<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>confirm &#8211; USA NEWS LIVE</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bloggingthree.soflytech.com/tag/confirm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bloggingthree.soflytech.com</link>
	<description>All About USA NEWS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 06:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Confirm the shares by 22% of sales, surprise gain through the holiday</title>
		<link>https://bloggingthree.soflytech.com/2025/02/confirm-the-shares-by-22-of-sales-surprise-gain-through-the-holiday/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chandankumarsoft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 06:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surprise]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bloggingthree.soflytech.com/?p=24230</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Confirm The shares rose by 22.8%on Friday after purchase, the later company company within the second quarter for the sales forecast of Wall Street and achieved a surprise gain in a powerful shopping period. The result was 23 cents per share in front of the analyst surveyed by LSEG, which was expected by the analysts [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<div id="RegularArticle-ArticleBody-5" data-module="ArticleBody" data-test="articleBody-2" data-analytics="RegularArticle-articleBody-5-2"><span class="HighlightShare-hidden" style="top:0;left:0"></span></p>
<div class="group">
<p><span class="QuoteInBody-quoteNameContainer" data-test="QuoteInBody" id="RegularArticle-QuoteInBody-1">Confirm<span class="QuoteInBody-inlineButton"><span class="AddToWatchlistButton-watchlistContainer" id="-WatchlistDropdown" data-analytics-id="-WatchlistDropdown"><button class="AddToWatchlistButton-watchlistButton" aria-label="Add To Watchlist" data-testid="dropdown-btn"><span class="AddToWatchlistButton-addWatchListFromTag"></span></button></span></span></span>    The shares rose by 22.8%on Friday after purchase, the later company company within the second quarter for the sales forecast of Wall Street and achieved a surprise gain in a powerful shopping period.</p>
<p>The result was 23 cents per share in front of the analyst surveyed by LSEG, which was expected by the analysts surveyed by LSEG. The company also recorded sales of $ 866 million and recorded growth of 47%in comparison with the previous yr. The analysts forecast revenue of $ 807 million.</p>
<p>&#8220;We have exceeded the adjusted operating result, which our profitability metric, which we lead,&#8221; in comparison with CNBC, Chief Financial Officer Rob O&#39;Hare.</p>
</div>
<div class="group">
<p>The gross volume of products, a continuously used metric within the room that shows the entire value of transactions, achieved $ 10.1 billion and exceeded a street account estimate of 9.64 billion US dollars. It was the primary time that the number passed $ 10 billion and was reflected in 35% growth in comparison with the previous yr.</p>
<p>In a letter to the shareholders, the corporate gave a big a part of growth for profits in its general business with goods and consumer electronics business through the shopping season.</p>
<p>Affirm said that it remains to be planning to achieve the GAAP redematability until the top of its fourth quarter. Over the present period, the corporate expects sales between 755 and 785 million US dollars. Active users who used the corporate&#39;s products rose by 23% to 21 million from a previous yr.</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><em>image credit : www.cnbc.com</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<media:content url="https://image.cnbcfm.com/api/v1/image/108027302-1724954436051-108027302-1724954167573-gettyimages-995761246-775159596.jpeg?v=1730312684&#038;w=1920&#038;h=1080" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three vital snack stalls by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.s hearing to substantiate the Senate</title>
		<link>https://bloggingthree.soflytech.com/2025/01/three-vital-snack-stalls-by-robert-f-kennedy-jr-s-hearing-to-substantiate-the-senate/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chandankumarsoft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 02:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[important]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jr.s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stalls]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bloggingthree.soflytech.com/?p=23596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Robert F. Kennedy Jr., The controversial election of President Donald Trump to guide the Ministry of Health and Human Services. The 71 -year -old Kennedy first appeared before the Senate Finance Committee, who will vote on whether his nomination as a HHS secretary enters the total chamber. In the Republican-controlled Senate, Kennedy can only lose [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<div id="RegularArticle-ArticleBody-5" data-module="ArticleBody" data-test="articleBody-2" data-analytics="RegularArticle-articleBody-5-2"><span class="HighlightShare-hidden" style="top:0;left:0"></span></p>
<div class="group">
<p>Robert F. Kennedy Jr., The controversial election of President Donald Trump to guide the Ministry of Health and Human Services.</p>
<p>The 71 -year -old Kennedy first appeared before the Senate Finance Committee, who will vote on whether his nomination as a HHS secretary enters the total chamber. In the Republican-controlled Senate, Kennedy can only lose three GOP votes if all Democrats oppose him.</p>
<p>He will even be released before the Senate Committee for Health, Education, Work and Pensions for a courtesy hearing on Thursday.</p>
<p>He described most of the questions when the senators grilled him on Wednesday. He also tried to reply some questions on Medicare and Medicaid, and sometimes said that he would trump guidelines in areas similar to reproductive rights and price negotiations for prescription medication.</p>
<p>If that is confirmed, Kennedy takes over the reins of A <a href="https://www.hhs.gov/about/budget/fy2025/index.html#:~:text=HHS%20proposes%20%24130.7%20billion%20in,the%20next%20public%20health%20crisis." target="_blank">$ 1.7 Billion agency</a> This supervises vaccines and other medicines, scientific research, public health infrastructure, pandemic willingness, food and tobacco products in addition to the health supply of thousands and thousands of Americans financed by the federal government. The heads of the Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institutes of Health and Centers for Medicare &#038; Medicaid Services, including all report on the HHS secretary.</p>
</div>
<div role="region" aria-labelledby="Placeholder-ArticleBody-Video-108094135">
<div role="button" tabindex="0" id="Placeholder-ArticleBody-Video-108094135" class="PlaceHolder-wrapper" data-vilynx-id="7000364979" data-test="VideoPlaceHolder">
<div class="InlineVideo-videoEmbed" id="InlineVideo-0" data-test="InlineVideo">
<div class="InlineVideo-wrapper">
<div class="InlineVideo-inlineThumbnailContainer"><img decoding="async" class="InlineVideo-videoThumbnail" src="https://image.cnbcfm.com/api/v1/image/108094136-17381663131738166309-38208767558-1080pnbcnews.jpg?v=1738166311&#038;w=750&#038;h=422&#038;vtcrop=y" alt="RFK Jr. testifies to the hearing to confirm the Senate for HHS Secretary"><span class="InlineVideo-videoButton"></span><span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="group">
<p>Kennedy was criticized by each side of the aisle. He is a distinguished vaccine skeptic and makes false claims that despite a long time of studies which have exposed this association, they&#8217;re related to autism.</p>
<p>Kennedy can also be the founding father of non-profit children&#39;s health defense, one of the best financed anti-access organization within the USA in a single <a href="https://extapps2.oge.gov/201/Presiden.nsf/PAS+Index/F3C8425ED335BB5685258C1A00565D57/%24FILE/Kennedy%2C%20Jr.%2C%20Robert%20F.%20%20finalEA.pdf" target="_blank">Government ethics agreement</a> Last week he said he stopped in December to function chairman or senior legal advisor to the organization.</p>
<p>Some critics have argued that his work, which is committed to vaccines, cost lives and that more Americans could prevent it from receiving beneficial recordings at a time when the vaccination rates are falling.</p>
<p>A demonstrator within the listening room called when Kennedy denied that he was anti-accine and accused him of being lied. It triggered applause and briefly interrupted its opening speeches.</p>
<p>The hearing broke again when Senator Senator Ron Wyden, D-ORE, Kennedy, Senator Ron Wyden, asked about his comments on vaccines. The chairman of the committee, Senator Mike Crapo, R-IDAHO, threatened to scale back the hearing if other demonstrators disrupted them.</p>
<p>In addition to the vaccines, Kennedy also made a preview of how he plans to pursue his wide platform &#8220;Make America Healthy&#8221; when he&#8217;s confirmed as the highest health officer of the nation. The platform argues that a corrupt alliance of drug and food firms and the federal health agencies that they regulate make the Americans less healthy. Kennedy has long claimed that the agencies that monitors HHS need a reform or a comprehensive overhaul.</p>
<p>Kennedy&#39;s supporters say that a few of his attitude to food, similar to the results of the risks of food additives and ultra-processed products, have achieved a broad attractiveness amongst Republicans and a few Democrats. But Kennedy said on Wednesday that he was not &#8220;the enemy of food producers&#8221; and notices that American farms are &#8220;the foundation of our culture and our national security&#8221;.</p>
<p>Caroline Kennedy, the cousin and daughter of the previous President John F. Kennedy of the candidate, wrote a letter to the senators who described her cousin as &#8220;predator&#8221; on Tuesday and asked her not to substantiate him.</p>
<p>Here are a few of crucial snack bars from the hearing on Wednesday:</p>
</div>
<h2 class="ArticleBody-subtitle"><a id="headline0"></a>Kennedy defends the vaccination stat</h2>
<div class="group">
<p>In his opening speeches in front of the panel, Kennedy pushed back the claims that he&#8217;s anti-vaccine or anti-industry.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#39;m not either; I&#39;m a Pro-Safety,&#8221; said Kennedy. &#8220;For years I have worked on sharpening the awareness of the mercury and toxic chemicals in fish, but that didn&#39;t do me against fish. All of my children are vaccinated, and I think vaccines play a crucial role in health care.&#8221;</p>
<p>Kennedy conducted heated debates with senators about his vaccine views and said: &#8220;I support the measles vaccine, I support the polio vaccine, I will do nothing but HHS secretary that makes it difficult or discouraged people who take&#8221;.</p>
<p>Senator Ron Wyden, D-ORE., Didn&#39;t buy this claim and emphasized Kennedy&#39;s earlier comments in a book that measles are usually not considered a threat. </p>
<p>The senators also identified on Kennedy&#39;s misinformation in regards to the safety of measles, mumps and rubella vaccines that were <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2019/11/26/deadly-measles-outbreak-hits-children-samoa-after-anti-vaccine-fears/" target="_blank">linked </a>A severe measles outbreak in Samoa in 2019, which made dozens of kids dead. This outbreak got here only a couple of months after Kennedy had visited the island station. </p>
<p>Kennedy denied to have something to do with the fatal outbreak. </p>
<p>&#8220;You can&#39;t find a single Samoan who says: &#39;I was not vaccinated because of Bobby Kennedy,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>When Wyden asked whether measles was fatal, Kennedy didn&#8217;t answer the query directly. Kennedy again claimed that he was not against Accacine.</p>
<p>Wyden also pressed Kennedy on his comments in a single <a href="https://lexfridman.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr-transcript/" target="_blank">2023 podcast</a> In which he said: &#8220;There is no vaccine that is safe and effective.&#8221; Kennedy said he had previously clarified these statements and wouldn&#8217;t prevent the Americans from getting certain vaccines.</p>
</div>
<h2 class="ArticleBody-subtitle"><a id="headline1"></a>Kennedy&#39;s postponement of abortion attitude</h2>
<div class="group">
<p>The Democrats urged Kennedy to reverse his attitude towards abortion as a result of political practicality and whether he would do the identical in other questions. </p>
<p>&#8220;When did you decide to sell the values ​​you had all your life to get power from President Trump?&#8221; Democratic Senator Maggie Hassan from New Hampshire said and identified his previous public support for abortion rights. </p>
<p>Kennedy said in answer: &#8220;Every abortion is a tragedy&#8221; &#8211; a line that he repeated at the least 4 times during the complete hearing. </p>
<p>When Kennedy was asked about regulations related to the abortion pill Mifepristone, he said, Trump &#8220;wants me to look at security problems&#8221;. He added that the president had not yet put a position on the way it should regulate.</p>
<p>&#8220;Whatever he does, I will implement these guidelines and work with this committee to make these guidelines meaningful,&#8221; said Kennedy. This is the same answer he had when he was asked about other abortion guidelines. </p>
<p>There are extensive scientific evidence that show that the pills which can be regulated and approved for the FDA are secure. </p>
</div>
<h2 class="ArticleBody-subtitle"><a id="headline2"></a>Kennedy fights to reply Medicare, Medicaid questions</h2>
<div class="group">
<p>Kennedy appeared to fight when Senator Bill Cassidy, R-La.,, <a href="https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/program-information/medicaid-and-chip-enrollment-data/report-highlights/index.html" target="_blank">80 million Americans</a>including many individuals with low incomes. </p>
<p>The Republicans could address Medicaid, which costs the federal government greater than $ 600 billion a yr, for the financing of reductions this yr to support tax cuts in paying tax cuts. Sometimes Kennedy Medicaid gave the impression to be confused with Medicare, a federal program that covers older and disabled Americans. </p>
<p>Kennedy described Medicaid by the federal government as &#8220;fully paid&#8221;. But this system can also be financed by states. </p>
<p>He also claimed that many Medicaid participants of high costs are frustrated and said: &#8220;Premiums are too high. The deductible are too high.&#8221; </p>
<p>However, nearly all of the Medicaid participants pay no premiums or a deductible for his or her cover. The Federal Law prohibits premiums for the author for MedicAID inscriptions with the bottom income. </p>
<p>Kennedy only described vague efforts to reform Medicaid, and said he supported the increasing &#8220;transparency&#8221; and &#8220;accountability&#8221;. </p>
</div>
</div>
<p><em>image credit : www.cnbc.com</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<media:content url="https://image.cnbcfm.com/api/v1/image/108094113-1738163674335-gettyimages-2195942001-AFP_36WH8MF.jpeg?v=1738163705&#038;w=1920&#038;h=1080" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Readers trust journalists less once they refute moderately than confirm claims</title>
		<link>https://bloggingthree.soflytech.com/2024/08/readers-trust-journalists-less-once-they-refute-moderately-than-confirm-claims/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chandankumarsoft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 00:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bloggingthree.soflytech.com/?p=11200</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Pointing out that others are incorrect is an element of life. And journalists should do that every one the time &#8211; it&#39;s a part of their job to differentiate truth from lies. But what if people just don&#39;t wish to hear corrections? Our recent research, published within the journal Communication Researchsuggests that that is the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<div itemprop="articleBody">
<p>Pointing out that others are incorrect is an element of life. And journalists should do that every one the time &#8211; it&#39;s a part of their job to differentiate truth from lies. But what if people just don&#39;t wish to hear corrections?</p>
<p>Our recent research, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241262377">published within the journal Communication Research</a>suggests that that is the case. In two studies, we found that folks generally trust journalists once they confirm the reality of claims, but are more suspicious when journalists correct false claims.</p>
<p>Some <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085">linguistics</a> And <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80002-2">Social Sciences</a> Theories suggest that folks intuitively understand that social expectations usually are not negative. Being unkind, reminiscent of mentioning someone&#39;s lie or mistake, carries the danger of a backlash.</p>
<p>We conclude that corrections are subject to a special, more critical standard than confirmations. Attempts to refute something can raise doubts in regards to the honesty and motives of journalists. In other words, should you provide a correction, you&#8217;re a little bit of a spoilsport, and that might negatively affect how you&#8217;re perceived.</p>
<h2>How we worked</h2>
<p>Using real articles, we examined what people take into consideration journalists who do “fact-checking.”</p>
<p>In our first study, participants read an in depth fact check that either corrected or confirmed a political or economic claim. For example, one focused on the statement &#8220;Congressional salaries have increased 231% over the past 30 years,&#8221; which is fake. We then asked participants how they rated the actual fact check and the journalist who wrote it.</p>
<p>Although people generally trust journalists quite a bit, more people expressed distrust of journalists who provided corrections than of those that provided confirmations. People were less skeptical of confirmatory fact-checks than of debunking articles. The percentage of respondents who expressed strong distrust doubled, from about 10% to about 22%.</p>
<p>Respondents also said they need more information to know whether journalists who refute statements are telling the reality than their assessment of journalists who confirm the claims.</p>
<p>In a second study, we presented marketing claims that ultimately turned out to be true or false. For example, some participants read an article a couple of brand that claimed its cooking tricks would save time, but the truth is they didn&#39;t work. Others read an article a couple of brand that offered cooking tricks that turned out to be true.</p>
<p>Again, across several product types, respondents said they needed more evidence to consider articles that exposed falsehoods and said they were more distrustful of journalists who corrected errors.</p>
<figure class="align-center zoomable">
<div class="placeholder-container" style="--aspect-ratio-percent:66.71087533156499%;--background-color:#30375b"><img decoding="async" alt="Man looks skeptically at tablet in his hands" class="lazyload" src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/610875/original/file-20240801-19-lmga91.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&#038;q=45&#038;auto=format&#038;w=754&#038;fit=clip" srcset="https://images.theconversation.com/files/610875/original/file-20240801-19-lmga91.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&#038;q=45&#038;auto=format&#038;w=600&#038;h=400&#038;fit=crop&#038;dpr=1 600w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/610875/original/file-20240801-19-lmga91.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&#038;q=30&#038;auto=format&#038;w=600&#038;h=400&#038;fit=crop&#038;dpr=2 1200w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/610875/original/file-20240801-19-lmga91.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&#038;q=15&#038;auto=format&#038;w=600&#038;h=400&#038;fit=crop&#038;dpr=3 1800w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/610875/original/file-20240801-19-lmga91.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&#038;q=45&#038;auto=format&#038;w=754&#038;h=503&#038;fit=crop&#038;dpr=1 754w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/610875/original/file-20240801-19-lmga91.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&#038;q=30&#038;auto=format&#038;w=754&#038;h=503&#038;fit=crop&#038;dpr=2 1508w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/610875/original/file-20240801-19-lmga91.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&#038;q=15&#038;auto=format&#038;w=754&#038;h=503&#038;fit=crop&#038;dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"></div><figcaption>
              <span class="caption">It is seemingly human nature that folks are uncomfortable when mistakes, untruths and lies are addressed.</span><br />
              <span class="attribution"><a class="source" href="https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/elegant-man-skeptically-views-tablet-screen-royalty-free-image/1554058699">Giulio Fornasar/iStock via Getty Images Plus</a></span><br />
            </figcaption></figure>
<h2>Why it will be significant</h2>
<p>Correcting misinformation is <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219854600">notoriously difficult</a>as researchers and journalists have discovered. The United States can be experiencing a decades-long <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/403166/americans-trust-media-remains-near-record-low.aspx">Decline in trust in journalism</a>. Fact-checking is meant to assist combat misinformation and disinformation, but our research shows that its usefulness is restricted. When journalists debunk facts, it will possibly create the impression that they only make negative statements.</p>
<p>Our second study also explains a component of popular culture: the backlash against someone exposing one other’s misdeeds. For example, should you read <a href="https://www.vice.com/en/article/88n95b/heres-why-people-are-mad-at-this-viral-pop-punk-band-tramp-stamps">an article</a> If you indicate that a band has lied about its origin story, you might find that it <a href="https://www.vice.com/en/article/qj84yx/stop-calling-artists-industry-plants-tramp-stamps">create a sub-controversy</a> within the comments from people who find themselves offended that anyone was even alerted to it, and rightly so. This scenario is strictly what we&#8217;d expect if fixes were robotically reviewed and distrusted by some people.</p>
<h2>What&#39;s next</h2>
<p>Future work can explore how journalists may be transparent without undermining trust. It is affordable to assume that folks will trust a journalist more if the journalist explains how they got here to a specific conclusion. However, our results suggest that this will not be entirely the case. Rather, trust is determined by what the conclusion is.</p>
<p>Participants in our studies were very trusting of journalists once they provided confirmations. And in fact, sometimes people haven&#8217;t any problem with corrections, for instance when a blatant piece of misinformation that they don&#39;t consider anyway is debunked. The challenge for journalists is perhaps to determine find out how to provide debunking without coming across as a debunker.</p>
<p><em>The Research Brief is a summary of interesting scientific papers.</em></p>
</p></div>
<p><em>image credit : theconversation.com</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<media:content url="https://images.theconversation.com/files/610865/original/file-20240801-27-4tpwhi.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&#038;rect=0%2C857%2C7940%2C3964&#038;q=45&#038;auto=format&#038;w=1356&#038;h=668&#038;fit=crop" medium="image"></media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
