had no access to heat or electricity. Those who watched and did nothing, Haidry warns, will sooner or later suffer the identical fate as these women.

The next two lines speak of the varied injustices that peaceful protesters endure – the “attacks” and “abuse.” within the hands of the state. Next, the text suggests that Hindu nationalists are imprisoning peculiar residents in “saffron cages.” Saffron is a reference on the colour used from Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party or BJP. You can imagine the cage metaphorically – for an India without fundamental rights. But it may also discuss with the actual prison sentences handed out to protesters.

The poem further suggests that these silent spectators will finally get up and realize that after the CAA comes into force, India has change into a living “hell” and a “slaughterhouse”. If they lament their inaction, the bully will mock them – “laughs and says / I was there and so were you.”

Haidry's lyrical denunciation of the federal government has infuriated supporters of Modi and the BJP.

Since Haidry can also be a Bollywood screenwriter, there have been such Calls for a boycott “Takht”, a movie he worked on. And when New York-based singer and activist Kiran Ahluwalia posted a rendition of “Tum Dekhogey” on Instagram On March 18, 2024, she was denied renewal of her Overseas Citizen of India card, a sort of second passport – a tactic often utilized by the Modi government To punish those that think otherwise.

Despite these attempts to suppress protest, the words of poets like Haidry proceed to resonate.

This is the fantastic thing about poetry, slipping easily through the bars of saffron cages and speaking truth to power and oppression.