For many independent movies with a low budget, an Oscar victory is a golden ticket.

The promoting may be utilized in theater publications or solutions along with more on -demand Rental and sales.

However for “No other country“A Palestinian Israeli film that is currently the best documentary at the 2025 Academy AwardsThis exposure may not lead to commercial success in the United States. This is because the film was not found a company for distribution it in America.

“No other Land” records the efforts of the Palestinian city dwellers to combat an Israeli plan to tear down their villages within the West Bank and use the realm as a military training site. It was staged by 4 Palestinian and Israeli activists and journalists: Basel AdraWho is a resident of the realm that’s exposed to demolition, Yuval AbrahamHamdan Ballal and Rachel Sor. While the Moviemakers organized demonstrations In a variety of US cities, the shortage of a national distributor makes a broader publication unlikely.

Film distributors are a vital, but often invisible link within the chain with which a movie can reach the lounge in cinemas and other people. In recent years it has develop into more common for controversial award -winning movies Finding problems to seek out a dealer. Palestinian movies have come across additional obstacles.

As an Arab scientist Anyone who wrote in regards to the Palestinian cinema, I’m dissatisfied with the difficulties with which “no other country” was confronted. But I'm not surprised.

The role of the film distributors

Distributors are sometimes invisible to cinema goers. But without oneIt may be difficult for a movie to seek out an audience.

Distributors often acquire rights to a movie for a certain country or a variety of countries. They then market movies Cinemas, cinema chains and streaming platforms. As a compensation, retailers receive a percentage of income that’s achieved through theater and residential exemptions.

The film “Soundtrack to a coup d'état“Another finalist for the very best documentary shows how this process often works. It was within the premiere on the Sundance Film Festival in January 2024 and was acquired for distribution just a number of months later Lorber cinemaAn incredible American distributor of independent movies.

The inability to seek out a dealer shouldn’t be remarkable itself. No film is entitled to sales, and a lot of the movies of newer or unknown directors are exposed to long possibilities.

However, it’s unusual for a movie like “No Other Land”, no other country, This has received critical recognition and was recognized At various film festivals and price exhibitions. Some have I set it as favorites To win the very best documentary on the Academy Awards. And “no other country” Could find distributors in Europewhere it is well accessible on several streaming platforms.

Why can “no other country” within the United States not find land?

There are a number of aspects in the sport.

Shy away from controversy

In recent years, film critics have found a trend: documentaries on controversial topics Distribution difficulties. This film via a campaign by Amazon staff to prepare and A documentary About Adam Kinzinger, one in every of the few Republican Congressmen who voted for Donald Trump's indictment in 2021.

Of course, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been controversial for a very long time. However, the publication of “No Other Land” comes at a time when the issue is especially striking. The Hamas attacks of October 7, 2023 and the next Israeli bombing and invasion of the Gaza Strip Campus protests and procedures In 2024. The critical comments of the filmmakers for the Israeli occupation of Palestine even have achieved counter response in Germany.

The undeniable fact that this conflict has been within the news since October 2023 also needs to increase the general public's interest in a movie like “No Other Land” – and due to this fact result in increased sales, the metric that the dealers are most desirous about.

Indeed, an earlier film that also documents Palestinian protests against Israeli land versions “,”5 broken cameras“Was finalist for the very best documentary on the Academy Awards 2013. It could discover a US distributor. However, the support of a giant documentary film development program of the European Union was supported Called greenhouse. Supporting a company reminiscent of Greenhouse that had connections to quite a few production and sales firms in Europe and the USA can facilitate the seek for a dealer.

In contrast, “no other country”, Although it has a Norwegian co-producer And received some funds from organizations in Europe and the USA, was mainly produced by a collective of the bottom film.

Phases for protest

While the distribution challenges can have been recently, controversy around Palestinian movies are nothing latest.

Many of them are based on the undeniable fact that the system of film festivals, awards and sales are mainly based on the origin nation of a movie. Since there isn’t any confident Palestinian state – and lots of countries and organizations haven’t recognized the condition of Palestine – The query of how Palestinian movies can categorize was difficult to resolve.

In 2002 the Academy of Arts and Sciences leaned the primary one Palestinian film submitted to the “Best Foreign Language Film” category – Elia Suleiman'S “Divine intervention” – Because Palestine was not recognized as a rustic by the United Nations. The rules have been modified for the award ceremony of the next yr.

In 2021 the occupation of the film “Let or not it’s tomorrow“, Who had an Israeli director, but primarily Palestinian actor, boycotted the Cannes Film Festival In protest against the categorization of the film as an Israeli film and never as a Palestinian film.

Film festivals and other cultural venues have also develop into locations and protest. For example on the Cannes Film Festival in 2017, the rights of Israeli Minister of Culture wore an argument – And meme-worthy – Dress with the skyline of Jerusalem to support Israeli sovereignty claims in regards to the Holy City, despite the unsolved status From Jerusalem to international law.

On 2024 Academy AwardsNumerous participants, including Billie Eilish, Mark Ruffalo and Mahershala Ali, wore red pens to support a ceasefire in Gaza, and propalestinian demonstrators delayed the start of the ceremonies.

When he accepted his award, “No Other Land” Director Yuval Abraham called “The United States' foreign policy to” block a solution to peace “.

Although a movie like “No Other Land” appeals to many Americans a subject of clear interest, I’m wondering if the seek for a US distributor was only tougher.

What role does Medicaid's role play within the health system?

Founded in 1965 along with Medicare, this system for public medical insurance for older Americans, Medicaid pays off For the health needs of adults and youngsters with low incomes, including greater than 1 of three individuals with disabilities. It also covers greater than 12 million that qualify for each Medicare and Medicaid because they’re each poor and over 65.

In addition, this safety network program pays the health costs of More than 2 in 5 US birth. Medicaid is a typical program of the federal government/federal States that manage it.

The law on inexpensive care should make just about all US -grown -ups under the age of 65 without children who earn up until 138% of the Federal League level level Right to Medicaid. Before the Learning Health Reform Act of 2010, adults without children in most countries Couldn't get a Medicaid cover. The Supreme Court, nevertheless, made this transformation optional for states.

So far, 40 states and Washington, DC – have participated in Medicaid expansion. The growth of this system has reduced the variety of Americans without medical insurance and the insurance gaps for the duvet gaps People with color And those with low -wage jobs that sometimes don’t receive any reports sponsored by the employer.

Hundreds of studies have determined that the expansion of Medicaid improved access to care and health of the individuals who have won the duvet, at the identical time reduces mortality and strengthen state economies. Among other things, positive results.

Ten states haven’t yet expanded Medicaid. Two of them, Georgia and Mississippi, seriously considered do that.

Why are you concerned about Medicaid's financing?

A Memo among the many Republicans of the home in circulation In January 2025 Contains a menu Of as much as 2.3 trillion US dollars of Medicaid, cuts over 10 years. A House budget blueprintPresent approved in a 217-215 The vote on February 25, which largely fell in party borders, identified that the Republican majority geared toward it as a substitute Reduce Medicaid's expenditure by 880 billion US dollars Over a decade.

To be clear, GOP legislators didn’t say that they wanted to do that.

Instead, she informed the committee that Medicaid and Medicare must be monitored with the intention to determine cuts of this size. Experts agree that the covering of Medicare editions can be harder to attract because Trump made it clear that he considered it to be unlimitedBut sometimes he proposed He could possibly be open to trim medicaid. He says Trump Supports the budget plan, which the home approved by the home.

In an interesting coincidence, Medicaid itself costs around 880 billion US dollars a yr Between expenses for the federal government and the state government. This indicates that the Republicans are striving for about 10%.

How does this system work?

If you might be entitled to Medicaid, you possibly can register for this system at any time and access medical insurance protection at any time.

If you require treatment for a condition that covers medicaid, be it breast cancer or the flu that happens without no – or low -Costs from the pocket. To be inscribed in Medicaid implies that your medical treatment is roofed and can’t be refused for budgetary reasons. The Federal Government contributes to what states pay for the health care of residents who register, however it cannot determine how much they need to spend on Medicaid – states do it.

The Federal Match Rate is connected to the per capita income of each state. This implies that a state with a lower per capita income receives the next federal game, with all countries receiving at the very least 50%. For states that participate within the Medicaid expansion, the federal game is 90%for this population.

A dozen states are called that Trigger laws of their books, which could mechanically revoke Medicaid's expansion if that is reduced.

How can the federal government lower its Medicaid editions?

The Federal Government could simply adapt the match rate and shift more of Medicaid to states. But previous suggestions have proposed a significant change, either through Pro head caps or Block subsidies.

The per capita limit would present one effort limit per person to federal financing, while block grants would present an overall limit for a way much the federal government would contribute to the prices of a state for medicaid. In return, the states would probably cover fewer people, reduce their benefits, pay less for maintaining or a mix of such cost reduction measures.

Either per capita cap or block subsidies would require massive transformation within the functioning of Medicaid.

The program has at all times provided the states open funds, and each states and beneficiaries depend on the steadiness of federal funds to get this system up and running. The insertion of caps or block grants would force the states to bring significantly more cash into this system or to drastically reduce registration. Assuming a major reduction in federal financing for Medicaid, Millions could lose medical insurance Cover that you just cannot afford to get elsewhere.

Spokesman Mike Johnson said that Pro Kopf -Caps and the change in federal match prices are not on the tableBut they were included within the Former Republican memo of the home Detailing of potential cuts.

What else could occur?

Another concept that many Republicans say, they support them, which adds to what’s referred to as known.Work requirements. “” “The first Trump administration approved state proposals for Medicaid -beneficiaries in order to complete a number of hours of“ community engagement ”for activities corresponding to work, vocational training, education or non -profit services with the intention to record and maintain the authorization of Medicaid. This despite the undeniable fact that the The majority of the Medicaid participants are already workingIf disabled, there are nurses for a loved one or are at college.

Some politicians argue that individuals help to keep up medicaid services Would help them to pass to the duvet of employers in order that the restriction feels like common sense. However, the essential documents can result in many working people being thrown out of this system To implement very costly. Also, Professional training programsPresent Volunteer work And education, unless it is usually not related to medical insurance protection in a final program, which makes this argument incorrect.

When Arkansas implemented Medicaid's work requirements in 2018, despite a lot of the participants who’re already working, he worked. About 18,000 people lost reporting. Politicians were badly understood and the participants had difficulty reporting their work activity. In addition, the employment of adults with low incomes didn’t grow.

Is Medicaid at risk of waste or fraud?

Medicaid already spends Less than medicar or private medical insurance per benefactor. This includes expenses for Doctors, hospitals, medication and tests.

The state accountability obligation – an independent, non -partisan government agency – estimated that the prevention of payments that shouldn’t be made may lead 50 billion US dollars of federal savings per yr. The GAO warns that “not all improper payments are the result of fraud.” This significant sum continues to be not near the scope of the cuts that the Republicans apparently need to make.

Would Medicaid spout patterns be popular?

That is impossible.

Surveys And Focus groups Show that Medicaid is extremely popular.

More than half The government say too little of the Americans for Medicaid, and only 15% say that the expenses are too high.

We consider that if Medicaid is openly discussed that members of the congress were flooded with calls from communities who ask their legislators to oppose them. That happened in 2017 When the primary Trump administration tried And didn’t lift the law on inexpensive care.

Should Medicaid be reduced by almost 880 billion US dollars in the following decade Thrown out of this system And don’t win insured. But that might only be the start of their problems. People who should not insured are waiting too long before you see a health care provider if you get sick or injured. results in poorer health results and the widening of the Health gaps Between Haves and Have-Nots.

For many independent movies with a low budget, an Oscar nomination is a golden ticket.

The promoting will be utilized in theater publications or solutions along with more on -demand Rental and sales.

However for “No other country“A Palestinian Israeli film that was nominated for the best documentary at The 2025 Academy AwardsIt is unlikely an organization for distribution it in America.

“No other Land” records the efforts of the Palestinian city dwellers to combat an Israeli plan to tear down their villages within the West Bank and use the world as a military training site. It was staged by 4 Palestinian and Israeli activists and journalists: Basel AdraWho is a resident of the world that’s exposed to demolition, Yuval AbrahamHamdan Ballal and Rachel Sor. While the Moviemakers organized demonstrations In numerous US cities, the shortage of a national distributor makes a broader publication unlikely.

Film distributors are an important, but often invisible link within the chain with which a movie can reach the front room in cinemas and other people. In recent years it has develop into more common for controversial award -winning movies Finding problems to search out a dealer. Palestinian movies have come across additional obstacles.

As an Arab scientist Anyone who wrote concerning the Palestinian cinema, I’m disenchanted with the difficulties with which “no other country” was confronted. But I'm not surprised.

The role of the film distributors

Distributors are sometimes invisible to cinema goers. But without oneIt will be difficult for a movie to search out an audience.

Distributors normally acquire rights to a movie for a certain country or numerous countries. They then market movies Cinemas, cinema chains and streaming platforms. As a compensation, retailers receive a percentage of income that’s achieved through theater and residential exemptions.

The film “Soundtrack to a coup d'état“Another finalist for the perfect documentary shows how this process normally works. It was within the premiere on the Sundance Film Festival in January 2024 and was acquired for distribution just a number of months later Lorber cinemaAn ideal American distributor of independent movies.

The inability to search out a dealer will not be remarkable itself. No film is entitled to sales, and a lot of the movies of newer or unknown directors are exposed to long possibilities.

However, it’s unusual for a movie like “No Other Land”, no other country, This has received critical recognition and was recognized At various film festivals and price exhibitions. Some have I set it as favorites To win the perfect documentary on the Academy Awards. And “no other country” Could find distributors in Europewhere it is definitely accessible on several streaming platforms.

Why can “no other country” within the United States not find land?

There are a number of aspects in the sport.

Shy away from controversy

In recent years, film critics have found a trend: documentaries on controversial topics Distribution difficulties. This film via a campaign by Amazon employees to prepare and A documentary About Adam Kinzinger, considered one of the few Republican Congressmen who voted for Donald Trump's indictment in 2021.

Of course, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been controversial for a very long time. However, the publication of “No Other Land” comes at a time when the issue is especially striking. The Hamas attacks of October 7, 2023 and the next Israeli bombing and invasion of the Gaza Strip Campus protests and procedures In 2024. The critical comments of the filmmakers for the Israeli occupation of Palestine even have achieved counter response in Germany.

The proven fact that this conflict has been within the news since October 2023 also needs to increase the general public's interest in a movie like “No Other Land” – and due to this fact result in increased sales, the metric that the dealers are most focused on.

Indeed, an earlier film that also documents Palestinian protests against Israeli land versions “,”5 broken cameras“Was finalist for the perfect documentary on the Academy Awards 2013. It could discover a US distributor. However, the support of a giant documentary film development program of the European Union was supported Called greenhouse. Supporting a company reminiscent of Greenhouse that had connections to quite a few production and sales corporations in Europe and the USA can facilitate the seek for a dealer.

In contrast, “no other country”, Although it has a Norwegian co-producer And received some funds from organizations in Europe and the USA, was mainly produced by a collective of the bottom film.

Phases for protest

While the distribution challenges could have been recently, controversy around Palestinian movies are nothing recent.

Many of them are based on the proven fact that the system of film festivals, awards and sales are mainly based on the origin nation of a movie. Since there isn’t any confident Palestinian state – and lots of countries and organizations haven’t recognized the condition of Palestine – The query of how Palestinian movies can categorize was difficult to resolve.

In 2002 the Academy of Arts and Sciences leaned the primary one Palestinian film submitted to the “Best Foreign Language Film” category – Elia Suleiman'S “Divine intervention” – Because Palestine was not recognized as a rustic by the United Nations. The rules have been modified for the award ceremony of the next 12 months.

In 2021 the occupation of the film “Let or not it’s tomorrow“, Who had an Israeli director, but primarily Palestinian actor, boycotted the Cannes Film Festival In protest against the categorization of the film as an Israeli film and never as a Palestinian film.

Film festivals and other cultural venues have also develop into locations and protest. For example on the Cannes Film Festival in 2017, the rights of Israeli Minister of Culture wore an argument – And meme-worthy – Dress with the skyline of Jerusalem to support Israeli sovereignty claims concerning the Holy City, despite the unsolved status From Jerusalem to international law.

On 2024 Academy AwardsNumerous participants, including Billie Eilish, Mark Ruffalo and Mahershala Ali, wore red pens to support a ceasefire in Gaza, and propalestinian demonstrators delayed the start of the ceremonies.

Although a movie like “No Other Land” appeals to many individuals within the USA for many individuals, he’s facing a tough fight against a dealer.

I’m wondering if a victory with the Oscars could be enough.

For many independent movies with a low budget, an Oscar nomination is a golden ticket.

The promoting could be utilized in theater publications or solutions along with more on -demand Rental and sales.

However for “No other country“A Palestinian film that for the best documentary of the nominated 2025 Academy AwardsIt is unlikely an organization for distribution it in America.

“No other Land” records the efforts of the Palestinian city dwellers to combat an Israeli plan to tear down their villages within the West Bank and use the world as a military training site. It was staged by 4 Palestinian and Israeli activists and journalists: Basel AdraWho is a resident of the world that’s exposed to demolition, Yuval AbrahamHamdan Ballal and Rachel Sor. While the Moviemakers organized demonstrations In quite a lot of US cities, the shortage of a national distributor makes a broader publication unlikely.

Film distributors are a vital, but often invisible link within the chain with which a movie can reach the front room in cinemas and folks. In recent years it has turn into more common for controversial award -winning movies Finding problems to seek out a dealer. Palestinian movies have come across additional obstacles.

As an Arab scientist Anyone who wrote in regards to the Palestinian cinema, I’m upset with the difficulties with which “no other country” was confronted. But I'm not surprised.

The role of the film distributors

Distributors are sometimes invisible to cinema goers. But without oneIt could be difficult for a movie to seek out an audience.

Distributors often acquire rights to a movie for a certain country or quite a lot of countries. They then market movies Cinemas, cinema chains and streaming platforms. As a compensation, retailers receive a percentage of income that’s achieved through theater and residential exemptions.

The film “Soundtrack to a coup d'état“Another finalist for one of the best documentary shows how this process often works. It was within the premiere on the Sundance Film Festival in January 2024 and was acquired for distribution just just a few months later Lorber cinemaAn amazing American distributor of independent movies.

The inability to seek out a dealer shouldn’t be remarkable itself. No film is entitled to sales, and many of the movies of newer or unknown directors are exposed to long possibilities.

However, it’s unusual for a movie like “No Other Land”, no other country, This has received critical recognition and was recognized At various film festivals and price exhibitions. Some have I set it as favorites To win one of the best documentary on the Academy Awards. And “no other country” Could find distributors in Europewhere it is definitely accessible on several streaming platforms.

Why can “no other country” within the United States not find land?

There are just a few aspects in the sport.

Shy away from controversy

In recent years, film critics have found a trend: documentaries on controversial topics Distribution difficulties. This film via a campaign by Amazon employees to arrange and A documentary About Adam Kinzinger, certainly one of the few Republican Congressmen who voted for Donald Trump's indictment in 2021.

Of course, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been controversial for a very long time. However, the publication of “No Other Land” comes at a time when the issue is especially striking. The Hamas attacks of October 7, 2023 and the next Israeli bombing and invasion of the Gaza Strip Campus protests and procedures In 2024. The critical comments of the filmmakers for the Israeli occupation of Palestine even have achieved counter response in Germany.

The indisputable fact that this conflict has been within the news since October 2023 also needs to increase the general public's interest in a movie like “No Other Land” – and due to this fact result in increased sales, the metric that the dealers are most serious about.

Indeed, an earlier film that also documents Palestinian protests against Israeli land versions “,”5 broken cameras“Was finalist for one of the best documentary on the Academy Awards 2013. It could discover a US distributor. However, the support of a giant documentary film development program of the European Union was supported Called greenhouse. Supporting a company reminiscent of Greenhouse that had connections to quite a few production and sales firms in Europe and the USA can facilitate the seek for a dealer.

In contrast, “no other country”, Although it has a Norwegian co-producer And received some funds from organizations in Europe and the USA, was mainly produced by a collective of the bottom film.

Phases for protest

While the distribution challenges can have been recently, controversy around Palestinian movies are nothing latest.

Many of them are based on the indisputable fact that the system of film festivals, awards and sales are mainly based on the origin nation of a movie. Since there isn’t any confident Palestinian state – and plenty of countries and organizations haven’t recognized the condition of Palestine – The query of how Palestinian movies can categorize was difficult to unravel.

In 2002 the Academy of Arts and Sciences leaned the primary one Palestinian film submitted to the “Best Foreign Language Film” category – Elia Suleiman'S “Divine intervention” – Because Palestine was not recognized as a rustic by the United Nations. The rules have been modified for the award ceremony of the next yr.

In 2021 the occupation of the film “Let or not it’s tomorrow“, Who had an Israeli director, but primarily Palestinian actor, boycotted the Cannes Film Festival In protest against the categorization of the film as an Israeli film and never as a Palestinian film.

Film festivals and other cultural venues have also turn into locations and protest. For example on the Cannes Film Festival in 2017, the rights of Israeli Minister of Culture wore an issue – And meme-worthy – Dress with the skyline of Jerusalem to support Israeli sovereignty claims in regards to the Holy City, despite the unsolved status From Jerusalem to international law.

On 2024 Academy AwardsPlenty of participants, including Billie Eilish, Mark Ruffalo and Mahershala Ali, wore red pens to support a ceasefire in Gaza, and propalestinian demonstrators delayed the start of the ceremonies.

Although a movie like “no other country” appeals to many individuals within the USA a subject of clear interest, it’s facing a tough fight against a dealer.

I’m wondering if a victory with the Oscars could be enough.

By LAURAN NEERGAARD

WASHINGTON (AP) — Nothing doctors prescribed controlled Michael Garrity's dangerously hypertension — until they removed some nerves in his kidneys.

“My blood pressure went up, I got out of breath and felt tired, and that doesn't happen anymore,” said Garrity, 62, of Needham, Massachusetts. He's still taking medication, but at lower doses his blood pressure is returning to normal for the primary time in years. “I’m thrilled.”

About half of adults within the U.S. suffer from hypertension, a significant risk for heart attacks, strokes, kidney failure and even dementia. Many people don't realize they’ve hypertension until it has caused serious damage.

“Know your blood pressure, know the numbers,” emphasized Dr. Randy Zusman of Massachusetts General Hospital, who focuses on the hardest-to-treat cases and advises individuals who think they're doing well to no less than have an annual checkup.

And only a fraction of patients have hypertension well controlled, leaving a necessity for brand new strategies. The Food and Drug Administration approved this “renal denervation” option a couple of 12 months ago, based on studies showing modest profit in patients whose blood pressure stays high despite multiple medications.

After the American Heart Association recently deemed it promising, some hospitals, including Mass General Brigham, at the moment are cautiously offering it while they determine who’re good candidates — and whether their insurance will cover a minimally invasive procedure that costs hundreds of dollars.

What is hypertension?

Two numbers describe blood pressure. The highest, “systolic” pressure is the force that blood exerts on the partitions of the arteries because it is pumped out of the center. The lower “diastolic” value measures the identical pressure, but between heartbeats.

The normal value is lower than 120 over 80. Blood pressure naturally fluctuates throughout the day and is higher if you end up physically lively or stressed. But when it stays high – consistently 130 over 80 or higher, in keeping with the newest guidelines – it stiffens the arteries and makes the center work harder.

How to measure blood pressure

No doctor's visit is crucial. Pharmacies and sometimes even libraries offer screening, and folks can use monitors at home.

To avoid falsely high readings, the American Medical Association has suggestions: Sit quietly, feet on the ground, legs uncrossed. Place the cuff in your bare arm, not over clothing. Instead of dangling your arm, place it on a table.

Medication is just not the one technique to treat hypertension

Medication is a must once hypertension reaches 140/90. The average patient requires two or three medications, sometimes more, together with a healthier lifestyle, Zusman said.

But the hypertension Garrity has struggled with since his late 20s is proof against treatment. Despite taking 4 to 6 medications in addition to a strict weight-reduction plan and exercise, his blood pressure recurrently reached 150 over 100 or worse.

What is Renal Denervation?

Doctors thread a small catheter or tube through blood vessels to succeed in the kidneys after which beam ultrasound or radiofrequency energy. These impulses go through the renal arteries and selectively goal surrounding nerves, Dr. Joseph Garasic, an interventional cardiologist at Mass General who performed Garrity's procedure. It takes about an hour.

Although already utilized in other countries, a significant U.S. trial of renal denervation failed a couple of decade ago, prompting changes before researchers tried again. In November 2023, the FDA approved two catheter systems from Recor Medical and Medtronic.

It's not a cure – and a few patients don't profit from it. However, Garasic said several studies showed, on average, an 8 to 10 point drop in blood pressure, a modest but vital improvement. Some, like Garrity, see a bigger decline, enough to step by step reduce medication use.

The FDA deemed the procedure secure for rigorously chosen patients — it wasn't tested in patients with kidney disease or narrowed arteries, for instance. And studies have only lasted a number of years, not long enough to say whether the nerves could eventually regenerate.

The American Heart Association's guidelines encourage prospective patients and experienced physicians to have “thoughtful and informed conversations” to make your mind up who’s a superb candidate.

Originally published: January 22, 2025 at 10:15 am PST

The symbolism Meghan Markle selected for her stunning New Year's Day back to Instagram, the day before the announcement of her head-turning recent Netflix lifestyle show, couldn't be clearer.

In classic black and white images, a video, allegedly shot by Prince HarryIt shows the Duchess of Sussex barefoot and wearing an informal, flowing white shirt and white capri pants. On a wintry day, she runs toward the surf of the Pacific Ocean near her home in Montecito. She laughs playfully and uses her famous calligraphy skills to jot down a cursive “2025” within the sand.

Meghan's recent Instagram profile photo also shows her in one other, sunnier beach photo, wearing a slip-style cotton dress, also very white. She also wears a large smile and her only piece of bijou, an elegantly easy diamond necklace – According to the Daily Mail, it’s selling for $15,000. One day after launching, the Instagram account @meghan had 830,000 followers.

Meghan's Instagram return after five years was followed by an announcement on Thursday alongside Netflix that she could be launching her long-awaited lifestyle show on January 15.

Titled “With love, Meghan” The show's trailer shows the Duchess in splashes of color – within the kitchen, within the garden and even visiting a beehive – as she cooks, gardens, arranges flowers and serves cakes. Harry makes a cameo within the trailer and celebrity guests include Mindy Kaling, chef Roy Choi, and Bay Area celebrities Alice Waters and Tatcha founder Vicky Tsai.

Commenting on Meghan's New Year's post, PR experts said her seaside images and all-white outfit were apparently chosen to point out “purity” and a desire for a “metaphorical new beginning” in 2025 – after a difficult few years for her audience image.

“The all-white clothing screams 'purity of reinvention', while the '2025' etched into the sand conveniently serves as both a literal time stamp and a metaphorical new beginning,” Mark Borkowski, a top UKPR expert, told the Daily Mail.

“Meghan chose the classic Instagram post with cryptic performance art,” Borkowski continued. “It’s a textbook PR example of someone who heralds a new era and is destined to intrigue and puzzle.”

“It's a subtle power play that simultaneously arouses curiosity and conveys control,” he added.

In true influencer fashion, Meghan could also use her Instagram account to generate revenue, with firms paying as much as $1 million to advertise in one among her posts, the Daily Mail reported. There is “no reason why Meghan couldn't earn such fees,” PR expert Eric Schiffer told the Daily Mail.

The past yr hasn't exactly been kind to Meghan's brand. She faced harsh reports from the entertainment industry about staff turnover and brand problems together with her planned lifestyle brand American Riviera Orchard, in addition to renewed accusations within the Hollywood Reporter and the Daily Beast that she was “the difficult duchess.” the “demon boss” and he’s “terrible” to work for. Famed editor Tina Brown proclaimed in the autumn that Meghan had “the worst judgment in the world,” while media critics harshly criticized “Polo,” the “tone-deaf” Netflix series about an elite sport for the spoiled wealthy that she co-produced with Harry.

Meghan's Netflix show could counter the bad taste left by “Polo,” especially with its fun-loving vow that “we don't strive for perfection. We strive for joy.”

The New York Post also suggested that Meghan's return to Instagram might be her opportunity to regain control of the narrative surrounding her public image. deadline said her recent account also allows her to fight back against all the web trolls that led her and Harry to quit social media in 2020. Notably, Meghan isn't allowing people to comment on her recent beach post.

As a Hollywood TV actress, Meghan was an avid social media user when she ran it The Tig Lifestyle Blog, described as “a meeting place for the discerning palate – those hungry for food, travel, fashion and beauty.” She closed The Tig in 2018, shortly before she married Harry and joined the British royal family.

To promote their work as a senior royal couple, Meghan and Harry launched their hugely popular Instagram account, Sussex Royal, in April 2019. Her account reached a record 1 million followers inside six hours of launching.

But the couple canceled the Sussex Royal account across the time she quit royal duties and moved to the United States in 2020.

Meghan expressed her reluctance to return to social media on account of the “almost insurmountable” online abuse she said she faced. Deadline reported. She and Harry have also called on social media platforms to strengthen content moderation policies, saying some apps could harm young people's mental health.

Two years ago, Meghan hinted at the potential for a return to social media in an interview with The Cut from New York Magazine confiding to the reporter, “Want to know a secret? I’ll be back…on Instagram.”

It was almost two years before Meghan opened an Instagram account for her planned recent lifestyle brand, American Riviera Orchard. Using the brand's logo, she teased its luxe coastal Central California aesthetic across “family, cooking, entertaining and home decor.” as Elle reported. Shortly after, she got a few of her famous friends to post pictures on their social media accounts showing that that they had received limited-edition pots of strawberry jam from American Riviera Orchard.

It's not clear whether American Riviera Orchard products will likely be featured in the brand new Netflix series. The trailer shows Meghan putting a label on a jar of lemon curd – however it's not the American Riviera Orchard label.

In the autumn, American Riviera Orchard was embroiled in a trademark dispute with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Most recently, the Oregon-based company, which sells high-quality gold foil-wrapped Harry and David pears, filed a lawsuit with the patent office saying the name American Riviera Orchard was too much like the “Royal Riviera” trademark they received Founders of the fruit they grow within the Rogue River Valley.

Originally published: January 2, 2025 at 9:15 am PST

In 2018, LL Bean accomplished its centennial yr “lifetime” return policywith returns limited to 1 yr after purchase and receipts required. The end of this popular policy sparked a backlash from several customers file lawsuits.

It also inspired my team of operations management researchers to check how customers react when retailers tighten their return policies. Our most vital insight: Regardless of whether or not they continuously or rarely return purchased products, consumers have objections – unless retailers explain why.

I work with a group from Researcher investigate Product Return Policy and the way they impact consumers and retailers.

As we explained in an article published within the Operations Management JournalWe designed experiments to analyze whether and why restrictions on return policies annoy customers. We also wanted to know what retailers can do to reduce backlash after making it tougher for purchasers to return goods.

We conducted three experiments through which we presented scenarios to 1,500 U.S. consumers who played the role of loyal customers of a fictional retailer. We examined their reactions to the restrictions of the fictional retailer's return policy, comparable to: B. charging a 15% restocking fee and limiting open-ended return periods to 365, 180 and 30 days.

Participants' willingness to buy from the fictional retailer decreased after it scaled back its long-standing lenient return policy. They also said they’d change into less willing to recommend the retailer.

This happened because customers began to distrust the retailer and its ability to supply quality service. The stricter the restriction, the stronger the backlash. Even those consumers who said they don't typically return products often responded negatively.

When the fictional retailer announced its latest, stricter returns policy through official communications channels and provided a justification, there was less backlash. Consumers felt the changes can be more justified if the retailer increased “Reciprocate abuse“, where customers return used products, or the high costs of processing returns.

You might think that the return might be tougher and expensive drive away some buyers. Our research shows that the priority is justified and explains why. It also shows how communicating return policy changes directly with customers can assist prevent or reduce backlash against retailers.

Why it matters

Americans returned one value of products An estimated $890 billion to retailers in 2024. There is often a price to processing a single item $21 to $46. Most of those goods leads to landfills.

The rise of e-commerce and other technological changes have contributed to this trend. Another factor is the convenience with which consumers can return items long after purchase and receive a full refund.

Many other retailers besides LL Bean have abolished their long-standing lenient return policy. For example, during the last decade, Macy's, a department store chain, and Kohl's, a significant clothing chain, have shortened returns timelines.

Macy's limited its open returns window to 1 yr in 2016, expanded it to 180 days in 2017 and to 90 days in 2019. In 2023, returns were not accepted after 30 days. Kohl's had no cut-off date on returns and would accept returns until 2019. Then a deadline of 180 days was introduced. Others, like fast fashion giants Zara and H&M, now charge their customers fees Fees when returning goods.

However, research shows that that is the case Customers value a no-questions-asked return policy and see them as an indication of quality service. And if these agreements change into the industry standard, customers may change into indignant if retailers don't comply with them.

Interestingly, most retailers which have limited their policies haven’t informed their customers directly. Instead, her silently updated the brand new guidelines on web sites, store displays and receipts. Although it could seem advisable not to attract attention to bad news – since most customers wouldn’t notice the changes that way – Dozens of threads on Reddit reports about these changes suggest that this isn’t all the time the case.

What isn’t yet known

We focused on restrictions on refunds and the way long customers can return goods after a purchase order. Other restrictions, comparable to retailers barring heavily discounted items from returns, may be value investigating.

When Sergio Pérez brought his automobile to a halt after being hit by Valtteri Bottas, he will need to have known it might likely be his last act as a Red Bull Formula 1 driver.

At the tip of a disappointing – in his own words, “terrible” – 12 months, Pérez didn't even have the possibility to finish a single lap on the season finale in Abu Dhabi. Bottas' hit, for which the Sauber driver was penalized, caused Pérez's RB20 to lose power and are available to a halt.

It denied Pérez the chance to say goodbye to F1 2024 on a positive note. But after his retirement he admitted for the primary time that he may not drive for Red Bull in 2025.

“We are talking about what is best for the future and we will see what happens in the coming days,” Pérez said. He added that he and the team would “discuss the situation for both parties and see if we can reach an agreement.”

On the method to Abu Dhabi it became clear that Pérez's time at Red Bull was running out. The team had lost the constructors' championship and finished the season third behind McLaren and Ferrari – and with it the prize money that got here with it. It is barely the third time since 2000 that drivers' champion Verstappen isn’t driving for the constructors' champion.

At the tip of a 12 months of speculation about Pérez's future, it seems that Red Bull has finally decided that enough is enough and that a change is required for 2025.

Until Sunday, Pérez had defiantly insisted he could be at Red Bull next 12 months, despite his subpar performance this season. He scored barely a 3rd of Max Verstappen's total points and hasn't made it onto the rostrum for the reason that fifth round in China. As he kept saying, he signed a contract extension in June.

Pérez remained committed to his contract until 2025 until media day on Thursday. After qualifying on Saturday, he still didn't think that Sunday could be his last race with Red Bull, saying there was “nothing new I could add to what I said before”.

Pérez's change of mood on Sunday was also reflected in Red Bull's post-race press release. In it, the team quoted Pérez as saying: “We will see what happens in the coming days, I don't know what will happen at the moment, I have a contract and the team and I have spoken.” It's about it discuss what’s best for everybody in the longer term.”

In Abu Dhabi, talks began between Pérez's camp and Red Bull about figuring out the agreement Pérez was referring to, essentially an agreement for him to offer up racing next 12 months. Given Pérez's contribution to Red Bull's recent success in Formula 1, some form of ambassadorial role is actually on the cards.

After the race, Red Bull team principal Christian Horner said the team wanted to sit down down with Pérez and “consider what the right and appropriate path forward is.” He highlighted Pérez's efforts for the team, particularly the 2 constructors' titles and his support for Max Verstappen on the 2021 finale in Abu Dhabi. Despite the difficulties of 2024, there continues to be great respect for the driving force at Red Bull.

“As he sits here now, he’s still our driver,” Horner said. “So it would be wrong for me to speculate about what next year might look like until he and I sit down and discuss this year and we think about it as a team.”

But Horner also said the drop to 3rd within the championship showed why it was crucial for 2 drivers to attain consistently, especially ahead of one other competitive season in 2025. “Ferrari will be strong with its line-up next year,” said he. “McLaren has a strong lineup. Mercedes will have an inexperienced driver in one of its seats. That’s why it’s very important for us that both drivers perform well and that there is no significant gap.”

Once an agreement is reached on Pérez's likely exit, Red Bull's next task can be to choose who will start alongside Verstappen. Horner said the four-time champion was the “most difficult teammate in the world to have”.

All signs in Abu Dhabi pointed to Liam Lawson getting the nod from RB to change into a Red Bull Racing driver in 2025. The New Zealander made a late exit in Abu Dhabi after a previously loose wheel cost him the possibility to fight for points, and he now has 11 F1 races to his name. However, he was all the time held in high regard throughout the Red Bull team, especially with advisor Helmut Marko. Red Bull have also supported such inexperience prior to now, promoting Alex Albon to change into Verstappen's teammate after just twelve races in 2019. The 22-year-old Lawson has only one loss and 6 points.

Lawson's promotion could be a blow to Yuki Tsunoda, who qualified ahead in all six races they spent as teammates this 12 months. The 24-year-old Tsunoda has been driving for RB since 2021 and has made decent progress yearly, but Red Bull still seems to have doubts about promoting him to the senior team.

“I think Liam did a very good job in difficult circumstances,” said Horner after the race in Abu Dhabi. “If you analyze what he did in the time he had and the race pace he had, I think he did a good job.

“I think Yuki did a good job. If something were to be decided with Checo, they would be the candidates we would look forward to.”

If Red Bull names Lawson as Verstappen's teammate for 2025, it might unlock a spot alongside Tsunoda at RB, which is prone to be filled by Isack Hadjar. 20-year-old Hadjar finished second on this 12 months's F2 standings and took part in two F1 training sessions for Red Bull in 2024. In Qatar, he hinted that he already knew his plans for 2025, having emerged as a number one teenager in Red Bull's youth program waiting to maneuver as much as Formula 1.

Pérez's struggles leading as much as 2024 have been difficult to look at. He began strong and achieved 4 podiums in the primary five races. At Suzuka, a real “drivers’ track” where Verstappen’s natural talent involves the fore, he was only a tenth off pole. As his form began to say no, Red Bull believed the brand new contract would give him the support and boost he needed. Horner admitted Friday that it just “didn’t work.”

These efforts to support Pérez have left the team in its current position, attempting to work out acceptable terms for his exit and ending a four-season rollercoaster ride. Horner said there was “no immediate rush” to sort things out, but a fast resolution will surely profit all parties.

It would give Red Bull the possibility to show things around and focus entirely on 2025 – and Lawson, assuming he gets the seat, the utmost time possible to organize for probably the most demanding task in all of racing: being Verstappen's teammate. It's a task that Pérez warned Thursday that knowing how the wind blows would perhaps be a serious challenge for any young rider.

“Since I was a teammate of Max at Red Bull as a young driver, if I’m honest I don’t want to be in this situation,” said Pérez.

“People can’t underestimate the challenge this seat presents.”

Fossil fuels are those Main drivers of climate changeYet they’re still heavily subsidized by governments world wide.

Although many countries have explicitly done so promised to cut back fossil fuel subsidies To combat climate change, this has proven difficult to attain. This keeps fossil fuels relatively inexpensive, their consumption and their greenhouse gas emissions proceed to grow.

I work in Environmental and energy law and have been involved within the fossil fuel sector for years. Here's how fossil fuel subsidies work and why they're so persistent.

What is a grant?

A subsidy is a financial profit given by a government to an organization or industry. Some subsidies are relatively obvious, reminiscent of: publicly funded crop insurance or Research grants to support pharmaceutical firms develop recent drugs.

Others are less visible. A Customs duty on an imported productFor example, domestic producers of this product may be subsidized. More controversially, some would argue that it’s a government fails to make an industry pay for the damage B. Air or water pollution, this also represents a subsidy.

Subsidies, particularly on this broader sense, are widespread throughout the worldwide economy. Many industries receive advantages through government motion that usually are not available to other industries in the identical jurisdiction, e.g Tax reliefrelaxed regulations or trade promotions.

Governments use subsidies for political and practical reasons. Politically, subsidies are useful for negotiating or increasing political support. In democracies, they will appease voters who otherwise wouldn’t conform to a change in policy. The 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, for instance, squeaked its way through Congress Subsidizing each renewable energy and oil and gas production.

Practically speaking, subsidies can stimulate a promising young industry, e.g Electric vehiclesAttracting businesses to a community or helping a mature sector weather an economic downturn, reminiscent of Rescue package for the auto industry This happened in 2008. Of course, policies can outlive their original purpose; Some of today's petroleum subsidies could also be attributed to the worldwide economic crisis.

How are fossil fuels subsidized?

Fossil fuel subsidies are available in many forms world wide. For example:

• In Saudi ArabiaFuel prices are set by the federal government, not the market. Price caps Subsidize the value residents pay for gasoline. The costs for state-owned oil producers there are offset by oil exports, which dwarf domestic consumption.

• Indonesia It also caps energy prices after which compensates state-owned energy firms for the losses they bear.

• In the United States, oil firms can do that make a tax deduction cover a big portion of their drilling costs.

Other subsidies are less directfor instance, when governments undercut prices for permits to extract or drill fossil fuels or fail to gather all taxes owed by fossil fuel producers.

Estimates of the overall value of worldwide fossil fuel subsidies vary significantly depending on whether analysts use a broad or narrow definition. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, or OECD for brief, the annual total is calculated in 2022 can be about 1.5 trillion US dollars. Tch The International Monetary Fund reported a number greater than 4 times higher, about $7 trillion.

Why do fossil fuel subsidy estimates vary so widely?

Analysts disagree about it Whether the subsidy tables should keep in mind environmental damage brought on by the extraction and use of fossil fuels that is just not included in the value of the fuel. The IMF views the prices of worldwide warming, local air pollution, and even traffic congestion and road damage as implicit subsidies because fossil fuel firms don't pay to repair these problems. The The OECD ignores these implicit advantages.

Regardless of which definition is applied, the general effect of national policies on fossil fuel prices paid by consumers is dramatic.

Oil, for instance, is traded on a world market, but the value per gallon Gasoline varies enormously world wide, from around 10 cents in Iran, Libya and Venezuela – where it’s heavily subsidized – to over $7 in Hong Kong, the Netherlands and far of Scandinavia, where fuel taxes counteract subsidies.

What is the world doing about fossil fuel subsidies?

World leaders have recognized that fossil fuel subsidies undermine efforts to combat climate change because they make fossil fuels cheaper than they otherwise can be.

In 2009, leaders of the G20, which incorporates lots of the world's largest economies, issued a press release with the choice to “rationalize and phase out in the medium term inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption.” Later that very same 12 months, the governments of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum or APEC has made a similar promise.

In 2010, ten more countries, including the Netherlands and New Zealand, established the Friends of fossil fuel subsidy reform group to “build political consensus on the importance of reforming fossil fuel subsidies.”

But these commitments have had little effect. One major subject Study of 157 countries Between 2003 and 2015, it found that governments “collectively made little or no progress” in reducing subsidies. In fact, the OECD found that total global subsidies nearly doubled in each 2021 and 2022.

Why are fossil fuel subsidies so difficult to eliminate?

There are several the reason why fossil fuel subsidies are difficult to eliminate. Many subsidies directly impact the prices incurred by fossil fuel producers, so reducing subsidies tends to end in higher prices for consumers. Because fossil fuels affect nearly every sector of the economy, rising fuel costs increase the costs of countless goods and services.

Subsidy reform tends to have a broad impact and is consistently inflationary. And if not rigorously planned, subsidy cuts may be regressive, forcing low-income residents to spend a bigger percentage of their income on energy.

Even in countries where there’s broad support for robust climate policies, subsidies are being reduced may be deeply unpopular and perhaps even cause public unrest.

The increase in fossil fuel subsidies in 2021-22 is illustrative. After Russia invaded Ukraine Energy prices rose across Europe. Governments were quick to supply aid to their residents, leading to their largest fossil fuel subsidies at all times. Europe had to choose from climate targets and reasonably priced energy and overwhelmingly selected the latter.

Of course, economists note that increasing fossil fuel prices can reduce demand and reduce emissions that drive climate change and harm the environment and human health. Against this background, price spikes offer a possibility for reform. As the IMF notedwhen prices decline after an increase, it “delivers.”[s] An opportune time to cost carbon and native air pollution emissions without necessarily raising energy prices above recent levels.”

How did the highest managers and board members react?

There was loads of leadership turmoil at OpenAI. The disagreements escalated in November 2023 when the corporate's board briefly fired its CEO Sam Altman. He got his job back in lower than every week, after which three board members resigned. The outgoing directors were advocates constructing stronger guardrails and promoting regulation to guard humanity from possible harm attributable to AI.

More than a dozen senior employees have resigned Since then, several other co-founders and executives have been answerable for overseeing OpenAI's security policies and practices. At least two of them have joined Anthropic, a competitor founded by a former OpenAI executive answerable for AI security. This is what among the departing executives say Altman has pushed the corporate to bring products to market ahead of schedule.

Security”has taken a back seat to shiny products” said Jan Leike, former head of OpenAI's security teamwho left in May 2024.

Why should the structure of OpenAI change?

OpenAI's wealthy investors cannot own shares within the organization or receive a seat on the board under the prevailing nonprofit governance structure. This is because OpenAI is registered as a non-profit organization whose purpose is to learn society and never private interests. To date, all investment rounds, including a reported total, have been accomplished $13 billion from Microsoftwere channeled through a for-profit subsidiary owned by the nonprofit organization.

The current structure allows OpenAI to just accept money from private investors in return for a future portion of its profits. However, these investors don’t receive a voting seat on the board and their profits are “capped”. According to previously published information, these are the unique investors of OpenAI You cannot earn greater than 100 times the cash they supply. The goal of it Hybrid governance The model is to balance profits with OpenAI's security-focused mission.

Converting to a for-profit company would allow its investors to amass ownership shares in OpenAI and not face a cap on their potential profits. Later, OpenAI could also go public and lift capital on the stock exchange.

Altman is reportedly attempting to purchase one personally 7% equity stake in OpenAIsaid a Bloomberg article that cited unnamed sources.

This Agreement shouldn’t be permitted for officers of non-profit organizations. in keeping with BoardSourcean association of nonprofit board members and executives. Instead, the association explains, nonprofits must “reinvest surpluses back into the organization and its tax-free purpose.”

What form of company could OpenAI turn into?

The Washington Post and other media outlets, citing unnamed sources, have reported that OpenAI has turn into a “Non-profit corporation” – a business that goals to learn society and generate profits.

Examples of corporations This status, generally known as B Corps., includes the outdoor clothing and equipment company Patagonia and the eyewear manufacturer Warby Parker.

It is more typical that a for-profit company – not a non-profit organization — will turn into a charitable corporation, in keeping with B Lab, a network that sets standards and offers certifications for B Corps. This is unusual for a non-profit organization, as non-profit governance already requires that these groups profit society.

The boards of directors of corporations with this legal form are free to have in mind the interests of society, the environment and other people who usually are not shareholders that shouldn’t be vital. The board should decide to make profits its top priority and sacrifice its performance status to please its investors. This is the net craft market Etsy did it in 2017, so two years after he became one listed company.

In my view, any try to convert a nonprofit organization right into a nonprofit corporation is a transparent departure from specializing in the nonprofit's mission. And there may be a risk that it’s going to turn into a non-profit entity Just be a trick to disguise a shift to concentrate on revenue growth and investor profits.

Many legal scholars and other experts predict that OpenAI will do that is not going to completely abandon its hybrid ownership model as a consequence of legal restrictions on the transfer of charitable assets into private hands.

But I believe OpenAI has a possible workaround: It could attempt to dilute the nonprofit's control by making it a minority shareholder in a brand new for-profit structure. This would effectively eliminate the nonprofit board's power to carry the corporation accountable. Such a move may lead to this an investigation by the responsible public prosecutor's office and possibly the Internal Revenue Service.

What could occur if OpenAI becomes a for-profit company?

There is so much at stake for society.

The potential harm that AI could cause is far-reaching, and a few of it’s already evident, similar to misleading political campaigns and bias in healthcare.

If OpenAI, an industry leader, focuses more on making profits than ensuring the security of AI, I consider these dangers could turn into even worse. Geoffrey Hinton, who won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2024 for his research on artificial intelligence, has done this warned that AI could worsen inequality by replacing “many everyday jobs.” He believes there may be a 50% probability “that we will have to face the problem of AI trying to take over humanity.”

And even when OpenAI retained board members who made security a top priority, the members of the brand new company board would only be their very own common denominators Commitment to protecting the interests of the corporate's shareholderswho would expect a profit. While such expectations are common on a for-profit board, they represent a conflict of interest on a nonprofit board, where the mission must come first and board members cannot derive financial profit from the organization's work.

The deal would undoubtedly please OpenAI's investors. But would it not be good for society? The purpose of nonprofit control of a for-profit subsidiary is to be certain that the profit doesn’t interfere with the nonprofit's mission. Without guardrails to be certain that the board is attempting to limit the harm to humanity attributable to AI, there can be little reason to stop the corporate from maximizing profits, whilst its chatbots and other AI products endanger society.

Regardless of what OpenAI does, most artificial intelligence corporations are already for-profit corporations. In my view, the one option to address the potential harm is thru higher industry standards and regulations which begin to take shape.

The governor of California vetoed such a bill in September 2024 on the grounds that it will slow innovation – but I consider that a slowdown is precisely what is required given the hazards AI already poses to society.