Cooper Dejean, Josh Sweat and the wild defense of Philadelphia Eagles refused Patrick Mahomes, Travis Kelce and the Kansas City Chiefs a Super Bowl-Drei-Torf.

It wasn't even close. Philadelphia recorded six sacks and two interceptions in an suffocating defensive performance.

On his twenty second birthday, Dejean got a pick-6, welding mahomes and the Eagles led the Chiefs 40-22 on Sunday to secure the second Super Bowl championship of the franchise.

Jalen Hurts threw two touchdowns and ran for a rating in a Tush push, and Vic Fangios Defense was so dominant that the Eagles from Saquon Barkley didn't need much.

The groundbreaking running back ended with 57 yards and broke the record of Terrell Davis for Yards in a single season, including playoffs. Hurts threw for 221 yards.

Even Taylor Swift's presence couldn’t help the chiefs. They lost for the primary time in 10 games this season with the pop superstar in a collection and observed friend Travis Kelce, who only won a pass at the tip of the third quarter.

Originally published: February 9, 2025 at 8:03 p.m. PST

Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court allows a multibillion-dollar investor class motion lawsuit to be filed against Facebook's parent company Metaresulting from the information protection scandal surrounding the Cambridge Analytica political consulting firm.

The justices heard arguments in November on Meta's try to dismiss the lawsuit. On Friday, they decided it was flawed to even take up the case.

The Supreme Court dismissed the corporate's appeal and left in place an appeal ruling that allowed the case to proceed.

Investors claim Meta didn’t fully disclose the risks involved Facebook users' personal data can be misused from Cambridge Analytica, a supporting company Donald Trump The first successful Republican presidential campaign in 2016.

Poor disclosures led to 2 significant drops in the corporate's stock price in 2018 after the general public learned of the extent of the privacy scandal, investors say.

Meta spokesman Andy Stone said the corporate was disillusioned by the court's decision. “Plaintiff’s claims are without merit and we will continue to defend ourselves as this case is considered by the district court,” Stone said in an emailed statement.

Meta has already paid a $5.1 billion effective and reached a $725 million privacy agreement with users.

Cambridge Analytica had ties to political strategist Trump Steve Bannon. It had paid a Facebook app developer to access the non-public data of around 87 million Facebook users. This data was then used to focus on US voters within the 2016 election campaign.

The lawsuit is one in all two Supreme Court cases involving class motion lawsuits against technology corporations. The judges are also wrestling with the query of whether the category motion lawsuit ought to be dismissed Nvidia. Investors say the corporate misled them about its reliance on selling computer chips to mine volatile cryptocurrencies.

Originally published: November 22, 2024 at 8:09 am PST

Most school shootings don’t occur out of the blue – there are often warning signs.

A yr earlier, a 14-year-old boy was arrested for allegedly opened fire in his highschool math class in Winder, Georgia, on September 4, 2024 – two teachers and two students killed – authorities visited his house investigate several anonymous suggestions about online threats to commit a faculty shooting.

When they questioned the then 13-year-old boy, he denied making the threats. The father told police that there have been hunting rifles in the home, but that the boy had no “unsupervised access“ to arms.

The FBI said in a press release On the day of the shooting, there was “no reasonable cause for an arrest” and native law enforcement had “alerted local schools to continue to monitor the individual.”

The school’s teachers received special ID cards with panic buttons every week before the shooting. While authorities imagine the IDs made the shooting seem worse than it was, the motion got here too late to stop the killings.

In some ways, the story reflects dozens of comparable stories that we, a sociologist And psychologistwe have now collected lately in our efforts to Lives of mass shootersIt's a typical example of certainly one of the most important challenges schools face in stopping school shootings: recognizing and responding to the warning signs that college shooters almost all the time send out long before they open fire.

In Our database of mass shootings within the United States since 1966 – defined as incidents by which 4 or more victims were murdered with weapons in a public place and weren’t linked to underlying criminal activity comparable to gangs or drugs – there have now been 15 shootings at K-12 schools. The first took place in Stockton, Californiain 1989.

Seven of those school shootings occurred within the last decade, including the second and third deadliest in history: Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, in 2022 (21 deaths) and Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, in 2018 (17 deaths). The deadliest in history occurred in December 2012, when 20 children and 6 adult employees were murdered at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

A complete of 138 people were killed within the attacks and a minimum of 177 were injured.

What we find out about mass shootings at schools

If the Columbine High School massacre took place in 1999 and was a turning point within the United StatesAt the time, it was the worst mass murder at a faculty within the country's history.

25 years later, it’s in fourth place.

Despite the Billions of dollars There has been no investment in class safety since Columbine, but school shootings have turn out to be more frequent and deadly. Aside from the mass shootings that make headlines, a gun goes off in an American school almost day-after-day.

Our research and dozens of interviews with school massacre perpetrators, survivors, and first responders suggest that a part of the issue lies with law enforcement and faculty officials. Influenced by myths and misinformation about Columbine, they still don't know enough about trends in class massacres to acknowledge the warning signs.

The majority of mass school shootings were committed by a lone perpetrator. Only two – Columbine and the 1998 school shooting Westside Middle School in JonesboroArkansas – carried out by two armed men.

The alternative of the term “gunmen” to explain the perpetrators is apt – all but certainly one of the mass school shootings recorded in our database were committed by men or boys. The average age of those involved within the attacks was 18 – the youngest was 11 and the oldest was 32. As minors, most school shooters used weapons borrowed or stolen from their parents, caregivers and other significant adults of their lives.

After every school shooting, people say, “We never thought something like this could happen in our community.” But school shootings most frequently occur in small suburban or rural communities like Winder, Georgia. There, the suspect is a 14-year-old student. This just isn’t surprising. Most school shooters have some connection to the varsity they attack. In our database, we found that 15 of the 17 school shooters were either current or former students.

For most perpetrators, the mass shooting is a final act. Most school shooters die within the attack. Of the 17 school shooters in our database, eight were arrested. The rest died on the scene, just about all by suicide – the one exception was the shooter at Robb Elementary in Uvalde, who was shot dead by police.

Preventing the following school shooting

Inspired by previous school shootings, some perpetrators seek fame and notoriety. However, most school shooting perpetrators are driven by desperation and general anger; over 80% of perpetrators of mass school shootings showed signs of crisis before the shooting, including depression, mood swings, agitation, isolation, problems with day by day tasks, and other noticeable behavioral changes.

Most importantly, over 90% of perpetrators communicated their plans to others upfront, preempting their attacks by leaving posts, messages or videos warning of their intentions. communicate their intention to cause harm as a final, desperate cry for help.

The key to stopping these tragedies is to listen to those warning signs and act immediately. Even if investigators don't have enough evidence to make an arrest, they’ll continually monitor students and help connect them with school- or community-based services or interventions, comparable to peer mentoring or mental health treatment. Simply criminalizing or punishing threats increases the danger of violence by exacerbating grievances against the varsity.

At the identical time, parents could be reminded Store weapons safelyAlmost all shootings by children and young people could be prevented by safely storing firearms and Responsibility for adult gun ownersWhen a gun is stored separate from its ammunition, locked and unloaded, it’s rather more difficult for somebody to quickly use it in a violent attack.

Parts of this text originally appeared in previous articles by the authors, first published on February 8, 2019 and May 25, 2022.

By Kaitlyn McGrath, Jen McCaffrey and Lauren Merola

BOSTON – Under sunny skies, 112-year-old Fenway Park witnessed one other piece of history Monday afternoon.

Danny Jansen was at bat for the Toronto Blue Jays against the Boston Red Sox on June 26, with the rating at 0-1 and base one on, when the skies opened and the sport was suspended because of severe weather.

Two months later, play resumed on Monday, but Jansen was now playing for the Red Sox. The Red Sox signed Jansen on July 27, creating the chance that a player could play for each teams in the identical game.

This possibility became a reality on Monday.

When Jansen got here in to play catcher for the Red Sox, he settled behind the plate to take a swing at a game where he had began as a batter. (Boston's original catcher in the sport, Reese McGuire, had been designated for that position shortly after trading Jansen.)

With Jansen behind the plate, the Blue Jays brought in Daulton Varsho to take over Jansen's original 0-1 plate appearance. Varsho struck out, fouled off Nick Pivetta's first pitch and swung through the second. (If the Count was two strikesit might have been credited to Jansen's line, but went to Varsho as a substitute.) After the strikeout, the runner on first base ran to second base and Jansen's throw landed in center. But Will Wagner followed with a strikeout to finish the inning.

“At first I didn't really think about it much,” Jansen said before the sport about the potential for playing for each teams. “But now we're here and it's going to be a cool moment, especially when it's all said and done, to look back and it's such a weird thing that happens, but I'm grateful to have the opportunity to do it and it's going to be cool.”

Pinch-hitting for Danny Jansen: Daulton Varsho

Now in cinemas: Danny Jansen

pic.twitter.com/PXnVZvbpml

— Toronto Blue Jays (@BlueJays) 26 August 2024

The Blue Jays won the sport, which lasted two months, 4-1. Toronto broke a scoreless tie within the seventh inning with a solo home run by George Springer. The Blue Jays scored three more runs within the eighth inning on doubles by Vladimir Guerrero, Jr. and Addison Barger. Jarren Duran's solo home run in the underside of the eighth inning was the Red Sox's only run. Jansen finished the sport 1 for 4, completing all 4 of his official at-bats as a member of the Red Sox.

Before the sport, the Red Sox released their revised lineup. Jansen was inserted into the seventh and Triston Casas into the eighth, where McGuire had batted in the unique lineup. Pivetta, normally a starter, took over Kutter Crawford's position on the mound in what’s going to officially be considered a relief appearance.

Game 1, Red Sox vs. Blue Jays: Duran CF, Hamilton 2B, Abreu RF, Devers 3B, Refsnyder LF, Yoshida DH, Jansen C, Casas 1B, Rafaela SS, Pivetta P

– Jen McCaffrey (@jcmccaffrey) 26 August 2024

The Blue Jays had to interchange five players from the unique roster who are not any longer available, including traded players and shortstop Bo Bichette, who’s on the IL.

The resumption of play brings with it quite a lot of other complications beyond Jansen's dual role.

For example, Leo Jiménez and Wagner each made their MLB debuts after June 26, but because they still appeared within the suspended game that might be recorded within the record books as having taken place on June 26, they already appeared in a game before being promoted to the Major Leagues.

“We’re driving a DeLorean,” Blue Jays manager John Schneider recently joked, referring to the automobile best known for its time travel within the movie “Back to the Future.”

This has happened before. The athletics Jayson Stark recently wrote that Juan Soto made his debut in 2018 before he even debuted. “He came to the Major Leagues on May 20, to the Washington Nationals. But he later played in a game that had been suspended on May 15 – and scored a home run. That is, he debuted before he debuted and also hit a home run before his first home run,” Stark wrote.

Meanwhile, the Blue Jays benched Joey Loperfido late to use him as a defensive replacement, meaning he was technically in two places at once. Still with the Houston Astros on June 26, the outfielder went 0-for-3 with a hit-by-pitch in a 7-1 win over the Colorado Rockies. Since he played left field for the final two innings, on paper he will go down in history as a player with two games played on the same day.

The Red Sox improved their record this season to 67-63, while the Blue Jays are 64-68.

Required reading

Local news

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology published its first Demographic data for the incoming class on Wednesday after the Supreme Court ruled to finish affirmative motion in college admissions. The result’s a category that’s less diverse than in previous years.

Stu Schmill, dean of admissions and student finance at MIT, said MITNews that 16% of enrolled students in the category of 2028 discover as Black, Hispanic, Native American, or Pacific Islander. This percentage has dropped from 25% in recent times.

The university attributes the decline to the Supreme Court ruling last June that invalidated minority promotions in college admissions. The ruling says race can now not be a criterion in student admissions and calls on colleges to search out latest ways to succeed in a various student body.

“We expected that this would result in fewer students from historically underrepresented racial and ethnic groups enrolling at MIT,” Schmill said in MIT News. “And that's exactly what happened.”

Schmill found that, based on empirical data and private experience, education is best when the scholar body meets “high academic standards” and is “broadly diverse.”

Schmill also said the college needs a various student body to draw the most effective students, who’ve said in surveys that attending a various institution is vital to them.

Before the Supreme Court decision, schools could use race as an element to discover students who got here from disparate educational environments from preschool through twelfth grade.

Although the college didn’t ask for information concerning the race or ethnicity of applicants this 12 months, Schmill said there’s “no doubt that we have missed many well-qualified and well-matched applicants from historically underrepresented backgrounds who we would have admitted in the past – and who would have excelled.”

Amidst the chaos that followed the US withdrawal from Afghanistan On August 15, 2021, the Biden administration announced that evacuated Afghans are allowed to enter the USA above humanitarian probationThe initiative would grant them temporary access to American soil, but not a path to everlasting residency.

In the next weeks approximately 70,000 Afghans fleeing the returning Taliban government were evacuated. Almost half had worked for the US government or American non-governmental organizations, some were members of the family, others had no prior connection.

After undergoing security and health checks in third countries and at domestic military bases, the overwhelming majority were resettled in quite a few states – Texas, Virginia and California were the Top travel destinations.

Humanitarian parole was at all times intended as a short lived solution to a right away problem; it is barely valid for 2 years, after which the person must adjust his or her status.

But armed with popular – and non-partisan – Support, lawmakers in Congress proposed the Afghan Adjustment Act in August 2022 To allow Afghans, after further screening, to transition from temporary to everlasting residency within the United States.

But two years later, the law has still not been passed. Humanitarian rights experts, Migration and refugeeswe see the plight of tens of hundreds of Afghans within the USA as a byproduct of the American political system in which bills are difficult to passAnd the upcoming elections in November will add one other layer to the uncertainty that already exists.

Delaying tactics in Congress

The first try and pass an Afghan Adjustment Act coincided with the primary anniversary of the autumn of Kabul. The bill, introduced by Democratic Senator Amy Klobuchar proposed prolonged access to the present Afghan Special Immigration Visato evacuated Afghans and offered some Afghans a separate path to convert their temporary stay right into a everlasting one.

The Special Immigrant Visa program was created in 2006 to offer a path to everlasting settlement within the United States for Afghans who supported the American armed forces. Approximately 77,000 Afghans had already approved The United States is scheduled to finish this system by 2021. However, as a consequence of bureaucratic inconsistencies and backlogs in this system, not less than 18,000 at-risk applicants and 53,000 eligible members of the family haven’t yet not received their visas when Kabul fell.

According to Klobuchar's bill Afghans who got here to the United States in 2021 or later could apply for everlasting residency either through the expanded Special Immigrant Visa program or by directly adjusting their status inside two years of their arrival.

The draft law has now been added in several expenditure accounts, includingmost recently the Supplement to national security in February 2024. But the measure didn’t progress as a consequence of republican opposition on the bill, which proposed a $95 billion development aid package to support Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan.

In part, that is the overall rule in American politics: the overwhelming majority of bills don’t grow to be law, and the present Congress has a historically low pass rate.

But the failure of the law comes despite bipartisan and broad popular support for helping the Afghans – including members of the military, veterans, religious groups and refugee advocates. Shortly after the autumn of Kabul Majority of Americans surveyed favored the admission of Afghans who had passed the safety checks. Even two years later, 80 percent of Americans thought the USA should help Afghans who’ve supported American forces in Afghanistan to resettle within the United States

There are also strong precedent for providing expedited pathways to everlasting residency. The US has previously passed adjustment laws for Cubans, Cambodians, Vietnamese and Iraqis, allowing them to adjust their status from temporary to everlasting residents.

Republican lawmakers who opposed Klobuchar’s Bill cited concerns that the vetting procedures weren’t rigorous enough, suggesting that some Afghans could have links to terrorist groups. Advocates for the Afghan evacuees counter that the law was not passed just because it didn’t have a sufficiently strong Lobbying behind it.

And while allowing Afghans to enter the U.S. legally or grow to be long-term residents has bipartisan support, the difficulty plays into partisan politics in the case of executive authority over immigration. Republicans oppose it. broad rejection of President Joe Biden’s deployment humanitarian release.

In July 2023, Republican Senator Tom Cotton introduced a competing bill that Act to make sure American security and protect Afghan alliesInstead of granting Afghans a direct path to everlasting residency after further screening, This would require Evacuees must meet strict criteria to acquire refugee status. And that could possibly be difficult for lots of the Afghan evacuees: Applicants would need to prove that they fear persecution by the Taliban – a high hurdle for many who have now been outside Afghanistan for 3 years.

Despite its stricter provisions, Cotton's bill failed.

In limbo

As a short lived solution, the Department of Homeland Security announced in May 2022 that Afghans without everlasting residency status within the United States could apply for temporary protection statuswhich allows individuals with expired or soon-to-expire residence permits to remain within the country for an extra 18 months.

In September 2023, the temporary protection status was prolonged for an additional 18 months. While it protects Afghans from deportation, it continues to be not a long-term solution.

Instead, most Afghans turned to an overburdened asylum system, with a Backlog of two.6 million asylum seekers Applications As of mid-2024. Unlike refugees resettled within the United States from abroad, individuals must already be within the United States to use for asylum.

To speed up the asylum process, US authorities exempted Afghans from registration fees in August 2021 and implemented a rationalized Application process.

But even when Congress ordered the U.S. immigration authorities to 150 days, only 136 and 191 In fiscal years 2023 and 2024, Afghans were granted asylum, with tens of hundreds of applications pending.

Afghans within the United States on humanitarian parole can still apply for a special immigrant visa, but without an extension, this path is barely open to those that have worked for the U.S. government for not less than one yr.

The Process has been revised in July 2022, combining two steps into one, however it stays burdensome for Afghan applicants. Long processing times and uncertainty about their future within the U.S. have created structural barriers and psychological anxieties for Afghans attempting to rebuild their lives. These difficulties are exacerbated by trauma from years of conflict in Afghanistan and a rapid exit from the country – many forced to go away quite a few members of the family behind.

How the election could affect the law

Now, as we mark the third anniversary of the autumn of Kabul, what happens to Afghans still stuck within the United States? The possibilities of the Afghan Adjustment Act passing under the following administration are uncertain.

Advisors to Vice President Kamala Harris have said the Democratic candidate for the White House is “committed to the Afghan resettlement effort and is looking for new ways to help.” Therefore, a Harris administration is predicted to proceed to pressure Congress to pass the bill, emphasizing its moral and strategic importance.

Donald Trump, the slowed down Allowing Afghan allies to enter the country by imposing even stricter security checks on the special immigrant visa process in 2017 signaled that his administration would prioritize stricter immigration policies if elected. This could reduce the likelihood of the Afghan Adjustment Act becoming a legislative priority, despite some Republican support.

The composition of Congress will even be crucial. If the Democrats retain the bulk within the Senate or gain a majority in each the House of Representatives and the Senate, the bill has a greater likelihood.

Regardless, we argue that the Afghan Adjustment Act shouldn’t be viewed simply as immigration laws. Regardless of which administration is elected in November, we imagine that failing to support wartime allies and ensure the protection of Afghans sends a negative signal to future partners. Without such assurances, individuals and groups could grow to be less willing to assist the United States abroad, potentially leaving American forces without critical support in future operations.

By Peter Valdes-Dapena | CNN

Sometimes technology doesn't live as much as its promise. But sometimes it's not the technology that permits you to down, however the individuals who use it. An organization that gives charging stations for electric vehicles is experimenting with cutting off power to people who find themselves standing around attempting to “fill up.”

Recently, I drove a brand new Chevrolet Blazer EV from New York City to Bristol, Pennsylvania. I figured the drive to Bristol with my family would take about 90 minutes. Since I hadn't began with a full battery, the return trip would take 15 to twenty minutes longer, with a stop to present the EV some charging.

I used to be very improper.

It took us 4 hours to get home that evening, waiting in line for electric vehicle chargers. Blame it on rude charger hogs who don't respect electric vehicle etiquette. It's like waiting in your table at a restaurant and watching people chatting casually over empty plates and half-empty wine glasses.

What's improper? Electric automobile fast chargers — the massive, tall units that appear to be large appliances — are generally not designed to totally charge an electrical automobile's batteries. They're designed to quickly pump power right into a battery, allowing drivers to make a fast stop and get back on the road after about 20 minutes. They're different from the smaller and more common “slow” or “destination” chargers, as Tesla calls them, that are designed for drivers to park, plug of their automobile … and drive away for hours.

However, fast charging may be hard on automobile batteries. To protect the batteries from damage, the charging speed is significantly reduced once the batteries are greater than 80% charged. In fact, it could take as long and even longer to go from 80% charge to a totally full battery than it does to succeed in 80%. In the meantime, lines of electrical vehicles wait behind nearly full cars.

I waited behind people whose batteries were at 92%, 94%, and even 97% full, as I could see on the charging screens, and yet they stayed there. I made my very own situation worse by giving up at one location and going to a different with more chargers, but there have been much more EVs waiting there.

Given that the dearth of public charging stations deters many electric vehicle consumers, According to several surveysthat may be a big problem.

Electrify America, one among America's largest charging providers, is experimenting with an answer to the issue of charge hogs that could make driving an electrical vehicle slow and ugly. At 10 of essentially the most used electric vehicle fast-charging stations in California, Electrify America has implemented a strict cap. Once a automobile's batteries reach 85% charge, charging will mechanically stop and the motive force will probably be prompted to unplug and drive away, otherwise they will probably be charged additional “idle time fees” of 40 cents per minute for taking over the space.

This is comparable to Tesla vehicles that do that mechanically. When a Tesla automobile, truck or SUV is plugged into a very busy Supercharger station, the vehicle itself can mechanically limit charging to only 80% “to avoid congestion,” in response to Tesla's online Supercharger support website.

In this case, nonetheless, the user can still override the limit using the vehicle's touchscreen. There will probably be no approach to bypass Electrify America's limit. A driver who desires to charge to 100% at one among these stations may have to go elsewhere.

Access to chargers has been a sore spot for electric vehicle owners for years (witness the complaints on Reddit and LinkedIn), but the problem is becoming increasingly critical because whilst EV sales growth slows, the variety of EVs on the road that need charging remains to be rising.

“I think what you're seeing is that the demand for public fast-charging stations is really skyrocketing,” said Sara Rafalson, executive vice chairman of policy at EV charging company EVgo, “And I would say we've really reached an inflection point in terms of demand in the last year and a half.”

Why so many drivers use so few chargers

Electric cars are still relatively recent to most owners, and their “fueling habits” are based on what they're used to with gasoline cars, says Robert Barrosa, president of EV charging company Electrify America. People go to a gas pump to “fill up,” and lots of treat a charger the identical way. Many recent EV owners may not even remember that charging speeds at all times drop off drastically after 80%.

But what if the closest fast charging station is not less than 15 or 20 minutes away? The relative scarcity of charging stations and the massive distances between them, could make people wish to stay some time once they've found one.

“Once you’re on a charger, it’s like, ‘Oh yeah. I’m filling all the way in which,'“, said Barrosa.

Both Electrify America and EVgo said they might expand their networks quickly to, as EVgo's Rafalson put it, “get ahead of the puck” and ensure there are enough charging stations to fulfill future demand. Having enough charging stations available could help mitigate the electricity hoarding that’s currently common at charging stations.

The problem of users hogging chargers might be exacerbated by Electrify America's free charging agreements with various automakers, including Mercedes-Benz and Hyundai. If charging time costs nothing, there isn’t a financial incentive to unplug. Like Diners Order countless shrimp at Red Lobstersome EV drivers take full advantage of this, to the growing frustration of the others waiting behind them.

There could also be other legitimate explanation why a driver would wish to charge to 100% at a quick charger, Barrosa said. For example, they could be taking a protracted trip to a spot where they know chargers are few and much between. Or they could be driving an electrical vehicle with relatively short range, like a Fiat 500e or Mazda MX-30, in order that they must pack as much into it as possible. Cases like these are why Electrify America is unlikely to implement a general charging cap at charging stations near major highways, he said.

Charging firms like Electrify America have an immense amount of real-time data on charging usage, so a more nuanced approach than simply limiting at certain charging stations could be possible. Some EV charging firms have experimented with plans that charge different amounts at different times to incentivize drivers to charge their batteries at less busy times. At least for now, Electrify America leaders wish to keep things easy, Barrosa says, so drivers know what to anticipate once they arrive at a charging station.

For now, we are able to only hope that drivers of electrical cars, who don’t necessarily should replenish their tanks, will learn to be more considerate.

The-CNN-Wire
& © 2024 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery company. All rights reserved.

Originally published: August 5, 2024 at 7:21 am