Earlier this month, Governor Gavin Newsom proposed recent emergency restrictions on California's cannabis industry, citing an urgent must protect children, a category of flippantly regulated products that contain intoxicating amounts of THC, the compound known for the cannabis high.

While many agree that some changes are obligatory, many business owners and consumers fear that the governor's recent regulations are too strict and will kill a fledgling industry just because it is about to hit the mainstream.

Critics say the proposed regulations would effectively ban a big selection of popular tinctures, capsules, beverages and other products comprised of industrial hemp, including those who primarily contain CBD, a non-intoxicating relative of THC.

Such offerings – which range from mild CBD sleep gummies to potent THC-infused drinks – are growing in popularity. While they’ll have similar effects, these hemp products are different from those containing the cannabis-derived THC sold in lots of licensed dispensaries.

Hemp products are widely available in liquor stores, gas stations and tobacco shops, which the governor cited as one among the principal reasons for his motion.

Newsom announced the state's proposed emergency rules on 6 Septemberafter a bill to control the hemp industry failed within the state legislature. The regulations are still being reviewed by the administration. If they arrive into force, it could be illegal for hemp products to contain “detectable” amounts of THC.

The proposed rules also ban a listing of about 30 “comparable” compounds referred to as cannabinoids, that are some naturally occurring and other synthetic chemicals that mimic the consequences of THC (short for tetrahydrocannabinol).

Most hemp industry advocates acknowledge that regulations should be adjusted to make sure products are protected and available to adults only, but they are saying Newsom has gone too far together with his zero-tolerance approach.

Among those affected are Jacob and Lindsey Dunn, owners of Sow Eden Organics, which operates out of a small store in La Verne. They produce, package and ship a line of business hemp-infused gummies and tinctures that buyers take to sleep higher or find relief from pain, anxiety and other ailments.

When the Dunns, who’ve a two-year-old son and expect a baby soon, met 10 years ago, Jacob was working from his kitchen table selling CBD capsules to medical dispensaries. Today they make around $500,000 in annual gross sales, but Jacob says the brand new rules could halve that quantity overnight because so a lot of their products contain low doses of THC.

Each of Sow Eden's popular sleep gummies, for instance, incorporates 2.5 milligrams of this compound. Many recreational cannabis products contain 5 to 10 milligrams or more per piece.

“This is a full-fledged, family-run small business,” Lindsey Dunn said Monday. “It's hard to say whether we can bring new products to market now … It's a huge deal. It's a huge effort.”

Newsom's office and the state Cannabis Control Board referred inquiries to the California Department of Public Health, which said the emergency measures were in response to “the increasing number of health incidents related to intoxicating cannabis products that state regulators have determined are being sold throughout the state.”

The agency said it had received “a growing number of complaints about illegal, intoxicating industrial hemp products in retail stores.”

If the state Board of Administrative Law approves the emergency order, it is going to remain in effect for at the very least 180 days. The governor has said that products that violate the order have to be faraway from store shelves immediately after the changes take effect.

Cannabis and THC remain subject to strict controls under federal law, but hemp—a lower-THC number of the cannabis plant that has long been used for business products like paper and twine—got a lift from the 2018 Farm Bill, which loosened federal restrictions.

Across the country, states are grappling with how best to handle the growing interest in consumer products infused with hemp-derived THC.

Some states have picked up on the trend. In Minnesota, one forecast estimates that hemp beverages could eventually generate sales of $200 million a yr. The state has enacted registration and testing requirements. Hemp Drinks Festival in Minneapolis In June, the general public was allowed to check dozens of brands. “No smoking,” read the flyer.

Proponents say this approach limits access for adults but allows the industry to proceed to grow and thrive.

A lawsuit in Missouri helped the state, Governor Mike Parsons' order regulating hemp products lower than two months after its announcement. New Jersey also has recent restrictions. face legal challenges.

Companies that produce hemp products imagine strict bans are fallacious.

“For a lot of people, this is a disaster,” said Christopher Lackner, president of the Hemp Beverage Alliance, a Colorado-based trade group.

“Why does it have to be so controversial?” he said. “Regulate it, put it on the shelves next to beer, wine or bottled water, tax it like a soft drink, regulate it like a soft drink. And everyone wins.”

Ajay Narain, chief executive of Beacon Beverages, based in Campbell, near San Jose, said his company switched from alcoholic beverages to mocktails infused with hemp-derived THC and CBD in February.

Business began slowly at first, but picked up speed when Beacon's non-alcoholic Key Lime Margaritas and Gin Tonics hit the shelves of major retailers like BevMo and Total Wine & More.

Now Narain fears that Newsom's “absurd” recent regulations will effectively “kill” the industry across the state.

“A lot of businesses are going to have to close,” Narain said. “He's just pulled the rug out from under them. And again, it's completely unnecessary. Regulate, don't eliminate.”

In 2021, Newsom passed a state law capping the entire concentration of THC in foods, beverages and cosmetics containing hemp to 0.3 percent and specifying how such products have to be tested and labeled.

But Newsom and members of his administration claim that many corporations are exploiting “loopholes” that allow them to sell products with intoxicating THC levels in places where minors should buy them.

On a recent Tuesday night, one end of the shelf outside a BevMo location in Torrance featured a number of cans in flavors like lemon lavender and a mock old-fashioned cocktail, with signs reading “THC INFUSED” in daring letters beneath each row of drinks.

A study released this month by BDSA, a Colorado-based company that analyzes cannabis and hemp industry data, found that the products have “created a lucrative niche that circumvents many of the challenges facing the regulated cannabis industry.”

“Unlike their cannabis counterparts, these products … can be produced, distributed and sold with minimal legal hurdles, making them a sought-after commodity,” the report said.

Some stakeholders, reminiscent of the California chapter of the National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws (Cal NORML), imagine Newsom was right in his decision to limit retail sales.

However, they complain that the proposed regulations could harm individuals with health and mental health problems who profit from non-intoxicating products that may even be banned.

“We fully support keeping intoxicating hemp products out of the retail market … but they're overdoing it. They're targeting these non-intoxicating hemp medications that have been widely available for years,” said Dale Gieringer, director of Cal NORML.

Ted Whitney, chief beverage officer at Danville-based Cheech & Chong Global Holding Co. – which sells each recreational cannabis products and products containing intoxicating hemp – said without the looming changes, the hemp industry might be in triple-digit sales in a decade.

It stays to be seen whether the state can fulfill this optimistic forecast. The recreational market, which is undercut by illegal traders and stifled by high taxes and bureaucracy, is struggling in comparison with some states.

Whitney argued that intoxicating cannabis is safer than other common products like tobacco and alcohol. The best option to protect children and boost the state's economy is to take a more moderate approach, he said.

“We can improve safety, we can improve regulation, we can increase revenue,” he said. “Let's make this a win-win situation instead of a lose-lose situation.”

©2024 Los Angeles Times. Visit www.latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Originally published: September 23, 2024 at 11:47 am

It isn’t any exaggeration to say that California's economic slowdown is due largely to the downturn within the technology sector.

Let my trusty table provide some context by the statistics on state-level gross domestic product, a broad measure of business performance. Consider probably the most recent reports – the slowdown of the primary quarter of 2024 and the last three months of 2023 – in comparison with the boom of the past five years.

Overall, California's GDP has grown by a median of two.2% recently, in comparison with 3.3% between 2019 and 2023. This is a much larger fluctuation than in the remaining of the country: US GDP grew by 2.4% within the last two quarters, barely slower than within the previous five years (2.6%).

Next, consider the changing list of things that determine California's business climate, specializing in how much key industries contribute to or detract from economic growth.

Let's take a have a look at what we call “information” – the creators of cutting-edge products and astronomical salaries. This industry is dominated by technology firms, but in addition includes groups just like the creative talents of Hollywood.

These firms grew by about $35 billion a 12 months during California's five-year economic boom that ended last September, nearly a 3rd of the national growth. Over the past six months, the data sector shrank by $3 billion a 12 months.

No surprise. We've seen headline-grabbing layoffs at California's tech giants. Hollywood production hasn't recovered from labor unrest either.

The dark side

In California's quirky and dynamic economy, ups and downs are nothing recent. Take a have a look at three other notable dips.

Production at California factories of “durable goods” — long-lasting products starting from aircraft parts to household appliances — grew by $11 billion annually through the five-year boom. This 12 months, it has fallen by $5 billion compared with the last two quarters.

The variety of “professional, scientific and technical” jobs – well-paid office jobs – grew by $21 billion a 12 months through the boom, a fifth of the full. But within the recent slowdown, growth slowed to $8 billion a 12 months.

And growth in the actual estate and rental and leasing segment – the individuals who broker real estate transactions – shrank by three-quarters to $3 billion through the slowdown. High mortgage rates, which the Federal Reserve is using to chill the country's overheated economy, were key to the slowdown.

Adding these numbers together, the full growth of this suddenly sluggish quartet of industries has risen to $2 billion a 12 months over the past two quarters, up from a rate of just $78 billion through the five-year boom.

This is sort of a setback, especially considering that salaries in these industries are lavish.

The downside

How has California grown recently?

Let's start with the federal government's contribution to economic growth. This spending has increased by $11 billion annually over the past two quarters, in comparison with just $3 billion through the five-year boom. However, the massive budget deficits of many California governments suggest that this spending surge is prone to slow.

Or take a have a look at three industries that will finally give you the chance to shake off their corona cobwebs.

Retail growth has been $16 billion a 12 months over the past two quarters — nearly a fifth of the national total and nearly thrice faster than through the five-year boom. Can aggressive consumer shopping proceed to spice up the economy — nationally or across the country?

Construction also rebounded, growing by $10 billion over the past two quarters. That's a remarkable rebound from the $2 billion annual decline because the pandemic limited production and expensive mortgages dampened output. Massive infrastructure projects – and the state's hunger for housing – should keep the development industry lucratively busy.

And then there's agriculture, which recently grew by $12 billion a 12 months after previously shrinking by $2 billion a 12 months. Higher food prices – have you ever been to the supermarket these days? – may be good for business.

This revitalized quartet grew by $49 billion annually during the last two quarters – almost ten times the expansion through the boom.

It must be noted that work in these 4 industries is less glamorous and lower paid than within the previously mentioned struggling industries.

Jonathan Lansner is a business columnist for the Southern California News Group. Reach him at jlansner@scng.com.

Originally published: July 22, 2024 at 7:24 am

Californians are blessed with a staggering number of freshwater species. I should know: I've experienced much of that diversity firsthand while exploring the state's mountains, rivers, lakes, valleys, bays, and coastlines.

As a baby, I spent a lot time within the water that my family joked that I used to be half frog.

I actually have turned my passion for nature right into a profession: As a biologist by training, I worked for a long time for the California Department of Water Resources. As a senior scientist, I actually have gained a greater understanding of the various challenges facing our waterways and the species that decision them home. Working to enhance conditions for these species has been the privilege of a lifetime.

At the identical time, I actually have witnessed a daunting and heartbreaking decline in native freshwater species. During my 30 years working within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, I watched in dismay as a whole fish population disappeared, leading to six different fish species (including the winter-running Chinook salmon) being placed on the state and federal endangered species lists.

We now live in a world where just a few extreme events—just a few heat waves or a significant wildfire—could wipe out a few of California's native freshwater species. And climate change, which is occurring faster than predicted, is making it even tougher to avoid wasting these species.

Many ecologists, agency officials, and others have worked for a long time to enhance conditions for California's native species. But our efforts haven’t been enough. The window of opportunity to avoid wasting these species is closing faster than we'd prefer to admit. Despite many laudable programs and well-intentioned efforts, California lacks a full-fledged statewide technique to protect native freshwater species within the face of climate change.

This has inspired a brand new report from the Public Policy Institute of California detailing what is required to handle the crisis. In the report, we explain why the worst impacts of climate change on our freshwater species are unlikely to be averted if we proceed as we’re—and even do higher.

California needs a brand new approach. We must take risks.

Much of what we’re currently doing to enhance aquatic habitat is very important to assist species adapt to changing conditions. To achieve success, we want to significantly diversify our actions, including through daring latest approaches.

It is time to develop a portfolio of measures to guard these species.

This approach should go far beyond simply restoring habitat. Focusing on habitat alone has not helped California's unique freshwater species, and threats are increasing with climate change. We must use existing and latest technologies to support and replenish populations, restore connections to historic habitats, and even relocate species when mandatory. And we must take motion to enhance genetic diversity, an underappreciated but mandatory prerequisite for responding to climate change.

We must even have the courage to confess that some species may disappear from their historic ranges despite our efforts. Therefore, immediate investment must be made in a historic species conservation programme, including tissue archives, genetic libraries and seed banks of native species to facilitate future reintroductions.

Having spent my entire life having fun with, studying and protecting California's remarkable freshwater species, I actually have seen firsthand how quickly conditions change and the way difficult it’s for us to reply.

Saving this vital resource would require daring latest approaches to conservation and the courage to take risks – not only for biologists like me, but for all Californians and for generations to return.

Ted Sommer is a fellow of the Public Policy Institute of California-CalTrout Ecosystem on the PPIC Water Policy Center. He previously served as a senior scientist on the California Department of Water Resources. He wrote this column for CalMatters.