Great scott! The Delorean ended up within the Orpheum Theater in San Francisco and like every child of the Eighties, I felt forced to return to the longer term.

Production is considered one of the brand new attractions for the Bay Area theater fans, including a new edition of “Uncle Vanya” at Berkeley Rep.

I even have to confess that the completely great automobile doesn't disappoint. In our age of the Snooze-worthy cybertruck, it’s difficult to not rave about this striking paragon of favor and substance. This baby even speaks in an allusion to “Knight Rider”. In fact, it is way probably the most slow a part of this nostalgic musical, which runs until March ninth. Yes, the luxurious automobile from the past is the star of the show, the more amusement park -Thrill trip than the musical.

Don't get me mistaken. In view of the tenor of the most recent events, the choice to cover within the splendor of the past is smart. Returning her childhood, a subject -related cocktail, perhaps a river capacitor, and Marty McFly (Lucas Hallauer) passes out and campaigns with the Kooky Alte Doc Brown (Don Stephenson) over my cohort. If you’ve got ever obsessed a couple of fuzzy pink warmers, that is your guilty pleasure, no?

Unfortunately, there just isn’t nearly enough mood and heart to maintain them with two hours and 45 minutes of recycled Robert Zemeckis Magic. The illusion designer Chris Fisher and the set designer Tim Hatley deserve their props, but they simply don't cut striking computer graphics alone.

In fact, you’re surprised why they didn't just stay at home and stream the OG film. That would higher satisfy the eager for sentimentality to which director John Rando depend on.

This query often is the most urgent for gen z kiddos. My daughter Daphne, 14, has a well -developed taste for the atmosphere of the 80s. She was weaned on John Hughes Oeuvre and Karate Kid Canon. Like her mother, she will be able to now not wait for “foreign things”.

But I'm afraid that it took a major candy and soda broom to get it to take a seat here. It just isn’t the case that the show is terrible, but there are a lot of dead patches through which you consider their shortcomings in comparison with the beloved film from 1985. The pace is definitely too sluggish for a story that just like the back of your space-time continuum.

The additional music is just too serious and general, while the extra background story draws history. There is way an excessive amount of upholstery from the film between the scenes, that are as funny and original as they might remember from childhood.

George McFlys Ode on GEEKINESS “Myopia is my utopia” just isn’t a song that somebody has to listen to. “Set your mind” and “no future” are completely unforgettable.

The try and restore the intelligent charisma of Michael J. Fox and the good eccentricity of Christopher Lloyd is definitely an ungrateful task. That is, Mike Bindeman

delivers a splendidly Herkische Jerky performance when the Uber nerd George and Zan Berube radiates spunk as Lorraine. Cartreze Tucker chews the landscape as Mayor Goldie Wilson. These energetic performances and the astonishing automobile mentioned above give this Animatronic Retread a certain shine.

The fourth Delorean dancers with wall matters, a recurring kickline in rocket style, are also an entertaining grade, however the joke will soon have the ability to exhaust his greeting. You can even giggle about anachronism points about how much progress in humanity in relation to patriarchy, racism and environmental injury may be familiar. But the yuks are too little and much apart.

Only ride-or-nostalgia junkies will wish to bounce on board this musical. If you now offer selfies within the flying Delorean throughout the break, this could be well worth the admission price. I might buckle up in a minute.

“Back to the future: The musical”

Book by Bob Gale, music and texts by Alan Silvestri and Glen Ballard, presented by Broadwaysf

Through: March ninth

Where: Orpheum Theater, 1192 Market St., San Francisco

Duration: Two hours, 45 minutes, a break

Tickets: 60 to $ 254 (subject to vary); www.broadwaysf.com

Originally published: February 24, 2025 at 12:39 p.m. PST

A brand new exhibition on the Euphrates Art Museum features works that aim to capture, express or trigger moments of connection, joy or wonder. “Glimmers” gets its name from a psychobiological term that describes those little moments that might help the nervous system feel secure or calm.

“Glimmers” shall be at Euphrates at De Anza College from October twenty second to December twenty second. 12. An artists' reception with refreshments and live music is planned for Saturday, November 2, from 1:30 p.m. to three p.m

The exhibition features photographs taken by Edwin Carungay in Oaxaca, Santa Cruz and San Francisco, in addition to sculptures made by Cheryl Coon using a whole lot of plastic cable ties.

Kristen Lindseth's “Sanctuaries for the Spirit” sculptures are inspired by Shinto shrines throughout Japan and symbolize reverence and reverence for nature. She created the Takahashi Inari Shrine for her 95-year-old mother-in-law, who’s a follower of Shinto and Zen Buddhism. In front of it’s a miniature chozuya, or water purification station, which you enter before heading to a shrine.

“I view cleansing as washing away worries so that it is possible to be fully present,” Lindseth said.

In “Feel Seen,” artist Bushra Gill reflects on how her headscarf makes her feel concurrently invisible and on display, and the way she is obligated to at all times have a smile on her face to counteract the otherness of the headband.

“Emigrating from Pakistan at a young age and feeling disconnected from everything forces me to think about connections, particularly an underlying structure of everything around us that connects us to each other and to nature, time and space,” Gill said.

Hadi Aghaee's paintings depict masterpieces of 18th-century Persian architecture in Shiraz, Iran, where he grew up.

“Glimmers” also features work by muralist Carlos Rodriguez and a Dia de Los Muertos-inspired installation by Fernanda Luisa Esparza and Lydia Sanchez featuring a whole lot of colourful Huichol/Wixarika pom-poms, symbolizing a life in harmony with nature and all of creation.

The Euphrates Art Museum is open Tuesday to Thursday from 11 a.m. to three p.m. The museum may also be open through the flea market on Saturday, December seventh, from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. The first Thursday open mic evenings are scheduled for November seventh December fifth, 5:30pm-7pm For more information visit www.deanza.edu/euphrat/inthemuseum.

Originally published: October 20, 2024 at 6:58 am

How it works

Over the counter

Children born worldwide in 2020 will experience twice as many forest fires over the course of their lives in comparison with those born in 1960. In California and other western states, frequent wildfires are as much a component of summer and fall as popsicles and candy on Halloween.

Forest fires produce high-quality particulate matter, or PM₂.₅, which suffocate the air and penetrate deep into the lungs. Researchers know that short-term exposure to PM₂.₅ from forest fires can Acute care visits for cardiovascular problems reminiscent of asthma. However, the long-term effects of repeated exposure to PM₂.₅ from wildfires on chronic diseases are unclear.

One reason for that is that science has not yet reached a consensus on how best to measure this sort of temporary but sustained stress. Environmental epidemiologists And Health Scientist Like us, we typically aggregate long-term exposure to total PM₂.₅ – which comes from power plants, industry and traffic – as a mean exposure over a yr. This is probably not useful when measuring exposure from wildfires. Unlike, for instance, traffic-related air pollution, PM₂.₅ levels from wildfires fluctuate widely over the course of the yr.

To improve health and justice research, our team developed five metrics which higher capture the long-term impact of forest fire PM₂.₅.

Measuring fluctuating PM₂ levels during forest fires

To understand why current measurements of PM₂.₅ from wildfires don’t adequately capture a person's long-term exposure, we’d like to take a look at the concept of averages.

Suppose the common PM₂.₅ level over a yr is 1 microgram per cubic meter. An individual may very well be exposed to 1 microgram per cubic meter each day for one year, or 365 micrograms per cubic meter on a single day.

Although these two scenarios end in the identical annual average exposure, they could have very different biological effects. The body may give you the option to fend off damage from a each day exposure of 1 microgram per cubic meter, but could also be overwhelmed by a single, huge dose of 365 micrograms per cubic meter.

To illustrate: In 2022, Americans experienced a average total pollution by PM₂.₅ of seven.8 micrograms per cubic meterResearchers estimated that within the 35 states where wildfires occur, these wildfires only burn a mean of 0.69 micrograms per cubic meter However, this attitude is simply too short-sighted, as a complete of PM₂.₅ will likely be released annually from 2016 to 2020.

For example, in a census tract near the 2018 Camp Fire, a mean PM₂.₅ concentration from wildfires of 1.2 micrograms per cubic meter was recorded between 2006 and 2020. However, throughout the actual fire event, the height concentration was 310 micrograms per cubic meter – the highest level worldwide on today.

Scientists want to raised understand what such extreme stress means for human health in the long run. Previous studies Long-term PM₂.₅ exposure from wildfires focused totally on people living near a big fire and examined their health status years later, excluding any recent exposures that occurred between baseline and follow-up.

Recent studies have examined long-term exposure to wildfire PM₂.₅, which changes over time. For example, researchers reported associations between exposure to wildfire PM₂.₅ over two years and the danger of death from cancer and other causes in Brazil. This work was also based on long-term average exposure and extreme exposures from periodic wildfire events were in a roundabout way measured. Because the study didn’t assess this, we have no idea whether a selected pattern of long-term PM₂.₅ exposure from wildfires was more harmful to health.

Most days, people are usually not exposed to wildfire particle pollution. However, some days, wildfire pollution could be very high. We currently have no idea whether just a few very bad days or many barely bad days pose a greater health risk.

A brand new framework

How can we arrive at more realistic estimates that capture the big peaks in PM₂.₅ levels that folks are exposed to during wildfires?

When it involves the particulate matter exposure people experience from wildfires, exposure scientists—researchers who study contact between people and pollutants within the environment—consider frequency, duration, and intensity. These interlocking aspects help describe the true burden on the body during a wildfire.

In our recent study, our team suggested a Framework for measuring long-term exposure to wildfire PM₂.₅ that takes under consideration the frequency, duration, and intensity of wildfires. We applied air quality models to California wildfire data from 2006 to 2020 and derived recent metrics that capture a spread of exposure types.

One metric we’ve developed is the variety of days with wildfire PM₂.₅ pollution over a protracted time frame, which may discover even the smallest pollution. Another metric is the common concentration of wildfire PM₂.₅ throughout the week with the best smoke pollution over a protracted time frame, which highlights the locations with the best pollution. We have also developed several other metrics which may be more useful depending on the impacts being studied.

Interestingly, these values ​​were highly correlated with one another, suggesting that on many days there was no less than some amount of PM₂₅ in wildfires. had the best values ​​overallWhile this may occasionally complicate the choice making between different exposure patterns, the appropriateness of every measure depends partly on the health effects we’re studying.

Environmental injustice

We also examined whether certain racial and ethnic groups were exposed to above-average levels of high-quality particulate matter from wildfires. We found that different groups were most in danger depending on the yr.

Consider 2018 and 2020, two years of major wildfires in California. The census tracts most affected by any measure were primarily non-Hispanic whites in 2018 and Hispanics in 2020. This is sensible, since non-Hispanic whites make up about 41.6% of California's population and Hispanics make up 36.4%.

To understand whether other groups were exposed to excess exposure to wildfire PM₂.₅, we made relative comparisons. That is, we compared the actual exposure to wildfire PM₂.₅ of every racial and ethnic group to what we might have expected in the event that they had been exposed to the national average.

We found that Indigenous communities were most exposed, exposed to 1.68 times more PM₂.₅ than expected. In comparison, non-Hispanic white Californians were exposed to 1.13 times more PM₂.₅ than expected, and multiracial Californians were exposed to 1.09 times greater than expected.

Rural tribal areas had the best average PM₂.₅ concentrations from wildfires – 0.83 micrograms per cubic meter – of all census tracts in our study. A big portion of Native Americans in California live in rural areas, often with higher forest fire risk resulting from a long time of poor forest management, including the legal suppression of cultural slash-and-burn practices, which studies have shown Help reduce catastrophic wildfires. Recent State laws has eliminated liability risks related to cultural fires on indigenous lands in California.

Understanding the causes and health effects of high long-term exposure to wildfire PM₂.₅ amongst Native Americans and Alaska Natives might help significant differences in health between these groups and other Americans.

Smartphone cameras have improved significantly lately. Using computational photography and AI, these devices can capture stunning images that may surpass what we see with the naked eye. A very striking example are photos of the Northern Lights or Aurora Borealis.

If you saw the Northern Lights whilst you were there the geomagnetic storms in May 2024You can have noticed that the photos in your smartphone look much more vibrant than in point of fact.

Northern lights, also called northern lights (Aurora borealis) or southern lights (Aurora australis), occur when the solar wind disrupts the Earth's magnetic field. They appear as streaks of color within the sky.

What makes photos of those events much more impressive than they seem at first glance? As a Professor of computational photographyI've seen the newest smartphone features overcome the boundaries of human vision.

Your eyes at the hours of darkness

Human eyes are remarkable. They will let you see footprints in a sunlit desert and control vehicles at high speeds. However, your eyes are less impressive in low light.

The human eye comprises two types Cells that reply to light – Rods and cones. There are quite a few rods and way more light sensitive. Cones process color but require more light to operate. As a result, our vision relies heavily on rods at night and misses colours.

The result’s like wearing dark sunglasses while watching a movie. At night, the colours appear washed out and muted. Even under a starry sky, the sensible hues of the aurora are present, but often too faint on your eyes to see clearly.

In poor lighting conditions, your brain prioritizes Motion detection and shape detection to enable you navigate. This compromise implies that the aurora's ethereal colours are sometimes invisible to the naked eye. Technology is the one approach to increase their brightness.

Taking the proper picture

Smartphones have revolutionized the way in which people perceive the world. These compact devices use multiple cameras and advanced sensors to capture more light than the human eye, even in low-light conditions. You can achieve this by utilizing longer exposure times – how long the Camera captures light – larger apertures and increasing the ISO Amount of sunshine Your camera allows it.

But smartphones can do greater than just adjust these settings. They also use Computational photography to boost your images with digital techniques and algorithms. Image stabilization Reduces camera shake and exposure settings optimize the quantity of sunshine the camera captures.

Multi-image processing Creates the proper photo by stacking multiple images on top of one another. A setting called Night mode can balance colours in low light, while LiDAR functions Some phones keep your images precisely focused.

LiDAR stands for Light Detection and Ranging. Phones with this setting emit laser pulses to quickly calculate the gap to things within the scene in any variety of light. LiDAR generates a depth map of the environment to enhance focus and highlight objects in your photos.

Tools of artificial intelligence in your smartphone camera you possibly can further enhance your photos by tweaking the settings, applying flashes and using super-resolution techniques to get really effective details. You may even Identify faces in your photos.

AI processing in your smartphone's camera

While you’ve gotten many options with a smartphone camera, regular cameras have larger sensors and superior optics that provide you with more control over the pictures you capture. Camera manufacturers like Nikon, Sony and Canon Normally avoid manipulating the imageInstead, creative control is left to the photographer.

These cameras offer photographers the pliability of Shooting in RAW formatallowing you to retain more data from each image for editing and infrequently producing higher quality results.

not how dedicated camerasmodern smartphone cameras Use AI during and after You take a photograph to enhance the standard of your photos. As you are taking a photograph, AI tools analyze the scene you point the camera at and adjust settings like exposure, white balance, and ISO while recognizing the topic being captured and stabilizing the image. These tools be certain that you get an incredible photo whenever you press the button.

You can often find features that use AI, akin to High dynamic range, Night mode And Fashion portraitenabled by default or accessible in your camera settings.

AI algorithms further improve your photos by refining details, reducing blur, and applying effects akin to color correction after capture.

All of those features help your camera take photos in low light conditions and contribute to those stunning aurora photos you will have captured together with your phone camera.

While the human eye struggles to completely perceive the otherworldly hues of the Northern Lights at night, modern smartphone cameras overcome this limitation. By leveraging AI and computational photography techniques, your devices will will let you see the colourful colours of solar storms within the atmosphere, amplifying the colour and capturing otherwise invisible details that escape even the sharpest eye.

SAN JOSE – On a rainy day that was hardly conducive to optimal individual performance, depth that translated into team championships was the defining feature of the Central Coast Section Swimming and Diving Championships at Independence High.

Before Saturday's final event, the 400-yard freestyle relay, Gunn (boys) and St. Ignatius (girls) had already won team titles. And because the icing on the cake, everyone took first place of their respective relays.

Gunn scored 258.5 points, topping crosstown rival and two-time defending champion Palo Alto (194). And the Titans did it without a person title list but with overwhelming depth.

“The boys were third two years ago, second last year and this year they started with championship ambitions,” said Gunn coach Dustin Fukuda. “They worked really hard. A really nice group of kids who really supported each other.”

St. Ignatius, which scored 257 points to 194 for runner-up Palo Alto, had a person winner in Caitlin Quill within the 100 backstroke, but won each the 400 free and 200 medley relays to earn the third consecutive girls CCS team title.

“It was led by our senior class,” St. Ignatius coach John Dahlz said. “It was the best senior class in history. These girls led the way.”

Saratoga sophomore Kelsey Zhang broke a CCS record by winning the 200 individual medley but was later disqualified, a call that two veteran opposing coaches decried as unfair. Undeterred, Zhang got here back and convincingly won her favorite event, the 100-meter butterfly, in 52.14 minutes.

She was asked what goals she had for the remaining of the season, time goals or location goals?

“Honestly, just to have fun,” she said. “I would like to have a good time and place, but just to have fun with my team.”

Among the most effective individual performances of the meet were Archbishop Mitty freshman Shareef Elaydi, who won the 200 IM (1:47.80) and the 100 fly (48.06) and earned first place for the 200 medley relay team.

Woodside junior Seth Collet was a double winner within the 100-meter backstroke (48.86) and 200-meter free (1:37.65).

Mountain View junior sprinter Dar Lavrenko, a Cal commit, won the 50 free (20.37) and the 100 free (44.53).

Castilleja senior Olivia Detter of Northwestern dominated the women' sprints, winning the 50 free (23.36) and the 100 free relay (50.47) and was the highest 200 free relay team , who took first place with a time of 1:35.63.

Two freshmen won the longest race of the day, the 500-meter race: Menlo-Atherton's Michael Powell within the boys' race and Leigh's Malia Groen in the women' race.

After posting the second-best time in Thursday's heats, Powell finished strong, coming from behind to win in 4:30.09.

“I didn’t really know I was going to win,” Powell said. “I thought back to my training and tried to convince myself to push harder. I thought, “Just 30 more seconds of pain and then so much happiness.”

Groen touched the wall in 4:55.09, ending ahead of MA's Hailey Preuss and Palo Alto's Liew Ladomirak, who previously won the 200 free. Groen also went into the ultimate with the second fastest mark within the heats, but lost her time by three seconds in the ultimate.

“I’m really happy about it, I’m really proud of myself,” Groen said. “I listened to my coach and had a race plan for the first time. I kept up with the team in the first half and did my best to pull away in the second half. And it somehow worked out.”